Congenital anomalies of the inferior vena cava (IVC) are rare, with a prevalence of 1%, and include interruption of the IVC, left IVC, and double IVC. Interruption of the IVC is a well-recognized, but uncommon anatomic anomaly [1]. The most common form of this anomaly is a right IVC that continues with the azygos vein via the right superior vena cava (R-SVC) into the right atrium (RA). A left IVC is also rare. When a left IVC is interrupted, the condition is more complicated because there are numerous routes for the return of blood [2]. In addition, interruption of the IVC is often associated with heterotaxy syndrome. If a patient does not have other features of the heterotaxy syndrome, it is easy for the examiner to miss the diagnosis. Herein, we present a patient without heterotaxy syndrome associated with interruption of the left IVC that continued with the hemiazygos vein system, a persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC), and an anomalous left hepatic vein (LHV) connected with the coronary sinus (CS). Together, the venous anomalies caused a coronary sinus aneurysm (CSA).

A 67-year-old woman had intermittent chest pain for 1 year. She underwent coronary angiography and was diagnosed with significant coronary artery disease involving three main coronary arteries at the referring hospital. All three main coronary arteries had stenotic changes. She presented to our hospital for a coronary artery bypass graft. At the time of the clinical examination, the pulse rate was 85 beats/min and the blood pressure was 132/84 mmHg. No murmurs were auscultated. The electrocardiogram showed persistent atrial fibrillation with abnormal ST segment changes. Echocardiography demonstrated a dilated CS (Fig. 1). Thoracic and abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography was performed on a 64-detector row scanner (Siemens, Forchheim, Germany). Images were obtained during patient breath-holding using the following acquisition parameters: 120 kV; 240 mA; and 1.5-mm thick contiguous section. The patient received 80 mL of contrast media (Iohexol 350; GE Healthcare, Shanghai, China) using a power injector at 3.5 mL/s, and the time delays from injection of the contrast agent to scanning were approximately 20 s and 60 s for the arterial and venous phases, respectively. Thoracic and abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed interruption of the left IVC that continued with the hemiazygos vein system, a PLSVC, and an anomalous LHV draining into the CSA (Figs. 2 & 3; Additional file 1: Movie 1). Considering her advanced age, the physicians did not plan to correct the venous anomalies. Three days later, a coronary artery bypass graft was performed, which confirmed the diagnosis. Half a month after the surgery, the pain was relieved and the patient was discharged from the hospital.

Various diagnostic and therapeutic procedures involving the right side of the heart, such as electrophysiologic studies, right heart catheterization, cardiopulmonary bypass surgery, IVC filter placement, and temporary pacing, have increased the need for ready access to the IVC via the transfemoral route. Anatomic anomalies of the IVC can make these procedures difficult.

The interruption of the IVC has a prevalence of 0.6%–2.0% in patients with congenital heart disease and 0.3% in healthy people [3]. Embryologically, the normal IVC consists of five segments (hepatic, suprarenal, renal, infrarenal [subrenal], and iliac), which are mainly derived from the right vitelline vein (hepatocardiac canal), the right subcardinal vein, the subcardial and supracardial anastomosis, the supracardial vein, and the persistent posterior cardinal veins. Suprarenal interruption of the IVC in the current case was due to a failed connection between the right vitelline and right subcardinal veins. The blood circulating in the caudal segments of the IVC reaches the azygos/hemiazygos system by way of a persistent right/left supracardinal vein. The interruption of the IVC can be associated with cardiac abnormalities, heterotaxy syndrome (polysplenia and asplenia), deep vein thrombosis, and renal vein anomalies, and has also been reported as an asymptomatic incidental finding. Of patients associated with interruption of the IVC without other features of the heterotaxy syndrome, 62.7% do not have any cardiac malformations, which easily lead to misdiagnosis of this anomaly during echocardiography [4].

The left IVC has a prevalence of 0.2%–0.5%, and develops as a result of the persistence of the left supracardinal vein and regression of the right supracardinal vein [5]. Usually, the left IVC crosses over to the right side at the level of the renal veins without interruption. Interruption of the left IVC is rare, and only accounts for 15.5% of all interruptions involving the IVC [4]. Unlike the interrupted right IVC, which always continues via the azygos vein draining into the R-SVC (97.7%), the interrupted left IVC continues via a number of routes. Haswell et al. [2] has described three routes for the interrupted left IVC: (1) interrupted left IVC → hemiazygos vein → azygos vein → R-SVC → RA; (2) interrupted left IVC → hemiazygos vein → accessory hemiazygos vein → left intercostals vein → PLSVC → CS → RA; and (3) interrupted left IVC → hemiazygos vein → accessory hemiazygos vein → left intercostals vein → left brachiocephalic vein → R-SVC → RA. Subsequently, other routes have been discovered. Based on a review of the literature, five other types of interrupted left IVCs have been described, including the mixed type (Fig. 4) [6‐8].

An anomalous LHV connection with the CS has rarely been reported in the literature; indeed, only 14 cases have been reported up to 2015 (Table 1). An anomalous LHV connection with the CS is due to the persistence of the left vitelline connection with the left sinus horn. The diagnosis of this anomaly has important clinical significance. First, an anomalous LHV connection with the CS can potentially lead to technical difficulties during trans-coronary sinus interventions and cannulation of the coronary veins for certain procedures, such as biventricular pacing. Second, this anomaly should be detected before cardiac surgery which uses a heart-lung machine because control of venous return will be challenging. Third, this anomaly should be awared in hepatic surgery and transplantation.

In patients with interruption of the IVC, the hepatic veins usually drain directly into the RA. Sometimes, the hepatic veins may connect with a residual IVC that eventually drains into the RA, pulmonary vein, or left atrium [9‐11]. Our case is the first report involving multiple systemic vein anomalies.

The above-mentioned multiple venous anomalies involve the vast majority of venous blood draining into the CS. Thus, intimal hyperplasia and loss of smooth muscle and elastic tissue with replacement by connective tissue with age may aggravate the formation of CSA [12]. CSA should be diagnosed as early as possible because the CSA in children may compress the mitral annulus and limit atrioventricular flow into the left heart, eventually causing left ventricle, aortic hypoplasia, and obstructive lesions in the left ventricle [13].

This is the first report involving these three co-existing systemic vein anomalies. Dilated CS by echocardiography is an important diagnostic clue for systemic anomalous venous pathways. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography provides a more comprehensive view of the entire course of abnormal veins. These congenital anomalies can be explained by the theory of embryonic development abnormalities.