Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 3/2012

01.05.2012 | Original article

Correction of Class II, Division 2 malocclusions using a completely customized lingual appliance and the Herbst device

Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Ausgabe 3/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Aim

The purpose of the present study was to examine the efficiency of correcting a Class II, Division 2 malocclusion using a completely customized lingual appliance.

Materials and methods

In 18 consecutively completed, Class II, Division 2 malocclusion patients, the correction of the upper incisor inclination, deep and distal bite were assessed by means of plaster casts, digital lateral cephalograms, and intraoral photographs taken at the time of debond. Furthermore, two independent calibrated examiners determined the weighted Peer Assessment Rating index (PAR Index) of the initial and end models.

Results

All Class II, Division 2 patients were treated successfully: upper incisor inclination using the palatal plane as a reference improved on average from 95.4° to 111.2°. The deep bite was reduced on average from 3.6 mm to 1.7 mm. Neutral occlusion was achieved in all patients who had undergone correction of an initially pronounced distal occlusion (4.5 mm on average). An 86.2% marked improvement was observed in the weighted PAR index score from an average of 24.7 at the beginning of treatment to 2.9 at the end of treatment, with no patient classified as “worse or no different.”

Conclusion

Class II, Division 2 malocclusions can be efficiently and reliably treated by a combination of a completely customized lingual appliance and the Herbst device.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Baccetti T, Franchi L, Stahl F (2009) Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 135:698 e691–610, discussion 698–699PubMedCrossRef Baccetti T, Franchi L, Stahl F (2009) Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 135:698 e691–610, discussion 698–699PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bock N, Ruf S (2008) Post-treatment occlusal changes in Class II Division 2 subjects treated with the Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod 30:606–613PubMedCrossRef Bock N, Ruf S (2008) Post-treatment occlusal changes in Class II Division 2 subjects treated with the Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod 30:606–613PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bock NC, Santo C, Pancherz H (2009) Facial profile and lip position changes in adult Class II, Division 2 subjects treated with the Herbst-multibracket appliance. A radiographic cephalometric pilot study. J Orofac Orthop 70:51–62PubMedCrossRef Bock NC, Santo C, Pancherz H (2009) Facial profile and lip position changes in adult Class II, Division 2 subjects treated with the Herbst-multibracket appliance. A radiographic cephalometric pilot study. J Orofac Orthop 70:51–62PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Canut JA, Arias S (1999) A long-term evaluation of treated Class II Division 2 malocclusions: a retrospective study model analysis. Eur J Orthod 21:377–386PubMedCrossRef Canut JA, Arias S (1999) A long-term evaluation of treated Class II Division 2 malocclusions: a retrospective study model analysis. Eur J Orthod 21:377–386PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Dahlberg G (1940) Statistical methods for medical and biological students. Interscience, New York Dahlberg G (1940) Statistical methods for medical and biological students. Interscience, New York
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Freitas KM de, Freitas MR de, Janson G et al (2006) Retrospective analysis of orthodontic treatment outcomes and its relation to postretention stability. J Appl Oral Sci 14:324–329PubMedCrossRef Freitas KM de, Freitas MR de, Janson G et al (2006) Retrospective analysis of orthodontic treatment outcomes and its relation to postretention stability. J Appl Oral Sci 14:324–329PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat DeGuzman L, Bahiraei D, Vig KW et al (1995) The validation of the Peer Assessment Rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 107:172–176PubMedCrossRef DeGuzman L, Bahiraei D, Vig KW et al (1995) The validation of the Peer Assessment Rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 107:172–176PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Demling A, Dittmer MP, Schwestka-Polly R (2009) Comparative analysis of slot dimension in lingual bracket systems. Head Face Med 5:27PubMedCrossRef Demling A, Dittmer MP, Schwestka-Polly R (2009) Comparative analysis of slot dimension in lingual bracket systems. Head Face Med 5:27PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Devreese H, De Pauw G, Van Maele G et al (2007) Stability of upper incisor inclination changes in Class II Division 2 patients. Eur J Orthod 29:314–320PubMedCrossRef Devreese H, De Pauw G, Van Maele G et al (2007) Stability of upper incisor inclination changes in Class II Division 2 patients. Eur J Orthod 29:314–320PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Drescher D (2000) Fernröntgenanalyse. In: Diedrich P (ed) Kieferorthopädie I, Praxis der Zahnheilkunde Bd 11, Urban & Fischer, München, pp 263–287 Drescher D (2000) Fernröntgenanalyse. In: Diedrich P (ed) Kieferorthopädie I, Praxis der Zahnheilkunde Bd 11, Urban & Fischer, München, pp 263–287
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Eberhard H, Hirschfelder U (1998) Treatment of Class II, Division 2 in the late growth period. J Orofac Orthop 59:352–361PubMedCrossRef Eberhard H, Hirschfelder U (1998) Treatment of Class II, Division 2 in the late growth period. J Orofac Orthop 59:352–361PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Fuhrmann R, Berg R (1990) Nachuntersuchung von Patienten mit Deckbiß des Typs Angle-Klasse II, 2. Prakt Kieferorthop 4:11–20 Fuhrmann R, Berg R (1990) Nachuntersuchung von Patienten mit Deckbiß des Typs Angle-Klasse II, 2. Prakt Kieferorthop 4:11–20
