Surgical resection combined with adjuvant chemotherapy is considered as the gold-standard treatment for advanced colorectal cancer patients. These patients have a poor 5-year survival rate of 5% or less. Furthermore, a large dose of chemotherapy can produce adverse side effects and severe toxicity. Therefore, this retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of dendritic cell-cytokine-induced killer (DC-CIK) cell infusion as an adjuvant therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer combined with first-line treatment.
Methods
A total of 142 patients with stage III/IV colorectal carcinoma who had been treated with first-line therapy were included in this study. Among these patients, 71 patients received first-line treatment only (non-DC-CIK group), while the other 71 patients who had similar demographic and clinical characteristics received a DC-CIK cell infusion combined with first-line treatment (DC-CIK group). These patients were followed up until August 2014. Data were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression.
Results
Our results showed that the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate for the DC-CIK group versus the non-DC-CIK group was 41.3 versus 19.4% (p = 0.001) and the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate for the DC-CIK group versus the non-DC-CIK group was 57.4 versus 33.6% (p = 0.022).
Conclusions
Our results showed that patients with advanced colorectal cancer might benefit from DC-CIK immunotherapy combined with first-line therapy by significantly prolonging 5-year OS and PFS.
Background
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is ranked the third leading malignancy and one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide [1]. Over 20% of CRC patients have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis [2]. In such advanced patients, who have a poor 5-year survival rate of 5% or less, surgical resection combined with adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy has been recommended as the gold standard of treatment [3‐7]. However, severe adverse side effects of such therapies limit the use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in advanced CRC patients [8, 9]. In the past decade, cell-based immunotherapy has been reported to improve the clinical outcomes by altering tumor immune responses, improving prognosis and overall survival rates, and the quality of life in cancer patients [10‐12]. Furthermore, it may minimize the presence of residual or resistant tumor cells after surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. However, studies of dendritic cell-cytokine-induced killer (DC-CIK) cells remain in preliminary stages, and the conclusion as to whether DC-CIK treatment in patients with distant metastatic disease is still poorly understood.
It has been previously reported that lymphocyte-activated killer (LAK) cells achieved clinical anti-tumor effects [13]. However, LAK cells have not been widely developed due to their inefficient proliferation and low anti-tumor activity. These hurdles were overcome by the identification of cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells in 2005, which are rapidly proliferative and possess powerful anti-tumor activity and minimal toxicity [14]. CIK cells are a group of heterogeneous cells, characteristically expressing the T cell marker CD3 and natural killer (NK) cell markers CD56 or CD16. It has been demonstrated that the administration of CIK cells can improve overall survival rates and quality of life for malignant patients [15, 16]. In 2010, dendritic cells (DCs) were approved for treating metastatic prostate cancer by the FDA [17]. DCs are the most potent antigen-presenting cells regulating and maintaining T cell responses in order to provide protective anti-tumor immunity. Moreover, many studies have indicated that DCs may enhance the function of CIK by significantly improving proliferation and tumor-specific activity of CIK cells [18]. Indeed, the clinical benefits of DC-CIK have been reported in patients with solid tumors [14, 19, 20].
Anzeige
A few studies examining the effectiveness of DC-CIK/CIK immunotherapy for colorectal cancer have been reported [21, 22]. In the past studies, we have achieved promising findings demonstrating DC-CIK cell therapy as an adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer and shown significant improvement in 3-year overall survival rate and disease-free survival rate [23, 24]. Wang et al. [25] showed DC-CIK immunotherapy significantly improved 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) in patients combined with chemotherapy. Gao et al. [21] also indicated that CRC are more sensitive to DC-CIK therapy than GC, and DFS and overall survival (OS) were both significantly prolonged in patients in the DC-CIK treatment group. However, few studies have focused on advanced CRC patients.
In the present study, we reviewed 142 advanced colorectal cancer treated with conventional or adjuvant DC-CIK therapy and analyzed their respective 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates and progression-free survival (PFS) rates. The purpose of our study was to investigate whether advanced colorectal cancer could benefit from DC-CIK combined with first-line treatments.
