nach oben

Clinical Oral Investigations

Erschienen in:

09.07.2019 | Original Article

Effect of enamel matrix derivative on wound healing following gingival recession coverage using the modified coronally advanced tunnel and subepithelial connective tissue graft: a randomised, controlled, clinical study

verfasst von: Alexandra Stähli, Jean-Claude Imber, Elena Raptis, Giovanni E. Salvi, Sigrun Eick, Anton Sculean

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 2/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

The potential effect of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) on wound healing following recession coverage surgery is still controversially discussed in the literature. The aim of this randomised, controlled, single blinded clinical study was, therefore, to investigate clinically and immunologically the potential effects of EMD on early wound healing and clinical results following treatment of single and multiple gingival recessions by the modified coronally advanced tunnel technique (MCAT) and subepithelial connective tissue graft (sCTG).

Materials and methods

A total of 40 systemically healthy patients with Miller class I, II or III single or multiple gingival recessions were treated with MCAT + sCTG with or without EMD. Patients were consecutively enrolled and randomly assigned to test or control treatment. Inflammatory markers (interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-8, IL-10 and matrix metalloprotease (MMP)-8) were measured at baseline, 2 days and 1 week postoperatively. The following clinical parameters were assessed at baseline and at 6 months postoperatively: Recession Depth (RD), Recession Width (RW), Width of Keratinized Tissue (KT) and Probing Depth (PD). Patient-reported outcomes were analysed by means of a visual analogue scale.

Results

No statistically significant differences were detected between the 2 groups in terms of inflammatory markers and patient-reported outcomes during early wound healing. In the test group, RD was reduced from 4.0 ± 1.2 mm at baseline to 0.9 ± 1.3 mm at 6 months (p < 0.001), while the corresponding values in the control group were 4.5 ± 2.0 mm at baseline and 1.0 ± 1.0 mm at 6 months, respectively. At 6 months, mean root coverage measured 78 ± 26% in the test group and 77 ± 18% in the control group, respectively.

Conclusion

Within their limits, the present data have failed to show an influence of EMD on the clinical and immunological parameters related to wound healing following recession coverage surgery using MCAT and sCTG.

Clinical relevance

Early wound healing following recession coverage by means of MCAT and sCTG does not seem to be influenced by the additional application of EMD.

Wennström JL (1996) Mucogingival therapy. Ann Periodontol 1(1):671–701. https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.1996.1.1.671 CrossRefPubMed

Daprile G, Gatto MR, Checchi L (2007) The evolution of buccal gingival recessions in a student population: a 5-year follow-up. J Periodontol 78(4):611–614. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.060277 CrossRefPubMed

Lovegrove J, Leichter J (2004) Exposed root surface: a review of aetiology, management and evidence-based outcomes of treatment. N Z Dent J 100(3):72–81PubMed

Serino G, Wennström JL, Lindhe J, Eneroth L (1994) The prevalence and distribution of gingival recession in subjects with a high standard of oral hygiene. J Clin Periodontol 21(1):57–63CrossRef

Susin C, Haas AN, Oppermann RV, Haugejorden O, Albandar JM (2004) Gingival recession: epidemiology and risk indicators in a representative urban Brazilian population. J Periodontol 75(10):1377–1386. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.10.1377 CrossRefPubMed

Cairo F, Nieri M, Pagliaro U (2014) Efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures in the treatment of localized facial gingival recessions. A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 41 Suppl 15:S44–S62. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12182 CrossRefPubMed

Graziani F, Gennai S, Roldan S, Discepoli N, Buti J, Madianos P, Herrera D (2014) Efficacy of periodontal plastic procedures in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions. J Clin Periodontol 41 Suppl 15:S63–S76. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12172 CrossRefPubMed

Aroca S, Keglevich T, Nikolidakis D, Gera I, Nagy K, Azzi R, Etienne D (2010) Treatment of class III multiple gingival recessions: a randomized-clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 37(1):88–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01492.x CrossRefPubMed

