Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 12/2015

01.11.2015 | Editorial Commentary

Concerning pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with large or locally advanced breast cancer

verfasst von: David Groheux, Elif Hindié

Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Ausgabe 12/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

In this issue of the European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, García Vicente and colleagues report on the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with clinical stage II or III breast cancer (BC). Following PET/CT imaging, the new metabolic stage was stage IV in 38 out of 198 patients (19 %). This had a major prognostic impact. The hazard ratio for death from BC (overall survival) was 0.117 for stage II vs. metabolic stage IV and 0.28 for stage III vs. metabolic stage IV [1]. Although the title of the study refers to locally advanced BC, about half of the included patients had clinical stage II disease [1]. Locally advanced BC is variably defined in the literature; some recommendations such as that of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network refers to patients with N2, N3 or T4 disease, i.e. AJCC clinical stages IIIA (excluding T3N1), IIIB and IIIC (Table 1) [2, 3].
Table 1
TNM stage grouping for breast cancer according to the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual [3]
AJCC stage
TNM
NCCN
I
T1
N0
M0
Primary operable breast cancer
IIA
T0
N1
M0
T1
N1
M0
T2
N0
M0
IIB
T2
N1
M0
T3
N0
M0
IIIA
T3
N1
M0
T0
N2
M0
Locally advanced breast cancer
T1
N2
M0
T2
N2
M0
T3
N2
M0
IIIB
T4
N0
M0
T4
N1
M0
T4
N2
M0
IIIC
Any T
N3
M0
IV
Any T
Any N
M1
Metastatic disease
AJCC American Joint Committee on Cancer, TNM Tumor Nodes Metastasis classification, NCCN National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat García Vicente A, Soriano Castrejón Á, López-Fidalgo J, Amo-Salas M, del Muñoz Sánchez M, Álvarez M, et al. Basal 18F-FDG PET/CT as a prognostic biomarker in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015. doi:10.1007/s00259-015-3102-x.PubMed García Vicente A, Soriano Castrejón Á, López-Fidalgo J, Amo-Salas M, del Muñoz Sánchez M, Álvarez M, et al. Basal 18F-FDG PET/CT as a prognostic biomarker in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015. doi:10.​1007/​s00259-015-3102-x.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1471–4.CrossRefPubMed Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1471–4.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cochet A, Dygai-Cochet I, Riedinger J-M, Humbert O, Berriolo-Riedinger A, Toubeau M, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT provides powerful prognostic stratification in the primary staging of large breast cancer when compared with conventional explorations. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:428–37.CrossRefPubMed Cochet A, Dygai-Cochet I, Riedinger J-M, Humbert O, Berriolo-Riedinger A, Toubeau M, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT provides powerful prognostic stratification in the primary staging of large breast cancer when compared with conventional explorations. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:428–37.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Groheux D, Hindié E, Delord M, Giacchetti S, Hamy A-S, de Bazelaire C, et al. Prognostic impact of 18FDG-PET-CT findings in clinical stage III and IIB breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:1879–87.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Groheux D, Hindié E, Delord M, Giacchetti S, Hamy A-S, de Bazelaire C, et al. Prognostic impact of 18FDG-PET-CT findings in clinical stage III and IIB breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:1879–87.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Riedl CC, Slobod E, Jochelson M, Morrow M, Goldman DA, Gonen M, et al. Retrospective analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging asymptomatic breast cancer patients younger than 40 years. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:1578–83.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Riedl CC, Slobod E, Jochelson M, Morrow M, Goldman DA, Gonen M, et al. Retrospective analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging asymptomatic breast cancer patients younger than 40 years. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:1578–83.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Segaert I, Mottaghy F, Ceyssens S, De Wever W, Stroobants S, Van Ongeval C, et al. Additional value of PET-CT in staging of clinical stage IIB and III breast cancer. Breast J. 2010;16:617–24.CrossRefPubMed Segaert I, Mottaghy F, Ceyssens S, De Wever W, Stroobants S, Van Ongeval C, et al. Additional value of PET-CT in staging of clinical stage IIB and III breast cancer. Breast J. 2010;16:617–24.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Groheux D, Giacchetti S, Moretti J-L, Porcher R, Espié M, Lehmann-Che J, et al. Correlation of high (18)F-FDG uptake to clinical, pathological and biological prognostic factors in breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:426–35.CrossRefPubMed Groheux D, Giacchetti S, Moretti J-L, Porcher R, Espié M, Lehmann-Che J, et al. Correlation of high (18)F-FDG uptake to clinical, pathological and biological prognostic factors in breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:426–35.