Methods
Patient selection
A retrospective analysis was carried out on the medical records of colorectal cancer patients in our hospital from January 1, 2006, to August 31, 2009. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients were pathologically diagnosed with colorectal cancer at stages III–IV according to the International Union Against Cancer’s (UICC 2002) classification based on pTNM system; (2) all patients received standard first-line treatment including surgical resection, adjuvant chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy; and (3) another cohort of patients received at least two cycles of DC-CIK immunotherapy. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients who did not receive standard first-line treatment and (2) patients who were not in advanced stages (III–IV stages). After review, 142 patients who met the described criteria were enrolled in this study for further analysis (Table 1). Among them, 71 patients received DC-CIK treatment (DC-CIK group), whereas the other 71 patients without DC-CIK treatment were used as the control group for comparisons.
Table 1
Clinicopathological characteristics of 142 patients
Characteristics
Total (n = 142)
Control (n = 71)
DC-CIK (n = 71)
p value
Sex, male/female
79/63
40/31
39/32
0.44
Age (years), mean ± SD
55.4 ± 14.4
55.6 ± 14.3
55.3 ± 14.6
0.90
KPS, mean ± SD
70.4 ± 6.3
70.1 ± 5.7
70.6 ± 6.8
0.79
Adenocarcinoma
Well differentiated
3
2
1
0.75
Moderately differentiated
104
54
50
Poorly differentiated
22
9
13
Unknown
13
6
7
TNM stage (III/IV)
98/54
41/30
47/24
0.27
FOLFIRI chemotherapy cycles
≤ 3
32
19
15
0.59
4–6
33
18
16
> 6
44
21
24
Radiotherapy (yes/no)
49/93
22/49
27/44
0.31
First-line treatment
All enrolled CRC patients underwent primary tumor resection and postoperative FOLFIRI chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy. The FOLFIRI [irinotecan (CPT-11), leucovorin (LV), and 5-FU] regimen consisted of CPT-11 intravenous infusion (80 mg/m2) on day 1, intravenous LV infusion (400 mg/m2) on day 1, and intravenous bolus injection (0.4 g/m2) and 46-h infusion (2.4 g/m2) of 5-FU on day 1 and day 2. This regimen was repeated every 2 weeks.
Anzeige
DC and CIK cell generation
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were separated from a 50-mL peripheral blood sample from each patient in the “DC-CIK” group by Ficoll-Paque density gradient centrifugation. PBMCs (1 × 107 cells/mL) were plated onto six-well dishes (BD). Non-adherent cells were collected after 2 h of incubation at 37 °C under 5% CO2. Adherent cells were cultured in GT-T551 medium containing granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF; 100 ng/mL; Amoytop) and interleukin-4 (IL-4; 50 ng/mL; Amoytop). The medium was replaced every 2 days. WT1 antigen (Miltenyi, UK) was then added to the medium at day 5 to a final concentration of 100 g/mL and cocultured with DCs for an additional 24 h.
Non-adherent cells were collected for CIK cell preparation. Cells were resuspended at a concentration of 5 × 106 cells/mL with GT-T551 medium containing interferon-gamma (IFN-γ; 1000 U/mL; Novo protein) and cultured in 75-cm2 culture flasks at 37 °C under 5% CO2. Cells were treated with 1000 U/mL IL-2 (Sihuanpharm) and 50 ng/mL anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody (Takara) after 24 h. Cell density was readjusted to 5 × 106 cells/mL by using fresh medium containing 500 U/mL IL-2 from day 2 to day 10. During the culture period, matured DCs were isolated by flow cytometry (Beckman) via DC-specific markers CD83, CD80, CD86, and HLA-DR (BD). Matured DCs were harvested and mixed with CIK cells at a ratio of 1:10 at day 7. On day 10, the co-cultured (DC-CIK) cells were examined by flow cytometry for CIK cell-specific markers with antibodies against CD3, CD8, and CD56 (Beckman).
