Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2017

12.08.2016 | Head and Neck Oncology

Differential Impact of Close Surgical Margin on Local Recurrence According to Primary Tumor Size in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

verfasst von: Jeon Yeob Jang, MD, PhD, Nayeon Choi, MD, Young-Hyeh Ko, MD, PhD, Man Ki Chung, MD, PhD, Young-Ik Son, MD, PhD, Chung-Hwan Baek, MD, PhD, Kwan-Hyuck Baek, PhD, Han-Sin Jeong, MD, PhD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 6/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The extent of surgical safety margin (gross tumor border to resection margin) in oral cancer surgery remains unclear, and no study has determined the differential impact of close surgical margin and microscopic extension according to primary tumor size in oral cancers.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 325 patients with surgically treated oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas to determine the effect of a close surgical margin (<5 mm) (cSM5) on local recurrence. In addition, the depth of microscopic tumor infiltration was determined in 90 available surgical specimens.

Results

The cSM5 was not related to the risk of local tumor recurrence in early-stage oral cancer, while it significantly increased the rate of local tumor recurrence in resectable advanced-stage oral cancers (hazard ratio 3.157, 95 % confidence interval 1.050–9.407, p = 0.041). Addition of postoperative adjuvant radiation to early-stage tumors with cSM5 did not further reduce the local recurrence rate compared to surgery alone. The depth of microscopic tumor extension from the gross tumor border was significantly associated with primary tumor thickness (ρ = 0.390, p < 0.001) and tumor sizes (ρ = 0.308, p = 0.003), which was a median (range) of 0.84 (0.14–2.32) mm in T1, 1.06 (0.20–4.34) mm in T2, and 1.77 (0.13–4.70) mm in T3–4.

Conclusions

The cSM5 was a significant risk factor for local recurrence only in advanced oral cancers, but not in early-stage tumors, where microscopic tumor extension was not beyond 3 mm in T1 tumors. Thus, the extent of surgical safety margin can be redefined according to the primary tumor size.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(4):9–29.CrossRefPubMed Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(4):9–29.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah JP, Gil Z. Current concepts in management of oral cancer—surgery. Oral Oncol. 2009;45:394–401.CrossRefPubMed Shah JP, Gil Z. Current concepts in management of oral cancer—surgery. Oral Oncol. 2009;45:394–401.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Brennan JA, Mao L, Hruban RH, et al. Molecular assessment of histopathological staging in squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:429–35.CrossRefPubMed Brennan JA, Mao L, Hruban RH, et al. Molecular assessment of histopathological staging in squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:429–35.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Nicoletti G, Soutar DS, Jackson MS, Wrench AA, Robertson G. Chewing and swallowing after surgical treatment for oral cancer: functional evaluation in 196 selected cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:329–38.CrossRefPubMed Nicoletti G, Soutar DS, Jackson MS, Wrench AA, Robertson G. Chewing and swallowing after surgical treatment for oral cancer: functional evaluation in 196 selected cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:329–38.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hara I, Gellrich NC, Duker J, et al. Evaluation of swallowing function after intraoral soft tissue reconstruction with microvascular free flaps. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32:593–9.CrossRefPubMed Hara I, Gellrich NC, Duker J, et al. Evaluation of swallowing function after intraoral soft tissue reconstruction with microvascular free flaps. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32:593–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hinni ML, Ferlito A, Brandwein-Gensler MS, et al. Surgical margins in head and neck cancer: a contemporary review. Head Neck. 2013;35:1362–70.CrossRefPubMed Hinni ML, Ferlito A, Brandwein-Gensler MS, et al. Surgical margins in head and neck cancer: a contemporary review. Head Neck. 2013;35:1362–70.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mao L, Clark D. Molecular margin of surgical resections—where do we go from here? Cancer. 2015;121:1914–6.CrossRefPubMed Mao L, Clark D. Molecular margin of surgical resections—where do we go from here? Cancer. 2015;121:1914–6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Meier JD, Oliver DA, Varvares MA. Surgical margin determination in head and neck oncology: current clinical practice. The results of an International American Head and Neck Society member survey. Head Neck. 2005;27:952–8.CrossRefPubMed Meier JD, Oliver DA, Varvares MA. Surgical margin determination in head and neck oncology: current clinical practice. The results of an International American Head and Neck Society member survey. Head Neck. 2005;27:952–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Binahmed A, Nason RW, Abdoh AA. The clinical significance of the positive surgical margin in oral cancer. Oral Oncol. 2007;43:780–4.CrossRefPubMed Binahmed A, Nason RW, Abdoh AA. The clinical significance of the positive surgical margin in oral cancer. Oral Oncol. 2007;43:780–4.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Sutton DN, Brown JS, Rogers SN, Vaughan ED, Woolgar JA. The prognostic implications of the surgical margin in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32:30–4.CrossRefPubMed Sutton DN, Brown JS, Rogers SN, Vaughan ED, Woolgar JA. The prognostic implications of the surgical margin in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32:30–4.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurita H, Nakanishi Y, Nishizawa R, et al. Impact of different surgical margin conditions on local recurrence of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2010;46:814–7.CrossRefPubMed Kurita H, Nakanishi Y, Nishizawa R, et al. Impact of different surgical margin conditions on local recurrence of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2010;46:814–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen TC, Wang CP, Ko JY, Yang TL, Lou PJ. The impact of pathologic close margin on the survival of patients with early stage oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2012;48:623–8.CrossRefPubMed Chen TC, Wang CP, Ko JY, Yang TL, Lou PJ. The impact of pathologic close margin on the survival of patients with early stage oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2012;48:623–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Barry CP, Ahmed F, Rogers SN, et al. Influence of surgical margins on local recurrence in T1/T2 oral squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2015;37:1176–80.CrossRefPubMed Barry CP, Ahmed F, Rogers SN, et al. Influence of surgical margins on local recurrence in T1/T2 oral squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2015;37:1176–80.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Dik EA, Willems SM, Ipenburg NA, Adriaansens SO, Rosenberg AJ, van Es RJ. Resection of early oral squamous cell carcinoma with positive or close margins: relevance of adjuvant treatment in relation to local recurrence: margins of 3 mm as safe as 5 mm. Oral Oncol. 2014;50:611–5.CrossRefPubMed Dik EA, Willems SM, Ipenburg NA, Adriaansens SO, Rosenberg AJ, van Es RJ. Resection of early oral squamous cell carcinoma with positive or close margins: relevance of adjuvant treatment in relation to local recurrence: margins of 3 mm as safe as 5 mm. Oral Oncol. 2014;50:611–5.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ch’ng S, Corbett-Burns S, Stanton N, et al.2013 Close margin alone does not warrant postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer.119(13):2427–37.CrossRefPubMed Ch’ng S, Corbett-Burns S, Stanton N, et al.2013 Close margin alone does not warrant postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer.119(13):2427–37.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1471–4.CrossRefPubMed Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1471–4.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Pfister DG, Ang KK, Brizel DM, et al. Head and neck cancers. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2011;9:596–650.CrossRefPubMed Pfister DG, Ang KK, Brizel DM, et al. Head and neck cancers. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2011;9:596–650.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mistry RC, Qureshi SS, Kumaran C. Post-resection mucosal margin shrinkage in oral cancer: quantification and significance. J Surg Oncol. 2005;91:131–3.CrossRefPubMed Mistry RC, Qureshi SS, Kumaran C. Post-resection mucosal margin shrinkage in oral cancer: quantification and significance. J Surg Oncol. 2005;91:131–3.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee J, Yoon N, Choi SY, et al. Extent of local invasion and safe resection in cT1–2 tonsil cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2013;107:469–73.CrossRefPubMed Lee J, Yoon N, Choi SY, et al. Extent of local invasion and safe resection in cT1–2 tonsil cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2013;107:469–73.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang TL, Wang CP, Ko JY, Lin CF, Lou PJ. Association of tumor satellite distance with prognosis and contralateral neck recurrence of tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2008;30:631–8.CrossRefPubMed Yang TL, Wang CP, Ko JY, Lin CF, Lou PJ. Association of tumor satellite distance with prognosis and contralateral neck recurrence of tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2008;30:631–8.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Hayashi M, Wu G, Roh JL, et al. Correlation of gene methylation in surgical margin imprints with locoregional recurrence in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2015;121:1957–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hayashi M, Wu G, Roh JL, et al. Correlation of gene methylation in surgical margin imprints with locoregional recurrence in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2015;121:1957–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat de Carvalho AC, Kowalski LP, Campos AH, Soares FA, Carvalho AL, Vettore AL. Clinical significance of molecular alterations in histologically negative surgical margins of head and neck cancer patients. Oral Oncol. 2012;48:240–8.CrossRefPubMed de Carvalho AC, Kowalski LP, Campos AH, Soares FA, Carvalho AL, Vettore AL. Clinical significance of molecular alterations in histologically negative surgical margins of head and neck cancer patients. Oral Oncol. 2012;48:240–8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Differential Impact of Close Surgical Margin on Local Recurrence According to Primary Tumor Size in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
verfasst von
Jeon Yeob Jang, MD, PhD
Nayeon Choi, MD
Young-Hyeh Ko, MD, PhD
Man Ki Chung, MD, PhD
Young-Ik Son, MD, PhD
Chung-Hwan Baek, MD, PhD
Kwan-Hyuck Baek, PhD
Han-Sin Jeong, MD, PhD
Publikationsdatum
12.08.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 6/2017
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5497-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2017

Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.