Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 10/2003

01.11.2003 | Otology

Electrode insertion depth in cochlear implantees estimated during surgery, on plain film radiographs and with electrode function testing

verfasst von: Robert H. R. Bettman, Adriaan F. van Olphen, Frans W. Zonneveld, Egbert H. Huizing

Erschienen in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Ausgabe 10/2003

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Three methods of determining electrode insertion depth in cochlear implantees are studied: intraoperative counting of inserted electrodes, plain film radiography using Stenvers projection and postoperative electrode function testing. In 16 cases the number of electrodes inserted in the cochlea were counted both by the surgeon at surgery and by two independent observers on plain film radiographs using Stenvers projections. The electrode function was tested postoperatively. The differences between the three methods in estimation of the number of intracochlear electrodes were analyzed with t -tests, and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of the mean differences were calculated. The mean difference between the radiograph observers was 0.25 electrode (95% CI, –0.69 to 1.19 electrodes.) The mean difference between radiography observations and the surgical counts was 0.60 electrode (95% CI, –0.71 to 1.91 electrodes.) The mean difference between surgical counting and electrode function testing was 0.40 electrode (95% CI, –0.66 to 1.46 electrodes.) The mean difference between radiograph observations and electrode function testing was 0.50 electrode (95% CI, –0.51 to 1.51 electrodes.) No significant differences existed between the three methods. Our findings showed similar results in estimating electrode array insertion depth with the three methods. Plain film radiography using Stenvers projection is satisfactory if imaging is indicated for determining the number of inserted electrodes.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Applebaum EL, Valvassori GE (1990) Further studies on the effects of magnetic resonance imaging fields on middle ear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 99: 801–804PubMed Applebaum EL, Valvassori GE (1990) Further studies on the effects of magnetic resonance imaging fields on middle ear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 99: 801–804PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bredberg G, Lindstrom B (1995) Insertion length of electrode array and its relation to speech communication performance and nonauditory side effects in multichannel-implanted patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol [Suppl] 166: 256–258 Bredberg G, Lindstrom B (1995) Insertion length of electrode array and its relation to speech communication performance and nonauditory side effects in multichannel-implanted patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol [Suppl] 166: 256–258
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen JM, Farb R, Hanusaik L, Shipp D, Nedzelski JM (1999) Depth and quality of electrode insertion: a radiologic and pitch scaling assessment of two cochlear implant systems. Am J Otol 20: 192–197PubMed Chen JM, Farb R, Hanusaik L, Shipp D, Nedzelski JM (1999) Depth and quality of electrode insertion: a radiologic and pitch scaling assessment of two cochlear implant systems. Am J Otol 20: 192–197PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Chou CK, McDougall JA, Can KW (1995) Absence of radiofrequency heating from auditory implants during magnetic resonance imaging. Bioelectromagnetics 16: 307–316PubMed Chou CK, McDougall JA, Can KW (1995) Absence of radiofrequency heating from auditory implants during magnetic resonance imaging. Bioelectromagnetics 16: 307–316PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Czerny C, Steiner E, Gstoettner W, Baumgartner WD, Imhof H (1997) Postoperative radiographic assessment of the Combi 40 cochlear implant. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169: 1689–1694PubMed Czerny C, Steiner E, Gstoettner W, Baumgartner WD, Imhof H (1997) Postoperative radiographic assessment of the Combi 40 cochlear implant. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169: 1689–1694PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gstoettner W, Franz P, Hamzavi J, Plenk H Jr, Baumgartner W, Czerny C (1999) Intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. Acta Otolaryngol 119: 229–233CrossRefPubMed Gstoettner W, Franz P, Hamzavi J, Plenk H Jr, Baumgartner W, Czerny C (1999) Intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. Acta Otolaryngol 119: 229–233CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartrampf R, Dahm MC, Battmer RD, Gnadeberg D, Strauss-Schier A, Rost U, Lenarz T (1995) Insertion depth of the Nucleus electrode array and relative performance. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol [Suppl] 166: 277–280 Hartrampf R, Dahm MC, Battmer RD, Gnadeberg D, Strauss-Schier A, Rost U, Lenarz T (1995) Insertion depth of the Nucleus electrode array and relative performance. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol [Suppl] 166: 277–280
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Himi T, Kataura A, Sakata M, Odawara Y, Satoh JI, Sawaishi M (1996) Three-dimensional imaging of the temporal bone using a helical CT scan and its application in patients with cochlear implantation. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 58: 298–300PubMed Himi T, Kataura A, Sakata M, Odawara Y, Satoh JI, Sawaishi M (1996) Three-dimensional imaging of the temporal bone using a helical CT scan and its application in patients with cochlear implantation. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 58: 298–300PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ketten DR, Skinner MW, Wang G, Vannier MW, Gates GA, Neely JG (1998) In vivo measures of cochlear length and insertion depth of nucleus cochlear implant electrode arrays. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol [Suppl] 175: 1–16 Ketten DR, Skinner MW, Wang G, Vannier MW, Gates GA, Neely JG (1998) In vivo measures of cochlear length and insertion depth of nucleus cochlear implant electrode arrays. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol [Suppl] 175: 1–16
