Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 6/2014

01.12.2014 | Original Research

Cost Sharing and Hereditary Cancer Risk: Predictors of Willingness-to-Pay for Genetic Testing

verfasst von: Jennifer M. Matro, Karen J. Ruth, Yu-Ning Wong, Katen C. McCully, Christina M. Rybak, Neal J. Meropol, Michael J. Hall

Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Ausgabe 6/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Increasing use of predictive genetic testing to gauge hereditary cancer risk has been paralleled by rising cost-sharing practices. Little is known about how demographic and psychosocial factors may influence individuals’ willingness-to-pay for genetic testing. The Gastrointestinal Tumor Risk Assessment Program Registry includes individuals presenting for genetic risk assessment based on personal/family cancer history. Participants complete a baseline survey assessing cancer history and psychosocial items. Willingness-to-pay items include intention for: genetic testing only if paid by insurance; testing with self-pay; and amount willing-to-pay ($25–$2,000). Multivariable models examined predictors of willingness-to-pay out-of-pocket (versus only if paid by insurance) and willingness-to-pay a smaller versus larger sum (≤$200 vs. ≥$500). All statistical tests are two-sided (α = 0.05). Of 385 evaluable participants, a minority (42 %) had a personal cancer history, while 56 % had ≥1 first-degree relative with colorectal cancer. Overall, 21.3 % were willing to have testing only if paid by insurance, and 78.7 % were willing-to-pay. Predictors of willingness-to-pay were: 1) concern for positive result; 2) confidence to control cancer risk; 3) fewer perceived barriers to colorectal cancer screening; 4) benefit of testing to guide screening (all p < 0.05). Subjects willing-to-pay a higher amount were male, more educated, had greater cancer worry, fewer relatives with colorectal cancer, and more positive attitudes toward genetic testing (all p < 0.05). Individuals seeking risk assessment are willing-to-pay out-of-pocket for genetic testing, and anticipate benefits to reducing cancer risk. Identifying factors associated with willingness-to-pay for genetic services is increasingly important as testing is integrated into routine cancer care.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Andersen, R. M. (1995). Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1–10. Andersen, R. M. (1995). Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1–10.
Zurück zum Zitat Andersen, M. R., Smith, R., Meischke, H., Bowen, D., & Urban, N. (2003). Breast cancer worry and mammography use by women with and without a family history in a population-based sample. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 12(4), 314–320. Andersen, M. R., Smith, R., Meischke, H., Bowen, D., & Urban, N. (2003). Breast cancer worry and mammography use by women with and without a family history in a population-based sample. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 12(4), 314–320.
Zurück zum Zitat Antoniou, A., Pharoah, P., Narod, S., Risch, H. A., Eyfjord, J. E., Hopper, J., & Borg, Å. (2003). Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with <i> BRCA1</i> or <i> BRCA2</i> mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 72(5), 1117–1130.CrossRef Antoniou, A., Pharoah, P., Narod, S., Risch, H. A., Eyfjord, J. E., Hopper, J., & Borg, Å. (2003). Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with <i> BRCA1</i> or <i> BRCA2</i> mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 72(5), 1117–1130.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Azjen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. K. J. Beckman (Ed.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Heidelberg: Springer. Azjen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. K. J. Beckman (Ed.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Heidelberg: Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Bosompra, K., Flynn, B. S., Ashikaga, T., Rairikar, C. J., Worden, J. K., & Solomon, L. J. (2000). Likelihood of undergoing genetic testing for cancer risk: a population-based study. Preventive Medicine, 30(2), 155–166.PubMedCrossRef Bosompra, K., Flynn, B. S., Ashikaga, T., Rairikar, C. J., Worden, J. K., & Solomon, L. J. (2000). Likelihood of undergoing genetic testing for cancer risk: a population-based study. Preventive Medicine, 30(2), 155–166.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bosompra, K., Ashikaga, T., Flynn, B. S., Worden, J. K., & Solomon, L. J. (2001). Psychosocial factors associated with the public’s willingness to pay for genetic testing for cancer risk: a structural equations model. Health Education Research, 16(2), 157–172.PubMedCrossRef Bosompra, K., Ashikaga, T., Flynn, B. S., Worden, J. K., & Solomon, L. J. (2001). Psychosocial factors associated with the public’s willingness to pay for genetic testing for cancer risk: a structural equations model. Health Education Research, 16(2), 157–172.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bottorff, J. L., Ratner, P. A., Balneaves, L. G., Richardson, C. G., McCullum, M., Hack, T., & Buxton, J. (2002). Women’s interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk the influence of sociodemographics and knowledge. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 11(1), 89–95. Bottorff, J. L., Ratner, P. A., Balneaves, L. G., Richardson, C. G., McCullum, M., Hack, T., & Buxton, J. (2002). Women’s interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk the influence of sociodemographics and knowledge. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 11(1), 89–95.
Zurück zum Zitat Burak, L. J., & Meyer, M. (1997). Using the health belief model to examine and predict college women’s cervical cancer screening beliefs and behavior. Health Care for Women International, 18(3), 251–262.PubMedCrossRef Burak, L. J., & Meyer, M. (1997). Using the health belief model to examine and predict college women’s cervical cancer screening beliefs and behavior. Health Care for Women International, 18(3), 251–262.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Burn, J., Gerdes, A.-M., Macrae, F., Mecklin, J.-P., Moeslein, G., Olschwang, S., . . . Bertario, L. (2011). Long-term effect of aspirin on cancer risk in carriers of hereditary colorectal cancer: an analysis from the CAPP2 randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. Burn, J., Gerdes, A.-M., Macrae, F., Mecklin, J.-P., Moeslein, G., Olschwang, S., . . . Bertario, L. (2011). Long-term effect of aspirin on cancer risk in carriers of hereditary colorectal cancer: an analysis from the CAPP2 randomised controlled trial. The Lancet.
Zurück zum Zitat Chaliki, H., Loader, S., Levenkron, J. C., Logan-Young, W., Hall, W. J., & Rowley, P. (1995). Women’s receptivity to testing for a genetic susceptibility to breast cancer. American Journal of Public Health, 85(8_Pt_1), 1133–1135.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Chaliki, H., Loader, S., Levenkron, J. C., Logan-Young, W., Hall, W. J., & Rowley, P. (1995). Women’s receptivity to testing for a genetic susceptibility to breast cancer. American Journal of Public Health, 85(8_Pt_1), 1133–1135.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chikhaoui, Y., Gélinas, H., Joseph, L., & Lance, J.-M. (2002). Cost-minimization analysis of genetic testing versus clinical screening of at-risk relatives for familial adenomatous polyposis. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 18(1), 67–80.PubMed Chikhaoui, Y., Gélinas, H., Joseph, L., & Lance, J.-M. (2002). Cost-minimization analysis of genetic testing versus clinical screening of at-risk relatives for familial adenomatous polyposis. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 18(1), 67–80.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Finlay, E., Stopfer, J. E., Burlingame, E., Evans, K. G., Nathanson, K. L., Weber, B. L., & Domchek, S. M. (2008). Factors determining dissemination of results and uptake of genetic testing in families with known BRCA1/2 mutations. Genetic Testing, 12(1), 81–91.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Finlay, E., Stopfer, J. E., Burlingame, E., Evans, K. G., Nathanson, K. L., Weber, B. L., & Domchek, S. M. (2008). Factors determining dissemination of results and uptake of genetic testing in families with known BRCA1/2 mutations. Genetic Testing, 12(1), 81–91.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Graves, K., Peshkin, B., Luta, G., Tuong, W., & Schwartz, M. (2011). Interest in genetic testing for modest changes in breast cancer risk: implications for SNP testing. Public Health Genomics, 14(3), 178–189.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Graves, K., Peshkin, B., Luta, G., Tuong, W., & Schwartz, M. (2011). Interest in genetic testing for modest changes in breast cancer risk: implications for SNP testing. Public Health Genomics, 14(3), 178–189.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gudgeon, J. M., Williams, J. L., Burt, R. W., Samowitz, W. S., Snow, G. L., & Williams, M. S. (2011). Lynch syndrome screening implementation: business analysis by a healthcare system. The American Journal of Managed Care, 17(8), e288–e300.PubMed Gudgeon, J. M., Williams, J. L., Burt, R. W., Samowitz, W. S., Snow, G. L., & Williams, M. S. (2011). Lynch syndrome screening implementation: business analysis by a healthcare system. The American Journal of Managed Care, 17(8), e288–e300.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Hudson, K. L., Murphy, J. A., Kaufman, D. J., Javitt, G. H., Katsanis, S. H., & Scott, J. (2006). Oversight of US genetic testing laboratories. Nature Biotechnology, 24(9), 1083–1090.PubMedCrossRef Hudson, K. L., Murphy, J. A., Kaufman, D. J., Javitt, G. H., Katsanis, S. H., & Scott, J. (2006). Oversight of US genetic testing laboratories. Nature Biotechnology, 24(9), 1083–1090.