nach oben

Lasers in Medical Science

Erschienen in:

22.04.2021 | Review Article

Effect of different types of adhesive systems on the bond strength and marginal integrity of composite restorations in cavities prepared with the erbium laser—a systematic review

verfasst von: Deepti Dua, Ankur Dua, Eugenia Anagnostaki, Riccardo Poli, Steven Parker

Erschienen in: Lasers in Medical Science | Ausgabe 1/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

There are inconclusive results regarding etching and bonding protocol to achieve optimal bond strength and marginal integrity of adhesive composite resin restorations in erbium laser prepared cavities. This systematic review aimed to consider which adhesive system protocol may be optimal in achieving the bond strength and marginal integrity in erbium laser–prepared cavities, comparable to that obtained with conventional method of cavity preparation. This review was developed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement with literature search based on all publications during the period January1, 2000–October 10, 2020, in three databases: MEDLINE, Google Scholar and ScienceDirect. The necessary information was extracted by two independent authors. The search resulted in 139 articles from all databases, and a total of thirty-one articles met the inclusion criteria. The results indicated that the selection of adhesives depending on their pH and composition and the laser pulse duration and pulse energy used plays an important role in predicting the adhesion and marginal integrity. The 10-MDP containing moderate self-etch adhesives has demonstrated predictable outcomes. Longer pulse durations used for cavity preparations may indicate the use of etch-and-rinse (EnR) or moderate self-etch adhesives (SEA) to allow better resin infiltration in deep craters formed due to laser irradiation. However, further studies with more standardizations in relation to adhesives and laser parameters are needed.

Shahabi S, Chiniforush N, Bahramian H, Monzavi A, Baghalian A, Kharazifard MJ (2013) The effect of erbium family laser on tensile bond strength of composite to dentin in comparison with conventional method. Lasers Med Sci 28(1):139–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1086-3CrossRefPubMed

Corona SA, Borsatto MC, Pecora JD, De SA, Rocha RA, Ramos TS, Palma-Dibb RG (2003) Assessing microleakage of different class V restorations after Er:YAG laser and bur preparation. J Oral Rehabil 30(10):1008–1014. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01173.xCrossRefPubMed

Keller U, Hibst R (1989) Experimental studies of the application of the Er:YAG laser on dental hard substances: II. Light microscopic and SEM investigations. Lasers Surg Med 9(4):345–351. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.1900090406CrossRefPubMed

Obeidi A, McCracken MS, Liu PR, Litaker MS, Beck P, Rahemtulla F (2009) Enhancement of bonding to enamel and dentin prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser. Lasers Surg Med 41(6):454–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.20790CrossRefPubMed

da Silva MP, Barceleiro MO, Dias KR, Zanin F (2011) Shear bond strength of two adhesive systems bonded to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin. Gen Dent 59(3):e96–e100

Lopes RM, Trevelin LT, da Cunha SR, de Oliveira RF, de Andrade Salgado DM, de Freitas PM, de Paula Eduardo C, Aranha AC (2015) Dental adhesion to erbium-lased tooth structure: a review of the literature. Photomed Laser Surg 33(8):393–403. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2015.3892CrossRefPubMed

Mir M, Gutknecht N, Poprawe R et al (2009) Visualising the procedures in the influence of water on the ablation of dental hard tissue with erbium:yttrium–aluminium–garnet and erbium,chromium:yttrium–scandium–gallium-garnet laser pulses. Lasers Med Sci 24:365–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-008-0571-1CrossRefPubMed

Du Q, Ge L, Zhang S, Zhang Q (2019) Effects of erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser irradiation on bovine dentin contaminated by cariogenic bacteria. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg 37(5):305–311. https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2018.4586CrossRefPubMed

Burnett LH Jr, Conceiçaõ EN, Pelinos JE, Eduardo CD (2001) Comparative study of influence on tensile bond strength of a composite to dentin using Er:YAG laser, air abrasion, or air turbine for preparation of cavities. J Clin Laser Med Surg 19(4):199–202. https://doi.org/10.1089/104454701316918970CrossRefPubMed

10.

Bertrand MF, Semez G, Leforestier E, Muller-Bolla M, Nammour S, Rocca JP (2006) Er:YAG laser cavity preparation and composite resin bonding with a single-component adhesive system: relationship between shear bond strength and microleakage. Lasers Surg Med 38(6):615–623. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.20342CrossRefPubMed

11.

