Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Cardiovascular Diabetology 1/2017

Open Access 01.12.2017 | Correction

Correction to: Updates on cardiovascular outcome trials in diabetes

verfasst von: Oliver Schnell, Lars Rydén, Eberhard Standl, Antonio Ceriello, on behalf of the D&CVD EASD Study Group

Erschienen in: Cardiovascular Diabetology | Ausgabe 1/2017

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN
Hinweise
The original article can be found online at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12933-017-0610-y.

Correction to: Cardiovasc Diabetol (2017) 16:128 https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12933-017-0610-y

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors submitted a corrected version of Table 4 (see below), as the original version contained a mistake.
Table 4
Comparison of outcome results from terminated CVOTs in comparison to placebo
 
SAVOR-TIMI53 [1, 2]
EXAMINE [3, 4]
TECOS [5]
ELIXA [6]
EMPA-REG OUTCOME [7]
LEADER [8]
Class
HR (95% CI)
Class
HR (95% CI)
Class
HR (95% CI)
Class
HR (95% CI)
Class
HR (95% CI)
Class
HR (95% CI)
p value
p value
p value
p value
p value
p value
Cardiovascular endpoints
 Primary composite MACE
CV death, MI, or stroke
1.00 (0.89–1.12)
0.99
CV death, MI, or stroke
0.96 (≤ 1.16)
0.32
CV death, MI, UA, or stroke
0.98 (0.89–1.08)
0.65
CV death, MI, UA, or stroke
1.02 (0.89–1.17)
0.81
CV death, MI, or stroke
0.86 (0.74–0.99)
0.04a
CV death, MI, or stroke
0.87 (0.78–0.97)
0.01
 Cardiovascular death
Primary endpoint
1.03 (0.87–1.22)
0.72
Primary endpoint
0.79 (0.60–1.04)
0.10
Secondary endpoint
1.03 (0.89–1.19)
0.71
Primary endpoint
0.98 (0.78–1.22)
0.85
Primary endpoint
0.62 (0.49–0.77)
< 0.001
Primary endpoint
0.78 (0.66–0.93)
0.007
 Myocardial infarction
Primary endpoint
0.95 (0.80–1.12)
0.52
Primary endpoint
1.08 (0.88–1.33)
0.47
Secondary endpoint
0.95 (0.81–1.11)
0.49
Primary endpoint
1.03 (0.87–1.22)
0.71
Primary endpoint
0.87 (0.70–1.09)
0.23
Primary endpoint
0.86 (0.73–1.00)
0.046
 Stroke
Primary endpoint
1.11 (0.88–1.39)
0.38
Primary endpoint
0.91 (0.55–1.50)
0.71
Secondary endpoint
0.97 (0.79–1.19)
0.76
Primary endpoint
1.12 (0.79–1.58)
0.54
Primary endpoint
1.18 (0.89–1.56)
0.26
Primary endpoint
0.86 (0.71–1.06)
0.16
 Hospitalization for unstable angina
Secondary endpoint
1.19 (0.89–1.60)
0.24
Secondary endpoint
0.90 (0.60–1.37)
0.632
Secondary endpoint
0.90 (0.70–1.16)
0.42
Primary endpoint
1.11 (0.47–2.62)
0.81
Secondary endpoint
0.99 (0.74–1.34)
0.97
Extended
primary endpoint
0.98 (0.76–1.26)
0.87
 Hospitalization for heart failure
Secondary endpoint
1.27 (1.07–1.51)
0.007
Extended primary endpoint
1.19 (0.90–1.58)
0.220
Secondary endpoint
1.00 (0.83–1.20)
0.98
Secondary endpoint
0.96 (0.75–1.23)
0.75
Secondary endpoint
0.65 (0.50–0.85)
0.002
Extended
primary endpoint
0.87 (0.73–1.05)
0.14
 
