Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Colorectal Cancer Reports
Erschienen in: Current Colorectal Cancer Reports 1/2017

18.01.2017 | Surgery and Surgical Innovations in Colorectal Cancer (S Huerta, Section Editor)

Current Status of Laparoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Cancer

verfasst von: Marta Pascual, Marta Jiménez-Toscano, Miguel Pera

Erschienen in: Current Colorectal Cancer Reports | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

We present a review of current status of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of colorectal cancer. We discuss recent controversies and describe the results of latest minimally invasive techniques and technological innovations.

Recent Findings

Despite recent studies questioning the quality of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision, the long-term data currently available continue to support the use of laparoscopy for the treatment of rectal cancer. Laparoscopy can also achieve a complete oncologic resection of T4 colon cancer similar to open surgery in selected patients. However, the evidence for laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision is still limited. Regarding latest techniques, single-incision laparoscopic surgery is not superior to multiport laparoscopy. Robotic surgery provides several technical advantages and short-term benefits. However, cost-effectiveness has not been demonstrated. Transanal total mesorectal excision is a promising technique for distal mesorectal dissection with acceptable short-term patient outcomes.

Summary

The oncological safety of laparoscopic excision of colorectal cancer has been widely demonstrated. The critical review of the results obtained with latest techniques will determine which of them will remain as part of the surgical approach in the treatment of colorectal cancer.
Literatur
1.
2.
Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991;1(3):144–50.PubMed
3.
Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Lacy AM, Castells A, et al. Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2007;142(3):298–303.PubMedCrossRef
4.
• Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365(9472):1718–26. Randomized controlled trial including not only colon but also rectal cancer with worrisome results.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Ng SS, et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet. 2004;363(9416):1187–92.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(7):477–84.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Pascual M, Salvans S, Pera M. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: current satus and implementation of the latest technological innovations. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:704–17.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
Simorov A, Shaligram A, Shostrom V, Boilesen E, Thompson J, Oleynikov D. Laparoscopic colon resection trends in utilization and rate of conversion to open procedure: a national database review of academic medical centers. Ann Surg. 2012;256(3):462–8.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Berends FJ, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Lange JF. Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic colectomy. Lancet. 1994;344(8914):58.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Lacy AM, Delgado S, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Castells A, Pique JM, Grande L, et al. Port site metastases and recurrence after laparoscopic colectomy. A randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 1998;12(8):1039–42.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Martinez J, Targarona EM, Balague C, Pera M, Trias M. Port site metastasis. An unresolved problem in laparoscopic surgery. A review. Int Surg. 1995;80(4):315–21.PubMed
12.
Vukasin P, Ortega AE, Greene FL, Steele GD, Simons AJ, Anthone GJ, et al. Wound recurrence following laparoscopic colon cancer resection. Results of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Laparoscopic Registry. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(10 Suppl):S20–3.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study G. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(20):2050–9.CrossRef
14.
Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study G, Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, et al. Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(1):44–52.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Hazebroek EJ, Color SG. COLOR: a randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(6):949–53.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Jacob BP, Salky B. Laparoscopic colectomy for colon adenocarcinoma: an 11-year retrospective review with 5-year survival rates. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(5):643–9.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Nakamura T, Mitomi H, Ohtani Y, Kokuba Y, Sato T, Ozawa H, et al. Comparison of long-term outcome of laparoscopic and conventional surgery for advanced colon and rectosigmoid cancer. Hepato-Gastroenterology. 2006;53(69):351–3.PubMed
18.
Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359(9325):2224–9.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, Sargent D, Schroeder G, Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study G. Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2002;287(3):321–8.PubMedCrossRef
20.
21.
Luján J, Valero G, Hernandez Q, Sanchez A, Frutos MD, Parrilla P. Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2009;96(9):982–9.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Listorti C, Cavaliere D, Avenia N, Gulla N, et al. Laparoscopic vs open resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Color Dis. 2012;14(6):e277–96.CrossRef
23.
Chen H, Zhao L, An S, Wu J, Zou Z, Liu H, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(3):617–26.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Ng SS, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Li JC, Hon SS, Mak TW, et al. Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of 3 randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg. 2014;259(1):139–47.PubMedCrossRef
