nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.09.2015 | Original Scientific Report

Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine for Postoperative Analgesia Following Laparoscopic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis

verfasst von: Nicholas T. Ventham, Ewan D. Kennedy, Richard R. Brady, Hugh M. Paterson, Doug Speake, Irwin Foo, Kenneth C. H. Fearon

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 9/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Intravenous (IV) lidocaine has analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of IV lidocaine in controlling postoperative pain following laparoscopic surgery.

Methods

A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IV lidocaine versus placebo/routine treatment for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic surgery. The primary outcome was opiate requirement at 24 h. Secondary outcomes included cumulative opiate requirement, numerical pain scores (2, 12, 24, 48 h at rest and on movement), recovery indices (nausea and vomiting, length of stay, time until diet resumption, first flatus and bowel movement) and side effects (cardiac/neurological toxicity). Subgroup analyses were performed according to operation type and to compare IV lidocaine with intraperitoneal lidocaine.

Results

Fourteen RCTs with 742 patients were included. IV lidocaine was associated with a small but significant reduction in opiate requirement at 24 h compared with placebo/routine care. IV lidocaine was associated with reduced cumulative opiate requirement, reduced pain scores at rest at 2, 12 and 24 h, reduced nausea and vomiting and a shorter time until resumption of diet. The length of stay did not differ between groups. There was a low incidence of IV lidocaine-associated toxicity. In subgroup analyses, there was no difference between IV and intraperitoneal lidocaine in the measured outcomes.

Conclusions

IV lidocaine has a multidimensional effect on the quality of recovery. IV lidocaine was associated with lower opiate requirements, reduced nausea and vomiting and a shorter time until resumption of diet. Whilst IV lidocaine appears safe, the optimal treatment regimen remains unknown. Statistical heterogeneity was high.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Møiniche S, Mikkelsen S, Wetterslev J, Dahl JB (1998) A qualitative systematic review of incisional local anaesthesia for postoperative pain relief after abdominal operations. Br J Anaesth 81:377–383PubMedCrossRef

Rafi AN (2001) Abdominal field block: a new approach via the lumbar triangle. Anaesthesia 56:1024–1026PubMedCrossRef

Johns N, O’Neill S, Ventham NT et al (2012) Clinical effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 14:e635–e642PubMedCrossRef

Ventham NT, Hughes M, O’Neill S et al (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of continuous local anaesthetic wound infiltration versus epidural analgesia for postoperative pain following abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 100:1280–1289PubMedCrossRef

Ventham NT, O’Neill S, Johns N et al (2014) Evaluation of novel local anesthetic wound infiltration techniques for postoperative pain following colorectal resection surgery: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 57:237–250PubMedCrossRef

Groudine S (2014) Transversus abdominis plane blocks and systemic absorption. Anesth Analg 119:1002PubMedCrossRef

Latzke D, Marhofer P, Kettner SC et al (2012) Pharmacokinetics of the local anesthetic ropivacaine after transversus abdominis plane block in healthy volunteers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 68:419–425PubMedCrossRef

Griffiths JD, Barron FA, Grant S et al (2010) Plasma ropivacaine concentrations after ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block. Br J Anaesth 105:853–856PubMedCrossRef

Keats AS, D’Alessandro GL, Beecher HK (1951) Controlled study of pain relief by intravenous procaine. J Am Med Assoc 147:1761–1763PubMedCrossRef

10.

Bartlett EE, Hutserani O (1961) Xylocaine for the relief of postoperative pain. Anesth Analg 40:296–304PubMedCrossRef

11.

Kawamata M, Takahashi T, Kozuka Y et al (2002) Experimental incision-induced pain in human skin: effects of systemic lidocaine on flare formation and hyperalgesia. Pain 100:77–89PubMedCrossRef

12.

Wu CL, Liu SS (2009) Intravenous lidocaine for ambulatory anesthesia: good to go or not so fast? Anesth Analg 109:1718–1719PubMedCrossRef

13.

Jänig W (2008) What is the mechanism underlying treatment of pain by systemic application of lidocaine? Pain 137:5–6PubMedCrossRef

14.

Tanelian DL, MacIver MB (1991) Analgesic concentrations of lidocaine suppress tonic A-delta and C fiber discharges produced by acute injury. Anesthesiology 74:934–936PubMedCrossRef

15.

Koppert W, Ostermeier N, Sittl R et al (2000) Low-dose lidocaine reduces secondary hyperalgesia by a central mode of action. Pain 85:217–224PubMedCrossRef

16.

Hollmann MW, Durieux ME (2000) Local anesthetics and the inflammatory response: a new therapeutic indication? Anesthesiology 93:858–875PubMedCrossRef

17.

Herroeder S, Pecher S, Schönherr ME et al (2007) Systemic lidocaine shortens length of hospital stay after colorectal surgery: a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Surg 246:192–200PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

18.

Marret E, Rolin M, Beaussier M, Bonnet F (2008) Meta-analysis of intravenous lidocaine and postoperative recovery after abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 95:1331–1338PubMedCrossRef

19.

Sun Y, Li T, Wang N et al (2012) Perioperative systemic lidocaine for postoperative analgesia and recovery after abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 55:1183–1194PubMedCrossRef

20.

McCarthy GC, Megalla SA, Habib AS (2010) Impact of intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative analgesia and recovery from surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Drugs 70:1149–1163PubMedCrossRef

21.

Vigneault L, Turgeon AF, Côté D et al (2011) Perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain control: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Can J Anaesth 58:22–37PubMedCrossRef

22.

Fearon KCH, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M et al (2005) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 24:466–477PubMedCrossRef

23.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 339:6

24.

Woodbury G (2002) Chapter 5. Normal probability distributions. In: An Introduction to statistics, 1st edn. Cengage Learning, p 254

25.

Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I (2005) Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 5:13PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

26.

Silvasti M, Rosenberg P, Seppälä T et al (1998) Comparison of analgesic efficacy of oxycodone and morphine in postoperative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 42:576–580PubMedCrossRef

27.

Pereira J, Lawlor P, Vigano A et al (2001) Equianalgesic dose ratios for opioids. a critical review and proposals for long-term dosing. J Pain Symptom Manage 22:672–687PubMedCrossRef

28.

UK Medicines Information pharmacists for NHS healthcare Professionals (UKMi) (2011) What are the equivalent doses of oral morphine to other oral opioids when used as analgesics in adult palliative care? http://www.surreyandsussex.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/UKMi-Equivalent-doses-of-Oral-Morphine-to-other-Oral-Opioids-in-adult-Palliative-Care.pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2014

29.

Chalmers TC, Smith H, Blackburn B et al (1981) A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial. Control Clin Trials 2:31–49PubMedCrossRef

30.

Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17:1–12PubMedCrossRef

31.

Viechtbauer W (2010) Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw 36:1–48

32.

Wu CT, Borel CO, Lee MS et al (2005) The interaction effect of perioperative cotreatment with dextromethorphan and intravenous lidocaine on pain relief and recovery of bowel function after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 100:448–453PubMedCrossRef

33.

Lauwick S, Kim DJ, Michelagnoli G et al (2008) Intraoperative infusion of lidocaine reduces postoperative fentanyl requirements in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Can J Anaesth 55:754–760PubMedCrossRef

34.

Saadawy IM, Kaki AM, Abd El Latif aa et al (2010) Lidocaine vs. magnesium: effect on analgesia after a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 54:549–556PubMedCrossRef

35.

Yang SY, Kang H, Choi GJ et al (2014) Efficacy of intraperitoneal and intravenous lidocaine on pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Int Med Res 42:307–319PubMedCrossRef

36.

Kaba A, Laurent SR, Detroz BJ et al (2007) Intravenous lidocaine infusion facilitates acute rehabilitation after laparoscopic colectomy. Anesthesiology 106:11–16PubMedCrossRef

37.

Kim HO, Lee SR, Choi WJ (2014) Early oral feeding following laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. ANZ J Surg 84:539–544PubMedCrossRef

38.

Tikuisis R, Miliauskas P, Samalavicius NE et al (2014) Intravenous lidocaine for post-operative pain relief after hand-assisted laparoscopic colon surgery: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Tech Coloproctol 18:373–380PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

39.

Grady P, Clark N, Lenahan J et al (2012) Effect of intraoperative intravenous lidocaine on postoperative pain and return of bowel function after laparoscopic abdominal gynecologic procedures. AANA J 80:282–288PubMed

40.

De Oliveira GSJ, Fitzgerald P, Streicher LF et al (2012) Systemic lidocaine to improve postoperative quality of recovery after ambulatory laparoscopic surgery. Anesth Analg 115:262–267PubMedCrossRef

41.

Lauwick S, Kim DJ, Mistraletti G, Carli F (2009) Functional walking capacity as an outcome measure of laparoscopic prostatectomy: the effect of lidocaine infusion. Br J Anaesth 103:213–219PubMedCrossRef

42.

