Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2018

30.08.2018 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Efficiency of the Foley catheter versus the double balloon catheter during the induction of second trimester pregnancy terminations: a randomized controlled trial

verfasst von: Gözde Demirezen, Berna Aslan Çetin, Begüm Aydoğan Mathyk, Nadiye Köroğlu, Gökhan Yildirim

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To compare induction-to-delivery intervals of Foley catheters and double balloon catheters in second trimester pregnancy terminations.

Methods

This randomized parallel study was conducted on women who underwent second trimester terminations between December 2016 and December 2017. Pregnant women in the second trimester with a Bishop score < 6 were included in the study. Participants were randomized into two groups, the first being the Foley catheter group and the second being the double balloon catheter group. The time frames from insertion of catheters to the delivery were recorded in each group. A multiple regression analysis was carried out to examine the contribution of factors to the induction-to-delivery interval. A survival analysis was conducted to compare the Foley method and the double balloon method.

Results

A total of 91 pregnant women were included in the final analysis. The induction-to-delivery interval was shorter in the Foley catheter group than in the double balloon catheter group (38 h 54 min ± 21 h 6 min versus 58 h 17 min ± 25 h 56 min). We also found that women with intrauterine fetal death (IUFD) had a shorter time to delivery compared to women with live fetuses (39 h 12 min ± 18 h 46 min vs 51 h 30 min ± 26 h 42 min, p = 0.04). Women with a history of vaginal delivery also had a shorter induction-to-delivery time compared to women who never delivered vaginally before (38 h 12 min ± 17 h 42 min vs 53 h 54 min ± 27 h 18 min, p = 0.004). In the multiple regression analysis, the most significant contributor to the induction-to-delivery time was the method used for induction of labor and followed by other factors including the viability of the fetus (live/IUFD), history of vaginal delivery and PPROM. The survival analysis showed that the induction-to-delivery interval was significantly shorter in the Foley catheter group than in the double balloon catheter group (HR 2.51, 95% CI 1.57–4.00, p = 0.001).

Conclusion

During the termination of second trimester pregnancies time from induction of labor to delivery is shorter with the Foley catheter compared to double balloon catheter.
Literatur
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Yapar EG, Senöz S, Urkütür M, Batioglu S, Gökmen O (1996) Second trimester pregnancy termination including fetal death: comparison of five different methods. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 69(2):97–102CrossRefPubMed Yapar EG, Senöz S, Urkütür M, Batioglu S, Gökmen O (1996) Second trimester pregnancy termination including fetal death: comparison of five different methods. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 69(2):97–102CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Atad J, Bornstein J, Calderon I, Petrikovsky BM, Sorokin Y, Abramovici H (1991) Nonpharmaceutical ripening of the unfavorable cervix and induction of labor by a novel double balloon device. Obstet Gynecol 77(1):146–152PubMed Atad J, Bornstein J, Calderon I, Petrikovsky BM, Sorokin Y, Abramovici H (1991) Nonpharmaceutical ripening of the unfavorable cervix and induction of labor by a novel double balloon device. Obstet Gynecol 77(1):146–152PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lajusticia H, Martínez-Domínguez SJ, Pérez-Roncero GR, Chedraui P, Pérez-López FR, Project HOaSAH (2018) Single versus double-balloon catheters for the induction of labor of singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials. Arch Gynecol Obstet 297(5):1089–1100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4713-9 CrossRefPubMed Lajusticia H, Martínez-Domínguez SJ, Pérez-Roncero GR, Chedraui P, Pérez-López FR, Project HOaSAH (2018) Single versus double-balloon catheters for the induction of labor of singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials. Arch Gynecol Obstet 297(5):1089–1100. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00404-018-4713-9 CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Diederen M, Gommers J, Wilkinson C, Turnbull D, Mol B (2018) Safety of the balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in the process of labour induction: a systematic review. BJOG 125(9):1086–1095. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15047 CrossRefPubMed Diederen M, Gommers J, Wilkinson C, Turnbull D, Mol B (2018) Safety of the balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in the process of labour induction: a systematic review. BJOG 125(9):1086–1095. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​1471-0528.​15047 CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Efficiency of the Foley catheter versus the double balloon catheter during the induction of second trimester pregnancy terminations: a randomized controlled trial
verfasst von
Gözde Demirezen
Berna Aslan Çetin
Begüm Aydoğan Mathyk
Nadiye Köroğlu
Gökhan Yildirim
Publikationsdatum
30.08.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4882-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.