SURGICAL TREATMENT
ELSTs are sometimes confined to the endolymphatic sac and duct, but more often erode the petrous bone or the mastoid air cells around the endolymphatic sac, including the posterior semicircular canal. However, larger tumors extend medially and inferiorly via the retrofacial route to invade the jugular bulb and the hypotympanum, and rarely invade the sigmoid sinus. Larger tumors often involve the posterior fossa dura and extend posteriorly to the cerebellopontine angle and anteriorly to the internal auditory canal, occasionally reaching the middle fossa across the tegmen mastoideum [
50]. These pathways of invasion have to be considered when planning the surgical approach.
According to Nevoux et al. [
29], there are two types of tumors. The first type infiltrates the bone and adjacent structures and is composed of fibrous tissue, but it is not markedly hemorrhagic. The second type is a cystic tumor form, which is weakly infiltrative and heavily hemorrhagic. Large hypervascularized cystic tumors with significant extension into posterior fossa may benefit from preoperative embolization before surgical resection to minimize intraoperative bleeding and morbidities, as well as to facilitate complete surgical resection. The blood supply arises mainly from the branches of the external carotid artery (posterior auricular artery, occipital artery, and ascending pharyngeal artery). The blood supply of huge intracranial growths may also be from branches of the vertebral artery, such as the anterior inferior cerebellar artery [
50,
51].
The type of approach depends on the hearing level and tumor size and localization. Sporadic tumors usually show worse hearing function and have a more delayed diagnosis. Clinical symptoms and aggressiveness of the tumor are more serious in the sporadic cases than in the cases of VHL, and the treatment should be more extensive to prevent recurrences. Conversely, in VHL-associated tumors, the goals of the treatment are to perform surgery as soon as possible with the least amount of hearing loss [
29].
According to Schipper et al., type-A ELST is locally confined and therefore amenable to total ablation through a transmastoidal–retrolabyrinthine approach with the preservation of the facial and vestibulocochlear nerves and inner ear structures [
47]. A mastoidectomy is performed with identification of the horizontal semicircular canal and the third segment of the facial nerve. The jugular bulb is skeletonized, as is the tegmental dura and sinodural angle. Once the posterior semicircular canal is skeletonized, the outline of a bulging tumor involving the endolymphatic sac is seen [
10]. When the posterior fossa dura is healthy, the sac and duct are removed en bloc. In the case of involvement of both dural leaflets of the endolymphatic sac, the dura in Trautmann’s triangle should be resected and the procedure transformed into a retrolabyrinthine–transdural approach. This would result in a transmastoid cerebrospinal fluid leak—hence, the space must be sealed-off by duroplasty using autologous fat grafts. Preservation of hearing requires that the integrity of the perilymphatic space should not be violated by fenestrating the semicircular canals. Whenever possible, one should aim to maintain hearing, since the incidence of bilateral ELSTs can be as high as 30% in VHL [
52]. Cochlear implantation has proved to be successful for aural rehabilitation in deaf patients with ELSTs and, if it is considered in bilateral ELST cases, surgical approaches should be tailored to keep the otic capsule intact in order to achieve optimal cochlear implant benefit [
50].
Preservation of hearing is also allowed using a retrosigmoid approach, which permits a better control of cerebellopontine angle tumor extensions than the retrolabyrinthine approach, as well as facilitates dural resection. In contrast, the retrosigmoid approach does not afford visualization of the posterior semicircular canal during dissection of the endolymphatic duct.
A translabyrinthine approach with facial nerve preservation would be appropriate for type-B ELST, mainly in patients with poor or unserviceable hearing, who often have labyrinthine invasion [
47]. Since the inner ear may already be eroded or destroyed, the lateral wall of the internal auditory canal can be drilled away. For complete removal, dural excision and duroaplasty are also required. Alternatively, a retrosigmoid approach may be considered.
For tumors with deeper involvement of the petrous bone, a transcochlear approach can be needed, when complete exenteration of the otic capsule and the exposure of the petrous carotid artery is necessary [
53]. A combined transtemporal–retrosigmoid approach or even subtotal resection of the temporal bone gives adequate exposure for tumors involving the posterior and middle cranial fossa.
For type-C ELST, the infratemporal approach is recommended for safe distal and proximal ligation and resection of the sigmoid sinus and jugular bulb in large lesions when the tumor involves the facial nerve, the jugular bulb, and the middle ear. Approximately 10–30% of ELST patients present preoperatively with facial nerve weakness or paralysis [
29,
50,
51]. The facial nerve should be preserved if the nerve is not invaded. This implies a total transposition of the facial nerve (Fisch A infratemporal fossa approach) or, preferably, the use of the fallopian bridge technique which preserves the integrity and vascularity of the facial nerve [
47,
54,
55]. In nearly 50% of the patients, the posterior wall of the external auditory canal must be demolished for better exposure of the carotid artery, and the middle ear cleft is obliterated after total removal of the tumor [
55]. Otherwise, involved facial nerves are removed, and the great auricular nerve is used for neural transplantation, or a facial nerve–hypoglossal nerve anastomosis is performed in the case of invasion of the proximal stump of the nerve. This should be followed by complete removal of the tumor [
47,
54].
According to the staging system proposed by Bambakidis et al., stage I and II ELSTs can be removed by transmastoid, translabyrinthine, retrolabyrinthine or retrosigmoid approaches depending on the extension to the middle ear and the presence of sensorineural hearing loss [
13]. Stage III and IV lesions require more complex approaches depending on the structures involved (subtemporal craniotomy with petrosectomy, modified transcochlear approaches, staged anterior and posterior fossa techniques, etc.) [
13,
56].
RADIATION THERAPY TREATMENT
External-beam RT should be considered for patients with close or positive margins as well as those with gross disease, either after subtotal resection or in patients considered inoperable due to morbidity or with tumors deemed incompletely resectable due to anatomical conditions, (e.g., cranial nerve involvement, complex vascular supply) [
43]. Because the likelihood of metastases is low, only the primary site is irradiated. Given the behavior of ELST as a low-grade adenocarcinoma, “carcinoma doses” should be employed so that patients with close (< 5 mm) or positive margins receive 66 Gy in 33 fractions and patients with gross disease receive 70 Gy in 35 fractions or their radiobiological dose equivalents. The difficulties in suggesting RT dose recommendations are influenced by limited data and unstated RT dose or dose-fractionation schedules.
Intensity modulated radiotherapy should be employed if patients are treated with photons due to the superior dose distribution in comparison to other techniques. Proton beam irradiation may be used rather than photon-based RT, if available, to reduce the dose to the organs at risk and hopefully reduce the likelihood of late complications [
57].
SRS may be employed alone or combined with external beam RT to treat areas of incompletely resected disease that are approximately 3 cm or less in maximum diameter. SRS may be delivered with a Gamma Knife, a linear accelerator-based system, or proton beam. The optimal marginal dose for SRS is probably 15–18 Gy. Sporadic but encouraging experiences on the use of SRS for post-surgical recurrences of ELST have been reported in the literature, although the risk of a marginal miss after SRS alone should not be underestimated [
58,
59].