nach oben

Abdominal Radiology

Erschienen in:

03.02.2023 | Special Section: Ileal Pouch

Dynamic ileal pouch emptying studies

verfasst von: Justin M. Ream, Lyndon Luk, Shannon Sheedy, J. G. Fletcher, James M. Church, Mark E. Baker

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 9/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Although much radiologic literature has focused on the short-term post-operative complications associated with ileal pouches, as the number of patients with long-term pouches has grown, there is increasing realization of the functional deficits that may occur long after pouch creation. Dynamic pouch imaging using fluoroscopy and MRI can provide assessment of the underlying causes of symptomatic pouch dysfunction and can provide critical insight to the management of this complex patient population. In this paper, we provide an overview of the unique problems encountered in patients with long-term ileal pouches, and provide an overview of the techniques, interpretation, and reporting for fluoroscopic and MR pouch defecography.

Lorenzo G, Maurizio C, Maria LP, et al (2016) Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis 20 years later: is it still a good surgical option for patients with ulcerative colitis? Int J Colorectal Dis 31:1835–1843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2657-8CrossRefPubMed

Lee GC, Cavallaro PM, Savitt LR, et al (2020) Bowel Function After J-Pouch May Be More Complex Than Previously Appreciated: A Comprehensive Analysis to Highlight Existing Knowledge Gaps. Dis Colon Rectum 63:207–216. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001543CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Quinn KP, Tse CS, Lightner AL, et al (2017) Nonrelaxing Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Is an Underestimated Complication of Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 15:1242–1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2017.02.024CrossRefPubMed

Khanna R, Li Y, Schroeder T, et al (2013) Manometric evaluation of evacuatory difficulty (dyschezia) in ileal pouch patients. Inflamm Bowel Dis 19:569–575. https://doi.org/10.1097/MIB.0b013e31827e78d6CrossRefPubMed

Church J (2019) The Implications of Pouch Physiology. Dis Colon Rectum 62:510–512. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001257CrossRefPubMed

Ho Y-H, Seow-Choen F, Tan M (2001) Colonic J-pouch function at six months versus straight coloanal anastomosis at two years: Randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 25:876–881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-001-0044-1CrossRefPubMed

Ide S, Araki T, Okita Y, et al (2017) Outcome and functional prognosis of pelvic sepsis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis. Surg Today 47:301–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-016-1430-5CrossRefPubMed

Stellingwerf ME, Maeda Y, Patel U, et al (2016) The role of the defaecating pouchogram in the assessment of evacuation difficulty after restorative proctocolectomy and pouch-anal anastomosis. Colorectal Dis 18:O292-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13431CrossRefPubMed

Quinn KP, Busciglio IA, Burton DD, et al (2022) Defining normal pouch function in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a pilot study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 55:1560–1568. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.16859CrossRefPubMed

10.

Gurland BH, Khatri G, Ram R, et al (2021) Consensus Definitions and Interpretation Templates for Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Defecatory Pelvic Floor Disorders: Proceedings of the Consensus Meeting of the Pelvic Floor Disorders Consortium of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, the Society of Abdominal Radiology, the International Continence Society, the American Urogynecologic Society, the International Urogynecological Association, and the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons. AJR Am J Roentgenol 217:800–812. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.21.26488

11.

Flusberg M, Xi Y, Jambhekar K, et al (2021) Variability in utilization and techniques of pelvic floor imaging: findings of the SAR pelvic floor dysfunction disease-focused panel. Abdom Radiol (NY) 46:1294–1301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-02957-5CrossRefPubMed

12.

Prasad R, Gelder K, Wiles R (2019) The patient’s experience of defaecating proctography: Comparing magnetic resonance with conventional fluoroscopy techniques. Radiography (Lond) 25:24–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2018.07.002CrossRefPubMed

13.

