Walking may present a feasible means of increasing physical activity participation among children and adolescents. |
Walking interventions, delivered in the school setting, may be effective in increasing physical activity. |
The evidence base is limited by the small number of studies conducted to date in this population and by the short-term duration of included studies. |
1 Introduction
2 Methods
2.1 Search Strategy
2.2 Eligibility Criteria
2.3 Study Selection and Data Extraction
2.4 Change in Walking Behaviour
2.5 Risk of Bias
2.6 Behaviour Change Techniques
3 Results
3.1 Study Selection
3.2 Characteristics of Included Studies
Study | Design; country | Setting (delivered by) | Participants | Outcome measures | Follow-upa
| Intervention description | Main results | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Studies in children (aged 5–12 years) | ||||||||
Sirard et al. [46] | RCT (individual); USA | Active travel to school (researcher) |
n = 11 Mean age: I group 9.7 y (SD 0.90) C group 9.5 y (SD 1.02) 55 % male | Accelerometer (counts/min, % of time spent in MVPA) | 2 weeks | I: Walking school bus, walked at normal pace C: Morning commute was not altered | Counts/min and % time MVPA: Before school* GCT** All days ↔ Weekdays ↔ | |
McKee et al. [55] | Quasi-experimental controlled trial (school); UK | School and family (teacher) |
n = 55 Mean age 9 y 40 % male | Distance travelled to school by walking (m) | 10 weeks | I: School-based active travel project delivered through teacher handbooks and pupil packs C: No intervention | Distance walked*** | |
McMinn et al. [47] | Quasi-experimental controlled trial (school); UK | Active travel to school (teacher) |
n = 166 Mean age: I group 8.7 y (SD 0.51) C group 8.6 y (SD 0.48) 60 % male | Accelerometer (daily step count) | 6 weeks | I: School-based active travel project delivered through teacher handbooks and pupil packs C: No intervention | Daily step count ↔ | |
Bungum et al. [48] | Quasi-experimental controlled trial (school); USA | Active travel to school (teacher/school) |
n = 172 Aged 5–11 y 53 % male | Observation: mode of travel to school (number of walkers) | 1 week, 2 weeks | I: School participated in NMD (encourages active travel to school) C: School did not participate in NMD | Number of walkers: 1 week ↔ 2 weeks ↔ | |
Mendoza et al. [49] | Quasi-experimental controlled trial (school); USA | Active travel to school (researcher) |
n = 653 Aged 5–11 y 49 % female Low income school, urban community | Mode of travel to school: show of hands | 1 month, 6 months, 12 months | I: Walking school bus to and from school up to 5 days/week C: Received standard information on school transportation (no intervention) | Walking to school: 1 month** 6 months** 12 months*** | |
Mendoza et al. [50] | Cluster RCT (school); USA | Active travel to school (researcher) |
n = 149 Mean age 9.7 y (SD 0.7) 70 % male Low income schools | Accelerometer (mins/day of MVPA) | 4/5 weeks | I: Walking school bus to and from school up to 5 days/week C: Received standard information on school transportation (no intervention) | Minutes/day MVPA* | |
Wen et al. [51] | Cluster RCT (school); Australia | Active travel to school (teacher/school/local council) |
n = 1996 Aged 10–12 y 53 % female | Student: 5-day travel mode survey Parent: mode of travel for typical week (walking trips) | 18 months | I: Multicomponent active travel to school, provided resources for students, schools and parents C: Received a programme on healthy eating at school | Walking to school: Student survey ↔ Parent survey* | |
Ford et al. [53] | RCT (individual); UK | School only (teacher/researcher) |
n = 152 Aged 5–11 years 52 % male | Accelerometer (weekday counts 0900–1500 hours) | 15 weeks | I: Participated in an accumulated brisk walking programme: 2 × 15 min walking sessions, at least three times/week C: Normal, seated lessons during walking (no intervention) | Mean weekday countsb: I group*** | |
Morrison et al. [57] | RCT (individual); UK | Home (family/researcher) |
n = 30 Mean age 10.9 y 67 % female | Accelerometer (total PA, % of time in sed, LPA, MVPA, time sitting) | 11 weeks | I: Family-based dog walking intervention, BCTs employed to increase frequency, intensity and duration of dog walking C: Did not receive any information, asked to continue normal routine | Total PA ↔ % Sed ↔ % LPA ↔ % MVPA ↔ % time sitting ↔ | |
Studies in adolescents (aged 13–18 years) | ||||||||
Schofield et al. [54] | Quasi-experimental controlled trial (school); Australia | School only (researcher) |
n = 68 Mean age 15.8 y (SD 0.8) Girls only | Pedometer (4-day step count) | 6 weeks, 12 weeks | I: 6 weekly sessions and 6-week maintenance phase I group 1: pedometer-based self-monitoring, encouraging step increases up to 10,000/day I group 2: self-monitoring through recording minutes of daily activity, daily minute prescriptions encouraging increases up to 30–60 mins/day C: Did not attend weekly meetings | 4-day step count: 6 weeks Group 1 ↔ Group 2 ↔ 12 weeks Group 1* Group 2 ↔ | |