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Groheux D, Majdoub M, Tixier F, Le Rest CC, Martineau A, Merlet P, et al. Do clinical, histological or immunohistochemical primary tumour characteristics translate into different 18F-FDG PET/CT volumetric and heterogeneity features in stage II/III breast cancer? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015. doi:10.1007/s00259-015-3110-x Groheux D, Majdoub M, Tixier F, Le Rest CC, Martineau A, Merlet P, et al. Do clinical, histological or immunohistochemical primary tumour characteristics translate into different 18F-FDG PET/CT volumetric and heterogeneity features in stage II/III breast cancer? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015. doi:10.​1007/​s00259-015-3110-x
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Humbert O, Berriolo-Riedinger A, Cochet A, Gauthier M, Charon-Barra C, Guiu S, et al. Prognostic relevance at 5 years of the early monitoring of neoadjuvant chemotherapy using 18F-FDG PET in luminal HER2-negative breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:416–27.CrossRefPubMed Humbert O, Berriolo-Riedinger A, Cochet A, Gauthier M, Charon-Barra C, Guiu S, et al. Prognostic relevance at 5 years of the early monitoring of neoadjuvant chemotherapy using 18F-FDG PET in luminal HER2-negative breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:416–27.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Aogi K, Kadoya T, Sugawara Y, Kiyoto S, Shigematsu H, Masumoto N, et al. Utility of 18F FDG-PET/CT for predicting prognosis of luminal-type breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;150:209–17.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Aogi K, Kadoya T, Sugawara Y, Kiyoto S, Shigematsu H, Masumoto N, et al. Utility of 18F FDG-PET/CT for predicting prognosis of luminal-type breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;150:209–17.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Groheux D, Sanna A, Majdoub M, de Cremoux P, Giacchetti S, Teixeira L, et al. Baseline tumor 18FDG uptake and modifications after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy are prognostic of outcome in ER+/HER2- breast cancer. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:824–31.CrossRefPubMed Groheux D, Sanna A, Majdoub M, de Cremoux P, Giacchetti S, Teixeira L, et al. Baseline tumor 18FDG uptake and modifications after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy are prognostic of outcome in ER+/HER2- breast cancer. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:824–31.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Groheux D, Giacchetti S, Hatt M, Marty M, Vercellino L, de Roquancourt A, et al. HER2-overexpressing breast cancer: FDG uptake after two cycles of chemotherapy predicts the outcome of neoadjuvant treatment. Br J Cancer. 2013;109:1157–64.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Groheux D, Giacchetti S, Hatt M, Marty M, Vercellino L, de Roquancourt A, et al. HER2-overexpressing breast cancer: FDG uptake after two cycles of chemotherapy predicts the outcome of neoadjuvant treatment. Br J Cancer. 2013;109:1157–64.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Carey LA, Dees EC, Sawyer L, Gatti L, Moore DT, Collichio F, et al. The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:2329–34.CrossRefPubMed Carey LA, Dees EC, Sawyer L, Gatti L, Moore DT, Collichio F, et al. The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:2329–34.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Groheux D, Hindié E, Giacchetti S, Hamy A-S, Berger F, Merlet P, et al. Early assessment with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography can help predict the outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50:1864–71.CrossRefPubMed Groheux D, Hindié E, Giacchetti S, Hamy A-S, Berger F, Merlet P, et al. Early assessment with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography can help predict the outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50:1864–71.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Groheux D, Giacchetti S, Delord M, de Roquancourt A, Merlet P, Hamy AS, et al. Prognostic impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT staging and of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:377–85.CrossRefPubMed Groheux D, Giacchetti S, Delord M, de Roquancourt A, Merlet P, Hamy AS, et al. Prognostic impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT staging and of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:377–85.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Concerning pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with large or locally advanced breast cancer
verfasst von
David Groheux
Elif Hindié
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Ausgabe 12/2015
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-015-3144-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2015

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 12/2015 Zur Ausgabe