Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 5/2016

10.05.2015 | Knee

Diagnosis and classification of chondral knee injuries: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy

verfasst von: Marcus Vinicius Danieli, João Paulo Fernandes Guerreiro, Alexandre deOliveira Queiroz, Hamilton daRosa Pereira, Susi Tagima, Marcelo Garcia Marini, Daniele Cristina Cataneo

Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Ausgabe 5/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of patients undergoing knee arthroscopy for chondral lesions. The hypothesis was that MRI displays low sensitivity in the diagnosis and classification of chondral injuries.

Methods

A total of 83 knees were evaluated. The MRIs were performed using the same machine (GE SIGNA HDX 1.45 T). The MRI results were compared with the arthroscopy findings, and an agreement analysis was performed. Thirty-eight of the 83 MRI exams were evaluated by another radiologist for inter-observer agreement analysis. These analyses were performed using the kappa (κ) coefficient.

Results

The highest incidence of chondral injury was in the patella (14.4 %). The κ coefficient was 0.31 for the patellar surface; 0.38 for the trochlea; 0.46 for the medial femoral condyle; 0.51 for the lateral femoral condyle; and 0.19 for the lateral plateau. After dividing the injuries into two groups (ICRS Grades 0–II and Grades III and IV), the following κ coefficients were obtained as follows: 0.49 (patella); 0.53 (trochlea); 0.46 (medial femoral condyle); 0.43 (medial plateau); 0.67 (lateral femoral condyle); and 0.51 (lateral plateau). The MRI sensitivity was 76.4 % (patella), 88.2 % (trochlea), 69.7 % (medial femoral condyle), 85.7 % (medial plateau), 81.8 % (lateral femoral condyle) and 75 % (lateral plateau). Comparing the radiologists’ evaluations, the following κ coefficients were obtained as follows: 0.73 (patella); 0.63 (trochlea); 0.84 (medial femoral condyle); 0.72 (medial plateau); 0.77 (lateral femoral condyle); and 0.91 (lateral plateau).

Conclusion

Compared with arthroscopy, MRI displays moderate sensitivity for detecting and classifying chondral knee injuries. It is an important image method, but we must be careful in the assessment of patients with suspected chondral lesions.

Level of evidence

III.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Alves Filho UPC, Leal LC, Fernandes AAC, Marques PO, Silva RR (2010) Concordância entre artroscopia e ressonância magnética para avaliação das lesões do joelho. Rev Baiana Saúde Pública 34:11–18 Alves Filho UPC, Leal LC, Fernandes AAC, Marques PO, Silva RR (2010) Concordância entre artroscopia e ressonância magnética para avaliação das lesões do joelho. Rev Baiana Saúde Pública 34:11–18
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Arøen A, Løken S, Heir S, Alvik E, Ekeland A, Granlund OG, Engebretsen L (2004) Articular cartilage lesions in 993 consecutive knee arthroscopies. Am J Sports Med 32(1):211–215CrossRefPubMed Arøen A, Løken S, Heir S, Alvik E, Ekeland A, Granlund OG, Engebretsen L (2004) Articular cartilage lesions in 993 consecutive knee arthroscopies. Am J Sports Med 32(1):211–215CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bredella MA, Tirman PF, Peterfy CG, Zarlingo M, Feller JF, Bost FW, Belzer JP, Wischer TK, Genant HK (1999) Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172(4):1073–1080CrossRefPubMed Bredella MA, Tirman PF, Peterfy CG, Zarlingo M, Feller JF, Bost FW, Belzer JP, Wischer TK, Genant HK (1999) Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172(4):1073–1080CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Brittberg M, Winalski CS (2003) Evaluation of cartilage injuries and repair. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85-A(Suppl 2):58–69 Brittberg M, Winalski CS (2003) Evaluation of cartilage injuries and repair. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85-A(Suppl 2):58–69
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell AB, Knopp MV, Kolovich GP, Wei W, Jia G, Siston RA, Flanigan DC (2013) Preoperative MRI underestimates articular cartilage defect size compared with findings at arthroscopic knee surgery. Am J Sports Med 41(3):590–595CrossRefPubMed Campbell AB, Knopp MV, Kolovich GP, Wei W, Jia G, Siston RA, Flanigan DC (2013) Preoperative MRI underestimates articular cartilage defect size compared with findings at arthroscopic knee surgery. Am J Sports Med 41(3):590–595CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat de Windt TS, Welsch GH, Brittberg M, Vonk LA, Marlovits S, Trattnig S, Saris DB (2013) Is magnetic resonance imaging reliable in predicting clinical outcome after articular cartilage repair of the knee? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 41(7):1695–1702CrossRefPubMed de Windt TS, Welsch GH, Brittberg M, Vonk LA, Marlovits S, Trattnig S, Saris DB (2013) Is magnetic resonance imaging reliable in predicting clinical outcome after articular cartilage repair of the knee? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 41(7):1695–1702CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Figueroa D, Calvo R, Vaisman A, Carrasco MA, Moraga C, Delgado I (2007) Knee chondral lesions: incidence and correlation between arthroscopic and magnetic resonance findings. Arthroscopy 23(3):312–315CrossRefPubMed Figueroa D, Calvo R, Vaisman A, Carrasco MA, Moraga C, Delgado I (2007) Knee chondral lesions: incidence and correlation between arthroscopic and magnetic resonance findings. Arthroscopy 23(3):312–315CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Galea A, Giuffre B, Dimmick S, Coolican MR, Parker DA (2009) The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanning and its influence on management decisions in knee surgery. Arthroscopy 25(5):473–480CrossRefPubMed Galea A, Giuffre B, Dimmick S, Coolican MR, Parker DA (2009) The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanning and its influence on management decisions in knee surgery. Arthroscopy 25(5):473–480CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris JD, Brophy RH, Jia G, Price B, Knopp M, Siston RA, Flanigan DC (2012) Sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging for detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage defects. Arthroscopy 28(11):1728–1737CrossRefPubMed Harris JD, Brophy RH, Jia G, Price B, Knopp M, Siston RA, Flanigan DC (2012) Sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging for detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage defects. Arthroscopy 28(11):1728–1737CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartley KG, Damon BM, Patterson GT, Long JH, Holt GE (2012) MRI techniques: a review and update for the orthopaedic surgeon. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 20(12):775–787PubMed Hartley KG, Damon BM, Patterson GT, Long JH, Holt GE (2012) MRI techniques: a review and update for the orthopaedic surgeon. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 20(12):775–787PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho YY, Stanley AJ, Hui JH, Wang SC (2007) Postoperative evaluation of the knee after autologous chondrocyte implantation: what radiologists need to know. RadioGraphics 27(1):207–222CrossRefPubMed Ho YY, Stanley AJ, Hui JH, Wang SC (2007) Postoperative evaluation of the knee after autologous chondrocyte implantation: what radiologists need to know. RadioGraphics 27(1):207–222CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Jungius KP, Schmid MR, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Koch P, Pfirrmann CW (2006) Cartilaginous defects of the femorotibial joint: accuracy of coronal short inversion time inversion-recovery MR sequence. Radiology 240(2):482–488CrossRefPubMed Jungius KP, Schmid MR, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Koch P, Pfirrmann CW (2006) Cartilaginous defects of the femorotibial joint: accuracy of coronal short inversion time inversion-recovery MR sequence. Radiology 240(2):482–488CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaplan LD, Schurhoff MR, Selesnick H, Thorpe M, Uribe JW (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee in asymptomatic professional basketball players. Arthroscopy 21(5):557–561CrossRefPubMed Kaplan LD, Schurhoff MR, Selesnick H, Thorpe M, Uribe JW (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee in asymptomatic professional basketball players. Arthroscopy 21(5):557–561CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kijowski R, Blankenbaker DG, Davis KW, Shinki K, Kaplan LD, De Smet AA (2009) Comparison of 1.5- and 3.0-T MR imaging for evaluating the articular cartilage of the knee joint. Radiology 250(3):839–848CrossRefPubMed Kijowski R, Blankenbaker DG, Davis KW, Shinki K, Kaplan LD, De Smet AA (2009) Comparison of 1.5- and 3.0-T MR imaging for evaluating the articular cartilage of the knee joint. Radiology 250(3):839–848CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kijowski R, Blankenbaker DG, Woods M, Del Rio AM, De Smet AA, Reeder SB (2011) Clinical usefulness of adding 3D cartilage imaging sequences to a routine knee MR protocol. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196(1):159–167CrossRefPubMed Kijowski R, Blankenbaker DG, Woods M, Del Rio AM, De Smet AA, Reeder SB (2011) Clinical usefulness of adding 3D cartilage imaging sequences to a routine knee MR protocol. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196(1):159–167CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuikka PI, Kiuru MJ, Niva MH, Kröger H, Pihlajamäki HK (2006) Sensitivity of routine 1.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging versus arthroscopy as gold standard in fresh traumatic chondral lesions of the knee in young adults. Arthroscopy 22(10):1033–1039CrossRefPubMed Kuikka PI, Kiuru MJ, Niva MH, Kröger H, Pihlajamäki HK (2006) Sensitivity of routine 1.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging versus arthroscopy as gold standard in fresh traumatic chondral lesions of the knee in young adults. Arthroscopy 22(10):1033–1039CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Mattila VM, Weckström M, Leppänen V, Kiuru M, Pihlajamäki H (2012) Sensitivity of MRI for articular cartilage lesions of the patellae. Scand J Surg 101(1):56–61CrossRefPubMed Mattila VM, Weckström M, Leppänen V, Kiuru M, Pihlajamäki H (2012) Sensitivity of MRI for articular cartilage lesions of the patellae. Scand J Surg 101(1):56–61CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Mori R, Ochi M, Sakai Y, Adachi N, Uchio Y (1999) Clinical significance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for focal chondral lesions. Magn Reson Imaging 17(8):1135–1140CrossRefPubMed Mori R, Ochi M, Sakai Y, Adachi N, Uchio Y (1999) Clinical significance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for focal chondral lesions. Magn Reson Imaging 17(8):1135–1140CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Munk B, Madsen F, Lundorf E, Staunstrup H, Schmidt SA, Bolvig L, Hellfritzsch MB, Jensen J (1998) Clinical magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopic findings in knees: a comparative prospective study of meniscus anterior cruciate ligament and cartilage lesions. Arthroscopy 14(2):171–175CrossRefPubMed Munk B, Madsen F, Lundorf E, Staunstrup H, Schmidt SA, Bolvig L, Hellfritzsch MB, Jensen J (1998) Clinical magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopic findings in knees: a comparative prospective study of meniscus anterior cruciate ligament and cartilage lesions. Arthroscopy 14(2):171–175CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Nepple JJ, Wright RW, Matava MJ, Brophy RH (2012) Full-thickness knee articular cartilage defects in national football league combine athletes undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: prevalence, location, and association with previous surgery. Arthroscopy 28(6):798–806CrossRefPubMed Nepple JJ, Wright RW, Matava MJ, Brophy RH (2012) Full-thickness knee articular cartilage defects in national football league combine athletes undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: prevalence, location, and association with previous surgery. Arthroscopy 28(6):798–806CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Oakley SP, Portek I, Szomor Z, Appleyard RC, Ghosh P, Kirkham BW, Murrell GA, Lassere MN (2005) Arthroscopy—a potential “gold standard” for the diagnosis of the chondropathy of early osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 13(5):368–378CrossRefPubMed Oakley SP, Portek I, Szomor Z, Appleyard RC, Ghosh P, Kirkham BW, Murrell GA, Lassere MN (2005) Arthroscopy—a potential “gold standard” for the diagnosis of the chondropathy of early osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 13(5):368–378CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Quatman CE, Hettrich CM, Schmitt LC, Spindler KP (2011) The clinical utility and diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging for identification of early and advanced knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 39(7):1557–1568CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Quatman CE, Hettrich CM, Schmitt LC, Spindler KP (2011) The clinical utility and diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging for identification of early and advanced knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 39(7):1557–1568CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Severino NR, Camargo OP, Aihara T, Cury RP, Oliveira VM, Vaz CE, Chameck A, Tomazini A, Silva JL (1997) Comparação entre a ressonância magnética e a artroscopia no diagnóstico das lesões do joelho. Rev Bras Ortop 32:275–278 Severino NR, Camargo OP, Aihara T, Cury RP, Oliveira VM, Vaz CE, Chameck A, Tomazini A, Silva JL (1997) Comparação entre a ressonância magnética e a artroscopia no diagnóstico das lesões do joelho. Rev Bras Ortop 32:275–278
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Shelbourne KD, Jari S, Gray T (2005) Outcome of untreated traumatic articular cartilage defects of the knee. J Bone Jt Surg 85-A(Suppl 2):8–16 Shelbourne KD, Jari S, Gray T (2005) Outcome of untreated traumatic articular cartilage defects of the knee. J Bone Jt Surg 85-A(Suppl 2):8–16
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Sonin AH, Pensy RA, Mulligan ME, Hatem S (2002) Grading articular cartilage of the knee using fast spin-echo proton density-weighted MR imaging without fat suppression. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179(5):1159–1166CrossRefPubMed Sonin AH, Pensy RA, Mulligan ME, Hatem S (2002) Grading articular cartilage of the knee using fast spin-echo proton density-weighted MR imaging without fat suppression. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179(5):1159–1166CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaz CE, Camargo OP, Santana PJ, Valezi AC (2005) Accuracy of magnetic resonance in identifying traumatic intraarticular knee lesions. Clinics 60(6):445–450CrossRefPubMed Vaz CE, Camargo OP, Santana PJ, Valezi AC (2005) Accuracy of magnetic resonance in identifying traumatic intraarticular knee lesions. Clinics 60(6):445–450CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat von Engelhardt LV, Kraft CN, Pennekamp PH, Schild HH, Schmitz A, von Falkenhausen M (2007) The evaluation of articular cartilage lesions of the knee with a 3-Tesla magnet. Arthroscopy 23(5):496–502CrossRef von Engelhardt LV, Kraft CN, Pennekamp PH, Schild HH, Schmitz A, von Falkenhausen M (2007) The evaluation of articular cartilage lesions of the knee with a 3-Tesla magnet. Arthroscopy 23(5):496–502CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat von Engelhardt LV, Raddatz M, Bouillon B, Spahn G, Dàvid A, Haage P, Lichtinger TK (2010) How reliable is MRI in diagnosing cartilaginous lesions in patients with first and recurrent lateral patellar dislocations? BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:149CrossRef von Engelhardt LV, Raddatz M, Bouillon B, Spahn G, Dàvid A, Haage P, Lichtinger TK (2010) How reliable is MRI in diagnosing cartilaginous lesions in patients with first and recurrent lateral patellar dislocations? BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:149CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat von Engelhardt LV, Lahner M, Klussmann A, Bouillon B, Dàvid A, Haage P, Lichtinger TK (2010) Arthroscopy vs. MRI for a detailed assessment of cartilage disease in osteoarthritis: diagnostic value of MRI in clinical practice. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:75CrossRef von Engelhardt LV, Lahner M, Klussmann A, Bouillon B, Dàvid A, Haage P, Lichtinger TK (2010) Arthroscopy vs. MRI for a detailed assessment of cartilage disease in osteoarthritis: diagnostic value of MRI in clinical practice. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:75CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoshioka H, Stevens K, Hargreaves BA, Steines D, Genovese M, Dillingham MF, Winalski CS, Lang P (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy. J Magn Reson Imaging 20(5):857–864CrossRefPubMed Yoshioka H, Stevens K, Hargreaves BA, Steines D, Genovese M, Dillingham MF, Winalski CS, Lang P (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy. J Magn Reson Imaging 20(5):857–864CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang M, Min Z, Rana N, Liu H (2013) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in grading knee chondral defects. Arthroscopy 29(2):349–356CrossRefPubMed Zhang M, Min Z, Rana N, Liu H (2013) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in grading knee chondral defects. Arthroscopy 29(2):349–356CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Diagnosis and classification of chondral knee injuries: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy
verfasst von
Marcus Vinicius Danieli
João Paulo Fernandes Guerreiro
Alexandre deOliveira Queiroz
Hamilton daRosa Pereira
Susi Tagima
Marcelo Garcia Marini
Daniele Cristina Cataneo
Publikationsdatum
10.05.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Ausgabe 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3622-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2016

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 5/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.