Corona SA, de Souza AE, Chinelatti MA, Borsatto MC, Pécora JD, Palma-Dibb RG (2007) Effect of energy and pulse repetition rate of Er: YAG laser on dentin ablation ability and morphological analysis of the laser-irradiated substrate. Photomed Laser Surg 25(1):26–33. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2006.1075CrossRefPubMed

12.

Coluzzi DJ, Parker SPA (2017) Textbooks in contemporary dentistry lasers in dentistry– current concepts. Springer International Publishing; ed 1; chapter 4; p 69- 72. eBook ISBN 978-3-319-51944-9; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51944-9

13.

Olivi G, Olivi M (2015) Lasers in restorative dentistry-a practical guide. Springer; Chapter 5 page 95. eBook ISBN 978-3-662-47317-7; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47317-7

14.

Luong E, Shayegan A (2018) Assessment of microleakage of class V restored by resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer and pit and fissure resin-based sealants following Er:YAG laser conditioning and acid etching: in vitro study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 10:83–92. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S153989CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Dunn WJ, Davis JT, Bush AC (2005) Shear bond strength and SEM evaluation of composite bonded to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin and enamel. Dent Mater 21(7):616–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.11.003CrossRefPubMed

16.

Esteves-Oliveira M, Carvalho WL, Eduardo Cde P, Zezell DM (2008) Influence of the additional Er:YAG laser conditioning step on the microleakage of class V restorations. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 87(2):538–543. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31141CrossRefPubMed

17.

Koliniotou-Koumpia E, Kouros P, Zafiriadis L, Koumpia E, Dionysopoulos P, Karagiannis V (2012) Bonding of adhesives to Er:YAG laser-treated dentin. Eur J Dent 6(1):16–23CrossRef

18.

Brulat N, Rocca JP, Leforestier E, Fiorucci G, Nammour S, Bertrand MF (2009) Shear bond strength of self-etching adhesive systems to Er:YAG-laser-prepared dentin. Lasers Med Sci 24(1):53–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-007-0519-xCrossRefPubMed

19.

Lee BS, Lin PY, Chen MH, Hsieh TT, Lin CP, Lai JY, Lan WH (2007) Tensile bond strength of Er,Cr:YSGG laser-irradiated human dentin and analysis of dentin-resin interface. Dent Mater 23(5):570–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.016CrossRefPubMed

20.

Gurgan S, Kiremitci A, Cakir FY, Yazici E, Gorucu J, Gutknecht N (2009) Shear bond strength of composite bonded to erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser-prepared dentin. Lasers Med Sci 24(1):117–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-007-0532-0CrossRefPubMed

21.

Anusavice KJ. Phillips’ science of dental materials. 2003, 11^th ed Elsevier Science, St. Louis; p. 394. eBook ISBN: 9781437725490; eBook ISBN: 9781455757282

22.

Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E (1982) The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 16(3):265–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820160307CrossRefPubMed

23.

Zhang L, Wang DY, Fan J, Li F, Chen YJ, Chen JH (2014) Stability of bonds made to superficial vs. deep dentin, before and after thermocycling. Dent Mater 30(11):1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.08.362CrossRefPubMed

24.

Asande Adebayo O, Francis Burrow M, John Tyas M (2008) Bonding of one-step and two-step self-etching primer adhesives to dentin with different tubule orientations. Acta Odontol Scand 66(3):159–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350802123118CrossRefPubMed

25.

Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (2003) Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28(3):215–235PubMed

26.

De Moor RJ, Delmé KI (2009) Laser-assisted cavity preparation and adhesion to erbium-lased tooth structure: part 1. Laser-assisted cavity preparation. J Adhes Dent 11(6):427–438. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a18136CrossRefPubMed

27.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 62(10):1006–1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005CrossRefPubMed

28.

Koliniotou-Koumpia E, Kouros P, Dionysopoulos D, Zafiriadis L (2015) Bonding strength of silorane-based composite to Er-YAG laser prepared dentin. Lasers Med Sci 30(2):509–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1353-yCrossRefPubMed

29.