25.
• Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, et al. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(14):1324–32. Large multicenter RCT including only rectal cancer patients. Short-term benefits with comparable oncological results.PubMedCrossRef
26.
•• Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ, Boller AM, George V, Abbas M, et al. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(13):1346–55. Recent multicenter RCT of pathologic outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. Laparoscopy failed to meet non-inferiority.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
• Stevenson AR, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW, Hewett P, Clouston AD, Gebski VJ, et al. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the ALaCaRT randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(13):1356–63. Another recent multicenter RCT of pathologic outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. Laparoscopy again failed to meet non-inferiority.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Ludwig AD, Fichera A. Laparoscopy for rectal cancer: is the story settled? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2016;26(4):302–4.CrossRef
29.
Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ. Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97(11):1638–45.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, Papadopoulos T, Merkel S. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation--technical notes and outcome. Color Dis. 2009;11(4):354–64. discussion 64–5.CrossRef
31.
Sondenaa K, Quirke P, Hohenberger W, Sugihara K, Kobayashi H, Kessler H, et al. The rationale behind complete mesocolic excision (CME) and a central vascular ligation for colon cancer in open and laparoscopic surgery : proceedings of a consensus conference. Int J Color Dis. 2014;29(4):419–28.CrossRef
32.
• Kontovounisios C, Kinross J, Tan E, Brown G, Rasheed S, Tekkis P. Complete mesocolic excision in colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Color Dis. 2015;17:7–16. Comprehensive systematic review on complete mesocolic excision. Long-term survival benefit has not been proved.CrossRef
33.
Fernandez-Cebrian JM, Gil Yonte P, Jimenez-Toscano M, Vega L, Ochando F. Laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon carcinoma: a surgical challenge but oncologically feasible. Color Dis. 2013;15(2):e79–83.CrossRef
34.
Kim CW, Kim CH, Baik SH. Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(4):816–30.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Lorenzon L, La Torre M, Ziparo V, Montebelli F, Mercantini P, Balducci G, et al. Evidence based medicine and surgical approaches for colon cancer: evidences, benefits and limitations of the laparoscopic vs open resection. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(13):3680–92.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
Siani LM, Garulli G. Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation in right colon cancer: a comprehensive review. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;8(2):106–14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
Bertelsen CA, Neuenschwander AU, Jansen JE, Kirkegaard-Klitbo A, Tenma JR, Wilhelmsen M, et al. Short-term outcomes after complete mesocolic excision compared with ‘conventional’ colonic cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2016;103(5):581–9.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, Rosso S, Coebergh JW, Comber H, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(6):1374–403.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Bretagnol F, Dedieu A, Zappa M, Guedj N, Ferron M, Panis Y. T4 colorectal cancer: is laparoscopic resection contraindicated? Color Dis. 2011;13(2):138–43.CrossRef
40.
Nakafusa Y, Tanaka T, Tanaka M, Kitajima Y, Sato S, Miyazaki K. Comparison of multivisceral resection and standard operation for locally advanced colorectal cancer: analysis of prognostic factors for short-term and long-term outcome. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(12):2055–63.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Ng DC, Co CS, Cheung HY, Chung CC, Li MK. The outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection in T4 cancer. Color Dis. 2011;13(10):e349–52.CrossRef
42.
Curley SA, Carlson GW, Shumate CR, Wishnow KI, Ames FC. Extended resection for locally advanced colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg. 1992;163(6):553–9.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zerey M, Hawver LM, Awad Z, Stefanidis D, Richardson W, Fanelli RD, et al. SAGES evidence-based guidelines for the laparoscopic resection of curable colon and rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(1):1–10.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Govindarajan A, Fraser N, Cranford V, Wirtzfeld D, Gallinger S, Law CH, et al. Predictors of multivisceral resection in patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(7):1923–30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
45.
Huh JW, Kim HR. The feasibility of laparoscopic resection compared to open surgery in clinically suspected T4 colorectal cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2012;22(5):463–7.CrossRef
46.
Kim KY, Hwang DW, Park YK, Lee HS. A single surgeon’s experience with 54 consecutive cases of multivisceral resection for locally advanced primary colorectal cancer: can the laparoscopic approach be performed safely? Surg Endosc. 2012;26(2):493–500.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Vignali A, Ghirardelli L, Di Palo S, Orsenigo E, Staudacher C. Laparoscopic treatment of advanced colonic cancer: a case-matched control with open surgery. Color Dis. 2013;15(8):944–8.CrossRef
48.
