Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2016

16.11.2015 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Does an increased cesarean section rate improve neonatal outcome in term pregnancies?

verfasst von: Marja Kupari, Nina Talola, Tiina Luukkaala, Kati Tihtonen

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 1/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To clarify whether an increased cesarean section rate improves the short-term neonatal outcome in singleton term pregnancies with cephalic presentation.

Methods

A retrospective study of institutional data on the mode of delivery and neonatal outcome. The study included two cohorts: 1998–1999 (n = 7437) and 2004–2005 (n = 8505), since the institutional cesarean section rate increased sharply between these cohorts and has remained stable after the latter study period.

Results

The caesarean section rate almost doubled from 6.8 to 11.3 % (p < 0.001), during the study period. The rate of neonates suffering severe birth asphyxia remained low in both cohorts (0.4 vs. 0.6 %) and there were no significant differences in neonatal outcome (Apgar score <4 at 1 min and Apgar score <7 at 5 min, severe birth asphyxia, resuscitation or artificial ventilation) between the study periods. In the subgroup of neonates delivered vaginally, no significant differences were found in the above-mentioned neonatal outcomes between the cohorts. Apart from other outcomes admissions to neonatal intensive care unit increased significantly (p < 0.001) during the latter period (0.8 vs 1.6 %).

Conclusions

Increasing cesarean section rate from a low to a moderate does not improve the short-term neonatal outcome in term singleton pregnancies. On the contrary neonatal intensive care unit admissions increased with increasing caesarean section rate. Furthermore it is possible to achieve good neonatal outcome with a low cesarean section rate.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Brennan DJ, Robson MS, Murphy M, O’Herlihy C (2009) Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201(308):e1PubMed Brennan DJ, Robson MS, Murphy M, O’Herlihy C (2009) Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201(308):e1PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat WHO (1985) Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 2:436–437 WHO (1985) Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 2:436–437
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Joffe M, Chapple J, Paterson C, Beard RW (1994) What is the optimal caesarean section rate? An outcome based study of existing variation. J Epidemiol Community Health 48:406–411CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Joffe M, Chapple J, Paterson C, Beard RW (1994) What is the optimal caesarean section rate? An outcome based study of existing variation. J Epidemiol Community Health 48:406–411CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Pallasmaa N, Alanen A, Ekblad U, Vahlberg T, Koivisto M, Raudaskoski T et al (2013) Variation in cesarean section rates is not related to maternal and neonatal outcomes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92:1168–1174PubMed Pallasmaa N, Alanen A, Ekblad U, Vahlberg T, Koivisto M, Raudaskoski T et al (2013) Variation in cesarean section rates is not related to maternal and neonatal outcomes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92:1168–1174PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Porreco RP (1985) High cesarean section rate: a new perspective. Obstet Gynecol 65:307–311PubMed Porreco RP (1985) High cesarean section rate: a new perspective. Obstet Gynecol 65:307–311PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Jonsdottir G, Smarason AK, Geirsson RT, Bjarnadottir RI (2009) No correlation between cesarean section rates and perinatal mortality of singleton infants over 2,500 g. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88:621–623CrossRefPubMed Jonsdottir G, Smarason AK, Geirsson RT, Bjarnadottir RI (2009) No correlation between cesarean section rates and perinatal mortality of singleton infants over 2,500 g. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88:621–623CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Foley ME, Alarab M, Daly L, Keane D, Macquillan K, O’Herlihy C (2005) Term neonatal asphyxial seizures and peripartum deaths: lack of correlation with a rising cesarean delivery rate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:102–108CrossRefPubMed Foley ME, Alarab M, Daly L, Keane D, Macquillan K, O’Herlihy C (2005) Term neonatal asphyxial seizures and peripartum deaths: lack of correlation with a rising cesarean delivery rate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:102–108CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gould JB, Danielsen B, Korst LM, Phibbs R, Chance K, Main E et al (2004) Cesarean delivery rates and neonatal morbidity in a low-risk population. Obstet Gynecol 104:11–19CrossRefPubMed Gould JB, Danielsen B, Korst LM, Phibbs R, Chance K, Main E et al (2004) Cesarean delivery rates and neonatal morbidity in a low-risk population. Obstet Gynecol 104:11–19CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith J, Wells L, Dodd K (2000) The continuing fall in incidence of hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy in term infants. BJOG 107:461–466CrossRefPubMed Smith J, Wells L, Dodd K (2000) The continuing fall in incidence of hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy in term infants. BJOG 107:461–466CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Pallasmaa N, Ekblad U, Gissler M (2008) Severe maternal morbidity and the mode of delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87:662–668CrossRefPubMed Pallasmaa N, Ekblad U, Gissler M (2008) Severe maternal morbidity and the mode of delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87:662–668CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Broe S, Khoo SK (1989) How safe is caesarean section in current practice? A survey of mortality and serious morbidity. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 29:93–98CrossRefPubMed Broe S, Khoo SK (1989) How safe is caesarean section in current practice? A survey of mortality and serious morbidity. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 29:93–98CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jain NJ, Kruse LK, Demissie K, Khandelwal M (2009) Impact of mode of delivery on neonatal complications: trends between 1997 and 2005. J Matern Fetal Neonat Med 22:491–500CrossRef Jain NJ, Kruse LK, Demissie K, Khandelwal M (2009) Impact of mode of delivery on neonatal complications: trends between 1997 and 2005. J Matern Fetal Neonat Med 22:491–500CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Sachs BP, Kobelin C, Castro MA, Frigoletto F (1999) The risks of lowering the cesarean-delivery rate. N Engl J Med 340:54–57CrossRefPubMed Sachs BP, Kobelin C, Castro MA, Frigoletto F (1999) The risks of lowering the cesarean-delivery rate. N Engl J Med 340:54–57CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat National Institute for Health and Welfare (2013) Official statistics of Finland, statistical report 24/2013, 27th of September 2013. Perinatal statistics-parturients, deliveries and newborns. Helsinki, 2013 National Institute for Health and Welfare (2013) Official statistics of Finland, statistical report 24/2013, 27th of September 2013. Perinatal statistics-parturients, deliveries and newborns. Helsinki, 2013
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Pihkala J, Hakala T, Voutilainen P, Raivio K (1989) Characteristic of recent fetal growth curves in Finland. Duodecim 105:1540–1546PubMed Pihkala J, Hakala T, Voutilainen P, Raivio K (1989) Characteristic of recent fetal growth curves in Finland. Duodecim 105:1540–1546PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Berglund S (2012) “ Every case of asphyxia can be used as a learning example “. Conclusions from an analysis of substandard obstetrical care. J Perinat Med 40:9–18CrossRef Berglund S (2012) “ Every case of asphyxia can be used as a learning example “. Conclusions from an analysis of substandard obstetrical care. J Perinat Med 40:9–18CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ojala K, Vääräsmäki M, Mäkikallio K, Valkama M, Tekay A (2006) A comparison of intraparrtum automated fetal electrocardiography and conventional cardiotocography—a randomized controlled study. BJOG 113:419–423CrossRefPubMed Ojala K, Vääräsmäki M, Mäkikallio K, Valkama M, Tekay A (2006) A comparison of intraparrtum automated fetal electrocardiography and conventional cardiotocography—a randomized controlled study. BJOG 113:419–423CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson KB, Dambrosia JM, Ting TY, Grether JK (1996) Uncertain value of electronic fetal monitoring in predicting cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med 334:613–618CrossRefPubMed Nelson KB, Dambrosia JM, Ting TY, Grether JK (1996) Uncertain value of electronic fetal monitoring in predicting cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med 334:613–618CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Helfand M, Marton K, Ueland K (1985) Factors involved in the interpretation of fetal monitor tracings. Obstet Gynecol 151:737–744 Helfand M, Marton K, Ueland K (1985) Factors involved in the interpretation of fetal monitor tracings. Obstet Gynecol 151:737–744
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Thacker SB, Stroup DF, Peterson HB (1995) Efficacy and safety of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: an update. Obstet Gynecol 86:613–620PubMed Thacker SB, Stroup DF, Peterson HB (1995) Efficacy and safety of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: an update. Obstet Gynecol 86:613–620PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Maisonneuve E, Audibert F, Guilbaud L, Lathelize J, Jousse M, Pierre F et al (2011) Risk factors for severe neonatal acidosis. Obstet Gynecol 118:818–823CrossRefPubMed Maisonneuve E, Audibert F, Guilbaud L, Lathelize J, Jousse M, Pierre F et al (2011) Risk factors for severe neonatal acidosis. Obstet Gynecol 118:818–823CrossRefPubMed
24.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Howell CJ, Kidd C, Roberts W, Upton P, Lucking L, Jones PW et al (2001) A randomised controlled trial of epidural compared with non-epidural analgesia in labour. BJOG 108:27–33PubMed Howell CJ, Kidd C, Roberts W, Upton P, Lucking L, Jones PW et al (2001) A randomised controlled trial of epidural compared with non-epidural analgesia in labour. BJOG 108:27–33PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Does an increased cesarean section rate improve neonatal outcome in term pregnancies?
verfasst von
Marja Kupari
Nina Talola
Tiina Luukkaala
Kati Tihtonen
Publikationsdatum
16.11.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3942-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.