Does dapagliflozin regress left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with type 2 diabetes? A prospective, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study
verfasst von:
Alexander J.M. Brown, Chim Lang, Rory McCrimmon, Allan Struthers
Patients with diabetes have a two to fourfold increased risk for development of and death from cardiovascular disease [CVD]. The current oral hypoglycaemic agents result in limited reduction in this cardiovascular risk. Sodium glucose linked co-transporter type 2 [SGLT2] inhibitors are a relatively new class of antidiabetic agent that have been shown to have potential cardiovascular benefits. In support of this, the EMPA-REG trial showed a striking 38% and 35% reduction in cardiovascular mortality and heart failure [HF] hospitalisation respectively. The exact mechanism (s) responsible for these effects remain (s) unclear. One potential mechanism is regression of Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH).
Methods
The DAPA-LVH trial is a prospective, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled ‘proof of concept’ single-centre study that has been ongoing since January 2017. It is designed specifically to assess whether the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin regresses left ventricular [LV] mass in patients with diabetes and left ventricular hypertrophy [LVH]. We are utilising cardiac and abdominal magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to quantify the cardiovascular and systemic effects of dapagliflozin 10 mg once daily against standard care over a 1 year observation period. The primary endpoint is to detect the changes in LV mass. The secondary outcomes are to assess the changes in, LV volumes, blood pressure, weight, visceral and subcutaneous fat.
Discussion
This trial will be able to determine if SGLT2 inhibitor therapy reduces LV mass in patient with diabetes and LVH thereby strengthening their position as oral hypoglycaemic agents with cardioprotective benefits.
Trial registration
Clinical Trials.gov: NCT02956811. Registered November 2016.
Abkürzungen
ABMP
Ambulatory blood pressure measurement
AF
Atrial fibrillation
ASE
American society for echocardiography
BMI
Body mass index
BNP
B type natriuretic peptide
BP
Blood pressure
CMRI
Cardiac magnetic resonance
CVD
cardiovascular death
EDV
End diastolic volume
eGFR
Estimated glomerular filtration rate
ESV
End systolic volume
FBC
Full blood count
FIRI
Fasting insulin resistance index
GCP
Good clinical practice
HbA1C
Glycosylated haemoglobin
HDL
High density lipoprotein
LFT
Liver function tests
LV
Left ventricular
LVEF
Left ventricular ejection fraction
LVH
Left ventricular hypertrophy
MDRD
Modification of diet in renal disease
MRI
Magnetic resonance imaging
NTproBNP
N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide
RAS
Renin angiotensin system
SCAT
Scottish diabetes research network
SDRN
Subcutaneous adipose tissue
SGLT2
Sodium glucose co-transporter 2
SPCRN
Scottish primary care research network
SV
Stroke volume
T2DM
type2 diabetes mellitus
TCTU
Tayside clinical trials unit
TRuST
Tayside randomisation system
U&Es
Urea and electrolytes
VAT
Visceral adipose tissue
WoCBP
Woman of child bearing potential
Background
Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus [T2DM] have double the risk of cardiovascular death [CVD] compared with patients without T2DM [1, 2]. Hyperglycaemia itself contributes to both the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and heart failure [3]. While intensive glucose control reduces the risk of microvascular complications it appears to be insufficient to reduce cardiovascular [CV] events [4]. Three large randomized controlled trials [RCTs] ADVANCE, ACCORD and VADT failed to demonstrate any significant effect on macrovascular events of more intensive glycaemic control in patients with longstanding T2DM when compared with standard medical care [5‐7].
The EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial was a landmark trial as it demonstrated for the first time that a glucose lowering agent could reduce CV events [8]. It was a multicentre, randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in 7020 patients with T2DM at high cardiovascular risk comparing the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin to placebo. In the empagliflozin group there were significantly lower rates of death from cardiovascular causes and heart failure hospitalisations, by 38 and 35% respectively. The exact mechanisms responsible for these effects remains unclear.
Anzeige
Left ventricular hypertrophy
One potential mechanism is regression of left ventricular hypertrophy [LVH]. Left ventricular hypertrophy is thought to be present in up to 70% of patients with T2DM [9] It is a strong independent predictor of cardiovascular deaths and events and is even worse than triple vessel coronary disease [10, 11]. The reason why LVH is so adverse is because it predates so many different cardiovascular events i.e. LVH is intrinsically arrhythmogenic and causes sudden death, it impedes left ventricular [LV] filling and leads to diastolic heart failure, it reduces coronary perfusion reserve and causes ischaemia and it causes left atrial enlargement leading to atrial fibrillation [AF], and cardio-embolic strokes [12].
