nach oben

International Orthopaedics

Erschienen in:

07.10.2017 | Original Paper

Dislocations after use of dual-mobility cups in cementless primary total hip arthroplasty: prospective multicentre series

verfasst von: Ji-hyo Hwang, Sang-Min Kim, Kwang-Jun Oh, Yeesuk Kim

Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of dislocation and specific complications of the dual-mobility cup.

Methods

The arthroplasties involved 167 hips in 165 patients; 51 hips (30.5%) were in men and 116 (69.4%) were in women. The active articulation E1® dual-mobility cup (Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA) was used, and the surgical approach was posterolateral in 120 hips and anterolateral in 47 hips.

Results

Four (2.3%) dislocations were observed. Mean time of dislocation was 30.5 days post-operatively. Three incomplete reductions occurred during closed reduction. When comparing parameters between dislocation and no-dislocation groups, there were no differences in patient and surgical parameters. However, all dislocations occurred in patients with femoral neck fractures and in the posterolateral approach group.

Conclusion

The incidence of dislocation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a dual-mobility cup was acceptable, and cup diameter of the dislocation group was substantially larger than that of no-dislocation group. Based on clinical outcomes of our study, we conclude that the dual-mobility cup is a reliable option in THA, and further studies are necessary.

Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Vail TP, Berry DJ (2009) The Epidemiology of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91-A:128–133. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.h.00155 CrossRef

Springer BD, Fehring TK, Griffin WL, Odum SM, Masonis JL (2009) Why Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Fails. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:166–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0566-z CrossRefPubMed

Burroughs BR, Hallstrom B, Golladay GJ, Hoeffel D, Harris WH (2005) Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes. J Arthroplast 20:11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2004.07.008 CrossRef

Berry DJ, von Knoch M, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS (2005) Effect of Femoral Head Diameter and Operative Approach on Risk of Dislocation After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87-A:2456–2463. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.d.02860

Robinson M, Bornstein L, Mennear B, Bostrom M, Nestor B, Padgett D, Westrich G (2012) Effect of restoration of combined offset on stability of large head THA. Hip Int 22:248–253. https://doi.org/10.5301/HIP.2012.9283 CrossRefPubMed

Lachiewicz PF, Kelley SS (2002) The use of constrained components in total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 10:233–238CrossRefPubMed

Nich C, Vandenbussche E, Augereau B, Sadaka J (2016) Do Dual-Mobility Cups Reduce the Risk of Dislocation in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Fractured Neck of Femur in Patients Aged Older Than 75 Years? J Arthroplast 31:1256–1260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.11.041 CrossRef

Boyer B, Philippot R, Geringer J, Farizon F (2012) Primary total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility socket to prevent dislocation: a 22-year follow-up of 240 hips. Int Orthop 36:511–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1289-4 CrossRefPubMed

Guyen O, Pibarot V, Vaz G, Chevillotte C, Carret JP, Bejui-Hugues J (2007) Unconstrained tripolar implants for primary total hip arthroplasty in patients at risk for dislocation. J Arthroplast 22:849–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2006.11.014 CrossRef

10.

Philippot R, Camilleri JP, Boyer B, Adam P, Farizon F (2009) The use of a dual-articulation acetabular cup system to prevent dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 384 cases at a mean follow-up of 15 years. Int Orthop 33:927–932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0589-9 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Leclercq S, Benoit JY, de Rosa JP, Tallier E, Leteurtre C, Girardin PH (2013) Evora(R) chromium-cobalt dual mobility socket: results at a minimum 10 years' follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99:923–928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2013.07.017 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Puch JM, Derhi G, Descamps L, Verdier R, Caton JH (2017) Dual-mobility cup in total hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty five years and over ten years of follow-up : A prospective and comparative series. Int Orthop 41:475–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3325-x CrossRefPubMed

13.

Prudhon JL, Verdier R, Caton JH (2017) Low friction arthroplasty and dual mobility cup: a new gold standard. Int Orthop 41:563–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3375-0 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Caton JH, Prudhon JL, Ferreira A, Aslanian T, Verdier R (2014) A comparative and retrospective study of three hundred and twenty primary Charnley type hip replacements with a minimum follow up of ten years to assess whether a dual mobility cup has a decreased dislocation risk. Int Orthop 38:1125–1129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2313-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Prudhon JL, Ferreira A, Verdier R (2013) Dual mobility cup: dislocation rate and survivorship at ten years of follow-up. Int Orthop 37:2345–2350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2067-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Langlais FL, Ropars M, Gaucher F, Musset T, Chaix O (2008) Dual mobility cemented cups have low dislocation rates in THA revisions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:389–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-007-0047-9 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Philippot R, Adam P, Reckhaus M, Delangle F, Verdot F, Curvale G, Farizon F (2009) Prevention of dislocation in total hip revision surgery using a dual mobility design. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:407–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2009.04.016 CrossRefPubMed

18.

Berry DJ, von Knoch M, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS (2004) The cumulative long-term risk of dislocation after primary Charnley total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:9–14CrossRefPubMed

19.

Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Vail TP, Berry DJ (2009) The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:128–133. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00155 CrossRefPubMed

20.

