Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2011

01.05.2011 | Gynecologic Oncology

Efficacy of Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy in Early-Stage Endometrioid Uterine Corpus Cancer

verfasst von: Seo-Yun Tong, MD, PhD, Jong-Min Lee, MD, PhD, Jae-Kwan Lee, MD, PhD, Jae Weon Kim, MD, PhD, Chi-Heum Cho, MD, PhD, Seok-Mo Kim, MD, PhD, Sang-Yoon Park, MD, PhD, Chan-Yong Park, MD, PhD, Ki-Tae Kim, MD, PhD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 5/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this study was to assess whether para-aortic lymphadenectomy has therapeutic efficacy for patients with early-stage endometrioid uterine cancer who underwent systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Methods

The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records and pathological findings of 547 patients with histologically proven FIGO stage I-II endometrioid uterine cancer, based on comprehensive surgical staging, including pelvic with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy.

Results

Among 547 patients, 330 patients had systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy only, and 217 had systematic pelvic with para-aortic lymphadenectomy. There were no significant differences in histopathological factors in the high-risk group, even though deep myometrial invasion (p = 0.02) and lymphvascular space invasion (p = 0.01) were more common in patients who underwent systematic pelvic with para-aortic lymphadenectomy in all study populations. Within a median follow-up of 31 (range, 5–120) months, there was no significant difference in overall survival between the pelvic lymphadenectomy only and pelvic with para-aortic lymphadenectomy groups in all populations (p = 0.77), even in high-risk patients (p = 0.82). Upon multivariate analysis, patients with lymphvascular space invasion had significantly worse overall survival (odds ratio (OR) = 7.38; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.86–29.23; p = 0.004).

Conclusions

Although a prospective, randomized study needs to be performed for confirmation, our data suggest that the therapeutic benefit of para-aortic lymphadenectomy is uncertain in stage I and II endometrioid uterine corpus cancer, even in patients at high-risk for recurrence.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Pecorelli S. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;105:103–4.PubMedCrossRef Pecorelli S. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;105:103–4.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeong NH, Lee JM, Lee SK. Current status in the management of uterine corpus cancer in Korea. J Gynecol Oncol. 2010;21:151–62.PubMedCrossRef Jeong NH, Lee JM, Lee SK. Current status in the management of uterine corpus cancer in Korea. J Gynecol Oncol. 2010;21:151–62.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim K, Ryu SY. Major clinical research advances in gynecologic cancer 2009. J Gynecol Oncol. 2009;20:203–9.PubMedCrossRef Kim K, Ryu SY. Major clinical research advances in gynecologic cancer 2009. J Gynecol Oncol. 2009;20:203–9.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Benedetti Panici P, Basile S, Maneschi F, et al. Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1707–16. Benedetti Panici P, Basile S, Maneschi F, et al. Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1707–16.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Cragun JM, Havrilesky LJ, Calingaert B, et al. Retrospective analysis of selective lymphadenectomy in apparent early-stage endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:3668–75.PubMedCrossRef Cragun JM, Havrilesky LJ, Calingaert B, et al. Retrospective analysis of selective lymphadenectomy in apparent early-stage endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:3668–75.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Fanning J. Long-term survival of intermediate risk endometrial cancer (stage IG3, IC, II) treated with full lymphadenectomy and brachytherapy without teletherapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;82:371–4.PubMedCrossRef Fanning J. Long-term survival of intermediate risk endometrial cancer (stage IG3, IC, II) treated with full lymphadenectomy and brachytherapy without teletherapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;82:371–4.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujimoto T, Nanjyo H, Nakamura A, et al. Para-aortic lymphadenectomy may improve disease-related survival in patients with multipositive pelvic lymph node stage IIIc endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;107:253–9.PubMedCrossRef Fujimoto T, Nanjyo H, Nakamura A, et al. Para-aortic lymphadenectomy may improve disease-related survival in patients with multipositive pelvic lymph node stage IIIc endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;107:253–9.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeong NH, Lee JM, Lee JK, et al. Role of systematic lymphadenectomy and adjuvant radiation in early-stage endometrioid uterine cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. (in press). Jeong NH, Lee JM, Lee JK, et al. Role of systematic lymphadenectomy and adjuvant radiation in early-stage endometrioid uterine cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. (in press).
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Todo Y, Kato H, Kaneuchi M, Watari H, Takeda M, Sakuragi N. Survival effect of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (SEPAL study): a retrospective cohort analysis. Lancet. 2010;375:1165–72.PubMedCrossRef Todo Y, Kato H, Kaneuchi M, Watari H, Takeda M, Sakuragi N. Survival effect of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (SEPAL study): a retrospective cohort analysis. Lancet. 2010;375:1165–72.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitchener H, Swart AM, Qian Q, Amos C, Parmar MK. Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study. Lancet. 2009;373:125–36.PubMedCrossRef Kitchener H, Swart AM, Qian Q, Amos C, Parmar MK. Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study. Lancet. 2009;373:125–36.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Creasman WT, Mutch DE, Herzog TJ. ASTEC lymphadenectomy and radiation therapy studies: are conclusions valid? Gynecol Oncol. 2010;116:293–4.PubMedCrossRef Creasman WT, Mutch DE, Herzog TJ. ASTEC lymphadenectomy and radiation therapy studies: are conclusions valid? Gynecol Oncol. 2010;116:293–4.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Dowdy SC, Mariani A. Lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer: when, not if. Lancet. 2010;375:1138–40.PubMedCrossRef Dowdy SC, Mariani A. Lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer: when, not if. Lancet. 2010;375:1138–40.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Seamon LG, Fowler JM, Cohn DE. Lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: the controversy. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;117:6–8.PubMedCrossRef Seamon LG, Fowler JM, Cohn DE. Lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: the controversy. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;117:6–8.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Tangjitgamol S, Anderson BO, See HT, et al. Management of endometrial cancer in Asia: consensus statement from the Asian Oncology Summit 2009. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:1119–27.PubMedCrossRef Tangjitgamol S, Anderson BO, See HT, et al. Management of endometrial cancer in Asia: consensus statement from the Asian Oncology Summit 2009. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:1119–27.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Mariani A, Webb MJ, Galli L, Podratz KC. Potential therapeutic role of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in node-positive endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;76:348–56.PubMedCrossRef Mariani A, Webb MJ, Galli L, Podratz KC. Potential therapeutic role of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in node-positive endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;76:348–56.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Yaegashi N, Ito K, Niikura H. Lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: is paraaortic lymphadenectomy necessary? Int J Clin Oncol. 2007;12:176–80.PubMedCrossRef Yaegashi N, Ito K, Niikura H. Lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: is paraaortic lymphadenectomy necessary? Int J Clin Oncol. 2007;12:176–80.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee KB, Ki KD, Lee JM, et al. The risk of lymph node metastasis based on myometrial invasion and tumor grade in endometrioid uterine cancers: a multicenter, retrospective Korean study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2882–7.PubMedCrossRef Lee KB, Ki KD, Lee JM, et al. The risk of lymph node metastasis based on myometrial invasion and tumor grade in endometrioid uterine cancers: a multicenter, retrospective Korean study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2882–7.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Uterine Neoplasms, V.1.2010 [database on the Internet]. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Uterine Neoplasms, V.1.2010 [database on the Internet].
