nach oben

Erschienen in:

11.04.2016 | Original Article

Enabling the transferability of complex interventions: exploring the combination of an intervention’s key functions and implementation

verfasst von: Mélanie Villeval, Elsa Bidault, Jeannie Shoveller, François Alias, Jean-Charles Basson, Catherine Frasse, Jean-Paul Génolini, Elisabeth Pons, Damien Verbiguié, Pascale Grosclaude, Thierry Lang

Erschienen in: International Journal of Public Health | Ausgabe 9/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

Several public health interventions are not described, not evaluated and not transferred. The objective was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of using a description model making a distinction between interventions’ transferable elements, and those that are more context-specific, to make their evaluation and transferability easier.

Methods

The theoretical distinction between an intervention function and its form in a specific context has been empirically explored. A community-based intervention (named “Ciné-Ma-Santé”) has been described, using a “key function/implementation/context” model. This process has been co-constructed through qualitative research and knowledge exchange process between project leaders and researchers from different disciplines.

Results

The use of the model proves feasible and useful for both project leaders and researchers. Nine key functions were described, as well as their implementation and the features of the intervention context.

Conclusions

Rendering explicit key functions of public health interventions could constitute a useful step to their evaluation and transfer. It enables the formulation of hypotheses regarding the potentially standardizable elements of interventions, and elements that can be modified while maintaining the integrity of the intervention.

Barnes M, Matka E, Sullivan H (2003) Evidence, understanding and complexity evaluation in non-linear systems. Evaluation 9:265–284CrossRef

Basson J-C, Haschar-Noé N, Honta M (2013) Toulouse, une «figure urbaine de la santé publique». À propos de l’action publique municipale de lutte contre les inégalités sociales de santé. Rev Épidémiol Santé Publique 61:81–88CrossRef

Bauman LJ, Stein REK, Ireys HT (1991) Reinventing fidelity: the transfer of social technology among settings. J Community Psychol 19:619–639CrossRef

Bernier J (2014) La Recherche Partenariale Comme Espace de Soutien à L’innovation. Global Health Promot 21:58–63CrossRef

Bonell C, Fletcher A, Morton M, Lorenc T, Moore L (2012) Realist randomised controlled trials: a new approach to evaluating complex public health interventions. Soc Sci Med 75:2299–2306CrossRefPubMed

Cargo M, Mercer SL (2008) The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice. An Rev Public Health 29:325–350CrossRef

Delpierre C, Kelly-Irving M (2011) To what extent are biological pathways useful when aiming to reduce social inequalities in cancer? Europ J Public Health 21:398–399CrossRef

Evans R, Scourfield J, Murphy S (2014) Pragmatic, formative process evaluations of complex interventions and why we need more of them. J Epidemiol Community Health. doi:10.1136/jech-2014-204806

Funnell SC, Rogers PJ (2011) Purposeful program theory: effective use of theories of change and logic models. Wiley, New York

Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, Robinson N (2006) Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof 26:13–24CrossRefPubMed

Hawe P, Potvin L (2009) What is population health intervention research? Can J Public Health 100(1):8–14

Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T (2004) Complex interventions: how “out of control” can a randomised controlled trial be? BMJ 328:1561–1563CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T (2009) Theorising Interventions as events in systems. Am J Community Psychol 43:267–276CrossRefPubMed

Lang T, Kelly-Irving M, Delpierre C (2009) Inequalities in health: from the epidemiologic model towards intervention. Pathways and accumulations along the life course. Rev Epidémiol Santé Publique 57:429–435CrossRefPubMed

Lang T, Bidault E, Villeval M, Alias F, Gandouet B, Servat M, Théis I, Breton E, Haschar-Noé N, Grosclaude P (2015) A health equity impact assessment umbrella program (AAPRISS) to tackle social inequalities in health: program description. Global Health Promot. pii:1757975914568127 (Epub ahead of print)

Lapalme J, Bisset S, Potvin L (2013) Role of context in evaluating neighbourhood interventions promoting positive youth development: a narrative systematic review. Int J Public Health 59:31–42CrossRefPubMed

Mackenzie M, O’Donnell C, Halliday E, Sridharan S, Platt S (2010) Do health improvement programmes fit with MRC guidance on evaluating complex interventions? BMJ (Clin Res Ed.) 340:c185CrossRef

Marchal B, van Belle S, van Olmen J, Hoerée T, Kegels G (2012) Is realist evaluation keeping its promise? A review of published empirical studies in the field of health systems research. Evaluation 18:192–212CrossRef

Masuda JR, Zupancic T, Crighton E, Muhajarine N, Phipps E (2014) Equity-focused knowledge translation: a framework for “reasonable action” on health inequities. Int J Public Health 59:457–464CrossRefPubMed

Michie S, Fixsen D, Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP (2009) Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method. Implement Sci 4:40CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Patton MQ (1997) Utilization-focused evaluation: the new century text, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

Patton MQ, LaBossière F (2012) L’évaluation axée sur l’utilisation. In: Ridde V, Dagenais C (eds) Approches et pratiques en évaluation de programmes, 2nd edn. Presses de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, pp 145–160

Pawson R, Tilley N (1997) Realistic evaluation. Sage, London

Pearson TA, Lewis C, Wall S, Jenkins PL, Nafziger A, Weinehall L (2001) Dissecting the “black box” of community intervention: background and rationale. Scand J Public Health 29:5–12

Potvin L, McQueen DD (2009) Practical dilemnas for health promotion evaluation. In: Potvin L, McQueen DD (eds) Health promotion evaluation practices in the Americas—values and research. Springer, New York, pp 25–45CrossRef

Potvin L, Bilodeau A, Gendron S (2008) Trois Défis Pour L’évaluation En Promotion de La Santé. Promot Educ 15:17–21CrossRef

Rychetnik L, Frommer M, Hawe P, Shiell A (2002) Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 56:119–127CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Shiell A, Hawe P, Gold L (2008) Complex interventions or complex systems? Implications for health economic evaluation. BMJ 336:1281–1283CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Shoveller J, Viehbeck S, Di Ruggiero E, Greyson D, Thomson K, Knight R (2015) A critical examination of representations of context within research on population health interventions. Crit Public Health. doi:10.1080/09581596.2015.1117577

Van Daele T, Van Audenhove C, Hermans D, Van Den Bergh O, Van Den Broucke S (2012) Empowerment implementation: enhancing fidelity and adaptation in a psycho-educational intervention. Health Promot Int 29:212–222CrossRefPubMed

Villeval M, Ginsbourger T, Bidault E, Alias F, Delpierre C, Gaborit E, Kelly-Irving M, Manuello P, Grosclaude P, Lang T (2014) L’interdisciplinarité en action: les «mots-pièges» d’une recherche interdisciplinaire. Santé Publique 26:155–163PubMed

Villeval M, Bidault E, Gaborit E, Grosclaude P, Haschar-Noé N, Lang T (2015) Un programme de recherche interventionnelle (AAPRISS) visant à réduire les inégalités sociales de santé: méthodes et validation. Can J Public Health 106:e434–e441CrossRefPubMed

Wang S, Moss JR, Hiller JE (2006) Applicability and transferability of interventions in evidence-based public health. Health Promot Int 21:76–83CrossRefPubMed

Whitehead M (2007) A typology of actions to tackle social inequalities in health. J Epidemiol Community Health 61:473–478CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

WHO (1998) Health promotion evaluation: recommendation to policy-makers. Report of the WHO European Working Group on Health Promotion Evaluation. World Health Organisation Europe, Copenhagen. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2004.00453.x/full

Woodward A, Kawachi I (2000) Why reduce health inequalities? J Epidemiol Community Health 54:923–929CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Enabling the transferability of complex interventions: exploring the combination of an intervention’s key functions and implementation
verfasst von: Mélanie Villeval
Elsa Bidault
Jeannie Shoveller
François Alias
Jean-Charles Basson
Catherine Frasse
Jean-Paul Génolini
Elisabeth Pons
Damien Verbiguié
Pascale Grosclaude
Thierry Lang
Publikationsdatum: 11.04.2016
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: International Journal of Public Health / Ausgabe 9/2016
Print ISSN: 1661-8556
Elektronische ISSN: 1661-8564
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-016-0809-9

Klimawandel und Gesundheit: Was Sie in der Hausarztpraxis wissen müssen und tun können

Springer Medizin

Enabling the transferability of complex interventions: exploring the combination of an intervention’s key functions and implementation

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Klimawandel und Gesundheit: Was Sie in der Hausarztpraxis wissen müssen und tun können

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2016

Health-care availability, preference, and distance for women in urban Bo, Sierra Leone

Reducing sick leave of Dutch vocational school students: adaptation of a sick leave protocol using the intervention mapping process

Hip fracture incidence 2003–2013 and projected cases until 2050 in Austria: a population-based study

Migration, public health and human rights

Educational differences in dietary intake and compliance with dietary recommendations in a Swiss adult population

Gestational age at first antenatal visit in Namibia