Current Understanding of the Interplay between Oab & Bph

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are very common and bothersome to men. For many years all male LUTS, even the storage ones, were attributed to the prostate, which was the target of therapeutic approaches. Increasing knowledge of the contribution of bladder dysfunction to LUTS pathophysiology has brought into focus detrusor overactivity (DO) and its treatments. Available data indicate that in many cases DO and overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms are secondary to bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), due to prostatic disease. Accumulating evidence also suggests that the two pathologies may coexist because they share etiologic factors. Despite the prevalence of storage symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), antimuscarinics, the main treatment for OAB, were infrequently used because of fear of urinary retention. Available clinical trials indicate that the addition of an antimuscarinic to prostate-targeted treatments, or treatment initiation with a combination regimen, is safe in terms of urinary retention and offers improvements in storage symptoms. Nevertheless, the improvement in overall quality of life is modest. Criteria for the selection of patients likely to benefit most from the addition of antimuscarinics to common BPH treatments are lacking.