Barakat B, Afzal A, Schweda D, Laali A (2020) Comparison of magnetic resonance defecography with pelvic floor ultrasound and vaginal inspection in the urogynecological diagnosis of pelvic floor dysfunction. Urol Ann 12:150–155. https://doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_78_19CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Kjaer MD, Simonsen JA, Hvidsten S, et al (2015) Scintigraphic Small Intestinal Transit Time and Defaecography in Patients with J-Pouch. Diagnostics (Basel) 5:399–412. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics5040399CrossRefPubMed

15.

Reiner CS, Tutuian R, Solopova AE, et al (2011) MR defecography in patients with dyssynergic defecation: spectrum of imaging findings and diagnostic value. Br J Radiol 84:136–144. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/28989463CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Ng K-S, Gonsalves SJ, Sagar PM (2019) Ileal-anal pouches: A review of its history, indications, and complications. World J Gastroenterol 25:4320–4342. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i31.4320CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Kiely JM, Fazio VW, Remzi FH, et al (2012) Pelvic sepsis after IPAA adversely affects function of the pouch and quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum 55:387–392. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e318246418eCrossRefPubMed

18.

Kirat HT, Remzi FH, Kiran RP, Fazio VW (2009) Comparison of outcomes after hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in 3,109 patients. Surgery 146:723–729; discussion 729-730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.041

19.

Fazio VW, Kiran RP, Remzi FH, et al (2013) Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis: Analysis of Outcome and Quality of Life in 3707 Patients. Annals of Surgery 257:679–685. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827d99a2CrossRefPubMed

20.

Holder-Murray J, Fichera A (2009) Anal transition zone in the surgical management of ulcerative colitis. World J Gastroenterol 15:769–773. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.769CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Annibali R, Oresland T, Hultén L (1994) Does the level of stapled ileoanal anastomosis influence physiologic and functional outcome? Dis Colon Rectum 37:321–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02053591CrossRefPubMed

22.

Khan F, Hull TL, Shen B (2018) Diagnosis and management of floppy pouch complex. Gastroenterology Report 6:246–256. https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/goy021CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Kirat HT, Kiran RP, Remzi FH, et al (2011) Diagnosis and management of afferent limb syndrome in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 17:1287–1290. https://doi.org/10.1002/ibd.21503CrossRefPubMed

24.

Rao SSC, Bharucha AE, Chiarioni G, et al (2016) Anorectal Disorders. Gastroenterology 150:1430-1442.e4. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.009CrossRef

25.

Segal JP, Chan H, Collins B, et al (2018) Biofeedback in patients with ileoanal pouch dysfunction: a specialist centre experience. Scand J Gastroenterol 53:665–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2018.1454508CrossRefPubMed

26.

El Sayed RF, Alt CD, Maccioni F, et al (2017) Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic floor dysfunction - joint recommendations of the ESUR and ESGAR Pelvic Floor Working Group. Eur Radiol 27:2067–2085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4471-7CrossRefPubMed

27.

Freeha K, Bo S (2018) Complications Related to J-Pouch Surgery. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) 14:571–576PubMed

28.

Joyce MR, Fazio VW, Hull TT, et al (2010) Ileal pouch prolapse: prevalence, management, and outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 14:993–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1194-yCrossRefPubMed

29.

Shen B (2012) Acute and chronic pouchitis—pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 9:323–333. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2012.58CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Dynamic ileal pouch emptying studies
verfasst von: Justin M. Ream
Lyndon Luk
Shannon Sheedy
J. G. Fletcher
James M. Church
Mark E. Baker
Publikationsdatum: 03.02.2023
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 9/2023
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03811-6

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Dynamic ileal pouch emptying studies

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

Update Radiologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2023

Update on The National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer (NAPRC): the radiologist’s role

Contrast enema, CT, and small bowel series of the ileal pouch

Imaging of Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Survey Results and Expert Opinion from the Rectal and Anal Cancer Disease-Focused Panel of the Society of Abdominal Radiology

Beyond T and N staging on rectal MRI: The future of rectal MRI is here

Reply to letter to the editor: Computed tomography-based radiomic analysis for predicting pathological response and prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer

Key clinical trials in rectal cancer shaping the current treatment paradigms: reference guide for radiologists

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

Update Radiologie