Shimon and Petlichkoff [56] | RCT (class); USA | School only (teacher) |
n = 113 Mean age 13.2 y (SD 0.72) 54 % male | Pedometer (daily step count) | 5 weeks | I group 1: Self-regulation strategies: unsealed pedometers for self-monitoring; plotted daily steps; information on goal setting strategies I group 2: Unsealed pedometers, recorded daily steps C: Wore sealed pedometers | Daily step count: Group 1* Group 2↔ | |
Lee et al. [52] | RCT (class); Taiwan | School only (nursing tutor/researcher) |
n = 91 Mean age 16.2 y (SD 0.41) Girls only | Pedometer (steps/day of aerobic walking) | 12 weeks | I: Instructed to complete 12,000 steps and/or 60 mins aerobic walking/day; individual discussions, goal setting, given pedometers C: Usual content and activity of physical education classes | Aerobic walking** |
3.3 Effect of Intervention on Walking Levels
3.4 Effect of Interventions in Children (Aged 5–12 years)
3.5 Effect of Interventions in Adolescents (Aged 13–18 years)
3.6 Risk of Bias
3.6.1 Low Risk of Bias
Study | Random sequence generation | Allocation concealment | Blinding of participants and personnel | Blinding of outcome assessment | Incomplete outcome data | Selective reporting | Other bias |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sirard et al. [46] | Low | Unclear | High | Unclear | Low | Unclear | High |
McKee et al. [55] | High | High | Unclear | Unclear | Low | Low | High |
McMinn et al. [47] | High | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Low | High |
Bungum et al. [48] | High | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | High |
Mendoza et al. [49] | High | High | Unclear | Unclear | Low | Low | High |
Mendoza et al. [50] | Low | Unclear | High | Low | Low | Low | High |
Wen et al. [51] | Low | High | High | Low | Unclear | Low | High |
Ford et al. [53] | Low | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | High |
Morrison et al. [57] | Low | Low | Unclear | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Schofield et al. [54] | High | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Low | Low | High |
Shimon and Petlichkoff [56] | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Low | Low | High |
Lee et al. [52] | Unclear | Unclear | High | Low | Low | Unclear | High |
3.6.2 High Risk of Bias
3.6.3 Unclear Risk of Bias
3.7 Behaviour Change Techniques
Study | Setting (delivered by) | Intervention classification | BCT categories | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sirard et al. [46] | School/local neighbourhood (study staff) | Active travel to school | Social support Repetition and substitution | Desirable |
McKee et al. [55] | School and family (classroom teacher) | Active travel to school | Goals and planning Feedback and monitoring Shaping knowledge | Desirable |
McMinn et al. [47] | School and family (classroom teacher) | Active travel to school | Goals and planning Feedback and monitoring Shaping knowledge | Undesirable |
Bungum et al. [48] | School/local neighbourhood (school staff) | Active travel to school | Associations Reward and threat | Undesirable |
Mendoza et al. [49] | School/local neighbourhood (study staff) | Active travel to school | Social support Repetition and substitution Comparison of outcomes | Desirable |
Mendoza et al. [50] | School/local neighbourhood (study staff) | Active travel to school | Social support Repetition and substitution | Desirable |
Wen et al. [51] | School/local neighbourhood (school staff, local council officers) | Active travel to school | Feedback and monitoring Shaping knowledge Natural consequences Repetition and substitution Antecedents | Desirable |
Ford et al. [53] | School only (teaching assistants and researcher) | Structured exercise, walking | Social support | Desirable |
Morrison et al. [57] | Family/home (parents and researcher) | Unstructured exercise, walking | Goals and planning Feedback and monitoring Social support Comparison of behaviour Repetition and substitution Comparison of outcomes Antecedents | Undesirable |
Schofield et al. [54] | School only (principal researcher/research assistant) | Educational/counselling, generic | Goals and planning Feedback and monitoring Associations Repetition and substitution | Desirable |
Shimon and Petlichkoff [56] | School only (physical education teachers and assistants) | Educational/counselling, generic | Goals and planning Feedback and monitoring Social support | Desirable |
Lee et al. [52] | School only (researcher/nursing tutor) | Individualised counselling | Goals and planning Feedback and monitoring Social support Natural consequences Associations Repetition and substitution Reward and threat | Desirable |