nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.05.2024 | Research

Conventional and digital maxillary occlusal record for the manufacture of complete-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses: randomized controlled clinical trial

verfasst von: Ana Larisse Carneiro Pereira, Maria de Fátima Trindade Pinto Campos, Ana Clara Soares Paiva Torres, Adriana da Fonte Porto Carreiro

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 5/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the trueness of the digital maxillary occlusal records in comparison with the conventional records for the fabrication of complete-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses.

Materials and methods

This randomized controlled clinical trial followed the recommendations of the CONSORT statement. Twenty participants who used a mandibular interim complete-arch fixed prosthesis and conventional complete maxillary dentures were included in the study. The participants were randomized into two types of maxillary occlusal records: conventional (COR) and digital (DOR) (TRIOS; Shape A/S). After fabricating the prostheses, the distribution and number of occlusal contact points, and the time taken to obtain the maxillary occlusal record and work model were evaluated. Descriptive analysis was used to evaluate the distribution of occlusal contact points. The Wilcoxon test was employed for assessing the number of occlusal contact points, while the Mann-Whitney U test was used for the time taken to obtain the working casts and the maxillary occlusal record and occlusal adjustment times (p < 0.05).

Results

There was a similarity in the jaw relation recording methods regarding the distribution of occlusal contact points. There was no difference in the number of occlusal contact points between the anterior (p = 0.439) and posterior (p = 0.227) teeth. No relationship was observed between the distribution and number of occlusal contact points (COR, p = 0.288; DOR, p = 0.183). DOR required less occlusal and clinical adjustment time, on the other hand more laboratory and total workflow time than COR (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The DOR may be an option for obtaining the functional space necessary for the assembly of teeth in complete-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses; however, it requires more working time.

Clinical relevance

The digital occlusal recording method can be used to assess the interocclusal space for the virtual tooth setup of a complete-arch implant-supported fixed prosthesis.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Park D-H, Park J-M, Choi J-W, Kang E-S, Bae E-B, Jeon Y-C, Jeong C-M, Yun M-J, Huh J-B (2017) Accuracy of several implant bite relation records techniques: na in-vitro pilot study. J Adv Prosthodont 9:341–349. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.5.341CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Zafiropoulos G-G, Galil AB, Deli G (2014) Na interocclusal recording method for the manufacture of full-arch implant-retained restorations. J Oral Implantol 40:357–364. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00232CrossRefPubMed

Ockert-Eriksson G, Eriksson A, Lockowandt P, Eriksson O (2000) Materials for interocclusal records and their ability to reproduce a 3-dimensional jaw relationship. Int J Prosthodont 13:152–158 PMID 11203625PubMed

Anup G, Ahila SC, Vasanthakumar M (2011) Evaluation of dimensional stability, accuracy and surface hardness of interocclusal recording materials at various time intervals: an in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 11:26–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-011-0054-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mullick SC, Stackhouse JA Jr, Vincent GR (1981) A study of interocclusal record materials. J Prosthet Dent 46:304–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(81)90219-5CrossRefPubMed

Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY (1999) Fabricating a stable record base for completely edentulous patients treated with osseointegrated implants using healing abutments. J Prosthet Dent 81:224–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70253-2CrossRefPubMed

Chaimattayompol N, Stanescu J, Steinberg J, Vergo TJ Jr (2001) Use of a cross-mounting buccal index to help transfer the spatial relationships of an interim prosthesis to the definitive implant-supported prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 85:509–515. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.115387CrossRefPubMed

Papaspyridakos P, Lal K (2008) Simple technique to transfer occlusal vertical dimension and articulate a definitive implant cast for a full arch implant prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 100:320–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60215-2CrossRefPubMed

Michelinakis G, Nikolidakis D (2019) Using the surgical guide for impression – free digital bite relation records in the edentulous maxilla – a technical note. Int J Implant Dent 2019(5):19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-019-0172-8CrossRef

10.

de Pereira ALC Fátima Trindade Pinto Campos, de Freitas RFC, Tôrres ACSP, de Luna Gomes JM, Pellizzer EP, Carreiro AFP (2021) Partially digital workflow for making complete-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses: A dental technique. J Prosthet Dent S0022-3913:00250-X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.04.018

11.

