Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Drug Safety 4/2012

01.04.2012 | Short Communication

Deriving Dose Limits for Warnings in Electronic Prescribing Systems

Statistical Analysis of Prescription Data at University Hospital Birmingham, UK

verfasst von: Dr Jamie J. Coleman, James Hodson, Robin E. Ferner

Erschienen in: Drug Safety | Ausgabe 4/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction: Electronic decision support can reduce medication errors, and dose-range checking is one element of that support.
Objective: The aim of this study was to design an approach to setting upper dose warning limits in electronic prescribing systems where there are historical data on dosing.
Method: We used historical data on 56 drug-form combinations for which over 100 prescriptions had been issued between 1 June 2009 and 31 May 2010 in a bespoke electronic prescribing system at University Hospital Birmingham, UK. First, two experts derived dose limits for each drug-form combination, then the drugs were randomly divided into a training set and a test set. A variation of the ‘Nearest Rank’ approach to estimate statistical limits was used to derive the percentile with the optimal sensitivity and specificity.
Results: For the 28 drug-form combinations in the test set, the 86th percentile of dose gave a mean sensitivity of 95.3% and a mean specificity of 97.9% for warning limits, representing the highest reasonable dose; the 96th percentile gave a mean sensitivity of 90.2% and mean specificity of 99.5% for disallow limits, beyond which no dose should be prescribed.
Conclusions: Dosing decision support within electronic prescribing systems can be derived by statistical analysis of historical prescription data. We advocate a combined theoretical and statistical derivation of dose checking rules in order to ensure that prescribers are alerted appropriately to potentially toxic doses.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2003 Jun 23; 163 (12): 1409–16PubMedCrossRef Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2003 Jun 23; 163 (12): 1409–16PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferner RE, Coleman JJ. An Algorithm for integrating contraindications into electronic prescribing decision support. Drug Saf 2010; 33 (12): 1089–96PubMedCrossRef Ferner RE, Coleman JJ. An Algorithm for integrating contraindications into electronic prescribing decision support. Drug Saf 2010; 33 (12): 1089–96PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Carey RG. Improving healthcare with control charts: basic and advanced SPC methods and case studies. Milwaukee (WI): ASQ Quality Press, 2003 Carey RG. Improving healthcare with control charts: basic and advanced SPC methods and case studies. Milwaukee (WI): ASQ Quality Press, 2003
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Tennant R, Mohammed MA, Coleman JJ, et al. Monitoring patients using control charts: a systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care 2007 Aug; 19 (4): 187–94PubMedCrossRef Tennant R, Mohammed MA, Coleman JJ, et al. Monitoring patients using control charts: a systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care 2007 Aug; 19 (4): 187–94PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Coleman JJ, Hemming K, Nightingale PG, et al. Can an electronic prescribing system detect doctors who are more likely to make a serious prescribing error? J R Soc Med 2011 May; 104 (5): 208–18PubMedCrossRef Coleman JJ, Hemming K, Nightingale PG, et al. Can an electronic prescribing system detect doctors who are more likely to make a serious prescribing error? J R Soc Med 2011 May; 104 (5): 208–18PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat BMA/RPS. British national formulary. 60th ed. London: Royal Pharmaceutical Society Publishing, BMJ Publishing Group, 2010 Sep BMA/RPS. British national formulary. 60th ed. London: Royal Pharmaceutical Society Publishing, BMJ Publishing Group, 2010 Sep
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Gravetter FJ, Wallnau LB. Statistics for the behavioral sciences. 8th ed. Belmont (CA): Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2009 Gravetter FJ, Wallnau LB. Statistics for the behavioral sciences. 8th ed. Belmont (CA): Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2009
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuperman GJ, Reichley RM, Bailey TC. Using commercial knowledge bases for clinical decision support: opportunities, hurdles, and recommendations. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006 Jul-Aug; 13 (4): 369–71PubMedCrossRef Kuperman GJ, Reichley RM, Bailey TC. Using commercial knowledge bases for clinical decision support: opportunities, hurdles, and recommendations. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006 Jul-Aug; 13 (4): 369–71PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Deriving Dose Limits for Warnings in Electronic Prescribing Systems
Statistical Analysis of Prescription Data at University Hospital Birmingham, UK
verfasst von
Dr Jamie J. Coleman
James Hodson
Robin E. Ferner
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2012
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Drug Safety / Ausgabe 4/2012
Print ISSN: 0114-5916
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1942
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/11594810-000000000-00000

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2012

Drug Safety 4/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Review Article

Safety of Flecainide

Original Research Articles

Assessing Opioid Shopping Behaviour