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobsen, P. B., Valdimarsdottier, H., Brown, K. L., & Offit, K. (1997). Decision-making about genetic testing among women at familial risk for breast cancer. Psychosomatic Medicine, 59(5), 459–466.PubMedCrossRef Jacobsen, P. B., Valdimarsdottier, H., Brown, K. L., & Offit, K. (1997). Decision-making about genetic testing among women at familial risk for breast cancer. Psychosomatic Medicine, 59(5), 459–466.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Järvinen, H. J., Renkonen-Sinisalo, L., Aktán-Collán, K., Peltomäki, P., Aaltonen, L. A., & Mecklin, J.-P. (2009). Ten years after mutation testing for Lynch syndrome: cancer incidence and outcome in mutation-positive and mutation-negative family members. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27(28), 4793–4797.PubMedCrossRef Järvinen, H. J., Renkonen-Sinisalo, L., Aktán-Collán, K., Peltomäki, P., Aaltonen, L. A., & Mecklin, J.-P. (2009). Ten years after mutation testing for Lynch syndrome: cancer incidence and outcome in mutation-positive and mutation-negative family members. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27(28), 4793–4797.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat King, M.-C., Marks, J. H., & Mandell, J. B. (2003). Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science, 302(5645), 643–646.PubMedCrossRef King, M.-C., Marks, J. H., & Mandell, J. B. (2003). Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science, 302(5645), 643–646.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lerman, C., Daly, M., Masny, A., & Balshem, A. (1994). Attitudes about genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 12(4), 843–850.PubMed Lerman, C., Daly, M., Masny, A., & Balshem, A. (1994). Attitudes about genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 12(4), 843–850.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Lerman, C., Seay, J., Balshem, A., & Audrain, J. (1995). Interest in genetic testing among first-degree relatives of breast cancer patients. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 57(3), 385–392.PubMedCrossRef Lerman, C., Seay, J., Balshem, A., & Audrain, J. (1995). Interest in genetic testing among first-degree relatives of breast cancer patients. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 57(3), 385–392.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lerman, C., Schwartz, M. D., Miller, S. M., Daly, M., Sands, C., & Rimer, B. K. (1996). A randomized trial of breast cancer risk counseling: Interacting effects of counseling, educational level, and coping style. Health Psychology, 15(2), 75.PubMedCrossRef Lerman, C., Schwartz, M. D., Miller, S. M., Daly, M., Sands, C., & Rimer, B. K. (1996). A randomized trial of breast cancer risk counseling: Interacting effects of counseling, educational level, and coping style. Health Psychology, 15(2), 75.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lerman, C., Kerner, J., Gomez-Caminero, A., Hughes, C., Reed, M. M., Biesecker, B., & Benkendorf, J. L. (1997). Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 89(2), 148–157.PubMedCrossRef Lerman, C., Kerner, J., Gomez-Caminero, A., Hughes, C., Reed, M. M., Biesecker, B., & Benkendorf, J. L. (1997). Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 89(2), 148–157.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Leventhal, H. (1970). Findings and theory in the study of fear communications. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 119–186.CrossRef Leventhal, H. (1970). Findings and theory in the study of fear communications. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 119–186.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Leventhal, H., Safer, M. A., & Panagis, D. M. (1983). The impact of communications on the self-regulation of health beliefs, decisions, and behavior. Health Education & Behavior, 10(1), 3–29.CrossRef Leventhal, H., Safer, M. A., & Panagis, D. M. (1983). The impact of communications on the self-regulation of health beliefs, decisions, and behavior. Health Education & Behavior, 10(1), 3–29.