Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Urban Health 2/2006

01.03.2006

Evaluation of an Intervention to Increase Screening Colonoscopy in an Urban Public Hospital Setting

verfasst von: Denis Nash, PhD, MPH, Sulaiman Azeez, David Vlahov, Melissa Schori

Erschienen in: Journal of Urban Health | Ausgabe 2/2006

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Only 50% of New Yorkers aged 50 and over reported ever being screened for colorectal cancer by any modality according to a recent household survey. The objective of this investigation was to assess the impact of a hospital-based intervention aimed at eliminating health care system barriers to timely colorectal cancer screening at Lincoln Medical Center, a large, urban public hospital in one of the nation's poorest census tracts. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all colonoscopies performed over an 11-month period, during which a multi-pronged intervention to increase the number of screening colonoscopies took place. Two “patient navigators” were hired during the study period to provide continuity for colonoscopy patients. A Direct Endoscopic Referral System (DERS) was also implemented. Enhancements to the gastrointestinal (GI) suite were also made to improve operational efficiency. Immediately following the introduction of the patient navigators, there was a dramatic and sustained decline in the broken appointment rates for both screening and diagnostic colonoscopy (from 67% in May of 2003 to 5% in June of 2003). The likelihood of keeping the appointment for colonoscopy after the patient navigator intervention increased by nearly 3-fold (relative risk = 2.6, 95% CI 2.2–3.0). The rate of screening colonoscopies increased from 56.8 per month to 119 per month. The screening colonoscopy coverage provided by this facility among persons aged 50 and over in surrounding Zip codes increased from 5.2 to 15.6% (RR 3.0, 95% CI 1.9–4.7). Efforts to increase the number of screening colonoscopies were highly successful, due in large part to the influence of patient navigators, a streamlined referral system, and GI suite enhancements. These findings suggest that there are significant health-care system barriers to colonoscopy that, when addressed, could have a significant impact on screening colonoscopy rates in the general population.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Cancer Facts and Figures. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2003. Cancer Facts and Figures. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2003.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat CNN Money, Best Places to Live, New York, New York. money.cnn.com/best/bplive/details/3651000.html. Accessed March 21, 2004. CNN Money, Best Places to Live, New York, New York. money.cnn.com/best/bplive/details/3651000.html. Accessed March 21, 2004.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Summary of Vital Statistics 2002. New York: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; 2003. Summary of Vital Statistics 2002. New York: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; 2003.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch SM, Berg AO, Lohr KN. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. Jul 16 2002;137(2):132–141.PubMed Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch SM, Berg AO, Lohr KN. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. Jul 16 2002;137(2):132–141.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Weir HK, Thun MJ, Hankey BF, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2000, featuring the uses of surveillance data for cancer prevention and control. J Natl Cancer Inst. Sep 3 2003;95(17):1276–1299.PubMed Weir HK, Thun MJ, Hankey BF, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2000, featuring the uses of surveillance data for cancer prevention and control. J Natl Cancer Inst. Sep 3 2003;95(17):1276–1299.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Breen N, Wagener DK, Brown ML, Davis WW, Ballard-Barbash R. Progress in cancer screening over a decade: results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys. J Natl Cancer Inst. Nov 21 2001;93(22):1704–1713.CrossRefPubMed Breen N, Wagener DK, Brown ML, Davis WW, Ballard-Barbash R. Progress in cancer screening over a decade: results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys. J Natl Cancer Inst. Nov 21 2001;93(22):1704–1713.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Giovannucci E. Modifiable risk factors for colon cancer. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. Dec 2002;31(4):925–943.CrossRefPubMed Giovannucci E. Modifiable risk factors for colon cancer. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. Dec 2002;31(4):925–943.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Thorpe LE, Mostashari F, Hajat A, et al. Colon cancer screening practices in New York City, 2003: results of a large random-digit dialed telephone survey. Cancer. Sep 1 2005;104(5):1075–1082.CrossRefPubMed Thorpe LE, Mostashari F, Hajat A, et al. Colon cancer screening practices in New York City, 2003: results of a large random-digit dialed telephone survey. Cancer. Sep 1 2005;104(5):1075–1082.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Vlahov D, Ahern J, Vazquez BS, et al. Racial/ethnic differences in screening for colon cancer: report from the New York Cancer Project. Ethn Dis. 2005 Winter;15(1):76–83.PubMed Vlahov D, Ahern J, Vazquez BS, et al. Racial/ethnic differences in screening for colon cancer: report from the New York Cancer Project. Ethn Dis. 2005 Winter;15(1):76–83.PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Feldman G, McCord C, Frieden TR. City Health Information: Preventing colorectal cancer. New York: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; 2003. Feldman G, McCord C, Frieden TR. City Health Information: Preventing colorectal cancer. New York: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; 2003.