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Galletti C, Fauquet-Roure C, Raybaud P (2010) Treatment of Class III malocclusions in adults using the Incognito lingual technique. Int Orthod 8:227–252PubMed Galletti C, Fauquet-Roure C, Raybaud P (2010) Treatment of Class III malocclusions in adults using the Incognito lingual technique. Int Orthod 8:227–252PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Galletti C, Mujagic M, Simon JS (2007) Orthodontie lingual: positionnement du premier arc dans la zone antérieure. Int Orthod 5:301–326CrossRef Galletti C, Mujagic M, Simon JS (2007) Orthodontie lingual: positionnement du premier arc dans la zone antérieure. Int Orthod 5:301–326CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Grauer D, Proffit WR (2011) Accuracy in tooth positioning with a fully customized lingual orthodontic appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 140:433–443PubMedCrossRef Grauer D, Proffit WR (2011) Accuracy in tooth positioning with a fully customized lingual orthodontic appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 140:433–443PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamdan AM, Rock WP (1999) An appraisal of the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index and a suggested new weighting system. Eur J Orthod 21:181–192PubMedCrossRef Hamdan AM, Rock WP (1999) An appraisal of the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index and a suggested new weighting system. Eur J Orthod 21:181–192PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Holman JK, Hans MG, Nelson S, Powers MP (1998) An assessment of extraction versus nonextraction orthodontic treatment using the peer assessment rating (PAR) index. Angle Orthod 68:527–534PubMed Holman JK, Hans MG, Nelson S, Powers MP (1998) An assessment of extraction versus nonextraction orthodontic treatment using the peer assessment rating (PAR) index. Angle Orthod 68:527–534PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ileri Z, Basciftci FA, Malkoc S, Ramoglu SI (2011) Comparison of the outcomes of the lower incisor extraction, premolar extraction and non-extraction treatments. Eur J Orthod (epub) Ileri Z, Basciftci FA, Malkoc S, Ramoglu SI (2011) Comparison of the outcomes of the lower incisor extraction, premolar extraction and non-extraction treatments. Eur J Orthod (epub)
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim TW, Little RM (1999) Postretention assessment of deep overbite correction in Class II Division 2 malocclusion. Angle Orthod 69:175–186PubMed Kim TW, Little RM (1999) Postretention assessment of deep overbite correction in Class II Division 2 malocclusion. Angle Orthod 69:175–186PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kinzel J, Aberschek P, Mischak I, Droschl H (2002) Study of the extent of torque, protrusion and intrusion of the incisors in the context of Class II, division 2 treatment in adults. J Orofac Orthop 63:283–299PubMedCrossRef Kinzel J, Aberschek P, Mischak I, Droschl H (2002) Study of the extent of torque, protrusion and intrusion of the incisors in the context of Class II, division 2 treatment in adults. J Orofac Orthop 63:283–299PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Lagerström L, Fornell AC, Stenvik A (2011) Outcome of a scheme for specialist orthodontic care, a follow-up study in 31-year-olds. Swed Dent J 35:41–47PubMed Lagerström L, Fornell AC, Stenvik A (2011) Outcome of a scheme for specialist orthodontic care, a follow-up study in 31-year-olds. Swed Dent J 35:41–47PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Locatelli R, Bednar J, Dietz VS, Gianelly AA (1992) Molar distalization with superelastic NiTi wire. J Clin Orthod 26:277–279PubMed Locatelli R, Bednar J, Dietz VS, Gianelly AA (1992) Molar distalization with superelastic NiTi wire. J Clin Orthod 26:277–279PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Lux CJ, Raeth O, Burden D et al (2004) Sagittal and vertical growth of the jaws in Class II, Division 1 and Class II, Division 2 malocclusions during prepubertal and pubertal development. J Orofac Orthop 65:290–311PubMedCrossRef Lux CJ, Raeth O, Burden D et al (2004) Sagittal and vertical growth of the jaws in Class II, Division 1 and Class II, Division 2 malocclusions during prepubertal and pubertal development. J Orofac Orthop 65:290–311PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Mavreas D, Athanasiou AE (2008) Factors affecting the duration of orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod 30:386–395PubMedCrossRef Mavreas D, Athanasiou AE (2008) Factors affecting the duration of orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod 30:386–395PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Mujagic M, Cuzin JF, Muller C (2008) La décompensation sur mesure. Apport de l’orthodontie linguale. Inf Dent 5:187–192 Mujagic M, Cuzin JF, Muller C (2008) La décompensation sur mesure. Apport de l’orthodontie linguale. Inf Dent 5:187–192
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Muller C, Simon JS (2007) L’orthodontie moderne. Traitement esthétique. Inf Dent 89:581–585 Muller C, Simon JS (2007) L’orthodontie moderne. Traitement esthétique. Inf Dent 89:581–585
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Obijou C, Pancherz H (1997) Herbst appliance treatment of Class II, Division 2 malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 112:287–291PubMedCrossRef Obijou C, Pancherz H (1997) Herbst appliance treatment of Class II, Division 2 malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 112:287–291PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Pancherz H (1985) The Herbst appliance − its biologic effects and clinical use. Am J Orthod 87:1–20PubMedCrossRef Pancherz H (1985) The Herbst appliance − its biologic effects and clinical use. Am J Orthod 87:1–20PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Pancherz H (1991) The nature of Class II relapse after Herbst appliance treatment: a cephalometric long-term investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 100:220–233PubMedCrossRef Pancherz H (1991) The nature of Class II relapse after Herbst appliance treatment: a cephalometric long-term investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 