Shukla PJ, Trencheva K, Merchant C, Maggiori L, Michelassi F, Sonoda T, et al. Laparoscopic resection of T4 colon cancers: is it feasible? Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58(1):25–31.PubMedCrossRef
49.
de’Angelis N, Vitali GC, Brunetti F, Wassmer CH, Gagniere C, Puppa G, et al. Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for T4 colon cancer a propensity score analysis. Int J Color Dis. 2016;31:1785–97.CrossRef
50.
•• Elnahas A, Sunil S, Jackson TD, Okrainec A, Quereshy FA. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for T4 colon cancer: evaluation of margin status. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(4):1491–6. This paper evaluated the surgical margin as an indicator of high quality procedure comparing open and laparoscopic approach. The rates of positive margins were comparable.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Chang GJ, Kaiser AM, Mills S, Rafferty JF, Buie WD, Standards Practice Task Force of the American Society of C, et al. Practice parameters for the management of colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(8):831–43.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Engstrom PF, Arnoletti JP, Benson 3rd AB, Chen YJ, Choti MA, Cooper HS, et al. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: colon cancer. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2011;9(10):1238–90.
53.
Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I. One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1997;84(5):695.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Pelosi MA, Pelosi 3rd MA. Laparoscopic appendectomy using a single umbilical puncture (minilaparoscopy). J Reprod Med. 1992;37(7):588–94.PubMed
55.
Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P. Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Int J Color Dis. 2008;23(10):1013–6.CrossRef
56.
Remzi FH, Kirat HT, Kaouk JH, Geisler DP. Single-port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. Color Dis. 2008;10(8):823–6.CrossRef
57.
Chew MH, Wong MT, Lim BY, Ng KH, Eu KW. Evaluation of current devices in single-incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a preliminary experience in 32 consecutive cases. World J Surg. 2011;35(4):873–80.PubMedCrossRef
58.
Dhumane PW, Diana M, Leroy J, Marescaux J. Minimally invasive single-site surgery for the digestive system: a technological review. J Minimal Access Surg. 2011;7(1):40–51.
59.
Chambers WM, Bicsak M, Lamparelli M, Dixon AR. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) in complex colorectal surgery: a technique offering potential and not just cosmesis. Color Dis. 2011;13(4):393–8.CrossRef
60.
Ramos-Valadez DI, Patel CB, Ragupathi M, Bartley Pickron T, Haas EM. Single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: safety and feasibility in a series of consecutive cases. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(10):2613–6.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Chew MH, Chang MH, Tan WS, Wong MT, Tang CL. Conventional laparoscopic versus single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a case cohort comparison of short-term outcomes in 144 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(2):471–7.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Gaujoux S, Maggiori L, Bretagnol F, Ferron M, Panis Y. Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of single port access colorectal surgery: a single institutional case-matched study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(3):629–34.PubMedCrossRef
63.
Ramos-Valadez DI, Ragupathi M, Nieto J, Patel CB, Miller S, Pickron TB, et al. Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: a case-matched series. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(1):96–102.PubMedCrossRef
64.
Daher R, Chouillard E, Panis Y. New trends in colorectal surgery: single port and natural orifice techniques. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(48):18104–20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
65.
Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, Mereu A, Binda B, Brachini G, et al. Standard laparoscopic versus single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: early results of a randomized prospective study. Am J Surg. 2012;204(1):115–20.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Poon JT, Cheung CW, Fan JK, Lo OS, Law WL. Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy for colonic neoplasm: a randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(10):2729–34.PubMedCrossRef
67.
Fung AK, Aly EH. Systematic review of single-incision laparoscopic colonic surgery. Br J Surg. 2012;99(10):1353–64.PubMedCrossRef
68.
Maggiori L, Gaujoux S, Tribillon E, Bretagnol F, Panis Y. Single-incision laparoscopy for colorectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of more than a thousand procedures. Color Dis. 2012;14(10):e643–54.CrossRef
69.
Yang TX, Chua TC. Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy versus conventional multiport laparoscopic colectomy: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Int J Color Dis. 2013;28(1):89–101.CrossRef
70.
Zhou YM, Wu LP, Zhao YF, Xu DH, Li B. Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopy for colorectal disease: a meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57(8):2103–12.PubMedCrossRef
71.
•• Podda M, Saba A, Porru F, Pisanu A. Systematic review with meta-analysis of studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic colectomy and multiport laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2016. The most comprehensive review published about SILS and multiport colectomy.
72.
•• Watanabe J, Ota M, Fujii S, Suwa H, Ishibe A, Endo I. Randomized clinical trial of single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic colectomy. Br J Surg. 2016;103(10):1276–81. Recent RCT showing that SILS is not superior to multiport laparoscopy.PubMedCrossRef
73.•
Aly EH. Robotic colorectal surgery: summary of the current evidence. Int J Color Dis. 2014;29(1):1–8. A comprehensive review of current evidences of robotic surgery in colorectal cancer.CrossRef