Wuethrich PY, Romero J, Burkhard FC, Curatolo M (2012) No benefit from perioperative intravenous lidocaine in laparoscopic renal surgery: a randomised, placebo-controlled study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 29:537–543PubMedCrossRef

43.

Kim TH, Kang H, Hong JH et al (2011) Intraperitoneal and intravenous lidocaine for effective pain relief after laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Surg Endosc 25:3183–3190PubMedCrossRef

44.

Kim TH, Kang H, Choi YS et al (2013) Pre- and intraoperative lidocaine injection for preemptive analgesics in laparoscopic gastrectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23:663–668PubMedCrossRef

45.

Ram D, Sistla SC, Karthikeyan VS et al (2014) Comparison of intravenous and intraperitoneal lignocaine for pain relief following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a double-blind, randomized, clinical trial. Surg Endosc 28:1291–1297PubMedCrossRef

46.

Cepeda MS, Africano JM, Polo R et al (2003) What decline in pain intensity is meaningful to patients with acute pain? Pain 105:151–157PubMedCrossRef

47.

Gray A, Kehlet H, Bonnet F, Rawal N (2005) Predicting postoperative analgesia outcomes: NNT league tables or procedure-specific evidence? Br J Anaesth 94:710–714PubMedCrossRef

48.

Wall PD, Melzack R (1999) Pain measurements in persons in pain. In: Wall PD, Melzack R (eds) Textbook of Pain, 4th edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh

49.

Paddison JS, Booth RJ, Fuchs D, Hill AG (2008) Peritoneal inflammation and fatigue experiences following colorectal surgery: a pilot study. Psychoneuroendocrinology 33:446–454PubMedCrossRef

50.

Sammour T, Kahokehr A, Soop M, Hill AG (2010) Peritoneal damage: the inflammatory response and clinical implications of the neuro-immuno-humoral axis. World J Surg 34:704–720. doi:10.1007/s00268-009-0382-y PubMedCrossRef

51.

Dorian P, Cass D, Schwartz B et al (2002) Amiodarone as compared with lidocaine for shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation. N Engl J Med 346:884–890PubMedCrossRef

52.

The Resus Council (2010) 2010 Resuscitation Guidelines. 177

53.

Cox B, Durieux ME, Marcus MAE (2003) Toxicity of local anaesthetics. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 17:111–136PubMedCrossRef

54.

Groudine SB, Fisher HA, Kaufman RP et al (1998) Intravenous lidocaine speeds the return of bowel function, decreases postoperative pain, and shortens hospital stay in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Anesth Analg 86:235–239PubMed

55.

Koppert W, Weigand M, Neumann F et al (2004) Perioperative intravenous lidocaine has preventive effects on postoperative pain and morphine consumption after major abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg 98:1050–1055PubMedCrossRef

56.

Griffin EM, Prystowsky H, HIingson RA (1951) The use of topical anaesthesia of the peritoneum in poor risk surgery and in augmenting inadequate vertebral conduction anaesthesia. N Z Med J 50:31–33PubMed

57.

Fuhrer Y, Charpentier C, Boulanger G et al (1996) Analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy by intraperitoneal administration of bupivacaine. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 15:128–134PubMedCrossRef

58.

Kahokehr A (2013) Intraperitoneal local anesthetic for postoperative pain. Saudi J Anaesth 7:5PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Titel: Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine for Postoperative Analgesia Following Laparoscopic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis
verfasst von: Nicholas T. Ventham
Ewan D. Kennedy
Richard R. Brady
Hugh M. Paterson
Doug Speake
Irwin Foo
Kenneth C. H. Fearon
Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2015
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 9/2015
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3105-6

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2015

Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Node Status by Circulating Mir-18b and Mir-20a During Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Rectal Cancer

World Health Assembly Resolution WHA68.15: “Strengthening Emergency and Essential Surgical Care and Anesthesia as a Component of Universal Health Coverage”—Addressing the Public Health Gaps Arising from Lack of Safe, Affordable and Accessible Surgical and Anesthetic Services

The Struggle for Equity: An Examination of Surgical Services at Two NGO Hospitals in Rural Haiti

National Comprehensive Cancer Network Resectability Status for Pancreatic Carcinoma Predicts Overall Survival

A Banner Year for Global Surgery: Now How to Make it Make a Difference on the Ground

Preoperative Platelet–Lymphocyte Ratio Augments CA 19-9 as a Predictor of Malignancy in Chronic Calcific Pancreatitis

Update Chirurgie