100:220–233PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Pinzan-Vercelino CR, Janson G, Pinzan A et al (2009) Comparative efficiency of Class II malocclusion treatment with the pendulum appliance or two maxillary premolar extractions and edgewise appliances [corrected]. Eur J Orthod 31:333–340PubMedCrossRef Pinzan-Vercelino CR, Janson G, Pinzan A et al (2009) Comparative efficiency of Class II malocclusion treatment with the pendulum appliance or two maxillary premolar extractions and edgewise appliances [corrected]. Eur J Orthod 31:333–340PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Richmond S, Shaw WC, Roberts CT, Andrews M (1992) The PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards. Eur J Orthod 14:180–187PubMed Richmond S, Shaw WC, Roberts CT, Andrews M (1992) The PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards. Eur J Orthod 14:180–187PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruf S, Pancherz H (2004) Orthognathic surgery and dentofacial orthopedics in adult Class II Division 1 treatment: mandibular sagittal split osteotomy versus Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 126:140–152; quiz 254–145PubMedCrossRef Ruf S, Pancherz H (2004) Orthognathic surgery and dentofacial orthopedics in adult Class II Division 1 treatment: mandibular sagittal split osteotomy versus Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 126:140–152; quiz 254–145PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Saelens NA, De Smit AA (1998) Therapeutic changes in extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 20:225–236PubMedCrossRef Saelens NA, De Smit AA (1998) Therapeutic changes in extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 20:225–236PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Schweitzer M, Pancherz H (2001) The incisor-lip relationship in Herbst/multi-bracket appliance treatment of Class II, Division 2 malocclusions. Angle Orthod 71:358–363PubMed Schweitzer M, Pancherz H (2001) The incisor-lip relationship in Herbst/multi-bracket appliance treatment of Class II, Division 2 malocclusions. Angle Orthod 71:358–363PubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwestka-Polly R (2004) Proceedings in orthognathic surgery with condylar positioning. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 36:205–218CrossRef Schwestka-Polly R (2004) Proceedings in orthognathic surgery with condylar positioning. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 36:205–218CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Tofeldt LN, Johnsson AC, Kjellberg H (2007) Evaluation of orthodontic treatment, retention and relapse in a 5-year follow-up: a comparison of treatment outcome between a specialist and a post-graduate clinic. Swed Dent J 31:121–127PubMed Tofeldt LN, Johnsson AC, Kjellberg H (2007) Evaluation of orthodontic treatment, retention and relapse in a 5-year follow-up: a comparison of treatment outcome between a specialist and a post-graduate clinic. Swed Dent J 31:121–127PubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Bremen J von, Bock N, Ruf S (2009) Is Herbst-multi-bracket appliance treatment more efficient in adolescents than in adults? Angle Orthod 79:173–177CrossRef Bremen J von, Bock N, Ruf S (2009) Is Herbst-multi-bracket appliance treatment more efficient in adolescents than in adults? Angle Orthod 79:173–177CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Walkow TM, Peck S (2002) Dental arch width in Class II Division 2 deep-bite malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 122:608–613PubMedCrossRef Walkow TM, Peck S (2002) Dental arch width in Class II Division 2 deep-bite malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 122:608–613PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Wehrbein H, Feifel H, Diedrich P (1999) Palatal implant anchorage reinforcement of posterior teeth: A prospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116:678–686PubMedCrossRef Wehrbein H, Feifel H, Diedrich P (1999) Palatal implant anchorage reinforcement of posterior teeth: A prospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116:678–686PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiechmann D, Schwestka-Polly R, Hohoff A (2008) Herbst appliance in lingual orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 134:439–446PubMedCrossRef Wiechmann D, Schwestka-Polly R, Hohoff A (2008) Herbst appliance in lingual orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 134:439–446PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiechmann D, Schwestka-Polly R, Pancherz H, Hohoff A (2010) Control of mandibular incisors with the combined Herbst and completely customized lingual appliance-a pilot study. Head Face Med 6:3PubMedCrossRef Wiechmann D, Schwestka-Polly R, Pancherz H, Hohoff A (2010) Control of mandibular incisors with the combined Herbst and completely customized lingual appliance-a pilot study. Head Face Med 6:3PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilmes B, Drescher D (2010) Application and effectiveness of the Beneslider: a device to move molars distally. World J Orthod 11:331–340PubMed Wilmes B, Drescher D (2010) Application and effectiveness of the Beneslider: a device to move molars distally. World J Orthod 11:331–340PubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Zentner A, Peylo S, Brothag D (2003) Predictive value of morphologic parameters for successful correction of Class II Division 2 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 123:279–285PubMedCrossRef Zentner A, Peylo S, Brothag D (2003) Predictive value of morphologic parameters for successful correction of Class II Division 2 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 123:279–285PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Correction of Class II, Division 2 malocclusions using a completely customized lingual appliance and the Herbst device
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2012
Erschienen in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Ausgabe 3/2012
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-012-0077-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2012