74.
Halabi WJ, Kang CY, Jafari MD, Nguyen VQ, Carmichael JC, Mills S, et al. Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the United States: a nationwide analysis of trends and outcomes. World J Surg. 2013;37(12):2782–90.PubMedCrossRef
75.
Melich G, Hong YK, Kim J, Hur H, Baik SH, Kim NK, et al. Simultaneous development of laparoscopy and robotics provides acceptable perioperative outcomes and shows robotics to have a faster learning curve and to be overall faster in rectal cancer surgery: analysis of novice MIS surgeon learning curves. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(3):558–68.PubMedCrossRef
76.
Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A, Ballantyne GH. Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(12):1689–94. discussion 95–6.PubMedCrossRef
77.
Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JD, Ballantyne GH, Paz IB. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(10):1521–5.PubMedCrossRef
78.
Mirnezami AH, Mirnezami R, Venkatasubramaniam AK, Chandrakumaran K, Cecil TD, Moran BJ. Robotic colorectal surgery: hype or new hope? A systematic review of robotics in colorectal surgery. Color Dis. 2010;12(11):1084–93.CrossRef
79.
Scarpinata R, Aly EH. Does robotic rectal cancer surgery offer improved early postoperative outcomes? Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(2):253–62.PubMedCrossRef
80.
•• Kim CW, Baik SH, Roh YH, Kang J, Hur H, Min BS, et al. Cost-effectiveness of robotic surgery for rectal cancer focusing on short-term outcomes: a propensity score-matching analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(22):e823. A complete economic study which includes not only the intraoperative cost but the short term and hospitalization ones.CrossRef
81.
Liao G, Zhao Z, Lin S, Li R, Yuan Y, Du S, et al. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials. World J Surg Oncol. 2014;12:122.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
82.
• Yang Y, Wang F, Zhang P, Shi C, Zou Y, Qin H, et al. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease, focusing on rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(12):3727–36. Meta-analysis on short-term outcomes and oncological accuracy of robotic surgery for rectal cancer.PubMedCrossRef
83.
•• Zhang X, Wei Z, Bie M, Peng X, Chen C. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2016. This is the most recent and complete meta-analysis comparing the robotic procedures and the gold standard laparoscopic one.
84.
D’Annibale A, Pernazza G, Morpurgo E, Monsellato I, Pende V, Lucandri G, et al. Robotic right colon resection: evaluation of first 50 consecutive cases for malignant disease. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(11):2856–62.PubMedCrossRef
85.
Park JS, Choi GS, Park SY, Kim HJ, Ryuk JP. Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy. Br J Surg. 2012;99(9):1219–26.PubMedCrossRef
86.
Hara M, Sng K, Yoo BE, Shin JW, Lee DW, Kim SH. Robotic-assisted surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma: short-term and midterm outcomes from 200 consecutive cases at a single institution. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57(5):570–7.PubMedCrossRef
87.
•• Pigazzi A. Results of robotic vs laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: ROLARR study. American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Annual Scientific Meeting. 2015(June 1st, Boston MA). The ROLARR trial is the only international randomized trial to date.
88.
Park EJ, Cho MS, Baek SJ, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, et al. Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg. 2015;261(1):129–37.PubMedCrossRef
89.
• Speicher PJ, Englum BR, Ganapathi AM, Nussbaum DP, Mantyh CR, Migaly J. Robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a national perspective on short-term oncologic outcomes. Ann Surg. 2015;262(6):1040–5. This manuscript evaluate the largest serie today with short-term oncological results.PubMedCrossRef
90.
Barnajian M, Pettet 3rd D, Kazi E, Foppa C, Bergamaschi R. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases. Color Dis. 2014;16(8):603–9.CrossRef
91.
Cho MS, Baek SJ, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, Lee KY, et al. Short and long-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a case-matched retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(11):e522.CrossRef
92.
Broholm M, Pommergaard HC, Gogenur I. Possible benefits of robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery regarding urological and sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Color Dis. 2015;17(5):375–81.CrossRef
93.
Kim JY, Kim NK, Lee KY, Hur H, Min BS, Kim JH. A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(8):2485–93.PubMedCrossRef
94.
Leong QM, Son DN, Cho JS, Baek SJ, Kwak JM, Amar AH, et al. Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: technique and short-term outcome for 29 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(9):2987–92.PubMedCrossRef
95.
Ramji KM, Cleghorn MC, Josse JM, MacNeill A, O’Brien C, Urbach D, et al. Comparison of clinical and economic outcomes between robotic, laparoscopic, and open rectal cancer surgery: early experience at a tertiary care center. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(4):1337–43.PubMedCrossRef
96.
Baek SJ, Kim SH, Cho JS, Shin JW, Kim J. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a cost analysis from a single institute in Korea. World J Surg. 2012;36(11):2722–9.PubMedCrossRef
97.
Baek JH, Pastor C, Pigazzi A. Robotic and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(2):521–5.PubMedCrossRef
98.
Montroni I, Wexner SD. Robotic colorectal cancer surgery: are data supporting the desire to innovate? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42(8):1085–7.PubMedCrossRef
99.
Auyang ED, Santos BF, Enter DH, Hungness ES, Soper NJ. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES(®)): a technical review. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(10):3135–48.PubMedCrossRef
