Early autologous and allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for adult patients with acute B and T cell precursor neoplasms: a 12-year single center experience

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ALL/LBL) is a rare and heterogeneous hematological malignancy. Uncontrolled proliferation of lymphoid progenitor cells committed to the B or T cell lineage in the bone marrow, the peripheral blood, and/or lymphatic and extra-lymphatic tissue characterize the disease. The estimated age- and disease-dependent annual incidence in Europe ranges between 0.17 and 1.45 per 100,000 individuals [1]. Over the past decades, treatment results have improved due to optimized risk stratification, the implementation of monoclonal antibodies (rituximab), BiTE antibodies (blinatumomab), and antibody-drug conjugates (inotuzumab-ozogamicin), as well as the development of highly sensitive diagnostic tools for MRD assessment [2‐6]. Besides patient- and disease-related risk-factors and response dynamics, MRD has evolved to the most sensitive marker for the risk of relapse after conventional chemotherapy as well as after stem cell transplantation (SCT) [1, 4, 7]. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is the treatment of choice for high and highest risk as well as relapsed/refractory patients [2, 3]. The conventional treatment approach for standard-risk patients consists of remission induction, consolidation, intensification, and maintenance with an overall treatment duration of 2 or more years [4]. The regimens most commonly used for adults in Europe are based on the pediatric BFM (Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster) protocol, whereas in the USA and many other parts of the world, the hyper-CVAD regimen is preferred [1, 8]. Despite such intensive treatment algorithms, results for adult ALL patients remain unsatisfying [4]. The role of autologous SCT (ASCT) in order to improve treatment results remains controversial. Clinical trials including randomized studies in the pre-MRD era in unselected ALL cohorts have failed to demonstrate any beneficial effect of such a treatment approach [2, 5]. However, studies that are more recent have shown that ASCT might be a suitable option at least for specific subgroups [6, 7].

The main goal of our retrospective single center analysis was to assess whether a significant reduction of treatment duration by early consolidation with ASCT in first complete remission in adult standard-risk ALL is feasible without loss of efficacy compared with the usually recommended conventional post-remission consolidation/maintenance strategy with an overall treatment duration of 2.5–3 years.

This retrospective single center analysis demonstrates that early intensification with ASCT in CR1 in adult patients with standard-risk B- or T-precursor ALL/LBL achieves a long-term OS and DFS of 45% and 33%, respectively, without any treatment-related mortality. Although heterogeneous due to the retrospective nature of our analysis, the distribution of the immunologic subtypes corresponds to that observed within the GMALL studies, and all patients including those with T-LBL received the same induction and intensive consolidation according to the GMALL 07/2003 protocol and the GMALL consensus statement for the treatment of adult patients with T-LBL. Despite the short overall treatment duration with a median time from diagnosis to transplant of 4.9 months, our survival data are comparable to the results of the LALA-94 trial in which standard-risk patients receiving remission induction, consolidation, and a consecutive maintenance program for 2 years achieved a 5-year OS and DFS of 44% and 35%, respectively [14]. In the MRC UKALLXII/ECOG E2993, multinational trial patients were randomized by a donor versus no donor stratification after remission induction and 3 courses of high-dose methotrexate to either receive an allogeneic transplant or, if no donor was available, to receive either consolidation/maintenance or an autograft. Among those patients randomized to chemotherapy versus autograft, the 5-year OS in standard-risk patients was 46% with chemotherapy and only 37% with an autograft [5]. Better results were reported by the PETHEMA ALL-AR-03 trial, in which only high-risk patients were eligible. Patients with good early cytological response and MRD negativity at the end of consolidation were allocated to delayed consolidation/maintenance therapy instead of allogeneic SCT. The 5-year OS and DFS of these MRD negative high-risk patients was 58% and 52%, respectively, particularly emphasizing the importance of highly sensitive MRD measurements for treatment guidance [15].

Whether MRD negativity determined by highly sensitive tools can also be used to significantly reduce the overall treatment duration by early intensification with ASCT in standard-risk patients in CR1 remains an open question. Besides the limited patient number, the fact that NGF for highly sensitive MRD detection was not available in our institution before April 2019 is another major drawback of our retrospective single center analysis [16]. Minimal residual disease negativity by NGF was therefore only documented in 1/1 patient in the autogroup and in 4/5 patients in the allogroup after this diagnostic tool has been implemented. However, although no firm conclusion can be drawn for such small patient numbers, we are convinced that the implementation of NGF will further improve the outcome of our early autotransplant strategy especially by reducing the risk of relapse through an optimized selection of those standard-risk patients who are most likely to benefit from such a short and intensive treatment approach, i.e., MRD negative patients. Furthermore, standard-risk patients who do not achieve MRD negativity (MolCR as defined by ESMO Guidelines) are candidates for one or two early courses of blinatumomab [1]. With blinatumomab, MRD negativity can be achieved in another 70–80% of MRD positive patients as has been demonstrated by the BLAST trial [17]. Whether in blinatumomab responders a consolidation with an autologous transplant with low or even no mortality, as reported here, would be preferable over allogeneic transplantation at least in standard-risk patients because of the high NRM of 37% seen in the BLAST Trial remains an open question [18]. Moreover, it remains elusive whether successful stem cell mobilization is feasible after the administration of blinatumomab to enable subsequent autotransplant at all [19].

Relapse of the underlying disease was the sole reason for the failure of our concept of a short and intensive treatment duration with a final autotransplant. The majority of these relapses were refractory to standard of care salvage chemotherapy thereby resulting in a poor outcome even after subsequent allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Our data in this patient cohort is comparable with the recently published report from the EBMT Acute Leukemia Working Party on the results of allogeneic stem cell transplantation with sequential conditioning using the FLAMSA-RIC strategy in adult patients with refractory or relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia with an overall survival of only 17% and a graft-versus-host disease- and leukemia-free survival of only 14% at 2 years [20]. Better results are only obtainable when MRD negativity prior to allotransplant is achieved by implementing targeted therapies [21, 22]. Whether a subsequent allogeneic SCT can be omitted in MRD responders after blinatumomab in the relapsed/refractory setting as it has been supposed by the results of the phase 3 TOWER study has to be interpreted with caution [22].

While the use of ASCT in adult ALL remains a matter of debate, frontline allogeneic SCT is the treatment of choice for Ph1+ and other high-risk B- and T-precursor neoplasms [23‐25]. Our results in thirty-five high- and highest-risk and relapsed/refractory patients perfectly fit to the recently published retrospective data of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) showing a long-term survival/cure in about two-thirds of the patients, a relatively low NRM of < 20%, and a RI of about 30% [26]. Whether in the era of potent tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in combination with BiTE antibodies or antibody-drug conjugates allogeneic SCT can be replaced by ASCT with less morbidity and mortality at least in those high- and highest-risk patients achieving a deep MolCR remains to be shown by prospective randomized trials.

In conclusion, despite all limitations, our retrospective single center analysis clearly demonstrates that an early autotransplant strategy significantly shortens treatment duration while providing an acceptable long-term outcome in standard-risk patients in first complete remission. The implementation of NGF might be helpful to better define those patients who would benefit most from such a short and intensive treatment approach by reducing the risk of relapse and the consecutive need for a salvage allotransplant with dismal outcome. The increasing availability of MRD evaluation by standardized, highly sensitive diagnostic tools and potent-targeted therapies (e.g., blinatumomab, TKIs) not only allows a more individualized medicine in adult ALL but also asks for the need to reconsider and redefine the role of prolonged chemotherapy versus early autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation in the treatment algorithms of various ALL subgroups.