DC-CIK treatment and follow-up
DC-CIK cell-based treatment was combined with first-line treatments. Our study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Fujian Provincial Tumor Hospital (IRB-2003-01). All 71 patients received at least two cycles of DC-CIK cells and signed informed consent.
Before transfusion, bacterial contamination and endotoxin levels were tested and were < 0.06 EU within 48 h. DC-CIK cells were then harvested and resuspended in normal salt solution and administered via intravenous infusion during intervals of chemotherapy twice a day for 4 days. The treatment protocol is shown in Fig. 1. Four transfusions were defined as one cycle. Patients received a total of 1–2 × 1010 cells at each cycle. The interval of every cycle was at least 2 weeks.
Fig. 1
Illustration of the DC-CIK cell treatment protocol
×
All patients were followed up after discharge, including clinic or telephone contact every 3 months for the first 2 years, 6 months for the next 3 years, and yearly thereafter from the fifth year. In this study, the follow-up deadline was August 2014. Follow-up included blood routine examination, colonoscopy every 6 months, CEA levels, and chest/abdominal CT scans every 6–12 months. In the DC-CIK group, lymphocyte subsets were determined before the start of every cycle of DC-CIK therapy. PET-CT was performed if tumor recurrence or metastases were suspected. Quality of life (QOL) of patients was evaluated according to the Karnofsky scores.
Statistical analysis
SPSS 16.0 software was used for analyzing data. Data was showed in mean ± SD. The postoperative survival rate was compared with the Kaplan-Meier method. Clinically different characteristics between the DC-CIK group and the control group before and after DC-CIK therapy were compared by Student’s t test. The Cox proportional hazard regression test was used for multivariate analysis. p < 0.05 was set as statistical significance.
Results
Baseline characteristics of patients
A total of 142 patients with histologically confirmed colorectal carcinoma were enrolled in this study, 71 in the DC-CIK group and 71 in the control group. All patients were at stages III and IV. The clinical characteristics of these two groups are described in Table 1. There were no significant differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between these two groups. Despite DC-CIK transfusion, treatment strategies and medical management were similar in these two groups.
Side effects of DC-CIK cell transfusion
During and after DC-CIK cell transfusion, six patients (8%) suffered from mild fever, chills, and fatigue; three also developed a headache; and one developed chest tightness and hypotension. All of them recovered after symptomatic treatment. There were no adverse reactions such as anaphylaxis. No patients presented with abnormal liver function tests (LFTs) or kidney function.
Anzeige
Quality-of-life assessment
Quality of life in DC-CIK-treated patients had the KPS score of 76.48 ± 8.53 compared to that of the control of 67.74 ± 7.82, which is statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Comparison of the effectiveness in clinic
In the median 76-month follow-up period of time, the median survival time of the patients in the DC-CIK group and non-DC-CIK group was 32 months (95%CI 18.89–45.41 months) and 17 months (95%CI 15.18–18.82 months), respectively, which was statistically significant (p < 0.001).
We then subsequently analyzed the 1, 3, and 5-year progression-free survival rates, which were 85.3, 64.1, and 57.4%, respectively, in the DC-CIK group, whereas in the non-DC-CIK group were 65.0, 44.3, and 33.6%, respectively (p = 0.017; Fig. 2). Furthermore, the 1, 3, and 5-year overall survival rates were 84.5, 46.0, and 41.3%, respectively, in the DC-CIK group compared to 65.7, 23.4, and 19.4%, respectively, in the non-DC-CIK group (p = 0.001; Fig. 3). Our data indicated that DC-CIK cells as an adjuvant therapy combined with first-line treatment could significantly reduce mortality and recurrence for advanced colorectal carcinoma.
