Anzeige
Erschienen in:
01.10.2020 | Systematic Review
Deprescribing Opioids in Chronic Non-cancer Pain: Systematic Review of Randomised Trials
Erschienen in: Drugs | Ausgabe 15/2020
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Background
Deprescribing, the process of reducing or discontinuing unnecessary or harmful medicines is an essential part of clinical practice.
Objective
To evaluate the efficacy of interventions designed to deprescribe opioid analgesics for pain relief in patients with chronic non-cancer pain.
Methods
We searched electronic databases, including clinical trial registries, from database inception to 13th January 2020 without restrictions, and conducted citation tracking. Our systematic review included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating interventions reducing the prescription, or use of opioid analgesics in patients with chronic pain versus control. Inventions could be aimed at the patient, clinician, or both. We excluded trials enrolling patients with cancer or illicit drug use. Two authors independently screened and extracted data. Outcome follow-up timepoints were short (≤ 3 months), intermediate (> 3 but < 12 months) or long (≥ 12 months) term. Primary outcome was the reduction in opioid dose [morphine milligram equivalent (MME) mg/day]. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.
Results
We included ten patient-focused RCT interventions (n = 835; median 37 participants) and 2 testing clinician-focused interventions (n = 291 clinicians); none at low risk of bias. Patient-focused interventions did not reduce opioid dose in the intermediate term [e.g. dose reduction protocol, mean difference (MD) − 19.9 MME, 95% CI − 107.5 to 67.7], nor did they increase the number of participants who ceased their dose, or increase the risk of serious adverse events or adverse events. One clinician intervention of education plus decision tools versus decision tools alone reduced the number of opioid prescriptions (risk difference (RD) − 0.1, 95% CI − 0.2 to − 0.1), dose (MD − 5.3 MME, 95% CI − 6.2 to − 4.5) and use (RD − 0.1, 95% CI − 0.1 to − 0.0) in the long term.
Limitations
Study heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis.
Conclusion
The small number of studies and heterogeneity prevented firm conclusions to recommend any one opioid-analgesic-deprescribing strategy in patients with chronic pain.
Systematic review registration number
PROSPERO CRD42017068422.