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mavaddat, N., Peock, S., Frost, D., Ellis, S., Platte, R., Fineberg, E., & Easton, D. F. (2013). Cancer risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from prospective analysis of EMBRACE. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 105(11), 812–822. doi:10.1093/jnci/djt095.PubMedCrossRef Mavaddat, N., Peock, S., Frost, D., Ellis, S., Platte, R., Fineberg, E., & Easton, D. F. (2013). Cancer risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from prospective analysis of EMBRACE. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 105(11), 812–822. doi:10.​1093/​jnci/​djt095.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mecklin, J. P., Aarnio, M., Läärä, E., Kairaluoma, M. V., Pylvänäinen, K., Peltomäki, P., & Järvinen, H. J. (2007). Development of colorectal tumors in colonoscopic surveillance in Lynch syndrome. Gastroenterology, 133(4), 1093–1098.PubMedCrossRef Mecklin, J. P., Aarnio, M., Läärä, E., Kairaluoma, M. V., Pylvänäinen, K., Peltomäki, P., & Järvinen, H. J. (2007). Development of colorectal tumors in colonoscopic surveillance in Lynch syndrome. Gastroenterology, 133(4), 1093–1098.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Miller, A. M., & Champion, V. L. (1997). Attitudes about breast cancer and mammography: racial, income, and educational differences. Women & Health, 26(1), 41–63.CrossRef Miller, A. M., & Champion, V. L. (1997). Attitudes about breast cancer and mammography: racial, income, and educational differences. Women & Health, 26(1), 41–63.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Patenaude, A. F., Dorval, M., DiGianni, L. S., Schneider, K. A., Chittenden, A., & Garber, J. E. (2006). Sharing BRCA1/2 test results with first-degree relatives: factors predicting who women tell. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 24(4), 700–706.PubMedCrossRef Patenaude, A. F., Dorval, M., DiGianni, L. S., Schneider, K. A., Chittenden, A., & Garber, J. E. (2006). Sharing BRCA1/2 test results with first-degree relatives: factors predicting who women tell. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 24(4), 700–706.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Powell, A., Chandrasekharan, S., & Cook-Deegan, R. (2010). Spinocerebellar ataxia: patient and health professional perspectives on whether and how patents affect access to clinical genetic testing. Genetics in Medicine, 12, S83–S110.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Powell, A., Chandrasekharan, S., & Cook-Deegan, R. (2010). Spinocerebellar ataxia: patient and health professional perspectives on whether and how patents affect access to clinical genetic testing. Genetics in Medicine, 12, S83–S110.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenstock, I. (1990). The health belief model: explaining health behavior through expectancies. In F. Lewis, K. Glanz, & B. K. Rimer (Eds.), Health behavior and health education theory research and practice (pp. 39–61). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Rosenstock, I. (1990). The health belief model: explaining health behavior through expectancies. In F. Lewis, K. Glanz, & B. K. Rimer (Eds.), Health behavior and health education theory research and practice (pp. 39–61). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwartz, M. D., Lerman, C., Miller, S. M., Daly, M., & Masny, A. (1995). Coping disposition, perceived risk, and psychological distress among women at increased risk for ovarian cancer. Health Psychology, 14(3), 232.PubMedCrossRef Schwartz, M. D., Lerman, C., Miller, S. M., Daly, M., & Masny, A. (1995). Coping disposition, perceived risk, and psychological distress among women at increased risk for ovarian cancer. Health Psychology, 14(3), 232.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Thomas, R., & Clarke, V. (1998). Colorectal cancer: a survey of community beliefs and behaviours in Victoria. The Medical Journal of Australia, 169(1), 37.PubMed Thomas, R., & Clarke, V. (1998). Colorectal cancer: a survey of community beliefs and behaviours in Victoria. The Medical Journal of Australia, 169(1), 37.