Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2022

01.03.2022 | Clinical trial

Definitive results of a phase III adjuvant trial comparing six cycles of FEC-100 to four cycles of AC in women with operable node-negative breast cancer: the NSABP B-36 trial (NRG Oncology)

verfasst von: Charles E. Geyer Jr., Hanna Bandos, Priya Rastogi, Samuel A. Jacobs, André Robidoux, Louis Fehrenbacher, Patrick J. Ward, Jonathan Polikoff, Adam M. Brufsky, Louise Provencher, Alexander H. G. Paterson, John T. Hamm, Robert L. Carolla, Luis Baez-Diaz, Thomas B. Julian, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, Norman Wolmark

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Ausgabe 3/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Results from adjuvant trials evaluating 6 cycles of epirubicin-based chemotherapy regimens suggested these programs may be more effective than 4 cycles of doxorubicin-based chemotherapy.

Method

NSABP B-36 was a phase III clinical trial originally designed as a 2 × 2 factorial study comparing 6 cycles of 5-FU, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC-100) to 4 cycles of conventional doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) with celecoxib or placebo. Shortly after activation, concerns regarding increased cardiovascular risks among selective COX-2 inhibitors resulted in a decision to remove the celecoxib/placebo from the trial. Women with histologically node-negative invasive breast cancer who had undergone primary surgery with a lumpectomy or total mastectomy were eligible. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS).

Results

Between May 2004 and July 2008, 2722 patients were enrolled. Administration of FEC-100 did not result in improvement in DFS compared to AC (HR 1.09; 95% CI 0.92–1.29, p value = 0.31). The effect of FEC-100 compared to AC on DFS was significantly different for receptor-positive (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.05–1.66) compared to receptor-negative patients (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.66–1.11) (treatment-by-receptor status interaction p value = 0.02). There was no statistically significant difference in the effect of treatment on overall survival (OS) with FEC-100 compared to AC (HR 1.06; 95% CI 0.84–1.35, p value = 0.61). Overall, Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were more frequent in the FEC-100 group.

Conclusion

The results of B-36 do not support use of six-cycle anthracycline-based regimens in node-negative breast cancer. Prolongation of anthracycline-based therapy with FEC-100 does not improve DFS or OS, relative to AC for 4 cycles, and was associated with expected increases in toxicity. A statistically significant interaction between treatment and hormone receptor status favoring AC in hormone-receptor-positive breast cancers is consistent with the hypothesis that optimal duration of chemotherapy may be four cycles in these patients. Late cardiac events and deaths prior to recurrence or second cancer were infrequent on both arms, but slightly higher with FEC-100.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00087178.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher B, Brown AM, Dimitrov NV et al (1990) Two months of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide with and without interval reinduction therapy compared with 6 months of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in positive-node breast cancer patients with tamoxifen-nonresponsive tumors: results from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-15. J Clin Oncol 8(9):1483–1496CrossRef Fisher B, Brown AM, Dimitrov NV et al (1990) Two months of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide with and without interval reinduction therapy compared with 6 months of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in positive-node breast cancer patients with tamoxifen-nonresponsive tumors: results from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-15. J Clin Oncol 8(9):1483–1496CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hutchins LF, Green SJ, Ravdin PM et al (2005) Randomized, controlled trial of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil with and without tamoxifen for high-risk, node-negative breast cancer: treatment results of Intergroup Protocol INT-0102. J Clin Oncol 23(33):8313–8321CrossRef Hutchins LF, Green SJ, Ravdin PM et al (2005) Randomized, controlled trial of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil with and without tamoxifen for high-risk, node-negative breast cancer: treatment results of Intergroup Protocol INT-0102. J Clin Oncol 23(33):8313–8321CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Levine MN, Pritchard KI, Bramwell VH et al (2005) Randomized trial comparing cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer: update of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Trial MA5. J Clin Oncol 23(22):5166–5170CrossRef Levine MN, Pritchard KI, Bramwell VH et al (2005) Randomized trial comparing cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer: update of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Trial MA5. J Clin Oncol 23(22):5166–5170CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Fumoleau P, Kerbrat P, Romestaing P et al (2003) Randomized trial comparing six versus three cycles of epirubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal, node-positive breast cancer patients: 10-year follow-up results of the French Adjuvant Study Group 01 trial. J Clin Oncol 21(2):298–305CrossRef Fumoleau P, Kerbrat P, Romestaing P et al (2003) Randomized trial comparing six versus three cycles of epirubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal, node-positive breast cancer patients: 10-year follow-up results of the French Adjuvant Study Group 01 trial. J Clin Oncol 21(2):298–305CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonneterre J, Roché H, Kerbrat P et al (2005) Epirubicin increases long-term survival in adjuvant chemotherapy of patients with poor-prognosis, node-positive, early breast cancer: 10-year follow up results of the French Adjuvant Study Group 05 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 23(12):2686–2693CrossRef Bonneterre J, Roché H, Kerbrat P et al (2005) Epirubicin increases long-term survival in adjuvant chemotherapy of patients with poor-prognosis, node-positive, early breast cancer: 10-year follow up results of the French Adjuvant Study Group 05 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 23(12):2686–2693CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat White SJ, Freedman LS (1978) Allocation of patients to treatment groups in a controlled clinical study. Br J Cancer 37:849–857CrossRef White SJ, Freedman LS (1978) Allocation of patients to treatment groups in a controlled clinical study. Br J Cancer 37:849–857CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin DY, Wei LJ, Ying Z (1993) Checking the Cox model with cumulative sums of martingale-based residuals. Biometrika 80:557–572CrossRef Lin DY, Wei LJ, Ying Z (1993) Checking the Cox model with cumulative sums of martingale-based residuals. Biometrika 80:557–572CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs SA, Wilson JW, Bandos H, et al. NSABP B-36: A randomized phase III trial comparing six cycles of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) to four cycles of adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (AC) in patients (pts) with node-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 75 (9); SABCS 2014 December 9–13, 2015; San Antonio, TX. Abstr S3–02. Jacobs SA, Wilson JW, Bandos H, et al. NSABP B-36: A randomized phase III trial comparing six cycles of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) to four cycles of adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (AC) in patients (pts) with node-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 75 (9); SABCS 2014 December 9–13, 2015; San Antonio, TX. Abstr S3–02.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Paik S, Tang G, Shak S et al (2006) Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:3726–3734CrossRef Paik S, Tang G, Shak S et al (2006) Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:3726–3734CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF et al (2018) Adjuvant chemotherapy guided by a 21-Gene Expression Assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 379:111–121CrossRef Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF et al (2018) Adjuvant chemotherapy guided by a 21-Gene Expression Assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 379:111–121CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Cardoso F ,van't Veer LJ (2016) Bogaerts J (2016) MINDACT Investigators: 70-Gene Signature as an aid to treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med 375:717–729CrossRef Cardoso F ,van't Veer LJ (2016) Bogaerts J (2016) MINDACT Investigators: 70-Gene Signature as an aid to treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med 375:717–729CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Definitive results of a phase III adjuvant trial comparing six cycles of FEC-100 to four cycles of AC in women with operable node-negative breast cancer: the NSABP B-36 trial (NRG Oncology)
verfasst von
Charles E. Geyer Jr.
Hanna Bandos
Priya Rastogi
Samuel A. Jacobs
André Robidoux
Louis Fehrenbacher
Patrick J. Ward
Jonathan Polikoff
Adam M. Brufsky
Louise Provencher
Alexander H. G. Paterson
John T. Hamm
Robert L. Carolla
Luis Baez-Diaz
Thomas B. Julian
Sandra M. Swain
Eleftherios P. Mamounas
Norman Wolmark
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2022
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Ausgabe 3/2022
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-021-06417-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2022

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Nodal-negativ nach neoadjuvanter Chemo: Axilladissektion verzichtbar?

03.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Wenn bei Mammakarzinomen durch eine neoadjuvante Chemotherapie ein Downstaging von nodal-positiv zu nodal-negativ gelingt, scheint es auch ohne Axilladissektion nur selten zu axillären Rezidiven zu kommen.

Wo hapert es noch bei der Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie?

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

Bestrahlung nach Prostatektomie: mehr Schaden als Nutzen?

02.05.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Eine adjuvante Radiotherapie nach radikaler Prostata-Op. bringt den Betroffenen wahrscheinlich keinen Vorteil. Im Gegenteil: Durch die Bestrahlung steigt offenbar das Risiko für Harn- und Stuhlinkontinenz.

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärzte und Psychotherapeuten.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.