How does one cause regression of LVH? Controlling blood pressure [BP] and using a drug that blocks the renin-angiotensin system [RAS] are the standard approaches to the management of LVH but this approach is only partially effective since 44% of all patients with T2DM are normotensive patients with LVH [9]. Thus normotensive LVH is very common [9, 13]. Indeed, BP only contributes 25% to the variability in LV mass seen in a population [14]. Despite a “normal” BP, normotensive LVH is just as risky as is hypertensive LVH [15]. Nevertheless, we do know that regressing LVH irrespective of BP changes is an effective way to reduce the incidence of all major cardiovascular [CV] events including specifically sudden deaths, heart failure hospitalisations, new onset AF and strokes [16‐23]. The LIFE trial provides conclusive proof that in diabetes, LVH regression per se reduces future cardiovascular events [by 24%], reduces CV deaths [by 37%] and reduces total deaths [by 41%] irrespective of BP [24].
Since controlling BP and using an angiotensin enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker is only partially effective at regressing LVH, we now need additional ways of regressing LVH. Insulin resistance is another mediator of LVH. The literature is awash with observational studies linking insulin resistance to LVH. The large studies are mostly positive which includes the Framingham Study, the Whitehall trial, the Strong Heart trial and the Women’s Health Initiative trial while HyperGEN is the one large negative trial [25‐29]. Therefore, it is likely that glycaemia contributes to LVH. However, there is little evidence to date that glycaemic control alone affects the risk of CV events and thus key ancillary properties of each anti-glycaemic drug will be necessary to deliver the CV benefits we so badly need in diabetes [4, 30, 31]. A separate albeit related factor associated with LVH is also obesity [25, 32, 33].
Sodium glucose linked co-transporter2 [SGLT2] inhibitors and their potential to regress LVH
In this study, we hypothesize that SGLT 2 inhibitors may be able to lead to LVH regression. Firstly, SGLT2 inhibitors employ a novel mechanism to lower blood glucose by enhancing urinary glucose excretion by competitively blocking the sodium glucose linked co-transporters in the proximal renal tubules, thus preventing the reabsorption of filtered glucose and sodium, resulting in glycosuria and natriuresis [34, 35]. This is in contrast with other antidiabetic medications which focus on restoring β-cell activity, insulin sensitivity and tissue glucose uptake to reduce plasma glucose levels. Accordingly, SGLT2 inhibitors are expected to maintain their potency as beta cell function declines with disease progression. Secondly, the glycosuric effects of SGLT2 inhibitors result in around 240-400 kcal/day loss through the urinary tract [36]. This calorific loss results in an average weight loss of around 2-3 kg that could help lead to LVH regression [37]. Finally, the natriuretic effect and subsequent osmotic diuresis could also be significant in patients with cardiovascular disease. This diuretic effect should reduce preload on the heart. The SGLT2 inhibitors lower blood pressure by 7-10 mmHg, reduce arterial stiffness and afterload [38‐40].
Anzeige
In summary, SGLT2 inhibitors may improve cardiac structure because they appear to reduce the four main causes of LVH: glycaemia/insulin resistance, weight, preload and afterload [blood pressure] [41]. Our hypothesis is that dapagliflozin will regress LVH in normotensive patients with T2DM. If so, this could be a large part of explaining why such drugs reduce CV events in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial.
The issue of how SGLT2 Inhibitors reduces CV events in diabetes is a hot topic following EMPAREG OUTCOME. A large ongoing trial [DECLARE – TIMI 58] is also in progress assessing the effect of Dapagliflozin on CV events. If DECLARE-TIMI 58 shows clearly that dapagliflozin reduces CV events, then our trial if positive will have revealed a possible contributing mechanism to the reduced CV events i.e. LVH regression.
Methods
Study design
The DAPA-LVH trial is a prospective, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled ‘proof of concept’ single-centre study conducted in NHS Tayside, Scotland designed to evaluate the efficacy of 12 months of the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin compared to placebo on left ventricular hypertrophy [LVH] in 64 normotensive participants with diabetes identified to have LVH. A recruitment window of 1.5 years from December 2016 has been set. Participants will be enrolled in this trial for a period of 12–13 months, [Fig. 1]. Therefore, the overall trial end date will be May 2019.