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Neubauer NL, Havrilesky LJ, Calingaert B, et al. The role of lymphadenectomy in the management of preoperative grade 1 endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;112:511–6.PubMedCrossRef Neubauer NL, Havrilesky LJ, Calingaert B, et al. The role of lymphadenectomy in the management of preoperative grade 1 endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;112:511–6.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kilgore LC, Partridge EE, Alvarez RD, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: survival comparisons of patients with and without pelvic node sampling. Gynecol Oncol. 1995;56:29–33.PubMedCrossRef Kilgore LC, Partridge EE, Alvarez RD, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: survival comparisons of patients with and without pelvic node sampling. Gynecol Oncol. 1995;56:29–33.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Mariani A, Dowdy SC, Cliby WA, et al. Efficacy of systematic lymphadenectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy in node-positive endometrial cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;101:200–8.PubMedCrossRef Mariani A, Dowdy SC, Cliby WA, et al. Efficacy of systematic lymphadenectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy in node-positive endometrial cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;101:200–8.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrow CP, Bundy BN, Kurman RJ, et al. Relationship between surgical-pathological risk factors and outcome in clinical stage I and II carcinoma of the endometrium: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 1991;40:55–65.PubMedCrossRef Morrow CP, Bundy BN, Kurman RJ, et al. Relationship between surgical-pathological risk factors and outcome in clinical stage I and II carcinoma of the endometrium: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 1991;40:55–65.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat McMeekin DS, Lashbrook D, Gold M, et al. Nodal distribution and its significance in FIGO stage IIIc endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;82:375–9.PubMedCrossRef McMeekin DS, Lashbrook D, Gold M, et al. Nodal distribution and its significance in FIGO stage IIIc endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;82:375–9.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Geisler JP, Linnemeier GC, Manahan KJ. Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007;98:39–43.PubMedCrossRef Geisler JP, Linnemeier GC, Manahan KJ. Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007;98:39–43.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Larson DM, Johnson KK. Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for surgical staging of high-risk endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. Gynecol Oncol. 1993;51:345–8.PubMedCrossRef Larson DM, Johnson KK. Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for surgical staging of high-risk endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. Gynecol Oncol. 1993;51:345–8.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Yokoyama Y, Maruyama H, Sato S, Saito Y. Indispensability of pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancers. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;64:411–7.PubMedCrossRef Yokoyama Y, Maruyama H, Sato S, Saito Y. Indispensability of pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancers. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;64:411–7.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Mariani A, Keeney GL, Aletti G, Webb MJ, Haddock MG, Podratz KC. Endometrial carcinoma: paraaortic dissemination. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;92:833–8.PubMedCrossRef Mariani A, Keeney GL, Aletti G, Webb MJ, Haddock MG, Podratz KC. Endometrial carcinoma: paraaortic dissemination. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;92:833–8.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Abu-Rustum NR, Gomez JD, Alektiar KM, et al. The incidence of isolated paraaortic nodal metastasis in surgically staged endometrial cancer patients with negative pelvic lymph nodes. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;115:236–8.PubMedCrossRef Abu-Rustum NR, Gomez JD, Alektiar KM, et al. The incidence of isolated paraaortic nodal metastasis in surgically staged endometrial cancer patients with negative pelvic lymph nodes. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;115:236–8.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim S, Wu HG, Lee HP, et al. Patterns of failure after postoperative radiation therapy for endometrial carcinoma. Cancer Res Treat. 2006;38:133–8.PubMedCrossRef Kim S, Wu HG, Lee HP, et al. Patterns of failure after postoperative radiation therapy for endometrial carcinoma. Cancer Res Treat. 2006;38:133–8.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Creutzberg CL, van Putten WL, Koper PC, et al. Surgery and postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone for patients with stage-1 endometrial carcinoma: multicentre randomised trial. PORTEC Study Group. Postoperative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma. Lancet. 2000;355:1404–11.PubMedCrossRef Creutzberg CL, van Putten WL, Koper PC, et al. Surgery and postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone for patients with stage-1 endometrial carcinoma: multicentre randomised trial. PORTEC Study Group. Postoperative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma. Lancet. 2000;355:1404–11.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Viani GA, Patia BF, Pellizzon AC, et al. (2006) High-risk surgical stage 1 endometrial cancer: analysis of treatment outcome. Radiat Oncol. 1:24.PubMedCrossRef Viani GA, Patia BF, Pellizzon AC, et al. (2006) High-risk surgical stage 1 endometrial cancer: analysis of treatment outcome. Radiat Oncol. 1:24.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Hacker NF FM. Uterine cancer. In: JS B, editor. Berek & Hacker’s gynecologic oncology, 5th edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010:400–17. Hacker NF FM. Uterine cancer. In: JS B, editor. Berek & Hacker’s gynecologic oncology, 5th edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010:400–17.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Engelsen IB, Akslen LA, Salvesen HB. Biologic markers in endometrial cancer treatment. APMIS. 2009;117:693–707.PubMedCrossRef Engelsen IB, Akslen LA, Salvesen HB. Biologic markers in endometrial cancer treatment. APMIS. 2009;117:693–707.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Efficacy of Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy in Early-Stage Endometrioid Uterine Corpus Cancer
verfasst von
Seo-Yun Tong, MD, PhD
Jong-Min Lee, MD, PhD
Jae-Kwan Lee, MD, PhD
Jae Weon Kim, MD, PhD
Chi-Heum Cho, MD, PhD
Seok-Mo Kim, MD, PhD
Sang-Yoon Park, MD, PhD
Chan-Yong Park, MD, PhD
Ki-Tae Kim, MD, PhD
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 5/2011
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1472-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2011

Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.