Aroca S, Molnar B, Windisch P, Gera I, Salvi GE, Nikolidakis D, Sculean A (2013) Treatment of multiple adjacent Miller class I and II gingival recessions with a modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) technique and a collagen matrix or palatal connective tissue graft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 40(7):713–720. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12112 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Sculean A, Cosgarea R, Stähli A, Katsaros C, Arweiler NB, Brecx M, Deppe H (2014) The modified coronally advanced tunnel combined with an enamel matrix derivative and subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of isolated mandibular Miller class I and II gingival recessions: a report of 16 cases. Quintessence Int 45(10):829–835. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a32636 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Sculean A, Cosgarea R, Stähli A, Katsaros C, Arweiler NB, Miron RJ, Deppe H (2016) Treatment of multiple adjacent maxillary Miller class I, II, and III gingival recessions with the modified coronally advanced tunnel, enamel matrix derivative, and subepithelial connective tissue graft: a report of 12 cases. Quintessence Int 47(8):653–659. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a36562 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Azaripour A, Kissinger M, Farina VS, Van Noorden CJ, Gerhold-Ay A, Willershausen B, Cortellini P (2016) Root coverage with connective tissue graft associated with coronally advanced flap or tunnel technique: a randomized, double-blind, mono-centre clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 43(12):1142–1150. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12627 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Bosshardt DD (2008) Biological mediators and periodontal regeneration: a review of enamel matrix proteins at the cellular and molecular levels. J Clin Periodontol 35(8 Suppl):87–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01264.x CrossRefPubMed

14.

Gestrelius S, Lyngstadaas SP, Hammarström L (2000) Emdogain--periodontal regeneration based on biomimicry. Clin Oral Investig 4(2):120–125CrossRef

15.

Miron RJ, Sculean A, Cochran DL, Froum S, Zucchelli G, Nemcovsky C, Donos N, Lyngstadaas SP, Deschner J, Dard M, Stavropoulos A, Zhang Y, Trombelli L, Kasaj A, Shirakata Y, Cortellini P, Tonetti M, Rasperini G, Jepsen S, Bosshardt DD (2016) Twenty years of enamel matrix derivative: the past, the present and the future. J Clin Periodontol 43(8):668–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12546 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Shirakata Y, Nakamura T, Shinohara Y, Nakamura-Hasegawa K, Hashiguchi C, Takeuchi N, Imafuji T, Sculean A, Noguchi K (2018) Split-mouth evaluation of connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of isolated gingival recession defects in dogs. Clin Oral Investig. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2750-1 CrossRef

17.

Okuda K, Miyazaki A, Momose M, Murata M, Nomura T, Kubota T, Wolff LF, Yoshie H (2001) Levels of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 and matrix metalloproteinases-1 and -8 in gingival crevicular fluid following treatment with enamel matrix derivative (EMDOGAIN). J Periodontal Res 36(5):309–316CrossRef

18.

Miller PD Jr (1985) A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 5:8–13PubMed

19.

O'Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE (1972) The plaque control record. J Periodontol 43(1):38. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1972.43.1.38 CrossRefPubMed

20.

Griffiths GS (2003) Formation, collection and significance of gingival crevice fluid. Periodontol 31:32–42CrossRef

21.

ADA and AAP introduce dentists to new time saving periodontal evaluation system (1992) Va Dent J 69(4):16–17

22.

Gibson CW (2008) The amelogenin “enamel proteins” and cells in the periodontium. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 18(4):345–360CrossRef

23.

Haase HR, Bartold PM (2001) Enamel matrix derivative induces matrix synthesis by cultured human periodontal fibroblast cells. J Periodontol 72(3):341–348. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.3.341 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Hoang AM, Oates TW, Cochran DL (2000) In vitro wound healing responses to enamel matrix derivative. J Periodontol 71(8):1270–1277. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.8.1270 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Rincon JC, Xiao Y, Young WG, Bartold PM (2005) Enhanced proliferation, attachment and osteopontin expression by porcine periodontal cells exposed to Emdogain. Arch Oral Biol 50(12):1047–1054CrossRef

26.

Suzuki N, Ohyama M, Maeno M, Ito K, Otsuka K (2001) Attachment of human periodontal ligament cells to enamel matrix-derived protein is mediated via interaction between BSP-like molecules and integrin alpha(v)beta3. J Periodontol 72(11):1520–1526. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.11.1520 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Van der Pauw MT, Van den Bos T, Everts V, Beertsen W (2000) Enamel matrix-derived protein stimulates attachment of periodontal ligament fibroblasts and enhances alkaline phosphatase activity and transforming growth factor beta1 release of periodontal ligament and gingival fibroblasts. J Periodontol 71(1):31–43. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.1.31 CrossRefPubMed

28.

Maymon-Gil T, Weinberg E, Nemcovsky C, Weinreb M (2016) Enamel matrix derivative promotes healing of a surgical wound in the rat oral mucosa. J Periodontol 87(5):601–609. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2016.150567 CrossRefPubMed

29.

Wennström JL, Lindhe J (2002) Some effects of enamel matrix proteins on wound healing in the dento-gingival region. J Clin Periodontol 29(1):9–14CrossRef

30.