Fig. 1
Study design flowchart. SDRN Scottish Diabetes Research Network; SPRN Scottish Primary Research Network; MRI Magnetic Resonance Imaging; BP Blood Pressure; BMI: Body Mass Index
×
At the screening visit an initial medical history and clinical examination will be performed following informed consent. Participants will have an electrocardiogram performed and bloods taken for safety analysis. Vital signs including blood pressure will be recorded to confirm eligibility prior to enrolment. Blood pressure will be taken using an Omron M10-IT blood pressure monitor and eligible patients will have an office blood pressure of 145/90 mmHg averaged over three readings. Patients who require optimisation of their blood pressure will do so but will have to be stable on their current antihypertensive medications for 3 months prior to enrolment. Patients with borderline office blood pressure will undergo ambulatory blood pressure measurement (AMBP) This will be performed using a Spacelab 90,217 ambulatory blood pressure monitor. Inclusion will be possible with a 24 h mean blood pressure < 140/85 mmHg. Participants will also be screened for echocardiographic evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy [LVH] by the standard American Society of Echocardiology [ASE] criteria. This will be performed using a Philips Epiq 7 machine by a fully trained operator. Eligible participants identified to have LVH on echocardiography will be recruited. The full inclusion criteria are as listed below.
Recruited patients will return for a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging [CMRI] at the Clinical Research Centre, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, within 3 weeks of the planned baseline [randomisation] visit. At the randomisation visit participants will have vital signs, body mass index, waist circumference and waist to hip ratio recorded. Participants will also be asked to undergo 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring using a Spacelab 90,217 ambulatory monitor. Examinations with greater than 50% successful readings will be deemed an acceptable exam. Bloods for safety analysis and research purposes [BNP, FIRI and Uric acid] will also be taken. During the visit, participants will also be randomly be assigned to either dapagliflozin 10 mg or matching placebo. The first dose will be administered during this visit and participants will be educated on the symptoms of both hypoglycaemia and diabetic ketoacidosis and given written instructions of how to manage it if either event occurs.
To reduce the likelihood of hypoglycaemia in participants taking insulin, participants who are already on insulin at time of recruitment will have their total daily dose of insulin reduced by 10% on the day they are randomised. Further dose titration will be done by the study team or GP based on the participant’s symptoms, home and laboratory-based blood sugar levels. Down-titration of therapy will be done in a stepwise manner starting with insulin. Other anti-diabetic agents will only be down-titrated once insulin has been discontinued.
In order to make the two groups comparable, a target HbA1c of ≤ 53 mmol/mol will be set for all participants. New onset diabetic patients will not be included in this study as SGLT2 inhibitors are currently only licensed as second line therapy. We will therefore be comparing a dapagliflozin [mostly as a second drug after metformin] based group against a conventionally treated group but without a SLGT2 inhibitor.
This will ensure that any difference in LV mass between groups is because dapagliflozin and all its ancillary cardiac properties and not because the two groups differed in glycaemic control.
Anzeige
With regards to BP, the main criteria will be that the baseline office BP is < 145/90 mmHg. However, the investigator will have clinical discretion to change anti-hypertensive drugs during the trial for safety reasons, under two circumstances. Firstly, if the systolic BP rises to above 140 mmHg on 2 consecutive visits during the trial then the participant can be started on extra anti-hypertensive drugs to re-achieve a systolic BP of < 145 mmHg. Secondly, if the participant suffers from dizziness and/or their systolic BP has fallen either by ≥ 25 mmHg or to an absolute level of ≤ 110 mmHg, then the attending physician can reduce or stop one of their antihypertensive drugs. These criteria serve two functions: firstly, to copy normal clinical practice and secondly to maintain participant safety.
Participants will return for three visits throughout the year to have safety and research bloods taken and to have vital signs, BMI, waist to hip ratio and waist circumference recorded. They will also be assessed for adverse events and to alter diabetic/antihypertensive therapy [if applicable].
The biomarker samples will be centrifuged and decanted into an aliquot which will be stored at -80 °C. Uric acid will be analysed with an elisa method using SIGMA-ALDRICH assay, UK. BNP will be measured by a MULTI-ARRAY system. The kit is from MESO SCALE DISCOVERY, USA. FIRI will be analysed with an elisa method using an ALPCO assay UK.
At the end of the 1 year study period, participants will return for repeated assessment of vital signs, BMI, waist circumference and waist to hip ratio, ambulatory blood pressure, echocardiography and CMRI. These values will be compared with their baseline tests to determine if any significant change has occurred with each of the two arms of the study populations. [See Table 1 for an overview of all visits scheduled for the trial].
