Correction: BMC Health Serv Res 22, 748 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08075-2
Anzeige
Following publication of the original article [1], some numbers under the heading P4P & COCI in Table 2 needs to be moved from the column Model Aa to the column Model Bb. This problem is caused due to a typesetting error. The correct Table 2 is given below.
Table 2
Adjusted hazard ratios by Cox proportional hazard model for different risk factors of LEA
Covariate | Adjusted HR (95%CI) | Adjusted HR (95% CI) | Adjusted HR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
Model Aa | Model Bb | Model Cc | |
P4P (ref.: non-P4P) | 0.35 (0.29-0.41)* | 0.37 (0.30-0.44)* | |
COCI | 0.08 (0.06-0.10)* | ||
Low COCI (reference) | |||
Middle COCI | 0.49 (0.43-0.55)* | ||
High COCI | 0.23 (0.21-0.27)* | ||
P4P & COCI | |||
non-P4P, low COCI (reference) | |||
non-P4P, middle COCI | 0.68 (0.61-0.76)* | ||
non-P4P, high COCI | 0.26 (0.22-0.31)* | ||
P4P, low COCI | 0.53 (0.44-0.67)* | ||
P4P, middle COCI | 0.30 (0.23-0.38)* | ||
P4P, high COCI | 0.06 (0.04-0.10)* | ||
Gender (ref.: female) | |||
Male | 1.16 (1.04-1.29) ǂ | 1.09 (0.99-1.20) | 1.15 (1.02-1.29)+ |
Age (ref.: 18< yr ≤ 55) | |||
56 ≤ yr ≤ 69 | 0.85 (0.73-1.00)+ | 0.81 (0.70-0.94) ǂ | 0.89 (0.75-1.06) |
yr ≥ 70 | 0.71 (0.60-0.83)* | 0.59 (0.51-0.69)* | 0.73 (0.61-0.87)* |
Diabetes duration (ref.: <5 yr) | |||
5 ≤ duration <10 | 2.06 (1.54-2.76) | 2.29 (1.76-2.98)* | 2.09 (1.52-2.87)* |
duration≥ 10 | 3.91 (2.93-5.20) | 4.35 (3.36-5.63)* | 3.90 (2.85-5.32)* |
CCI score (ref: score=0) | |||
1-2 | 0.55 (0.47-0.64)* | 0.56 (0.48-0.64)* | 0.55 (0.47-0.66)* |
≥ 3 | 0.28 (0.21-0.39)* | 0.31 (0.24-0.41)* | 0.30 (0.21-0.41)* |
DSCI score (ref: score=0) | |||
1-2 | 1.07 (0.89-1.29) | 1.05 (0.89-1.24) | 1.11 (0.91-1.35) |
≥ 3 | 1.77 (1.28-2.45)* | 1.63 (1.21-2.19) ǂ | 1.89 (1.34-2.65)* |
CDD (ref: No) | |||
Yes | 0.72 (0.56-0.93)+ | 0.82 (0.65-1.05) | 0.77 (0.58-1.01) |
Residence (ref.: Rural) | |||
Urban | 0.82 (0.73-0.92)* | 0.81 (0.73-0.91)* | 0.83 (0.73-0.94) ǂ |
Monthly salary/wage (ref.: FP and dependent) | |||
< NTD 20,000 | 0.96 (0.83-1.10) | 0.96 (0.84-1.09) | 1.00 (0.86-1.15) |
≥ NTD 20,000 | 0.85 (0.75-0.97)+ | 0.86 (0.76-0.96) ǂ | 0.91 (0.80-1.04) |
Health care facility level (ref.: Medical center) | |||
Regional hospital | 1.14 (1.00-1.31) | 1.11 (0.98-1.26) | 1.13 (0.98-1.31) |
District hospital | 1.06 (0.92-1.23) | 1.02 (0.89-1.17) | 0.99 (0.83-1.16) |
Community clinic | 0.87 (0.75-1.01) | 0.86 (0.75-0.99) + | 0.89 (0.75-1.05) |
Akaike information criterion | 30,787 | 36,804 | 30,699 |
Schwarz-Bayesian criterion | 30,888 | 36,918 | 30,794 |
In calculating the cut-off points of tertiles for time-weighted average COCI 2010-2013, there was an error made in reporting so that the tertiles of the distribution of the COCI scores and thus the cutoffs should be corrected as follows:
-
“low COCI (< 0.360)” revised to (<0.50);
-
“middle COCI (0.360–0.643)” revised to (0.50-0.80);
-
“high COCI (≥ 0.643)” revised to (≥0.80).
Numbers to be revised are shown in the following 4 sections:
Page 1, Abstract, Results: With the low COCI (<0.50) group as the reference, the aHR of LEA was 0.49 (p < 0.0001) for the middle COCI group, (p < 0.0001), and the aHR of LEA for the high COCI (≥0.80) group was 0.23 (p < 0.0001). | |
Page 3, Line 2: We divided the COCI scores into 3 subgroups based on the tertiles of the distribution for analysis: low (<0.50), middle (0.50-0.80), and high (≥0.80). | |
Page 8, Left column, Line 9-12: With the low COCI (<0.50) group as the reference, the aHR of LEA was 0.49 (p < 0.0001) for the middle COCI group, p < 0.0001, and the aHR of LEA for the high COCI (≥0.80) group was 0.23 (p < 0.0001). | |
Page 8, Right column, Line 4-8 In model B, with low COCI (<0.50) subgroup of non-P4P group as the reference, the aHR of LEA was 0.68 (p < 0.0001) for middle COCI subgroup of non-P4P group, 0.26 (p < 0.0001) for high COCI (≥0.80) … |
Anzeige
The original article [1] has been corrected.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.