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Urban, N., Anderson, G., & Peacock, S. (1994). Mammography screening: how important is cost as a barrier to use? American Journal of Public Health, 84(1), 50–55.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Urban, N., Anderson, G., & Peacock, S. (1994). Mammography screening: how important is cost as a barrier to use? American Journal of Public Health, 84(1), 50–55.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vernon, S. W. (1997). Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 89(19), 1406–1422.PubMedCrossRef Vernon, S. W. (1997). Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 89(19), 1406–1422.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, G., Kuppermann, M., Kim, B., Phillips, K. A., & Ladabaum, U. (2012a). Influence of patient preferences on the cost-effectiveness of screening for lynch syndrome. Journal of Oncology Practice, 8(3S), e24s–e30s.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Wang, G., Kuppermann, M., Kim, B., Phillips, K. A., & Ladabaum, U. (2012a). Influence of patient preferences on the cost-effectiveness of screening for lynch syndrome. Journal of Oncology Practice, 8(3S), e24s–e30s.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, V. W., Koh, P. K., Chow, W. L., & Lim, J. F. Y. (2012b). Predictive genetic testing of first degree relatives of mutation carriers is a cost-effective strategy in preventing hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer in Singapore. Familial Cancer, 11(2), 279–289.PubMedCrossRef Wang, V. W., Koh, P. K., Chow, W. L., & Lim, J. F. Y. (2012b). Predictive genetic testing of first degree relatives of mutation carriers is a cost-effective strategy in preventing hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer in Singapore. Familial Cancer, 11(2), 279–289.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wiseman, M., Dancyger, C., & Michie, S. (2010). Communicating genetic risk information within families: a review. Familial Cancer, 9(4), 691–703.PubMedCrossRef Wiseman, M., Dancyger, C., & Michie, S. (2010). Communicating genetic risk information within families: a review. Familial Cancer, 9(4), 691–703.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wong, Y.-N., Hamilton, O., Egleston, B., Salador, K., Murphy, C., & Meropol, N. J. (2010). Understanding how out-of-pocket expenses, treatment value, and patient characteristics influence treatment choices. The Oncologist, 15(6), 566–576.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Wong, Y.-N., Hamilton, O., Egleston, B., Salador, K., Murphy, C., & Meropol, N. J. (2010). Understanding how out-of-pocket expenses, treatment value, and patient characteristics influence treatment choices. The Oncologist, 15(6), 566–576.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yang, K. Y., Caughey, A. B., Little, S. E., Cheung, M. K., & Chen, L.-M. (2011). A cost-effectiveness analysis of prophylactic surgery versus gynecologic surveillance for women from hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) Families. Familial Cancer, 10(3), 535–543.PubMedCrossRef Yang, K. Y., Caughey, A. B., Little, S. E., Cheung, M. K., & Chen, L.-M. (2011). A cost-effectiveness analysis of prophylactic surgery versus gynecologic surveillance for women from hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) Families. Familial Cancer, 10(3), 535–543.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Cost Sharing and Hereditary Cancer Risk: Predictors of Willingness-to-Pay for Genetic Testing
verfasst von
Jennifer M. Matro
Karen J. Ruth
Yu-Ning Wong
Katen C. McCully
Christina M. Rybak
Neal J. Meropol
Michael J. Hall
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Ausgabe 6/2014
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-014-9724-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2014

Journal of Genetic Counseling 6/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.