nach oben

Journal of Religion and Health

Erschienen in:

01.06.2010 | Original Paper

Episcopal Measure of Faith Tradition: A Context-Specific Approach to Measuring Religiousness

verfasst von: Daniel E. Hall, Harold G. Koenig, Keith G. Meador

Erschienen in: Journal of Religion and Health | Ausgabe 2/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Precise measurement of religiousness remains a vexing problem. In addition to relying almost exclusively on self-report, existing measures of religiousness pay little attention to the specific context of religious belief, and this may override distinctive norms of particular faith traditions and potentially confound the conclusions drawn from such research. To address these limitations, the authors describe a modified form of narrative content analysis that could eventually sort respondents into distinct theological traditions. A pilot test among Episcopalians demonstrates encouraging reliability (kappa 0.74, 95% LCI 0.47, P < 0.0002), and tests for convergent and discriminate validity suggest that the context of religious belief is both relevant and insufficiently assessed by the existing paradigm of religious measurements. If validated in a religiously diverse sample, this approach could be combined with existing, context-free measures of religiousness to generate more meaningful findings.

Allport, G. (1950). The Individual and his religion: A psychological interpretation. New York: Macmillan.

Baider, L., Holland, J. C., Russak, S. M., De-Nour, A. K. (2001). The system of belief inventory (SBI-15): A validation study in Israel. Psycho-Oncology, 10(6), 534–540.

Cohen, A. B. (2002). The importance of spirituality in well-being for Jews and Christians. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 825–838. doi:10.1023/A:1020656823365.CrossRef

Cohen, A. B., Hall, D. E. (2009). Existential beliefs, social satisfaction, and well-being among Catholic, Jewish, and Protestant older adults. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 19, 39–54.

Cohen, A. B., Hall, D. E., Koenig, H. G., & Meador, K. G. (2005a). Social versus individual motivation: Implications for normative definitions of religious motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(1), 48–61. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_4.CrossRefPubMed

Cohen, A. B., Keltner, D., & Rozin, P. (2005b). Different religions, different emotions. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(06), 734–735.

Cohen, A. B., Rozin, P., & Siegel, J. (2003). Faith versus practice: Different bases for religiosity judgments by Jews and Protestants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 287–295. doi:10.1002/ejsp.148.CrossRef

Cramer, D. (1998). Fundamental statistics for social research. New York: Routledge.

Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovic.

Feinstein, A. R. (2002). Appraising the success of caring. In L. Cluff & R. Binstock (Eds.), The lost art of caring (pp. 201–218). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Fetzer-Institute/NIA-Working Group. (1999). Multidemensional Measurement of Religiousness/Spirituality for use in Health Research. Kalamazoo: John E. Fetzer Institute.

Frei, H. (1975). The identity of Jesus Christ: The hermeneutical bases of dogmatic theology. Philadelphia: Fortress.

Hall, T. W. (2002, August 23). Relational Spirituality: Implications of the Convergence of Attachment Theory, Interpersonal Neurobiology and Emotional Information Processing. Paper presented at the Paper Presented as the Margaret Gorman Early Career Award to Division 36 (Psychology of Religion) of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.

Hall, D. E., Koenig, H. G., & Meador, K. G. (2004). Conceptualizing “religion”: How language shapes and constrains knowledge in the study of religion and health. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 47(3), 386–401. doi:10.1353/pbm.2004.0050.CrossRefPubMed

Hatch, R. L., Burg, M. A., Naberhaus, D. S., & Hellmich, L. K. (1998). The spiritual involvement and beliefs scale: Development and testing of a new instrument. The Journal of Family Practice, 46(6), 476–486.PubMed

Hays, J. C., Meador, K. G., Branch, P. S., & George, L. K. (2001). The Spiritual History Scale in four dimensions (SHS-4): validity and reliability. The Gerontologist, 41(2), 239–249.PubMed

Hill, P. C., & Hood, R., Jr (Eds.). (1999). Measures of religiosity. Birmingham, Alabama: Religious Education Press.

Hill, P. C., & Pargament, K. I. (2003). Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality: Implications for physical and mental health research. American Psychologist January, 58(1), 64–74.CrossRef

Holland, J. C., Kash, K. M., Passik, S., et al. (1998). A brief spiritual beliefs inventory for use in quality of life research in life-threatening illness. Psycho-Oncology, 7(6), 460–469.

Idler, E. L., Musick, M. A., Ellison, C. G., George, L. K., Krause, N., Ory, M. G., et al. (2003). Measuring multiple dimensions of religion and spirituality for health research: Conceptual background and findings from the 1998 General Social Survey. Research on Aging, 25(4), 327–365. doi:10.1177/0164027503025004001.CrossRef

Jensen, L. A. (1998). Moral divisions within countries between orthodoxy and progressivism: India and the United States. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37(1), 90–107. doi:10.2307/1388031.CrossRef

Kark, J. D., Shemi, G., Friedlander, Y., Martin, O., Manor, O., & Blondheim, S. H. (1996). Does religious observance promote health? Mortality in secular vs religious kibbutzim in Israel. American Journal of Public Health, 86(3), 341–346. doi:10.2105/AJPH.86.3.341.CrossRefPubMed

King, L. A. (2003). Measures and meaning: The use of qualitative data in social and personality psychology. In C. Sansone, C. C. Morf, & A. T. Panter (Eds.), The Sage handbook of methods in social psychology. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

King, L. A., Scollon, C. K., Ramsey, C., & Williams, T. (2000). Stories of life transition: Subjective well-being and ego development in parents of children with Down Syndrome. Journal of Research in Personality, 34(4), 509–536. doi:10.1006/jrpe.2000.2285.CrossRef

Kirkpatrick, L., & Hood, R., Jr. (1990). Intrinsic–extrinsic religious orientation: The boon or bane of contemporary psychology of religion? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 29(4), 442–462. doi:10.2307/1387311.CrossRef

Koenig, H., Parkerson, G. R., Jr, & Meador, K. G. (1997). Religion index for psychiatric research. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 154(6), 885–886.PubMed

Krause, N., Ellison, C. G., & Wulff, K. M. (1999). Church-based emotional support, negative interaction, and psychological well-being: Findings from a national sample of presbyterians. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37(3), 725–741.

Krause, N., Tarakeshwar, N., Ellison, C. G., & Wulff, K. M. (2001). Religious coping among the religious: The relationships between religious coping and well-being in a national sample of Presbyterian clergy, elders and members. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40(3), 497–513. doi:10.1111/0021-8294.00073.CrossRef

Landis, J., & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310.CrossRefPubMed

Lindbeck, G. (1984). The nature of doctrine: Religion and theology in a post liberal age. Philadelphia: Westminster.

Mays, N., & Pope, C. (1995). Qualitative research: Rigour and qualiltative research. British Medical Journal, 311, 109–112.PubMed

McCullough, M. E., Pargament, K. I., & Thoresen, C. (Eds.). (2000). Forgiveness: Theory, research and practice. New York: Guilford Press.

Moberg, D. (2002). Assessing and measuring spirituality: Confronting dilemmas of universal and particular evaluative criteria. Journal of Adult Development, 9(1), 47–60. doi:10.1023/A:1013877201375.CrossRef

Peterman, A. H., Fitchett, G., Brady, M. J., Hernandez, L., & Cella, D. (2002). Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-spiritual well-being scale (FACIT-Sp). Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24(1), 49–58. doi:10.1207/S15324796ABM2401_06.CrossRefPubMed

Pope, C., & Mays, N. (1995). Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. British Medical Journal, 311, 42–45.PubMed

Princeton Religion Research Center. (1996). Religion in America. Princeton: The Gallup Poll.

Taylor, M. (1987). Paul Tillich: Theologian of the boundaries. London: Collins Liturgical Press.

Tillich, P. (1951–1963). Systematic Theology (3 Volumes). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Underwood, L. G., & Teresi, J. A. (2002). The daily spiritual experience scale: Development, theoretical description, reliability, exploratory factor analysis, and preliminary construct validity using health-related data. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24(1), 22–33. doi:10.1207/S15324796ABM2401_04.CrossRefPubMed

Wuthnow, R. (1993). Christianity in the twenty-first century: Reflections on the challenges ahead. New York: Oxford University Press.

Titel: Episcopal Measure of Faith Tradition: A Context-Specific Approach to Measuring Religiousness
verfasst von: Daniel E. Hall
Harold G. Koenig
Keith G. Meador
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2010
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Religion and Health / Ausgabe 2/2010
Print ISSN: 0022-4197
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6571
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-009-9240-3

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2010

The Priest’s Husband

State of Research for Faith Community Nursing 2009

Erratum to: The Old Book Switcheroo: Or Anatomy of a Delusion

Editorial

Be Not Anxious: Pastoral Care of Disquieted Souls.

The Priest’s Husband