Tonetti MS, Fourmousis I, Suvan J, Cortellini P, Bragger U, Lang NP (2004) Healing, post-operative morbidity and patient perception of outcomes following regenerative therapy of deep intrabony defects. J Clin Periodontol 31(12):1092–1098. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00615 CrossRefPubMed

31.

Hagenaars S, Louwerse PH, Timmerman MF, Van der Velden U, Van der Weijden GA (2004) Soft-tissue wound healing following periodontal surgery and Emdogain application. J Clin Periodontol 31(10):850–856. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00571.x CrossRefPubMed

32.

Brett PM, Parkar M, Olsen I, Tonetti M (2002) Expression profiling of periodontal ligament cells stimulated with enamel matrix proteins in vitro: a model for tissue regeneration. J Dent Res 81(11):776–783. https://doi.org/10.1177/0810776 CrossRefPubMed

33.

Kapferer I, Schmidt S, Gstir R, Durstberger G, Huber LA, Vietor I (2011) Gene-expression profiles of epithelial cells treated with EMD in vitro: analysis using complementary DNA arrays. J Periodontal Res 46(1):118–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.2010.01321.x CrossRefPubMed

34.

Parkar MH, Tonetti M (2004) Gene expression profiles of periodontal ligament cells treated with enamel matrix proteins in vitro: analysis using cDNA arrays. J Periodontol 75(11):1539–1546. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.11.1539 CrossRefPubMed

35.

Stähli A, Bosshardt D, Sculean A, Gruber R (2014) Emdogain-regulated gene expression in palatal fibroblasts requires TGF-betaRI kinase signaling. PLoS One 9(9):e105672. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105672 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Cueva MA, Boltchi FE, Hallmon WW, Nunn ME, Rivera-Hidalgo F, Rees T (2004) A comparative study of coronally advanced flaps with and without the addition of enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of marginal tissue recession. J Periodontol 75(7):949–956. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.7.949 CrossRefPubMed

37.

Castellanos A, de la Rosa M, de la Garza M, Caffesse RG (2006) Enamel matrix derivative and coronal flaps to cover marginal tissue recessions. J Periodontol 77(1):7–14. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.77.1.7 CrossRefPubMed

38.

Spahr A, Haegewald S, Tsoulfidou F, Rompola E, Heijl L, Bernimoulin JP, Ring C, Sander S, Haller B (2005) Coverage of Miller class I and II recession defects using enamel matrix proteins versus coronally advanced flap technique: a 2-year report. J Periodontol 76(11):1871–1880. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.11.1871 CrossRefPubMed

39.

Henriques PS, Pelegrine AA, Nogueira AA, Borghi MM (2010) Application of subepithelial connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a split-mouth randomized study. J Oral Sci 52(3):463–471CrossRef

40.

Sato S, Yamada K, Kato T, Haryu K, Ito K (2006) Treatment of Miller class III recessions with enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain) in combination with subepithelial connective tissue grafting. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 26(1):71–77PubMed

41.

Miron RJ, Bosshardt DD, Laugisch O, Katsaros C, Buser D, Sculean A (2012) Enamel matrix protein adsorption to root surfaces in the presence or absence of human blood. J Periodontol 83(7):885–892. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2011.110404 CrossRefPubMed

42.

Barootchi S, Tavelli L, Ravidà A, Wang CW, Wang HL (2018) Effect of EDTA root conditioning on the outcome of coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 22(8):2727–2741CrossRef

Titel: Effect of enamel matrix derivative on wound healing following gingival recession coverage using the modified coronally advanced tunnel and subepithelial connective tissue graft: a randomised, controlled, clinical study
verfasst von: Alexandra Stähli
Jean-Claude Imber
Elena Raptis
Giovanni E. Salvi
Sigrun Eick
Anton Sculean
Publikationsdatum: 09.07.2019
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03008-6

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Effect of enamel matrix derivative on wound healing following gingival recession coverage using the modified coronally advanced tunnel and subepithelial connective tissue graft: a randomised, controlled, clinical study

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Clinical relevance

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Newsletter

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Clinical relevance

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2020

Reliability and validity of a new classification of MIH based on severity

Effect of a hydrophobic bonding resin on the 36-month performance of a universal adhesive—a randomized clinical trial

Clinical and histological reaction of periodontal tissues to subgingival resin composite restorations

Minimum size and positioning of imaging field for CBCT scans of impacted maxillary canines

Secondary caries: prevalence, characteristics, and approach

Effect of cavity lining on the restoration of root surface carious lesions: a split-mouth, 5-year randomized controlled clinical trial

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Newsletter