Erschienen in:
20.02.2021 | Original Article
Emergency urolithiasis management at a national level: exploring the need for a care pathway
verfasst von:
Pat Rohan, Conor Casey, Gregory J. Nason, Jan Sorensen, Kenneth Mealy
Erschienen in:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -)
|
Ausgabe 1/2022
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Background
Urolithiasis is a common urological presentation1. A total of 25–49 million people in Europe live with symptomatic stone disease, with the incidence increasing1.
Aims
To examine length of stay (LOS) and transfer patterns for patients presenting with urolithiasis to Irish Model 2/3 hospitals without a specialist urology service, compared with those who present to a model 4 hospital with an on-site urology service.
Methods
Using the National Quality Assurance & Improvement System (NQAIS), we assessed patients presenting with urolithiasis, nationally from January 2016 to December 2019.
Results
During the study period, there were 11,856 emergency presentations with urolithiasis. A total of 6510 (54.9%) presented to model 4 hospitals, while 5346 (45.1%) presented to model 2/3 hospitals. A total of 874 (16.35%) patients required transfer from model 2/3 hospital to a model 4 hospital for further management. Those transferred from model 2/3 hospitals spent a mean of 3.68 days awaiting transfer and had a mean LOS of 3.88 days in the model 4 hospital. A total of 7.56 days compared with a mean LOS of 2.9 days for those presenting directly to a model 4 hospital.
Conclusion
At a national level in Ireland, many patients with urolithiasis present to hospitals that are unable to cater for their needs. Patients presenting with urolithiasis to model 2/3 hospitals have significantly longer LOS compared with patients who present directly to a model 4 hospital. A formal ‘stone pathway’ is required to provide timely care for these patients2—such a pathway would provide better patient care and result in improved bed utilisation.