Papaspyridakos P, Kang K, De Furia C, Amin S, Kudara Y, Weber H-P (2018) Digital workflow in full-arch implant rehabilitation with segmented minimally veneered monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: 2-year clinical follow-up. J Esthet Restor Dent 30:5–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12323CrossRefPubMed

12.

Ahmed WM, Verhaeghe TV, McCullagh APG (2021) Maxillary complete-arch implant-supported restoration: a digital scanning and maxillomandibular relationship workflow. J Prosthet Dent 125:216–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.01.010CrossRefPubMed

13.

Meneghetti P, Moura GF, Tavelli L, Li J, Siqueira R, Wang H-L, Mendonça G (2021) A fully digital approach for implant fixed complete dentures: a case report. J Esthet Restor Dent 33:1070–1076. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12798CrossRefPubMed

14.

Russo LL, Ciavarella D, Salamini A, Guida L (2019) Alignment of intraoral scans and relation records of maxillomandibular relationships for the edentulous maxillary arch. J Prosthet Dent 121:737–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.06.022CrossRefPubMed

15.

Solaberrieta E, Otegi JR, Goicoechea N, Brizuela A, Pradies G (2015) Comparison of a conventional and virtual occlusal record. J Prosthet Dent 114:92–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.01.009CrossRefPubMed

16.

Maruyama T, Nakamura Y, Hayashi T, Kato K (2006) Computer-aided determination of occlusal contact points for dental 3-D CAD. Med Biol Eng Comput 44:445–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-006-0046-0CrossRefPubMed

17.

Lee JD, Gallucci GO, Lee SJ (2022) An in-vitro evaluation of articulation accuracy for digitally milled casts vs. conventional gypsum casts. Dent J (Basel) 10:11. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10010011CrossRefPubMed

18.

Porter JL, Carrico CK, Lindauer SJ, Tüfekçi E (2018) Comparison of intraoral and extraoral scanners on the accuracy of digital model articulation. J Orthod 45:275–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/14653125.2018.1500773CrossRefPubMed

19.

Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D (2010) CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. J Pharmacol Pharmocother 1:100–107. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232CrossRef

20.

Pereira ALC, Segundo HVS, Campos MFTP, Curinga MRS, Tôrres ACSP, Carreiro AFP (2021) Solid index versus impression for transferring the position of implants in mandibular total edentulous arches: a clinical study on trueness. Int J Adv Eng Res Sci 8:1–7. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.88.1CrossRef

21.

Pereira ALC, de Freitas RFCP, de Fátima Trindade Ponto Campos M, Tôrres ACSP, de Medeiros AKB, da, Porto Carreiro F (2021) A Trueness of a device for intraoral scanning to capture the angle and distance between implants in edentulous mandibular arches. J Prosthet Dent 14:00149-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.039

22.

Savabi O, Yosefimoghadam A, Nejatidanesh F (2009) A method for making the implant-supported record bases. J Oral Implantol 35:300–302. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00019R1.1CrossRefPubMed

23.

An X, Fang J-H, Jeong S-M, Choi B-H (2018) A CAD-CAM technique for conversion of interim-to-definitive restoration in patients with complete edentulism. J Prosthet Dent 120:190–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.003CrossRefPubMed

24.

Revilla-León M, Pérez-Barquero JA, Zubizarreta-Macho A, Barmak AB, Att W, Kois JC (2023) Influence of the number of teeth and location of the virtual occlusal record on the accuracy of the maxilla-mandibular relationship obtained by using an intraoral scanner. J Prosthodont 32:253–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13526CrossRefPubMed

25.

Alharbi N, Osman R, Wismeijer D (2016) Effects on build orientation on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed complete coverage interim dental restorations. J Prosthet Dent 115:760–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.002CrossRefPubMed

26.