Table 1
Overview of all the study visits in the DAPALVH trial
Visit
1 Screening
2 Baselinea
3 follow-upa
4 Follow-upa
5 Follow-upa
6 Last visita
Timeline - weeks
0 to − 4
0 Within 4 weeks of screening visit
4b [+/− 1 week]
17 [+/− 4 weeks]
34 [+/− 4 weeks]
52 [+/− 4 weeks]
Informed Consent
X
Medical History
X
Demographics
X
Concomitant Medications
X
X
X
X
X
X
Physical Examination
X
Height & weight
X
BP & P
X
X
X
X
X
X
Temperature
X
ECG
X
Echoc
X
X
Safety Bloodsd
X
X
X
X
X
X
Inclusion/Exclusion
X
Pregnancy Testing if applicablee
X
X
X
X
X
X
Research Blood Sample f
X
X
X
X
X
Genetic blood sample
X
24 h BP
X
X
Cardiac & abdominal MRIg
X
X
Waist & hip measurement
X
X
X
X
X
Adjustment of diabetes medication
X
X
X
X
Adjustment of anti-hypertensive medication
X
X
X
X
Record Adverse Events
X
X
X
X
X
Randomisation
X
Dispense Trial Drugs
Xh
X
X
X
Return trial drugs
X
X
X
X
aParticipants will be fasted for these visits
bAt least 3 weeks after commencing study medication
cIf a participant has had a clinical echo done within the previous 6 months the results from this will be used for assessing eligibility, otherwise an echo will be performed at the screening visit
dU&E, FBC, LFT, cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol
eSee section 7.2
fHbA1c, FIRI, BNP, glucose, uric acid. A sample to be held for future research will be taken at the last visit
gThe MRI scan may be performed ± 3 weeks from the baseline visit and may therefore require a separate visit
hIf the participant as not yet had their MRI scan they will be asked not to start their study medication until they have had their scan. Their Visit 3 will be delayed until the patient has had at least 3 weeks of study medication
Anzeige
Study population
Diabetic patients with LVH will be identified for this study and all potential participants who meet the following criteria will be eligible for the trial:
Inclusion criteria:
Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus based on the current American Diabetes Association guidelines.
Aged 18–80 years
Body Mass Index ≥ 23 kg/m2
HbA1c 48-85 mmol/mol [last known result within in the previous 6 months]
BP < 145/90 mmHg. Office BP at screening visit will be used however if this is above the inclusion criteria then the 24 h recording at screening visit will be used to confirm that in the opinion of the PI the BP is adequately controlled.
Echocardiographic LV hypertrophy (defined as either an LV mass index of >115 g/m2 for men and > 95 g/m2 for women indexed to body surface area or > 48 g/m2.7 or 44 g/m2.7 when indexed to height2.7)
Women of childbearing potential* [WoCBP] must agree to take precautions to avoid pregnancy throughout the trial and for 4 weeks after intake of the last dose
Exclusion criteria:
Any condition that in the opinion of the investigator may render the participant unable to complete the trial including non CV disease [e.g. active malignancy].
Participants with type 1 diabetes mellitus
Participants who have previously had an episode of diabetic ketoacidosis.
Serum Potassium or Sodium results outwith the normal range
Diagnosis of clinical heart failure
History of human immunodeficiency virus
LV systolic dysfunction [LVEF < 45%] [last known result within in the previous 6 months]
eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m2 [last known result within in the previous month] assessed using an abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation and indexed to 1.73m2.
Known liver function tests > 3 times upper limit of normal [based on last measures and documented laboratory measurement in the previous 6 months]
Body weight > 150Kg [unable to fit into a MRI scanner]
Contraindications to MRI [e.g. claustrophobia, metal implants, penetrative eye injury or exposure to metal fragments in eye requiring medical attention]
Past or current treatment with any SGLT2 inhibitor
Allergy to any SGLT2 inhibitor or lactose or galactose intolerance
Current treatment with loop diuretic
Currently receiving long term [> 30 consecutive days] treatment with an oral steroid
Pregnant or breast feeding participants
Involvement in the planning and/or conduct of the trial [applies to Astra Zeneca or representative staff and/or staff at the trial site].
Participation in another interventional study [other than observational trials and registries] within 30 days before visit 1.
Individuals considered at risk for poor protocol or medication compliance
Randomisation and treatment allocation
After successful screening for eligibility and safety, participants will be randomised to either dapagliflozin 10 mg or matching placebo [identical tablet containing lactose] in a double blind fashion. The double blind medication [dapagliflozin or placebo] will be prepared and packaged by AstraZeneca and labelled by our onsite clinical trials pharmaceutical pharmacy. Randomisation will be carried out via our Tayside Randomisation System [TRuST], a Good Clinical Practice [GCP] compliant web-based system run by the Tayside Clinical Trials Unit [TCTU], to preserve allocation concealment. This will securely backup both the randomisation seed and the randomisation allocation and have it available in the onsite 24 h emergency unblinding facility.