Clohisy JC, Harris WH (1999) Primary hybrid total hip replacement, performed with insertion of the acetabular component without cement and a precoat femoral component with cement. An average ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81-A:247–255CrossRef

21.

Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51-A:737–755CrossRef

22.

Woo RYG, Morrey BF (1982) Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64-A:1295–1306CrossRef

23.

D'Apuzzo MR, Koch CN, Esposito CI, Elpers ME, Wright TM, Westrich GH (2016) Assessment of Damage on a Dual Mobility Acetabular System. J Arthroplast 31:1828–1835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.039 CrossRef

24.

Boyer B, Neri T, Geringer J, Di Iorio A, Philippot R, Farizon F (2017) Understanding wear in dual mobility total hip replacement: first generation explant wear patterns. Int Orthop 41:529–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3362-5 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Gaudin G, Ferreira A, Gaillard R, Prudhon JL, Caton JH, Lustig S (2017) Equivalent wear performance of dual mobility bearing compared with standard bearing in total hip arthroplasty: in vitro study. Int Orthop 41:521–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3346-5 CrossRefPubMed

26.

Plummer DR, Haughom BD, Della Valle CJ (2014) Dual mobility in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 45:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2013.08.004 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Bousquet G, Gazielly DF, Debiesse JL (1985) The ceramic coated cementless total hip arthroplasty: Basic concepts and surgical technique. J Orthopaedic Surg Tech 1:15–28

28.

Combes A, Migaud H, Girard J, Duhamel A, Fessy MH (2013) Low rate of dislocation of dual-mobility cups in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:3891–3900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-2929-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Hamadouche M, Arnould H, Bouxin B (2012) Is a cementless dual mobility socket in primary THA a reasonable option? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:3048–3053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2395-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Vielpeau C, Lebel B, Ardouin L, Burdin G, Lautridou C (2011) The dual mobility socket concept: experience with 668 cases. Int Orthop 35:225–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1156-8 CrossRefPubMed

31.

Ferreira A, Prudhon JL, Verdier R, Puch JM, Descamps L, Dehri G, Remi M, Caton JH (2017) Contemporary dual-mobility cup regional and private register: methodology and results. Int Orthop 41:439–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3405-6 CrossRefPubMed

32.

Liao L, Zhao Jm SW, Xf D, Lj C, Luo S (2012) A meta-analysis of total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty outcomes for displaced femoral neck fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132:1021–1029. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-012-1485-8 CrossRefPubMed

33.

Yu L, Wang Y, Chen J (2012) Total Hip Arthroplasty Versus Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures: Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:2235–2243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2293-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Burgers PTPW, Van Geene AR, Van den Bekerom MPJ, Van Lieshout EMM, Blom B, Aleem IS, Bhandari M, Poolman RW (2012) Total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the healthy elderly: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized trials. Int Orthop 36:1549–1560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1569-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Brooks PJ (2013) Dislocation following total hip replacement: causes and cures. Bone Joint J 95-B:67–69. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.95b11.32645 CrossRefPubMed

36.

Masonis JL, Bourne RB (2002) Surgical approach, abductor function, and total hip arthroplasty dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 405:46–53CrossRef

37.

Soong M, Rubash HE, Macaulay W (2004) Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 12:314–321CrossRefPubMed

38.

Roberts JM, Fu FH, McClain EJ, Ferguson AB Jr (1984) A comparison of the posterolateral and anterolateral approaches to total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 187:205–210

39.

Enocson A, Hedbeck CJ, Tidermark J, Pettersson H, Ponzer S, Lapidus LJ (2009) Dislocation of total hip replacement in patients with fractures of the femoral neck. Acta Orthop 80:184–189. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453670902930024 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Philippot R, Boyer B, Farizon F (2013) Intraprosthetic dislocation: a specific complication of the dual-mobility system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:965–970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2639-2 CrossRefPubMed

41.

Malatray M, Roux JP, Gunst S, Pibarot V, Wegrzyn J (2017) Highly crosslinked polyethylene: a safe alternative to conventional polyethylene for dual mobility cup mobile component. A biomechanical validation. Int Orthop 41:507–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3334-9 CrossRefPubMed

42.

Oral E, Muratoglu OK (2011) Vitamin E diffused, highly crosslinked UHMWPE: a review. Int Orthop 35:215–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1161-y CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Dislocations after use of dual-mobility cups in cementless primary total hip arthroplasty: prospective multicentre series
verfasst von: Ji-hyo Hwang
Sang-Min Kim
Kwang-Jun Oh
Yeesuk Kim
Publikationsdatum: 07.10.2017
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3660-6

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

25.04.2024 | Hypertonie | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Dislocations after use of dual-mobility cups in cementless primary total hip arthroplasty: prospective multicentre series

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

Reconstruction for chronic Achilles tendinopathy: comparison of flexor hallucis longus (FHL) transfer versus V-Y advancement

In regard to the letter by Li and Yang on the article “Which immobilization is better for distal radius fracture? A prospective randomized trial”

Cyclic mechanical stretch enhances BMP9-induced osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells

Two-stage revision of infected shoulder arthroplasty using prosthesis of antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement: minimum three-year follow-up

Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy after lower extremity fracture surgery: a pilot study

Hyaluronic acid injections for osteoarthritis of the knee: predictors of successful treatment

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie