nach oben

International Journal of Clinical Oncology

Erschienen in:

06.03.2020 | Original Article

Evaluation of a routine second curettage for hydatidiform mole: a cohort study

verfasst von: Eiko Yamamoto, Kimihiro Nishino, Kaoru Niimi, Eri Watanabe, Yukari Oda, Kazuhiko Ino, Fumitaka Kikkawa

Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Ausgabe 6/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate routine second curettage for hydatidiform mole (HM) by comparing the characteristics and outcomes of developing gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN).

Study design

This was a cohort study including 173 patients diagnosed with HM between January 2002 and August 2019 who were followed up at Nagoya University Hospital, Japan. After an evacuation, 105 and 68 patients were managed with the routine method (routine group) and elective method (elective group) for a second curettage, respectively. The routine second curettage was performed around 7 days after the first evacuation. Patients in the elective group underwent a second curettage if there was ultrasonographic evidence of molar remnants in the uterine cavity. Socio-clinical factors were retrospectively compared between the routine and elective groups, and between patients showing regression and those who developed GTN.

Results

The incidence of GTN was 15.2% in the routine group and 20.6% in the elective group, and the difference was not significant (P = 0.364). The median GTN risk score was significantly higher in the routine group than in the elective group (P = 0.033). Presence of a complete HM, gestational age, and a pre-treatment human chorionic gonadotropin level of ≥ 200,000 mIU/mL were independent risk factors for GTN in molar patients.

Conclusion

The incidence of GTN was unchanged but the risk score of GTN was higher in the routine group than in the elective group. Routine second curettage may not be necessary, but further study will be needed to confirm this.

Lurain JR (2010) Gestational trophoblastic disease I: epidemiology, pathology, clinical presentation and diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic disease, and management of hydatidiform mole. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(6):531–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.073 CrossRefPubMed

Yamamoto E, Niimi K, Kiyono T et al (2017) Establishment and characterization of cell lines derived from complete hydatidiform mole. Int J Mol Med 40(3):614–622. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2017.3067 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Seckl MJ, Sebire NJ, Berkowitz RS (2010) Gestational trophoblastic disease. Lancet 376(9742):717–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60280-2 CrossRefPubMed

Kaneki E, Kobayashi H, Hirakawa T et al (2010) Incidence of postmolar gestational trophoblastic disease in androgenetic moles and the morphological features associated with low risk postmolar gestational trophoblastic disease. Cancer Sci 101(7):1717–1721. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01602.x CrossRefPubMed

Kan M, Yamamoto E, Niimi K et al (2016) Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia and pregnancy outcome after routine second curettage for hydatidiform mole a retrospective observational study. J Reprod Med 61(7–8):373–379PubMed

Kang WD, Choi HS, Kim SM (2012) Prediction of persistent gestational trophobalstic neoplasia: the role of hCG level and ratio in 2 weeks after evacuation of complete mole. Gynecol Oncol 124(2):250–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.10.035 CrossRefPubMed

Horn LC, Kowalzik J, Bilek K et al (2006) Clinicopathologic characteristics and subsequent pregnancy outcome in 139 complete hydatidiform moles. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 128(1–2):10–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.01.024 CrossRefPubMed

Feltmate CM, Growdon WB, Wolfberg AJ et al (2006) Clinical characteristics of persistent gestational trophoblastic neoplasia after partial hydatidiform molar pregnancy. J Reprod Med 51(11):902–906PubMed

Sato A, Usui H, Shozu M (2019) Comparison between vacuum aspiration and forceps plus blunt curettage for the evacuation of complete hydatidiform moles. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 58(5):650–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2019.07.012 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Berkowitz RS, Goldstein DP (2009) Clinical practice. Molar pregnancy. N Engl J Med 360(16):1639–1645. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp0900696 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Alazzam M, Young T, Coleman R et al (2011) Predicting gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN): is urine hCG the answer? Gynecol Oncol 122(3):595–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.05.035 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Sato S, Yamamoto E, Niimi K et al (2019) The efficacy and toxicity of 4-day chemotherapy with methotrexate, etoposide and actinomycin D in patients with choriocarcinoma and high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Int J Clin Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-019-01540-9 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Goto S, Ino K, Mitsui T et al (2004) Survival rates of patients with choriocarcinoma treated with chemotherapy without hysterectomy: effects of anticancer agents on subsequent births. Gynecol Oncol 93(2):529–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.02.018 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Lao TT, Lee FH, Yeung SS (1987) Repeat curettage after evacuation of hydatidiform mole An appraisal. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 66(4):305–307CrossRefPubMed

15.

Sasaki S (2003) Management of gestational trophoblastic diseases in Japan a review. Placenta 24:S28–32CrossRefPubMed

16.

Yamamoto E, Trinh TD, Sekiya Y, Tamakoshi K, Nguyen XP, Nishino K, Niimi K, Kotani T, Kajiyama H, Shibata K, Le QT, Kikkawa F (2020) The management of hydatidiform mole using prophylactic chemotherapy and hysterectomy for high-risk patients decreased the incidence of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia in Vietnam: a retrospective observational study. Nagoya J Med Sci 82 (in press)

17.

Golfier F, Raudrant D, Frappart L et al (2007) First epidemiological data from the French Trophoblastic Disease Reference Center. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196(2):171–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2006.10.867 CrossRef

18.

van Trommel NE, Massuger LF, Verheijen RH et al (2005) The curative effect of a second curettage in persistent trophoblastic disease: a retrospective cohort survey. Gynecol Oncol 99(1):6–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.06.032 CrossRefPubMed

19.

Osborne RJ, Filiaci VL, Schink JC et al (2016) Second curettage for low-risk nonmetastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 128(3):535–542. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001554 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Japanese Pathological Society (1995) The general rules for clinical and pathological management of trophoblastic disease (written in Japanese). Second Edition. Igaku-shoin, Tokyo

21.

The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Japanese Pathological Society (2011) The general rules for clinical and pathological management of trophoblastic disease (written in Japanese). Third Edition. Igaku-shoin, Tokyo

22.

Sumigama S, Itakura A, Yamamoto T et al (2007) Genetically identified complete hydatidiform mole coexisting with a live twin fetus: comparison with conventional diagnosis. Gynecol Obstet Invest 64(4):228–231. https://doi.org/10.1159/000106496 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Kohorn EI (2001) The new FIGO 2000 staging and risk factor scoring system for gestational trophoblastic disease: description and critical assessment. Int J Gynecol Cancer 11(1):73–77CrossRefPubMed

24.

Niimi K, Yamamoto E, Nishino K et al (2017) Spontaneous regression of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol Rep 21:98–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2017.07.011 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Seckl MJ, Fisher RA, Salerno G et al (2000) Choriocarcinoma and partial hydatidiform moles. Lancet 356(9223):36–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02432-6 CrossRefPubMed

26.

Tidy JA, Gillespie AM, Bright N et al (2000) Gestational trophoblastic disease: a study of mode of evacuation and subsequent need for treatment with chemotherapy. Gynecol Oncol 78(3 Pt 1):309–312. https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.2000.5839 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Stone M, Bagshawe KD (1979) An analysis of the influences of maternal age, gestational age, contraceptive method, and the mode of primary treatment of patients with hydatidiform moles on the incidence of subsequent chemotherapy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 86(10):782–792. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1979.tb10694.x CrossRefPubMed

28.

Attwood HD, Park WW (1961) Embolism to the lungs by trophoblast. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 68:611–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1961.tb02778.x CrossRefPubMed

29.

Usui H, Kiyokawa T, Qu J et al (2016) Comparison between pathological diagnosis and cytogenetic diagnosis by short tandem repeat polymorphism analysis of suspected molar pregnancies. J Reprod Med 61(5–6):219–223PubMed

Titel: Evaluation of a routine second curettage for hydatidiform mole: a cohort study
verfasst von: Eiko Yamamoto
Kimihiro Nishino
Kaoru Niimi
Eri Watanabe
Yukari Oda
Kazuhiko Ino
Fumitaka Kikkawa
Publikationsdatum: 06.03.2020
Verlag: Springer Singapore
Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Ausgabe 6/2020
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Elektronische ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-020-01640-x

Springer Medizin

Evaluation of a routine second curettage for hydatidiform mole: a cohort study