Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 3/2017

18.11.2016 | Original Scientific Report

Diagnostic Accuracy of Abdominal Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

verfasst von: Vanja Giljaca, Tin Nadarevic, Goran Poropat, Vesna Stefanac Nadarevic, Davor Stimac

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of abdominal ultrasound (US) for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA), in terms of sensitivity, specificity and post-test probabilities for positive and negative result.

Methods

A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane library and Science Citation Index Expanded from January 1994 to October 2014 was performed. Two authors independently evaluated studies for inclusion, extracted data and performed analyses. The reference standard for evaluation of final diagnosis was pathohistological report on tissue obtained at appendectomy. Summary sensitivity, specificity and post-test probability of AA after positive and negative result of US with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

Results

Out of 3306 references identified through electronic searches, 17 reports met the inclusion criteria, with 2841 included participants. The summary sensitivity and specificity of US for diagnosis of AA were 69% (95% CI 59–78%) and 81% (95% CI 73–88%), respectively. At the median pretest probability of AA of 76.4%, the post-test probability for a positive and negative result of US was 92% (95% CI 88–95%) and 55% (95% CI 46–63%), respectively.

Conclusions

Abdominal ultrasound does not seem to have a role in the diagnostic pathway for diagnosis of AA in suspected patients. The summary sensitivity and specificity of US do not exceed that of physical examination. Patients that require additional diagnostic workup should be referred to more sensitive and specific diagnostic procedures, such as computed tomography.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Murata A, Okamoto K, Mayumi T et al (2014) Age-related differences in outcomes and etiologies of acute abdominal pain based on a national administrative database. Tohoku J Exp Med 233:9–15CrossRefPubMed Murata A, Okamoto K, Mayumi T et al (2014) Age-related differences in outcomes and etiologies of acute abdominal pain based on a national administrative database. Tohoku J Exp Med 233:9–15CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Gwynn LK (2001) The diagnosis of acute appendicitis: clinical assessment versus computed tomography evaluation. J Emerg Med 21:119–123CrossRefPubMed Gwynn LK (2001) The diagnosis of acute appendicitis: clinical assessment versus computed tomography evaluation. J Emerg Med 21:119–123CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS et al (1990) The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 132:910–925CrossRefPubMed Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS et al (1990) The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 132:910–925CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee SL, Walsh AJ, Ho HS (2001) Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg 136:556–562CrossRefPubMed Lee SL, Walsh AJ, Ho HS (2001) Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg 136:556–562CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Golledge J, Toms AP, Franklin IJ et al (1996) Assessment of peritonism in appendicitis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 78:11–14PubMedPubMedCentral Golledge J, Toms AP, Franklin IJ et al (1996) Assessment of peritonism in appendicitis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 78:11–14PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdul Rahman MM, Salh AM, Al-Sand SN (2006) The value of history taking, physical examination in the study of acute appendicitis in comparison to histopathology. Iraqi Postgrad Med J 5:46–53 Abdul Rahman MM, Salh AM, Al-Sand SN (2006) The value of history taking, physical examination in the study of acute appendicitis in comparison to histopathology. Iraqi Postgrad Med J 5:46–53
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Izbicki JR, Wolfram TK, Dietmar KW et al (1992) Accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a retrospective and prospective analysis of 686 patients. Eur J Surg 158:227–231PubMed Izbicki JR, Wolfram TK, Dietmar KW et al (1992) Accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a retrospective and prospective analysis of 686 patients. Eur J Surg 158:227–231PubMed
9.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Howell JM, Eddy OL, Lukens TW et al (2010) Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 55:71–116CrossRefPubMed Howell JM, Eddy OL, Lukens TW et al (2010) Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 55:71–116CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Nitta N, Takahashi M, Furukawa A et al (2005) MR imaging of the normal appendix and acute appendicitis. J Magn Reson Imaging 21:156–165CrossRefPubMed Nitta N, Takahashi M, Furukawa A et al (2005) MR imaging of the normal appendix and acute appendicitis. J Magn Reson Imaging 21:156–165CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Ajerami Y (2012) Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. East Mediterr Health J 18:66–69PubMed Al-Ajerami Y (2012) Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. East Mediterr Health J 18:66–69PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Nasiri S, Mohebbi F, Sodagari N et al (2012) Diagnostic values of ultrasound and the modified Alvarado scoring system in acute appendicitis. Int J Emerg Med 5:26CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nasiri S, Mohebbi F, Sodagari N et al (2012) Diagnostic values of ultrasound and the modified Alvarado scoring system in acute appendicitis. Int J Emerg Med 5:26CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SY, Lee KH, Kim K et al (2011) Acute appendicitis in young adults: low-versus standard-radiation-dose contrast-enhanced abdominal CT for diagnosis. Radiology 260:437–445CrossRefPubMed Kim SY, Lee KH, Kim K et al (2011) Acute appendicitis in young adults: low-versus standard-radiation-dose contrast-enhanced abdominal CT for diagnosis. Radiology 260:437–445CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Leeuwenburgh MMN, Wiarda BM, Wiezer MJ et al (2013) Comparison of imaging strategies with conditional contrast-enhanced CT and unenhanced MR imaging in patients suspected of having appendicitis: a multicenter diagnostic performance study. Radiology 268:135–143CrossRefPubMed Leeuwenburgh MMN, Wiarda BM, Wiezer MJ et al (2013) Comparison of imaging strategies with conditional contrast-enhanced CT and unenhanced MR imaging in patients suspected of having appendicitis: a multicenter diagnostic performance study. Radiology 268:135–143CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Moineddin DAS, Kellenberger CJ, Epelman M et al (2006) US or CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adults? A meta-analysis. Radiology 24:83–94 Moineddin DAS, Kellenberger CJ, Epelman M et al (2006) US or CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adults? A meta-analysis. Radiology 24:83–94
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilms IM, de Hoog DE, de Visser DC et al (2011) Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:CD008359 Wilms IM, de Hoog DE, de Visser DC et al (2011) Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:CD008359
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergeron E (2006) Clinical judgment remains of great value in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Can J Surg 49:96–100PubMedPubMedCentral Bergeron E (2006) Clinical judgment remains of great value in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Can J Surg 49:96–100PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Flum DR, Morris A, Koepsell T et al (2001) Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis. JAMA 286:1748–1753CrossRefPubMed Flum DR, Morris A, Koepsell T et al (2001) Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis. JAMA 286:1748–1753CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA (2004) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD001546 Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA (2004) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD001546
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H et al (2004) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg 239:43–52CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H et al (2004) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg 239:43–52CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Vinz H, Neu J (2007) Malpractice claims relating to the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis-decisions of the Norddeutsche Schlichtungsstelle (Expert Panel for Extrajudicial Claims Resolution of the Medical Associations in Northern Germany). Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich 101:553–563PubMed Vinz H, Neu J (2007) Malpractice claims relating to the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis-decisions of the Norddeutsche Schlichtungsstelle (Expert Panel for Extrajudicial Claims Resolution of the Medical Associations in Northern Germany). Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich 101:553–563PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME et al (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155:529–536CrossRefPubMed Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME et al (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155:529–536CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer Program] (2012) Version 5.2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer Program] (2012) Version 5.2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AWS et al (2005) Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 58:982–990CrossRefPubMed Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AWS et al (2005) Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 58:982–990CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat SAS 9.2 [Computer Program]. SAS E. Version 9.2. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc., 2008. Computer Program SAS 9.2 [Computer Program]. SAS E. Version 9.2. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc., 2008. Computer Program
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Schuetz GM, Schlattmann P, Dewey M et al (2012) Use of 3 × 2 tables with an intention to diagnose approach to assess clinical performance of diagnostic tests: meta-analytical evaluation of coronary CT angiography studies. BMJ 345:e6717CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schuetz GM, Schlattmann P, Dewey M et al (2012) Use of 3 × 2 tables with an intention to diagnose approach to assess clinical performance of diagnostic tests: meta-analytical evaluation of coronary CT angiography studies. BMJ 345:e6717CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Bendeck SE, Nino-Murcia M, Berry GJ et al (2002) Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates. Radiology 225:131–136CrossRefPubMed Bendeck SE, Nino-Murcia M, Berry GJ et al (2002) Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates. Radiology 225:131–136CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Fergusson JA, Hitos K, Simpson E (2002) Utility of white cell count and ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. ANZ J Surg 72:781–785CrossRefPubMed Fergusson JA, Hitos K, Simpson E (2002) Utility of white cell count and ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. ANZ J Surg 72:781–785CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Flum DR, McClure TD, Morris A et al (2005) Misdiagnosis of appendicitis and the use of diagnostic imaging. J Am Coll Surg 201:933–939CrossRefPubMed Flum DR, McClure TD, Morris A et al (2005) Misdiagnosis of appendicitis and the use of diagnostic imaging. J Am Coll Surg 201:933–939CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Gökçe AH, Aren A, Gökçe FS et al (2011) Reliability of ultrasonography for diagnosing acute appendicitis. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 17:19–22CrossRefPubMed Gökçe AH, Aren A, Gökçe FS et al (2011) Reliability of ultrasonography for diagnosing acute appendicitis. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 17:19–22CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Grodziński T, Gackowski W, Nyckowski P (2004) Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Pol Przegl Chir 76:1165–1174 Grodziński T, Gackowski W, Nyckowski P (2004) Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Pol Przegl Chir 76:1165–1174
35.
Zurück zum Zitat John SK, Joseph J, Shetty SR (2011) Avoiding negative appendectomies in rural surgical practice: is C-reactive protein estimation useful as a diagnostic tool? Natl Med J India 24:144–147PubMed John SK, Joseph J, Shetty SR (2011) Avoiding negative appendectomies in rural surgical practice: is C-reactive protein estimation useful as a diagnostic tool? Natl Med J India 24:144–147PubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Khanzada TW, Samad A, Sushel C (2009) Negative Appendectomy Rate: Can It Be Reduced? J Liaquat Uni Med Health Sci 8:19–22 Khanzada TW, Samad A, Sushel C (2009) Negative Appendectomy Rate: Can It Be Reduced? J Liaquat Uni Med Health Sci 8:19–22
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Köksal H, Uysal B, Sarıbabıççı R (2009) The role of the Alvarado scoring system and ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Gazi Med. J. 20:113–116 Köksal H, Uysal B, Sarıbabıççı R (2009) The role of the Alvarado scoring system and ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Gazi Med. J. 20:113–116
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurane SB, Sangolli MS, Gogate AS (2008) A one year prospective study to compare and evaluate diagnostic accuracy of modified Alvarado score and ultrasonography in acute appendicitis, in adults. Indian J Surg 70:125–129CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kurane SB, Sangolli MS, Gogate AS (2008) A one year prospective study to compare and evaluate diagnostic accuracy of modified Alvarado score and ultrasonography in acute appendicitis, in adults. Indian J Surg 70:125–129CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Memisoglu K, Karip B, Mestan M et al (2010) The value of preoperative diagnostic tests in acute appendicitis, retrospective analysis of 196 patients. World J Emerg Surg 5:5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Memisoglu K, Karip B, Mestan M et al (2010) The value of preoperative diagnostic tests in acute appendicitis, retrospective analysis of 196 patients. World J Emerg Surg 5:5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Peixoto Rde O, Nunes TA, Gomes CA (2011) Indices of diagnostic abdominal ultrasonography in acute appendicitis: influence of gender and physical constitution, time evolution of the disease and experience of radiologist. Rev Col Bras Cir 38:105–111CrossRefPubMed Peixoto Rde O, Nunes TA, Gomes CA (2011) Indices of diagnostic abdominal ultrasonography in acute appendicitis: influence of gender and physical constitution, time evolution of the disease and experience of radiologist. Rev Col Bras Cir 38:105–111CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Saeed K, Mehboob F, Azam V (2009) Role of abdominal sonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Rawal Med J 34:138–140 Saeed K, Mehboob F, Azam V (2009) Role of abdominal sonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Rawal Med J 34:138–140
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Sezer TO, Gulece B, Zalluhoglu N et al (2012) Diagnostic value of ultrasonography in appendicitis. Adv Clin Exp Med 21:633–636PubMed Sezer TO, Gulece B, Zalluhoglu N et al (2012) Diagnostic value of ultrasonography in appendicitis. Adv Clin Exp Med 21:633–636PubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma R, Kasliwal DK, Sharma RG (2007) Evaluation of negative appendicectomy rate in cases of suspected acute appendicitis and to study the usefulness of ultrasonography in improving the diagnostic accuracy. Indian J Surg 69:194–197CrossRefPubMed Sharma R, Kasliwal DK, Sharma RG (2007) Evaluation of negative appendicectomy rate in cases of suspected acute appendicitis and to study the usefulness of ultrasonography in improving the diagnostic accuracy. Indian J Surg 69:194–197CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Stunell H, Aremu M, Collins D et al (2008) Assessment of the value of pelvic ultrasonography in pre-menopausal women with right iliac fossa pain. Ir Med J 101:216–217PubMed Stunell H, Aremu M, Collins D et al (2008) Assessment of the value of pelvic ultrasonography in pre-menopausal women with right iliac fossa pain. Ir Med J 101:216–217PubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Uebel P, Weiss H, Trimborn CP et al (1996) Ultrasound diagnosis of acute appendicitis—possibilities and limits of the method—results of prospective and retrospective clinical studies. Ultraschall Med 17:100–105CrossRefPubMed Uebel P, Weiss H, Trimborn CP et al (1996) Ultrasound diagnosis of acute appendicitis—possibilities and limits of the method—results of prospective and retrospective clinical studies. Ultraschall Med 17:100–105CrossRefPubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat West WM, Brady-West DC, McDonald AH et al (2006) Ultrasound and white blood cell counts in suspected acute appendicitis. West Indian Med J 55:100–102CrossRefPubMed West WM, Brady-West DC, McDonald AH et al (2006) Ultrasound and white blood cell counts in suspected acute appendicitis. West Indian Med J 55:100–102CrossRefPubMed
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Mallin M, Craven P, Ockerse P et al (2015) Diagnosis of appendicitis by bedside ultrasound in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 33:430–432CrossRefPubMed Mallin M, Craven P, Ockerse P et al (2015) Diagnosis of appendicitis by bedside ultrasound in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 33:430–432CrossRefPubMed
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Hussain S, Rahman A, Abbasi T et al (2014) Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in acute appendicitis. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 26:12–17PubMed Hussain S, Rahman A, Abbasi T et al (2014) Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in acute appendicitis. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 26:12–17PubMed
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Nielsen JW, Boomer L, Kurtovic K et al (2015) Reducing computed tomography scans for appendicitis by introduction of a standardized and validated ultrasonography report template. J Pediatr Surg 50:144–148CrossRefPubMed Nielsen JW, Boomer L, Kurtovic K et al (2015) Reducing computed tomography scans for appendicitis by introduction of a standardized and validated ultrasonography report template. J Pediatr Surg 50:144–148CrossRefPubMed
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Shogilev D, Duus N, Odom SR et al (2014) Diagnosing appendicitis: evidence-based review of the diagnostic approach in 2014. West J Emerg Med 15:859–871CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shogilev D, Duus N, Odom SR et al (2014) Diagnosing appendicitis: evidence-based review of the diagnostic approach in 2014. West J Emerg Med 15:859–871CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Buscemi N, Hartling L, Vandermeer B (2006) Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 59:697–703CrossRefPubMed Buscemi N, Hartling L, Vandermeer B (2006) Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 59:697–703CrossRefPubMed
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Orr RK, Porter D, Hartman D (1995) Ultrasonography to evaluate adults for appendicitis: decision making based on meta-analysis and probabilistic reasoning. Acad Emerg Med 2:644–650CrossRefPubMed Orr RK, Porter D, Hartman D (1995) Ultrasonography to evaluate adults for appendicitis: decision making based on meta-analysis and probabilistic reasoning. Acad Emerg Med 2:644–650CrossRefPubMed
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Terasawa T, Blackmore CC, Bent S et al (2004) Systematic review: computed tomography and ultrasonography to detect acute appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Ann Intern Med 141:537–546CrossRefPubMed Terasawa T, Blackmore CC, Bent S et al (2004) Systematic review: computed tomography and ultrasonography to detect acute appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Ann Intern Med 141:537–546CrossRefPubMed
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Weston AR, Jackson TJ, Blamey S (2005) Diagnosis of appendicitis in adults by ultrasonography or computed tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 21:368–379CrossRefPubMed Weston AR, Jackson TJ, Blamey S (2005) Diagnosis of appendicitis in adults by ultrasonography or computed tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 21:368–379CrossRefPubMed
55.
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Doria AS, Moineddin R, Kellenberger CJ et al (2006) US or CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adults? A meta-analysis. Radiology 241:83–94CrossRefPubMed Doria AS, Moineddin R, Kellenberger CJ et al (2006) US or CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adults? A meta-analysis. Radiology 241:83–94CrossRefPubMed
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Khayal KA, Al-Omran MA (2007) Computed tomography and ultrasonography in the diagnosis of equivocal acute appendicitis. Saudi Med J 28:173–180PubMed Al-Khayal KA, Al-Omran MA (2007) Computed tomography and ultrasonography in the diagnosis of equivocal acute appendicitis. Saudi Med J 28:173–180PubMed
58.
Zurück zum Zitat van Randen A, Bipat S, Zwinderman AH et al (2008) Acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of CT and graded compression US related to prevalence of disease. Radiology 249:97–106CrossRefPubMed van Randen A, Bipat S, Zwinderman AH et al (2008) Acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of CT and graded compression US related to prevalence of disease. Radiology 249:97–106CrossRefPubMed
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Carroll PJ, Gibson D, El-Faedy O et al (2013) Surgeon-performed ultrasound at the bedside for the detection of appendicitis and gallstones: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 205:102–108CrossRefPubMed Carroll PJ, Gibson D, El-Faedy O et al (2013) Surgeon-performed ultrasound at the bedside for the detection of appendicitis and gallstones: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 205:102–108CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Diagnostic Accuracy of Abdominal Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
verfasst von
Vanja Giljaca
Tin Nadarevic
Goran Poropat
Vesna Stefanac Nadarevic
Davor Stimac
Publikationsdatum
18.11.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3792-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

World Journal of Surgery 3/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.