100.
Whiteford MH, Denk PM, Swanstrom LL. Feasibility of radical sigmoid colectomy performed as natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) using transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(10):1870–4.PubMedCrossRef
101.
Velhote MC, Velhote CE. A NOTES modification of the transanal pull-through. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2009;19(2):255–7.CrossRef
102.
Torres RA, Orban RD, Tocaimaza L, Vallejos Pereira G, Arevalo JR. Transvaginal specimen extraction after laparoscopic colectomy. World J Surg. 2012;36(7):1699–702.PubMedCrossRef
103.
Fuchs KH, Breithaupt W, Varga G, Schulz T, Reinisch A, Josipovic N. Transanal hybrid colon resection: from laparoscopy to NOTES. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(3):746–52.PubMedCrossRef
104.
Bulian DR, Runkel N, Burghardt J, Lamade W, Butters M, Utech M, et al. Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) for colon resections--analysis of the first 139 patients of the German NOTES Registry (GNR). Int J Color Dis. 2014;29(7):853–61.CrossRef
105.
Buess G, Theiss R, Gunther M, Hutterer F, Pichlmaier H. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Leber Magen Darm. 1985;15(6):271–9.PubMed
106.
Arezzo A, Passera R, Scozzari G, Verra M, Morino M. Laparoscopy for rectal cancer reduces short-term mortality and morbidity: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(5):1485–502.PubMedCrossRef
107.
Christoforidis D, Cho HM, Dixon MR, Mellgren AF, Madoff RD, Finne CO. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus conventional transanal excision for patients with early rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2009;249(5):776–82.PubMedCrossRef
108.
Morino M, Arezzo A, Allaix ME. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Tech Coloproctol. 2013;17 Suppl 1:S55–61.PubMedCrossRef
109.
Atallah S, Albert M, Larach S. Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(9):2200–5.PubMedCrossRef
110.
Sylla P, Bordeianou LG, Berger D, Han KS, Lauwers GY, Sahani DV, et al. A pilot study of natural orifice transanal endoscopic total mesorectal excision with laparoscopic assistance for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(9):3396–405.PubMedCrossRef
111.
Trunzo JA, Delaney CP. Natural orifice proctectomy using a transanal endoscopic microsurgical technique in a porcine model. Surg Innov. 2010;17(1):48–52.PubMedCrossRef
112.
Zorron R, Phillips HN, Coelho D, Flach L, Lemos FB, Vassallo RC. Perirectal NOTES access: “down-to-up” total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Innov. 2012;19(1):11–9.PubMedCrossRef
113.
Bhattacharjee HK, Kirschniak A, Storz P, Wilhelm P, Kunert W. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery-based transanal access for colorectal surgery: experience on human cadavers. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2011;21(9):835–40.CrossRef
114.
Telem DA, Han KS, Kim MC, Ajari I, Sohn DK, Woods K, et al. Transanal rectosigmoid resection via natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) with total mesorectal excision in a large human cadaver series. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(1):74–80.PubMedCrossRef
115.
Sylla P, Rattner DW, Delgado S, Lacy AM. NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(5):1205–10.PubMedCrossRef
116.
Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Albert M, deBeche-Adams T, Nassif G, Hunter L, et al. Transanal minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectal excision (TAMIS-TME): results and experience with the first 20 patients undergoing curative-intent rectal cancer surgery at a single institution. Tech Coloproctol. 2014;18(5):473–80.PubMedCrossRef
117.
•• Fernández M, Delgado S, Castells A, Tasende M, Momblán D, Díaz del Globo G, et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: short-term outcomes in comparison with laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg. 2015;261:221–7. The authors confirmed that TaTME is a feasible and safe technique in short-term follow up.CrossRef
118.
Tuech JJ, Karoui M, Lelong B, De Chaisemartin C, Bridoux V, Manceau G, et al. A step toward NOTES total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: endoscopic transanal proctectomy. Ann Surg. 2015;261(2):228–33.PubMedCrossRef
119.
•• Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S, Wynn G, Austin R, Warusavitarne J, et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision: international registry results of the first 720 cases. Ann Surg. 2016, doi:10. 1097/SLA.00000000000001948. An international registry including the first 720 cases. TaTME appears to be an oncologically safe and effective technique.
120.
Trépanier JS, Fernandez-Hevia M, Lacy AM. Transanal total mesorectal excision: surgical technique description and outcomes. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2016;25(5):234–40.PubMedCrossRef
121.
•• Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Keller D, Burke J, Hunter L. Natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Br J Surg. 2015;102(2):e73–92.PubMedCrossRef
122.
Deijen CL, Velthuis S, Tsai A, Mavroveli S, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Sietses C, et al. COLOR III: a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(8):3210–5.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Current Status of Laparoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Cancer
verfasst von
Marta Pascual
Marta Jiménez-Toscano
Miguel Pera
Publikationsdatum
18.01.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Colorectal Cancer Reports / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1556-3790
Elektronische ISSN: 1556-3804
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11888-017-0345-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Current Colorectal Cancer Reports 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Radiation Therapy and Radiation Therapy Innovations in Colorectal Cancer (JY Wo, Section Editor)