Event rate (%) active group
 
Event rate (%) active group
 
Event rate (%) active group
 
Event rate (%) active group
 
Event rate (%) active group
 
Event rate (%) active group
 
 Primary composite MACE
7.3
 
11.3
 
9.6
 
13.4
 
10.5
 
13.0
 
 
No. (%)
p value
 
No. (%)
p value
 
No. (%)
p value
 
No. (%)
p value
 
No. (%)
p value
 
No. (%)
p value
 
Non-cardiovascular endpoints
 Renal event
5.8
0.04
 
0.9
0.88
 
1.4
 
1.6
 
5.2
 
5.7
0.003
 
 Acute pancreatitis
0.3
0.77
 
0.4
0.5
 
0.3
0.07
 
0.2
 
0.3b
 
0.4
0.44
 
 Hypoglycemia events
15.3
< 0.001
 
6.7
0.74
 
2.2
0.33
 
16.6
0.14
 
2.8
 
2.4
0.02
 
 
SUSTAIN 6 [9]
EXSCEL [10]
DEVOTE [11]
CANVAS program [12]
ACE [13]
Class
HR (95% CI)
p value
Class
HR (95% CI)
p value
Class
HR (95% CI)
p value
Class
HR (95% CI)
p value
Class
HR (95% CI)
p value
Cardiovascular endpoints
 Primary composite MACE
CV death, MI, or stroke
0.74 (0.58–0.95)
0.02a
CV death, MI or stroke
0.91 (0.83–1.00)
0.06a
CV death, MI or stroke
0.91 (0.78–1.06)
< 0.001
CV death, MI or stroke
0.86 (0.75–0.97)
0.02a
CV death, MI, stroke, UA and HF
0.98 (0.86–1.11)
0.73
 Cardiovascular death
Primary endpoint
0.98 (0.65–1.48)
0.92
Secondary endpoint
0.88 (0.76–1.02)
Primary endpoint
0.96 (0.76–1.21)
0.71
Primary endpoint
0.87 (0.72–1.06)
Secondary endpoint
0.89 (0.71–1.11)
0.29
 Myocardial infarction
Primary endpoint
0.74 (0.51–1.08)
0.12
Secondary endpoint
0.97 (0.85–1.10)
Primary endpoint
0.85 (0.68–1.06)
0.15
Primary endpoint
0.89 (0.73–1.09)
Secondary endpoint
1.12 (0.87–1.46)
0.38
 Stroke
Primary endpoint
0.61 (0.38–0.99)
0.04
Secondary endpoint
0.85 (0.70–1.03)
Primary endpoint
0.90 (0.65–1.23)
0.50
Primary endpoint
0.87 (0.69–1.09)
Secondary endpoint
0.97 (0.70–1.33)
0.83
 Hospitalization for unstable angina
Extended primary endpoint
0.82 (0.47–1.44)
0.49
Primary endpoint
0.95 (0.68–1.31)
0.74
Secondary endpoint
1.02 (0.82–1.26)
0.87
 Hospitalization for heart failure
Extended primary endpoint
1.11 (0.77–1.61)
0.57
Secondary endpoint
0.94 (0.78–1.13)
Secondary endpoint
0.67 (0.52–0.87)
Secondary endpoint
0.89 (0.63–1.24)
0.48
 
Event rate (%) active group
Event rate (%) active group
Event rate (%) active group
Event rate (%) active group
Event rate (%) active group
 Primary composite MACE
6.6
11.4
8.5
26.9d
14.4
 
No. (%)
p value
No. (%)
p value
No. (%)
p value
No. (%)
p value
No. (%)
p value
Non-cardiovascular endpoints
 Renal event
3.9
55 (0.7)
3.8
19.7d
0.32
 Acute pancreatitis
0.55
26 (0.4)
0.5d
0.63
 Hypoglycemia events
22.4c
247 (3.4)
4.9
< 0.001a
56.0d
0.20
54 (2)
0.95
aSuperiority test
bAverage across all age ranges
cSevere hypoglycaemia as defined by ADA
dNumber of participants per 1000 patient-years
The original article has been corrected.
References
1.
Leiter LA, et al. Efficacy and safety of saxagliptin in older participants in the SAVOR-TIMI 53 trial. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(6):1145–53.
 
2.
Scirica BM, et al. Saxagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(14):1317–26.
 
3.
White WB, et al. Alogliptin after acute coronary syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(14):1327–35.
 
4.
Zannad F, et al. Heart failure and mortality outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes taking alogliptin versus placebo in EXAMINE: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9982):2067–76.
 
5.
Green JB, et al. Effect of sitagliptin on cardiovascular outcomes in Type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(3):232–42.
 
6.
Pfeffer MA, et al. Lixisenatide in patients with Type 2 diabetes and acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(23):2247–57.
 
7.
Zinman B, et al. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in Type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2117–28.
 
8.
Marso SP, et al. Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in Type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(4):311–22
 
9.
Marso SP, et al. Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with Type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(19):1834–44.
 
10.
Holman RR, et al. Effects of once-weekly exenatide on cardiovascular outcomes in Type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(13):1228–39.
 
11.
Marso SP, et al. Efficacy and safety of degludec versus glargine in Type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(8):723–32.
 
12.
Neal B, et al. Canagliflozin and cardiovascular and renal events in Type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(7):644-57.
 
13.
Holman RR, et al. Effects of acarbose on cardiovascular and diabetes outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease and impaired glucose tolerance (ACE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;S2213-8587(17):30309–1.
 

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
Metadaten
Titel
Correction to: Updates on cardiovascular outcome trials in diabetes
verfasst von
Oliver Schnell
Lars Rydén
Eberhard Standl
Antonio Ceriello
on behalf of the D&CVD EASD Study Group
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2017
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
Cardiovascular Diabetology / Ausgabe 1/2017
Elektronische ISSN: 1475-2840
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-017-0633-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Cardiovascular Diabetology 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.