Anzeige
Once randomised, the participant will continue to take the trial medication once daily for 1 year, if tolerated. Compliance will be checked and documented, by the dispensing pharmacy, using tablet counts at each visit. If non-compliant, they will be encouraged to become compliant. If study drug needs to be stopped due to intolerance or adverse events, they will remain in the study in order to do an “intention to treat” analysis.
Study outcomes
Primary objective and outcome
The primary outcome is to determine if dapagliflozin reduces left ventricular [LV] mass in patients with type 2 diabetes and LV hypertrophy when compared to placebo.
Secondary outcomes
To determine if dapagliflozin has any effect on LV diastolic function.
To determine if as expected dapagliflozin reduces blood pressure [BP]
To assess the effect of dapagliflozin on left ventricular diastolic function and global longitudinal strain
To determine if as expected dapagliflozin reduces body weight
To determine if dapagliflozin reduces visceral fat mass
To determine if as expected dapagliflozin reduces HbA1C.
To determine the effect of dapagliflozin on B-type natriuretic peptide [BNP], Uric acid and Fasting Insulin Resistance Index [FIRI]
To assess the tolerability of dapagliflozin in this patient group
Sample size and power calculations
For the primary outcome of LV mass regression using cardiac MRI, we have powered this study for an absolute change in LV mass based on previous studies that we have conducted in our unit. In our recently published study of LVH regression using allopurinol in participants with ischaemic heart disease [41], we found that allopurinol significantly reduced LV mass by − 5·2 ± 5·8 g compared to placebo − 1·3 ± 4·5 g [p < 0·007]. In per-cent terms, this degree of LVH regression is the same as seen between the two arms of the echo sub-study of the LIFE study where CV events were also different between groups. For an 80% power at a 5% significance level [α = 0·05], to detect a similar change in LV mass, we will require 29 subjects per group. Both our previous studies have shown a 10% dropout rate. Therefore, accounting for this, we will require a total of 64 participants [32 per group]. The 10% dropout rate is standard for such studies and includes those who died and those who withdraw consent.
Cardiac MRI protocol
Baseline and repeat Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging [CMRI] examinations at baseline visit [+/− 3 weeks] and after the final 12 month [+/− 4 weeks] visit will be performed on a 3 T Magnetrom Trio scanner [Siemens, Erlangen, Germany] using body array and spine matrix radiofrequency coils.. Short axis images from the atrio-ventricular ring to the LV apex will be acquired using a 2D ECG-gated breath hold segmented SSFP cine sequence with retrospective gating. Quantitative measurement of LV mass, ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV) and stroke volume (SV) will be derived by region of interest contours placed around endocardial and epicardial LV borders at end systole and end diastole.
Transmitral flow and the isovolumetric relaxation time will be assessed using through plane phase contrast images with electrocardiographic synchronisation.
At the same time of the CMRI visceral and subcutaneous abdominal fat mass will be assessed. For measurement of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SCAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) two successive axial 3D DIXON volume interpolated breath hold examination sequences will be acquired. These sequences will cover an anatomical area from the diaphragm to the pelvic floor, with a slice thickness of 3 mm and up to 88 slices (dependent on patient size) collected within a single 3D block.
For image analysis the ‘fat only’ DIXON MR images will be segmented using Analyze (Mayo Clinic) software, and the SCAT and VAT compartments are defined using a signal intensity threshold method with manual correction where required. Epicardial fat structures and fat associated with the vertebrae will both be omitted from the final calculated volumes.
From a single MRI slice at the L2-L3 intervertebral level. This single observer will analyse all the scans. Analysis will be performed offline [Argus Software, Siemens] by a single blinded observer.
The reproducibility of all parameters using MRI will be derived by this observer. A test-retest intra-observer co-efficient of variation of 2.0% is usual in this department’s past MRI studies. Should the scanner become unavailable for a prolonged period of time during the study an alternative scanner will be used. MRI methods will be adapted as appropriate to ensure optimal study results can be obtained.
Discussion
SGLT2 inhibitors including dapagliflozin improve systemic glucose metabolism, lower blood pressure and lower body weight, thus they ameliorate the metabolic and haemodynamic risk factors heavily implicated in causing LVH. In this study, we propose that the SGLT2 inhibitors may be particularly suitable at regressing LVH. This effect might ultimately explain the reduced CV events seen so far in one large outcome trial with these drugs [Fig. 2].