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 3/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

19.04.2024 Vorhofflimmern Nachrichten

Werden Personen mit Vorhofflimmern in der Blanking-Periode nach einer Katheterablation gegen eine bestehende Parodontitis behandelt, verbessert dies die Erfolgsaussichten. Dafür sprechen die Resultate einer prospektiven Untersuchung.

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

11.04.2024 Endokarditis Nachrichten

Bei welchen Personen eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe zur Prävention einer infektiösen Endokarditis nach invasiven zahnärztlichen Eingriffen sinnvoll ist, wird diskutiert. Neue Daten stehen im Einklang mit den europäischen Leitlinienempfehlungen.

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

08.04.2024 Zahnmedizin Nachrichten

Der Aufbau von Geweben und Organen während der Embryonalentwicklung wird von den Zellen bemerkenswert choreografiert. Für diesen Prozess braucht es spezielle sogenannte „Organisatoren“. In einer aktuellen Veröffentlichung im Fachjournal Nature Cell Biology berichten Forschende durch welchen Vorgang diese Organisatoren im Gewebe entstehen und wie sie dann die Bildung von Zähnen orchestrieren.

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

11.03.2024 Kinderzahnmedizin Nachrichten

Infolge der Umbenennung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kinderzahnheilkunde in Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kinderzahnmedizin (DGKiZ) wird deren Mitgliederzeitschrift Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde in Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnmedizin umbenannt. Aus diesem Grunde trägt die erste Ausgabe in 2024 erstmalig den neuen Titel.

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.