Celik EU, Ergücü Z, Türkün LS, Türkün M (2006) Shear bond strength of different adhesives to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin. J Adhes Dent 8(5):319–325PubMed

30.

Guven Y, Aktoren O (2015) Shear bond strength and ultrastructural interface analysis of different adhesive systems to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin. Lasers Med Sci 30(2):769–778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1424-0CrossRefPubMed

31.

Shirani F, Birang R, Malekipur MR, Zeilabi A, Shahmoradi M, Kazemi S, Khazaei S (2012) Adhesion to Er:YAG laser and bur prepared root and crown dentine. Aust Dent J 57(2):138–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2012.01682.xCrossRefPubMed

32.

Korkmaz FM, Baygin O, Tuzuner T, Bagis B, Arslan I (2013) The effect of an erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser on the microleakage and bond strength of silorane and micro-hybrid composite restorations. Eur J Dent 7(Suppl 1):S033–S040. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.119061CrossRefPubMed

33.

Moldes VL, Capp CI, Navarro RS, Matos AB, Youssef MN, Cassoni A (2009) In vitro microleakage of composite restorations prepared by Er:YAG/Er,Cr:YSGG lasers and conventional drills associated with two adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent 11(3):221–229PubMed

34.

Aranha AC, Turbino ML, Powell GL, Eduardo Cde P (2005) Assessing microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after Er:YAG laser and bur preparation. Lasers Surg Med 37(2):172–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.20208CrossRefPubMed

35.

Gutknecht N, Apel C, Schäfer C, Lampert F (2001) Microleakage of composite fillings in Er,Cr:YSGG laser-prepared class II cavities. Lasers Surg Med 28(4):371–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.1064

36.

Gorucu J, Gurgan S, Cakir FY, Bicer CO, Gorucu H (2011) The effect of different preparation and etching procedures on the microleakage of direct composite veneer restorations. Photomed Laser Surg 29(3):205–211. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2009.2752CrossRefPubMed

37.

Marotti J, Geraldo-Martins VR, Bello-Silva MS, de Paula Eduardo C, Apel C, Gutknecht N (2010) Influence of etching with erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser on microleakage of class V restoration. Lasers Med Sci 25(3):325–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-008-0623-6CrossRefPubMed

38.

Korkmaz Y, Ozel E, Attar N, Bicer CO, Firatli E (2010) Microleakage and scanning electron microscopy evaluation of all-in-one self-etch adhesives and their respective nanocomposites prepared by erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and bur. Lasers Med Sci 25(4):493–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-009-0672-5CrossRefPubMed

39.

Ozel E, Tuna EB, Firatli S, Firatli E (2016) Comparison of total-etch, self-etch, and selective etching techniques on class V composite restorations prepared by Er:YAG laser and bur: a scanning electron microscopy study. Microsc Res Tech 79(10):998–1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.22735CrossRefPubMed

40.

Yaman BC, Guray BE, Dorter C, Gomeç Y, Yazıcıoglu O, Erdilek D (2012) Effect of the erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser or diamond bur cavity preparation on the marginal microleakage of class V cavities restored with different adhesives and composite systems. Lasers Med Sci 27(4):785–794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-011-0981-3CrossRefPubMed

41.

Krmek SJ, Bogdan I, Simeon P, Mehicić GP, Katanec D, Anić I (2010) A three-dimensional evaluation of microleakage of class V cavities prepared by the very short pulse mode of the erbium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser. Lasers Med Sci 25(6):823–828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-009-0707-yCrossRefPubMed

42.

Sanhadji El Haddar Y, Cetik S, Bahrami B, Atash R (2016) A comparative study of microleakage on dental surfaces bonded with three self-etch adhesive systems treated with the Er:YAG laser and bur. Biomed Res Int 2016:2509757. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2509757CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Arami S, Shahabi S, Tabatabaie M, Chiniforush N, Morshedi E, Torabi S (2014) Assessing microleakage of composite restorations in class V cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser irradiation or diamond bur. J Conserv Dent 17(3):216–219. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.131778CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

44.

Delme KI, Deman PJ, De Moor RJ (2005) Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after conventional and Er:YAG laser preparation. J Oral Rehabil 32(9):676–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01550.xCrossRefPubMed

45.