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale—update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology. Feb 2003;124(2):544–560.CrossRefPubMed Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale—update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology. Feb 2003;124(2):544–560.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Byers T, Levin B, Rothenberger D, Dodd GD, Smith RA. American Cancer Society guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: update 1997. American Cancer Society Detection and Treatment Advisory Group on Colorectal Cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. May–Jun 1997;47(3):154–160.PubMed Byers T, Levin B, Rothenberger D, Dodd GD, Smith RA. American Cancer Society guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: update 1997. American Cancer Society Detection and Treatment Advisory Group on Colorectal Cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. May–Jun 1997;47(3):154–160.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg AO. Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendations and rationale. Am J Nurs. Sep 2002;102(9):107–117.PubMed Berg AO. Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendations and rationale. Am J Nurs. Sep 2002;102(9):107–117.PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Karpati AM, Lu X, Mostashari F, Thorpe L, Frieden TR. Community Health Profiles: The Health of Highbridge and Morrisania, Bronx. New York: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; 2003. Karpati AM, Lu X, Mostashari F, Thorpe L, Frieden TR. Community Health Profiles: The Health of Highbridge and Morrisania, Bronx. New York: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; 2003.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Thorpe L, Mostashari F, Feldman G, et al. Cancer Screening in New York City: We can do much better. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; 2003. Thorpe L, Mostashari F, Feldman G, et al. Cancer Screening in New York City: We can do much better. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; 2003.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Finney Rutten LJ, Nelson DE, Meissner HI. Examination of population-wide trends in barriers to cancer screening from a diffusion of innovation perspective (1987–2000). Prev Med Mar. 2004;38(3):258–268.CrossRef Finney Rutten LJ, Nelson DE, Meissner HI. Examination of population-wide trends in barriers to cancer screening from a diffusion of innovation perspective (1987–2000). Prev Med Mar. 2004;38(3):258–268.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health 2000. Washington, District of Columbia: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2002. Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health 2000. Washington, District of Columbia: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2002.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Diez Roux AV, Merkin SS, Arnett D, et al. Neighborhood of residence and incidence of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. Jul 12 2001;345(2):99–106.CrossRefPubMed Diez Roux AV, Merkin SS, Arnett D, et al. Neighborhood of residence and incidence of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. Jul 12 2001;345(2):99–106.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Yen IH, Syme SL. The social environment and health: a discussion of the epidemiologic literature. Annu Rev Public Health. 1999;20:287–308.CrossRefPubMed Yen IH, Syme SL. The social environment and health: a discussion of the epidemiologic literature. Annu Rev Public Health. 1999;20:287–308.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Diez Roux AV. Invited commentary: places, people, and health. Am J Epidemiol. Mar 15 2002;155(6):516–519.CrossRefPubMed Diez Roux AV. Invited commentary: places, people, and health. Am J Epidemiol. Mar 15 2002;155(6):516–519.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat O'Campo P, Xue X, Wang MC, Caughy M. Neighborhood risk factors for low birthweight in Baltimore: a multilevel analysis. Am J Public Health. Jul 1997;87(7):1113–1118.PubMedCrossRef O'Campo P, Xue X, Wang MC, Caughy M. Neighborhood risk factors for low birthweight in Baltimore: a multilevel analysis. Am J Public Health. Jul 1997;87(7):1113–1118.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh S, Darroch JE, Frost JJ. Socioeconomic disadvantage and adolescent women's sexual and reproductive behavior: the case of five developed countries. Fam Plann Perspect. Nov–Dec 2001;33(6):251–258, 289.PubMedCrossRef Singh S, Darroch JE, Frost JJ. Socioeconomic disadvantage and adolescent women's sexual and reproductive behavior: the case of five developed countries. Fam Plann Perspect. Nov–Dec 2001;33(6):251–258, 289.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Evaluation of an Intervention to Increase Screening Colonoscopy in an Urban Public Hospital Setting
verfasst von
Denis Nash, PhD, MPH
Sulaiman Azeez
David Vlahov
Melissa Schori
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2006
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Urban Health / Ausgabe 2/2006
Print ISSN: 1099-3460
Elektronische ISSN: 1468-2869
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-006-9029-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2006

Journal of Urban Health 2/2006 Zur Ausgabe