Fig. 2
Kaplan-Meier estimate for progression-free survival (PFS) of patients
Fig. 3
Kaplan-Meier estimate for overall survival (OS) of patients
×
×
Discussion
The present retrospective study of advanced CRC patients revealed several important findings. Firstly, DC-CIK cell adjuvant transfusion resulted in significantly prolonged 5-year OS rates compared to that of the control group. Secondly, the 5-year PFS rates were significantly improved. Finally, the 1- and 3-year OS and PFS rates in the DC-CIK group were higher than those in the control group. These results suggested that DC-CIK cell treatment, combined with first-line therapy, is an effective therapeutic strategy for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.
Anzeige
DC-CIK cell treatment has been an established technique and is now widely used in cancer patients. Previous clinical studies have provided strong evidence supporting the efficacy of DC-CIK immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Zhao et al. [26] showed that “the GP regimen combined with DC-CIK immunotherapy would reduce postoperative tumor recurrence and prolonging the survival time of patients with NSCLC.” Ma et al. [27] dedicated that “CIK cell therapy demonstrated a significant superiority in prolonging the median overall survival, PFS, DCR, ORR and QoL of HCC patients.” Other studies of gastric cancer [28], advanced renal cancer [29], and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma [30] demonstrated that DC-CIK cell infusions could improve outcomes of patients. In our study, we selected 142 advanced CRC patients for evaluating the impact of adjuvant DC-CIK cell infusion, in particular in reference to 5-year OS and 5-year PFS rates, when combined with first-line routine therapy. Our results, consistent with previous studies in other advanced cancers, indicated that adjuvant DC-CIK cells could prolong 5-year OS and PFS rates for advanced CRC patients [26‐30]. The 5-year OS rate of the control group in our study was similar to that in Gao et al.’s [21] showing 19.4 vs. 15% of effects, while Zhu et al. [31] suggested that CIK cells could prolong DFS but not OS rates for resected CRCs. Although the 3- and 5-year OS and PFS rates in our present DC-CIK group were lower than our other previously published studies in earlier staged CRC patients [23, 24], we have achieved promising results in advanced CRC patients and improved outcomes without adverse side effects. It was also shown that DC-CIK adjuvant transfusion therapy is safe and tolerated in advanced CRC patients.
Immunosuppression may be apparent in patients after surgery and chemotherapy, especially in advanced cancer patients. Moreover, DCs obtained from such patients may be dysfunctional and more likely to induce tolerance or non-productive T cell responses because of lost expression of antigens or MHC molecules in advanced patients [32]. Therefore, the clinical benefits of DC-CIK cells may be due to their strong anti-tumor activities through immumodulation [33]. DC-CIK cells not only eradicated residual tumor cells but also enhanced immune surveillance capacity of host cells by producing pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-2 and IFN-γ to prevent or delay tumor recurrence [34, 35]. However, the responsible mechanisms for these clinical benefits remain to be elucidated.
While some objective clinical benefits have been demonstrated in patients with advanced or metastatic CRC, more studies are warranted. Firstly, due to the retrospective nature limitations, a well-designed prospective study should be carried out to examine these results further. Secondly, combined therapies may be optimized by comparison with other recent cell-based therapeutic studies. Indeed, it has been reported that chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy before cell transfusion can enhance anti-tumor effects in previous clinical studies [36]. Moreover, a recent study reported cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death ligand1 (PD-1) may play key roles in inhibiting T cell activation during cell therapies [37]. Currently, we are combining adoptive transfer of T cells with PD1 and CTLA-4 blockade after inductive chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy in a similar manner. In the future, we believe that several alternative modalities may improve immunotherapy with traditional therapies and ultimately change patient outcomes in advanced CRC cancer patients.
Conclusion
In summary, DC-CIK cell adjuvant transfusion resulted in significantly prolonged 5-year OS rates compared to that of the control group. Secondly, the 5-year PFS rates were significantly improved; the 1- and 3-year OS and PFS rates in the DC-CIK group were higher than those in the control group. These results suggested that DC-CIK cell treatment, combined with first-line therapy, is an effective therapeutic strategy for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.
Anzeige
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This study was supported in part by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (#2016J01514) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (#813022800).
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by the ethics committee of Fujian Medical University cancer Hospital and was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association. All enrolled patients provided written informed consent.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.
Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.