Shigetani Y, Tate Y, Okamoto A, Iwaku M, Abu-Bakr N (2002) A study of cavity preparation by Er:YAG laser. Effects on the marginal leakage of composite resin restoration. Dent Mater J 21(3):238–249CrossRef

46.

Phanombualert J, Chimtim P, Heebthamai T, Weera-Archakul W (2015) Microleakage of self-etch adhesive system in class V cavities prepared by using Er:YAG laser with different pulse modes. Photomed Laser Surg 33(9):467–472. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2015.3926CrossRefPubMed

47.

Shinoki T, Kato J, Otsuki M, Tagami J (2011) Effect of cavity preparation with Er:YAG laser on marginal integrity of resin composite restorations. Asian Pac J Dent 11:19–25

48.

Reis AF, Giannini M, Kavaguchi A, Soares CJ, Line SR (2004) Comparison of microtensile bond strength to enamel and dentin of human, bovine, and porcine teeth. J Adhes Dent Summer 6(2):117–121

49.

Akin GE, Herguner-Siso S, Ozcan M, Ozel-Bektas O, Akin H (2012) Bond strengths of one-step self-etch adhesives to laser-irradiated and bur-cut dentin after water storage and thermocycling. Photomed Laser Surg 30(4):214–221. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2011.3170CrossRefPubMed

50.

Khoroushi M, Ehteshami A (2016) Marginal microleakage of cervical composite resin restorations bonded using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives: two dimensional vs. three dimensional methods. Restor Dent Endod 41(2):83–90. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2016.41.2.83CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

51.

Ramos RP, Chinelatti MA, Chimello DT, Borsatto MC, Pécora JD, Palma-Dibb RG (2004) Bonding of self-etching and total-etch systems to Er:YAG laser-irradiated dentin. Tensile bond strength and scanning electron microscopy. Braz Dent J 15:SI9–S20CrossRef

52.

Esteves-Oliveira M, Zezell DM, Apel C, Turbino ML, Aranha AC, Eduardo Cde P, Gutknecht N (2007) Bond strength of self-etching primer to bur cut, Er,Cr:YSGG, and Er:YAG lased dental surfaces. Photomed Laser Surg 25(5):373–380. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2007.2044CrossRefPubMed

53.

Tay FR, Sano H, Carvalho R, Pashley EL, Pashley DH (2000) An ultrastructural study of the influence of acidity of self-etching primers and smear layer thickness on bonding to intact dentin. J Adhes Dent Summer 2(2):83–98

54.

Tsuchiya K, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsubota K, Tsujimoto A, Berry TP, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2016) Effect of a functional monomer (MDP) on the enamel bond durability of single- step self-etch adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci 124(1):96–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12232CrossRefPubMed

55.

Nishimoto Y, Otsuki M, Yamauti M, Eguchi T, Sato Y, Foxton RM, Tagami J (2008) Effect of pulse duration of Er: YAG laser on dentin ablation. Dent Mater J 27(3):433–439. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.27.433CrossRefPubMed

56.

Roebuck EM, Saunders WP, Whitters CJ (2000) Influence of erbium:YAG laser energies on the microleakage of class V resin-based composite restorations. Am J Dent 13(5):280–284PubMed

Titel: Effect of different types of adhesive systems on the bond strength and marginal integrity of composite restorations in cavities prepared with the erbium laser—a systematic review
verfasst von: Deepti Dua
Ankur Dua
Eugenia Anagnostaki
Riccardo Poli
Steven Parker
Publikationsdatum: 22.04.2021
Verlag: Springer London
Erschienen in: Lasers in Medical Science / Ausgabe 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0268-8921
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-604X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-021-03294-1

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

Biological non-ablative repair of lumbar discs by transforaminal intradiscal laser irradiation: MRI quantitative analysis of the effects—preliminary report

Comparative study of the clinico-trichoscopic response to treatment of hirsutism with long pulsed (1064 nm) Nd:YAG laser in idiopathic hirsutism and polycystic ovarian syndrome patients

Local lung coagulation post resection: an ex-vivo porcine model

In vitro evaluation of physical and chemical parameters involved in aPDT of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans

Diode laser versus bipolar diathermy for turbinate reduction in cases of inferior turbinate hypertrophy

Photobiomodulation-blue and red LED: protection or cellular toxicity? In vitro study with human fibroblasts