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumakawa K, Takeda H, Ujita N (1997) Determining the optimum insertion length of electrodes in the cochlear 22-channel implant: results of a clinical study. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 52: 129–134PubMed Kumakawa K, Takeda H, Ujita N (1997) Determining the optimum insertion length of electrodes in the cochlear 22-channel implant: results of a clinical study. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 52: 129–134PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lawson JT, Cranley K, Toner JG (1998) Digital imaging: a valuable technique for the postoperative assessment of cochlear implantation. Eur Radiol 8: 951–954CrossRefPubMed Lawson JT, Cranley K, Toner JG (1998) Digital imaging: a valuable technique for the postoperative assessment of cochlear implantation. Eur Radiol 8: 951–954CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Marsh MA, Xu J, Blamey PJ, Whitford LA, Xu SA, Silverman JM, Clark GM (1993) Radiologic evaluation of multichannel intracochlear implant insertion depth [published erratum appears in Am J Otol 1993 Nov 14: 627]. Am J Otol 14: 386–391PubMed Marsh MA, Xu J, Blamey PJ, Whitford LA, Xu SA, Silverman JM, Clark GM (1993) Radiologic evaluation of multichannel intracochlear implant insertion depth [published erratum appears in Am J Otol 1993 Nov 14: 627]. Am J Otol 14: 386–391PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Mukherji SK, Mancuso AA, Kotzur IM, Slattery WH III, Swartz JD, Tart RP, Nall A (1994) CT of the temporal bone: findings after mastoidectomy, ossicular reconstruction, and cochlear implantation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163: 1467–1471PubMed Mukherji SK, Mancuso AA, Kotzur IM, Slattery WH III, Swartz JD, Tart RP, Nall A (1994) CT of the temporal bone: findings after mastoidectomy, ossicular reconstruction, and cochlear implantation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163: 1467–1471PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Qaiyumi SA, Hendrickx P, Bachor E, Laszig R, Battmer BD, Galanski M (1991) Postoperative konventionelle Schläfenbeintomographie in der Beurteilung von reizinadäquaten Empfindungen (RIE) bei Cochlear-Implant-Patienten. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 155: 442–444PubMed Qaiyumi SA, Hendrickx P, Bachor E, Laszig R, Battmer BD, Galanski M (1991) Postoperative konventionelle Schläfenbeintomographie in der Beurteilung von reizinadäquaten Empfindungen (RIE) bei Cochlear-Implant-Patienten. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 155: 442–444PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenberg RA, Cohen NL, Reede DL (1987) Radiographic imaging for the cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 96: 300–304PubMed Rosenberg RA, Cohen NL, Reede DL (1987) Radiographic imaging for the cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 96: 300–304PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Shpizner BA, Holliday RA, Roland JT, Cohen NL, Waltzman SB, Shapiro WH (1995) Postoperative imaging of the multichannel cochlear implant. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 16: 1517–1524PubMed Shpizner BA, Holliday RA, Roland JT, Cohen NL, Waltzman SB, Shapiro WH (1995) Postoperative imaging of the multichannel cochlear implant. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 16: 1517–1524PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Stenvers HW (1917) Roentgenology of os petrosum. Arch Radiol Elec 22: 97–112 Stenvers HW (1917) Roentgenology of os petrosum. Arch Radiol Elec 22: 97–112
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Teissl C, Kremser C, Hochmair ES, Hochmair-Desoyer IJ (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging and cochlear implants: compatibility and safety aspects. J Magn Reson Imaging 9: 26–38CrossRefPubMed Teissl C, Kremser C, Hochmair ES, Hochmair-Desoyer IJ (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging and cochlear implants: compatibility and safety aspects. J Magn Reson Imaging 9: 26–38CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Weber BP, Goldring JE, Santogrossi T, Koestler H, Tziviskos G, Battmer R, Lenarz T (1998) Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility testing of the Clarion 1.2 cochlear implant. Am J Otol 19: 584–590PubMed Weber BP, Goldring JE, Santogrossi T, Koestler H, Tziviskos G, Battmer R, Lenarz T (1998) Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility testing of the Clarion 1.2 cochlear implant. Am J Otol 19: 584–590PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Youssefzadeh S, Baumgartner W, Dorffner R, Gstottner W, Trattnig S (1998) MR compatibility of Med EL cochlear implants: clinical testing at 1.0 T. J Comput Assist Tomogr 22: 346–350CrossRefPubMed Youssefzadeh S, Baumgartner W, Dorffner R, Gstottner W, Trattnig S (1998) MR compatibility of Med EL cochlear implants: clinical testing at 1.0 T. J Comput Assist Tomogr 22: 346–350CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Electrode insertion depth in cochlear implantees estimated during surgery, on plain film radiographs and with electrode function testing
verfasst von
Robert H. R. Bettman
Adriaan F. van Olphen
Frans W. Zonneveld
Egbert H. Huizing
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2003
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Ausgabe 10/2003
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-003-0593-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2003

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 10/2003 Zur Ausgabe

Kinder mit anhaltender Sinusitis profitieren häufig von Antibiotika

30.04.2024 Rhinitis und Sinusitis Nachrichten

Persistieren Sinusitisbeschwerden bei Kindern länger als zehn Tage, ist eine Antibiotikatherapie häufig gut wirksam: Ein Therapieversagen ist damit zu über 40% seltener zu beobachten als unter Placebo.

CUP-Syndrom: Künstliche Intelligenz kann Primärtumor finden

30.04.2024 Künstliche Intelligenz Nachrichten

Krebserkrankungen unbekannten Ursprungs (CUP) sind eine diagnostische Herausforderung. KI-Systeme können Pathologen dabei unterstützen, zytologische Bilder zu interpretieren, um den Primärtumor zu lokalisieren.

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.