Fig. 2
DAPA LVH trial hypothesis. The above figure explains the hypothesis of the DAPALVH trial where reduction in preload and afterload, weight and insulin resistance will all contribute to regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. This will be measured by cardiac MRI. BNP: B Type Natriuretic Peptide; BP: Blood Pressure; EDV: End Diastolic Volume; FIRI: Fasting Insulin Resistance Index; HBA1C: Glycosylated Haemoglobin; IVRT: Isovolumetric Relaxation Time; LA: Left Atrial; LV: Left Ventricular; LVEF: Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction; LVH: Left Ventricular Hypertrophy; MRI: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
×
The primary haemodynamic effect of SGLT2 inhibitors is an osmotic diuresis. Patients treated with dapagliflozin produce approximately 375mls of extra urine per day [36]. Several trials have shown that SGLT2 inhibitors lead to a reduction in systolic BP in a range of 3-5 mmHg and ~ 2-3 mmHg in diastolic BP [37]. This will be further assessed in our trial with ambulatory blood pressure recordings at randomisation and upon completion of the trial. The reason for the observed BP reduction with SGLT2 inhibition is not completely understood but is likely secondary to several different things including the modest diuretic effect, mild natriuresis and weight reduction [39, 42]. Data from a mechanistic trial has also demonstrated that empagliflozin reduced arterial stiffness in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus [43]. These effects on intravascular volume and blood pressure will result in reduced preload and afterload respectively, thereby facilitating a reduction in intra-cardiac pressure and thereby an improvement in cardiac structure [24, 44]. Indeed following EMPA-REG Outcome trial there has been a lot of interest in the effects of SGLT2 inhibition on cardiac structure with a number of ongoing trials looking into the effects in patients with both diastolic and systolic heart failure in addition to cardiovascular outcomes [Tables 2, 3, and 4].
Table 2
Ongoing trials assessing the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with systolic heart failure
SGLT2 Inhibitor
Trial Name; Clinical Trial Identifier
Primary Outcome measure
Patient Populationa
Final Results
Empagliflozin
Empagliflozin Impact on Haemodynamics in Patients with Diabetes and Heart Failure [EMBRACE-HF]. [54]
NCT03030222
Change in pulmonary artery diastolic pressure
N = 60
10 mg vs placebo
Either LVEF 40% or > 40%
NHYA II-IV
HbA1c ≥ 6.5% and ≤ 11%
GFR > 30 ml/min
June 2018
Empagliflozin
SGLT2 Inhibition in Diabetic Patients With Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction [55]
NCT02862067
SGLT2 inhibition effects on cardiorespiratory fitness
N = 31
10 mg/25 mg standard care
LVEF ≤ 50% [in maximum tolerated HF therapy
HbA1c 7–10%
Age ≥ 18 years
GFR > 45 ml/min
June 2018
Empagliflozin
EMPagliflozin outcomE tRial in Patients with chrOnic heaRt Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction [EMPEROR-Reduced] [56]
NCT03057977
Time to first event of adjudicated CV death or adjudicated hospitalisation for HF in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction
N = 2850
LVEF ≥ 36to ≤ 40%: NTproBNP ≥ 2500 pg/ml
LVEF ≥ 31% to ≤ 35%: NT-proBNP ≥ 1000 pg/ml
If LVEF ≤ 30% NT-proBNP ≥ 600 pg/ml
Age > 18 years
GFR > 20 ml/min
June 2020
Dapagliflozin
Dapagliflozin Effect on Symptoms and Biomarkers in Diabetes Patients with Heart Failure [DEFINE-HF] [57]
NCT02653482
Differences in the average reduction of NTproBNP
Proportion of patient that achieve a ≥ 5pts increase in heart failure disease specific quality of life score or a ≥ 20% decrease in NTproBNP
N = 250
10 mg vs placebo
LVEF ≤ 40/NHYA II-III
HbA1c 6.5–11.0%
Age 19–119 years
GFR > 45 ml/min
BNP ≥ 125 pg/ml and/or NTproBNP ≥ 600 pg/ml
May 2017
Dapagliflozin
Study to Evaluate the Effect of dapagliflozin on the Incidence of Worsening Heart Failure or Cardiovascular Death in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction [Dapa-HF]. [58] NCT03036124
Time to first occurrence of the composite: CV death or hospitalisation for HF or urgent HF visit.
N = 4500
5/10 mg vs placebo
LVEF ≤ 40/NHYA II-IV
Age 18 to 130 years
GFR > 30 ml/min
NTproBNP ≥ 600 pg/ml
December 2019
Dapagliflozin
Safety and Effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitors in Patients with Heart Failure and Diabetes [REFORM] [59]
NCT02397421
Change in LV end systolic volume or LV end diastolic volume as determined by CMRI
N = 56
10 mg vs placebo.