The Impact of Novel Radiation Treatment Techniques on Toxicity and Clinical Outcomes in Rectal Cancer

Surgery and Surgical Innovations in Colorectal Cancer (S Huerta, Section Editor)

Local Excision Versus Total Mesorectal Excision for Clinical Stage I (cT1–cT2) Rectal Cancer

Surgery and Surgical Innovations in Colorectal Cancer (S Huerta, Section Editor)

Lymphadenectomy in Colorectal Cancer: Therapeutic Role and How Many Nodes Are Needed for Appropriate Staging?

Personalized Medicine in Colorectal Cancer (D Cunningham and EC Smyth, Section Editors)

Molecular Stratification of Colorectal Cancer: Moving from the Laboratory to Clinical Practice

Hot Topic

Multidisciplinary Management of Rectal Cancer with Synchronous Resectable Liver Metastases

Surgery and Surgical Innovations in Colorectal Cancer (S Huerta, Section Editor)

Current Concepts on the Distal Margin of Resection of Rectal Cancer Tumors after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

25.04.2024 NSCLC Nachrichten

Das Risiko für Rezidiv oder Tod von Patienten und Patientinnen mit reseziertem ALK-positivem NSCLC ist unter einer adjuvanten Therapie mit dem Tyrosinkinase-Inhibitor Alectinib signifikant geringer als unter platinbasierter Chemotherapie.

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

24.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Nachrichten

Patienten, die zur Behandlung ihres Prostatakarzinoms eine Androgendeprivationstherapie erhalten, entwickeln nicht selten eine Anämie. Wer ältere Patienten internistisch mitbetreut, sollte auf diese Nebenwirkung achten.

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

23.04.2024 Medikamente in Schwangerschaft und Stillzeit Nachrichten

Müssen sich Schwangere einer Krebstherapie unterziehen, rufen Immuncheckpointinhibitoren offenbar nicht mehr unerwünschte Wirkungen hervor als andere Mittel gegen Krebs.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise