Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3/2022

24.06.2022 | Editorial

Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Emerging Technology (ELSIET) Symposium

verfasst von: Evie Kendal

Erschienen in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry | Ausgabe 3/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Establishing ethical guidelines for the development and release of emerging technologies involves many practical challenges. Traditional methods of evaluating relevant ethical dimensions, such as Beauchamp and Childress’s (2001) Principlist framework, are often not fit for purpose: after all, how can one give autonomous, informed consent to the use of novel technologies whose effects are unknown? How can cost-benefit analyses be conducted in cases where there is a high degree of scientific uncertainty about the severity and likelihood of different risks, and potential benefits have not yet been demonstrated? Nevertheless, it is necessary to promote consideration of the ethical, legal, and social implications of emerging technologies to avoid them being released into what some commentators label a moral, policy, and/or legal vacuum (Moor 2005; Edwards 1991). Consequently, various methods for approaching the ethics of emerging technologies have arisen over the last few decades, some of the more common of which are summarized below. …
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress, 2001. Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress, 2001. Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Boenink, M., T. Swierstra, and D. Stemerding. 2010. Anticipating the interaction between technology and morality: A scenario study of experimenting with humans in bionanotechnology. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 4(2): 1–41.CrossRef Boenink, M., T. Swierstra, and D. Stemerding. 2010. Anticipating the interaction between technology and morality: A scenario study of experimenting with humans in bionanotechnology. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 4(2): 1–41.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bouchaut, B., and L. Asveld. 2021. Responsible learning about risks arising from emerging biotechnologies. Science and Engineering Ethics 27(2): 22.CrossRef Bouchaut, B., and L. Asveld. 2021. Responsible learning about risks arising from emerging biotechnologies. Science and Engineering Ethics 27(2): 22.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brey, P.A.E. 2012. Anticipatory ethics for emerging technologies. NanoEthics 6(1): 1-13.CrossRef Brey, P.A.E. 2012. Anticipatory ethics for emerging technologies. NanoEthics 6(1): 1-13.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Delgado et al. 2022. Bias in algorithms of AI systems developed for COVID-19: A scoping review. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 19(3) Delgado et al. 2022. Bias in algorithms of AI systems developed for COVID-19: A scoping review. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 19(3)
Zurück zum Zitat Edwards, J. 1991. New conceptions: Biosocial innovations and the family. Journal of Marriage and Family 53(2): 349–360.CrossRef Edwards, J. 1991. New conceptions: Biosocial innovations and the family. Journal of Marriage and Family 53(2): 349–360.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Friedman, B., M. Harbers, D. Hendry, J. van den Hoven, C. Jonker and N. Logler 2021. Eight grand challenges for value sensitive design from the 2016 Lorentz workshop. Ethics and Information Technology 23(1): 5–16.CrossRef Friedman, B., M. Harbers, D. Hendry, J. van den Hoven, C. Jonker and N. Logler 2021. Eight grand challenges for value sensitive design from the 2016 Lorentz workshop. Ethics and Information Technology 23(1): 5–16.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gouvea, R., J. Linton, M. Montoya, and S. Walsh. 2012. Emerging technologies and ethics: A race-to-the-bottom or the top? Journal of Business Ethics 109(4): 553–567.CrossRef Gouvea, R., J. Linton, M. Montoya, and S. Walsh. 2012. Emerging technologies and ethics: A race-to-the-bottom or the top? Journal of Business Ethics 109(4): 553–567.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grunwald, A. 2020. The objects of technology assessment. Hermeneutic extension of consequentialist reasoning. Journal of Responsible Innovation 7(1): 96–112.CrossRef Grunwald, A. 2020. The objects of technology assessment. Hermeneutic extension of consequentialist reasoning. Journal of Responsible Innovation 7(1): 96–112.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grunwald, A. 2019. Technology assessment in practice and theory. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. Grunwald, A. 2019. Technology assessment in practice and theory. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Guida, A. 2021. The precautionary principle and genetically modified organisms: A bone of contention between European institutions and member states. Journal of Law and the Biosciences 8(1): lsab012.CrossRef Guida, A. 2021. The precautionary principle and genetically modified organisms: A bone of contention between European institutions and member states. Journal of Law and the Biosciences 8(1): lsab012.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hansson, S.O. 2020. How extreme is the precautionary principle? NanoEthics 14(3): 245–257.CrossRef Hansson, S.O. 2020. How extreme is the precautionary principle? NanoEthics 14(3): 245–257.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hester, K., M. Mullins, F. Murphy, and S. Tofail. 2015. Anticipatory ethics and governance (AEG): Towards a future care orientation around nanotechnology. NanoEthics 9(2): 123–136.CrossRef Hester, K., M. Mullins, F. Murphy, and S. Tofail. 2015. Anticipatory ethics and governance (AEG): Towards a future care orientation around nanotechnology. NanoEthics 9(2): 123–136.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mittelstadt, B. D., Stahl, B. C., and Fairweather, N. B. 2015. How to shape a better future? Epistemic difficulties for ethical assessment and anticipatory governance of emerging technologies. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18: 1027–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-015-9582-8 Mittelstadt, B. D., Stahl, B. C., and Fairweather, N. B. 2015. How to shape a better future? Epistemic difficulties for ethical assessment and anticipatory governance of emerging technologies. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18: 1027–47. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10677-015-9582-8
Zurück zum Zitat Moor, J.H. 2005. Why we need better ethics for emerging technologies. Ethics and Information Technology 7(3):111–119.CrossRef Moor, J.H. 2005. Why we need better ethics for emerging technologies. Ethics and Information Technology 7(3):111–119.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mumford, E. 1993. The participation of users in systems design: An account of the origin, evolution, and use of the ETHICS method. Florida: CRC Press. Mumford, E. 1993. The participation of users in systems design: An account of the origin, evolution, and use of the ETHICS method. Florida: CRC Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Nestor, M.W., and R.L. Wilson. 2020. Beyond Mendelian genetics: Anticipatory biomedical ethics and policy implications for the use of CRISPR together with gene drive in humans. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17(1): 133–144.CrossRef Nestor, M.W., and R.L. Wilson. 2020. Beyond Mendelian genetics: Anticipatory biomedical ethics and policy implications for the use of CRISPR together with gene drive in humans. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17(1): 133–144.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Palm, E., and S.O. Hansson. 2006. The case for ethical technology assessment (eTA). Technological Forecasting and Social Change 73(5): 543–558.CrossRef Palm, E., and S.O. Hansson. 2006. The case for ethical technology assessment (eTA). Technological Forecasting and Social Change 73(5): 543–558.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schick, A. 2019. What counts as “success” in speculative and anticipatory ethics? Lessons from the advent of germline gene editing. NanoEthics 13(3): 261–267.CrossRef Schick, A. 2019. What counts as “success” in speculative and anticipatory ethics? Lessons from the advent of germline gene editing. NanoEthics 13(3): 261–267.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Umbrello, S., and I. van de Poel. 2021. Mapping value sensitive design onto AI for social good principles. AI and Ethics 1(3): 283–296.CrossRef Umbrello, S., and I. van de Poel. 2021. Mapping value sensitive design onto AI for social good principles. AI and Ethics 1(3): 283–296.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wareham, C., and C. Nardini. 2015. Policy on synthetic biology: Deliberation, probability, and the precautionary paradox. Bioethics 29(2): 118-25.CrossRef Wareham, C., and C. Nardini. 2015. Policy on synthetic biology: Deliberation, probability, and the precautionary paradox. Bioethics 29(2): 118-25.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wolff, J. 2014. The precautionary attitude: Asking preliminary questions. Hastings Center Report 44(S5): S27–S28.CrossRef Wolff, J. 2014. The precautionary attitude: Asking preliminary questions. Hastings Center Report 44(S5): S27–S28.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Emerging Technology (ELSIET) Symposium
verfasst von
Evie Kendal
Publikationsdatum
24.06.2022
Verlag
Springer Nature Singapore
Erschienen in
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry / Ausgabe 3/2022
Print ISSN: 1176-7529
Elektronische ISSN: 1872-4353
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-022-10197-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2022

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Symposium: Emerging Technologies

Ethics of Buying DNA