LVEF < 50%/NYHA I-II
HbA1c > 6%
Age 18 to 75 years
GFR > 45 ml/min
August 2017
Canagliflozin
A Randomised Active-Control Double-Blinded Study to Evaluate the Treatment of Diabetes in Patients with Systolic Heart Failure. [60]
NCT02920918
Change from baseline aerobic exercise capacity
Change from baseline ventilator efficiency
N = 88
LVEF ≤ 40%/NYHAII-III
HbA1C 6.5%–10%
Age ≥ 18 years
GFR >50 ml/min
November 2018
aEnrolment details correct at the time of writing as per ClinicalTrials.gov
BNP B Type Natriuretic Peptide, CMRI Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging, ESKD End Stage Kidney Disease, GFR Glomerular Filtration Rate, HbA1C Glycosylated Haemoglobin, HF Heart Failure, LV Left Ventricular, LVEF Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, NTproBNP N Terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide, NYHA New York Heart Association, SGLT2 Sodium Glucose Linked Co-Transporter2
Table 3
Ongoing Trials assessing the use of SGLT2 in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
SGLT 2 Inhibitor
Trial Name; Clinical Trial Identifier
Primary Outcome Measure
Patient Populationa
Final Results
Empagliflozin
Effects of Empagliflozin on Left Diastolic Function Compared to Usual Care in Type 2 Diabetics [EmDia]. [61] NCT02932436
Difference in E/E’ ratio measured by echocardiography
N = 264
10 mg vs placebo
Age 18–84 years
HbA1C ≥ 7–10% on diabetic therapy or
≥ 7–9% diet controlled
GFR > 60 ml/min
October 2017
Empagliflozin
SGLT2 Inhibition and Left Ventricular Mass [EMPATROPHY] [62];
NCT 02728453
Change in ventricular mass assessed using CMRI
N = 60
25 mg vs 2-4 mg Glimepiride
LVEF ≥ 45%
Age ≥ 40 and < 80 years
Office BP ≤ 150/95 mmHg
HbA1C 6.5–9%
GFR > 60 ml/min
April 2018
Empagliflozin
Effects of Empagliflozin on Cardiac Structure in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes [EMPA-HEART] [63]
NCT02998970
Left Ventricular Mass changes measured by CMRI at 24 weeks
N = 90
10 mg vs placebo
LVEF > 30%
Age ≥ 40 and ≤ 80 years
HbA1C 6.5- ≤ 10%
GFR > 60 ml/min
June 2017
Dapagliflozin
Effects of Dapagliflozin on Biomarkers, Symptoms and Functional Status in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes or Pre-diabetes, and PRESERVED Ejection Fraction; [64]
NCT030302235
Changes from baseline in NTproBNP
N = 320
10 mg vs placebo
LVEF ≥ 45%
Age 19 to < 119 years
HbA1C ≥ 5.7 - < 11%
GFR < 30 ml/min
March 2019
Dapagliflozin
Does Dapagliflozin Regress Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes; [65]
NCT02956911
Left Ventricular Mass changes measured by CMRI at 52 weeks
N = 64
10 mg vs placebo
LVEF ≥ 45%
Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 75 years
HbA1C ≥ 7 - < 10%
GFR > 60 ml/min
May 2019
aEnrolment details correct at the time of writing as per ClinicalTrials.gov
CMRI Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging, GFR Glomerular Filtration Rate, HbA1C Glycosylated Haemoglobin, HF Heart Failure, LV Left Ventricular, LVEF Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, NTproBNP N Terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide, NYHA New York Heart Association, SGLT2 Sodium Glucose Linked Co-Transporter2
Table 4
Ongoing Cardiovascular Outcome Trials with SGLT2 inhibitors
Evaluation of the Effects of Canagliflozin on Renal and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Participants with Diabetic Nephropathy [CREDENCE] [68];
NCT 02065791
Time to first occurrence of an event in the primary composite of endpoint of ESKD, doubling of serum creatinine, renal or CV death.
N = 4200
100 mg vs placebo
HbA1c 6.5–12%
Age > 30 years
GFR ≥ 30 to < 90 ml/min
June 2019
aEnrolment details correct at the time of writing as per ClinicalTrials.gov
ESKD End Stage Kidney Disease, GFR Glomerular Filtration Rate, HbA1C Glycosylated Haemoglobin, HF Heart Failure, LV Left Ventricular, LVEF Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, NYHA New York Heart Association, SGLT2 Sodium Glucose Linked Co-Transporter2
Dapagliflozin is known to produce clinically meaningful reductions in HbA1c. [45] Studies have also shown that treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors improves insulin sensitivity as measured by peripheral glucose uptake [46, 47]. One such study showed that insulin mediated tissue glucose disposal increased by around 18% with only 2 weeks of dapagliflozin therapy [47]. Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinaemia have been associated with increased atherosclerosis risk and left ventricular hypertrophy [25‐29, 48].
Other metabolic effects of the SGLT2 inhibitors include weight loss. With selective SGLT2 inhibition urinary glucose is increased resulting in a negative energy balance and subsequent weight loss [36]. A 24 week study comparing dapagliflozin to placebo showed a 2.5–3.5 kg weight reduction as a result of the calorific loss produced by glycosuria [49]. This is a finding throughout the SGLT2 class [37]. Of potential greater interest is how they change visceral fat mass as this is associated with an increased risk of T2DM and increased risk of CVD and overall mortality [50]. Indeed all the three currently available SGLT2 inhibitors when compared to glimepiride in dedicated body composition studies have shown that the majority of weight loss associated with SGLT2 inhibition was due to a reduction in visceral fat or subcutaneous fat [45, 51, 52]. Accordingly, we have chosen to also measure visceral and subcutaneous fat mass as a secondary outcome of the DAPA-LVH.
Given these metabolic and haemodynamic effects our hypothesis is that we will see a reduction in left ventricular mass. Indeed, pre-clinical work has shown that SGLT2 inhibitors are capable of reducing LV mass in a rat model with progressive HF [53]. We have therefore selected CMRI measurements of LV mass as our primary outcome measures for the DAPALVH Trial. By ensuring the trial is adequately powered we will determine if treatment with an SGLT2 inhibitor is able to reduce LV mass in diabetic patients with LVH.
The EMPA-REG Outcomes trial revealed a reduction in cardiovascular death and HF hospitalisations with the use of empagliflozin in patients with T2DM. However, it is unknown if these effects are seen throughout the SGLT2 inhibitor class. Other cardiovascular outcome trials such as DECLARE-TIMI 58 for dapagliflozin and CANVAS for canagliflozin will reveal whether the cardioprotective effects of SGLT2- inhibitor therapy is seen across the drug class. As described above this study will provide insights into the mechanism of the positive cardiovascular effects conferred by SGLT2 inhibitor therapy and may also help decide the course of future research – should LVH be a favoured target?
Limitations
Firstly, this is a relatively small, single centre trial. The use of CMRI though has allowed the power of the trial to be preserved despite the small number of participants. However, given the small numbers some differences observed may still be the result of chance. Secondly, diabetes is a dynamic disease as a patient’s glycaemia control may fluctuate and this may necessitate dose adjustments of anti-diabetic medications during the trial which may confound the outcome. However, every measure will be taken to ensure blinding of the investigators is maintained and uniformity in the dose adjustments made.
Conclusion
Historically much attention has focused on the prevention and treatment of the microvascular complications of diabetes. CVD however is still the main co-morbid condition and primary contributor to mortality in patients with diabetes. Besides metformin therapeutic options to optimise glycaemic control which reduce cardiovascular risk are limited. Empagliflozin an SGLT2 inhibitor has been shown to produce significant reductions in cardiovascular mortality and hospitalisation with heart failure [8]. We propose that SGLT2 inhibitors may cause regression of LVH due to their ability to reduce preload/afterload, weight and insulin resistance which may account for their positive cardiovascular effects. Upcoming major trials will establish if the effect seen with empagliflozin is an SGLT2 class effect. If so, the results of this study if positive will help us understand the mechanisms of the cardioprotective effects of SGLT2 inhibitors and if positive further establish this group of medications as anti-diabetic agents with the added value of protecting the heart.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This study is funded by Astra Zeneca.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study has been granted ethics approval by the East of Scotland Research Ethics Service [16/ES/0131].
Consent for publication
This article does not contain any individual person’s data thus consent for publication is not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Does dapagliflozin regress left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with type 2 diabetes? A prospective, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study
verfasst von
Alexander J.M. Brown Chim Lang Rory McCrimmon Allan Struthers
Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.
Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.
Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.
Der als Antidiabetikum sowie zum Gewichtsmanagement zugelassene Wirkstoff Tirzepatid hat in Studien bei adipösen Patienten auch schlafbezogene Atmungsstörungen deutlich reduziert, informiert der Hersteller in einer Vorab-Meldung zum Studienausgang.
Update Kardiologie
Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.