Yousef H, Harris BT, Elathamma EN, Morton D, Lin W-S (2021) Effect of additive manufacturing process and storage condition on the dimensional accuracy and stability of 3D-printed dental casts. J Prosthet Dent 128:1041–1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.028CrossRefPubMed

27.

Barbosa DB, Barão VAR, Monteiro DR, Compagnoni MA, Marra J (2008) Bond strength of denture teeth to acrylic resin: effect of thermocycling and polymerization methods. Gerodontology 25:237–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2008.00218.xCrossRefPubMed

28.

Palaskar JN, Singh S, Mittal S (2019) Evaluation and comparison of different polymerization techniques, curing cyles, and thicknesses of two denture base materials. Indian J Dent Res 30:583–589. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_170_16CrossRefPubMed

29.

Chen JC, Lacefield WR, Castleberry DJ (1988) Effect of denture thickness and curing cycle on the dimensional stability of acrylic resin denture bases. Dent Mater 4:20–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(88)80083-6CrossRefPubMed

30.

Sadamori S, Ganefiyanti T, Hamada T, Arima T (1994) Influence of thickness and location on the residual monomer content of denture base cured by three processing methods. J Prosthet Dent 72:19–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90210-0CrossRefPubMed

31.

Consani RL, Domitti SS, Rizzatti Barbosa CM, Consani S (2002) Effect of commercial acrylic resins on dimensional accuracy of the maxillary denture base. Braz Dent J 13:57–60 PMID: 11870965PubMed

32.

Caetano CR, Consani RLX, Bacchi A, Correr AB, Dos Santos MBF (2013) Influence of different flask systems on tooth displacement and suprastructure misfit in mandibular fixed implant-supported complete dentures. J Prosthodont Res 57:213–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2013.04.001CrossRefPubMed

33.

Suzuki T, Kumagai H, Yoshitomi N, McGlumphy EA (1999) Occlusal contacts of edentulous patients with mandibular hybrid dentures opposing maxillary complete dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14:504–509 PMID: 10453664PubMed

34.

Revilla-Léon M, Gómez-Polo M, Zeitler JM, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Pérez-Barquero JÁ (2022) Does the available interocclusal space influence the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship captured with an intraoral scanner? J Prosthet Dent S0022–3913:00564–00569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.09.004CrossRef

35.

Revilla-Léon M, Gómez-Polo M, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Yilmaz B, Pérez-Barquero JA (2023) Influence of occlusal collision corrections completed by two intraoral scanners or a dental design program on the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship. J Prosthet Dent S 0022–3913:00345–00341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.05.015CrossRef

36.

Chinam N, Bekkali M, Kallas M, Li J (2023) Virtual occlusal records acquired by using intraoral scanners: a review of factors that influence maxillo-mandibular relationship accuracy. J Prosthodont 32:192–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13787CrossRefPubMed

37.

Nuytens P, D´haese R, Vandeweghe S (2022) Reliability and Time Efficiency of Digital vs. Analog Bite relation records technique for the manufacture of full-Arch fixed Implant Prostheses. J Clin Med 19:2882. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102882CrossRef

38.

Marti AM, Harris BT, Metz MJ, Morton D, Scarfe WC, Metz CJ, Lin W-S (2017) Comparison of digital scanning and polyvinyl siloxane impression techniques by dental students: instructional efficiency and attitudes towards technology. Eur J Dent Educ 21:200–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12201CrossRefPubMed

39.

Róth I, Czigola A, Joós-Kovács GL, Dalos M, Hermann P, Borbély J (2020) Learning curve of digital intraoral scanning – an in vivo study. BMC Oral Health 20:87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01278-1CrossRef

Titel: Conventional and digital maxillary occlusal record for the manufacture of complete-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses: randomized controlled clinical trial
verfasst von: Ana Larisse Carneiro Pereira
Maria de Fátima Trindade Pinto Campos
Ana Clara Soares Paiva Torres
Adriana da Fonte Porto Carreiro
Publikationsdatum: 01.05.2024
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 5/2024
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05639-w

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Conventional and digital maxillary occlusal record for the manufacture of complete-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses: randomized controlled clinical trial