Introduction
Blepharophimosis, ptosis, and epicanthus inversus syndrome (BPES; OMIM #110,100) is a rare, autosomally inherited disease that occurs in approximately 1 in 50,000 births worldwide [
1]. BPES primarily affects the development of the eyes with four main characteristic features: eyelid dysplasia (telecanthus), small palpebral fissures (blepharophimosis), drooping eyelids (ptosis), and a tiny skin fold running inward and upward from the lower lid (epicanthus inversus) [
2]. BPES can be further divided into two subtypes depending on the presence or absence of systemic involvement. In type I BPES, the eyelid abnormalities are co-inherited with premature ovarian failure (POF), while type II BPES only manifests as eyelid defects. In addition to the hallmark eye malformations, other common ocular signs include squint, nystagmus, microphthalmus, microcornea, and stenosis of the lacrymal canaliculi [
3].
BPES is most commonly inherited in an autosomal dominant manner. Studies have revealed that
FOXL2 is the major disease-causing gene associated with BPES, accounting for 67% of cases [
4,
5]. Other genes being reported to cause BPES with extended phenotypes include
KAT6B [
6],
SEPT9 [
7], and
ITGB5 [
8]. Due to the wide variety of BPES ocular manifestations, there is still a need to investigate the disease causal variants associated with the different ocular phenotypes of BPES. The BPES pedigree reported in this study was affiliated with the presence of anisometropia and unilateral pathologic myopia (PM). Moreover, the proband was diagnosed with congenital cataracts. Interestingly, BPES accompanied by congenital cataracts or PM has rarely been reported, and there is a lack of molecular genetic studies of BPES associated with anisometropia [
9,
10].
Thus, this study investigated the disease-causing gene or variant in a family affected by a rare presentation of BPES using whole-exome sequencing (WES) with the aim of investigating the genotype–phenotype correlation of BPES with anisometropia, unilateral PM, and congenital cataracts.
Methods
Participants
Members of this family underwent comprehensive ocular examinations that included a best-corrected visual acuities (BCVAs) test, color face photography, corneal and conjunctival examination with a slit-lamp microscope, axial length examination with an IOL Master optical biometer, ocular ultrasound, and fundus examination. The distance between the inner canthus, the length and height of the eyelid fissure, and the muscle strength of the levator were also measured. The proband and his mother were diagnosed with BPES, however family members could not confirm the family history of BPES, thus this family was defined as a sporadic BPES pedigree. This study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the ethics committee of The Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. All participants signed written consent forms.
Whole-exome Sequencing (WES) and Bioinformatics
Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples obtained from each affected individual in this pedigree. WES was then performed using Illumina NovaSeq 6000. Average sequencing coverage was 100 × , and up to 95% of coverage was 20 × . The VeritaTrekker Variants Detection System was applied to detect the single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), insertions or deletions (InDels, < 50 bp), and copy number variants (CNVs, > 100 kb) in the whole exome region within 5 bp of splicing sites or within 50 bp of InDels. The raw data was analyzed and annotated by Enliven Data Annotation and Interpretation System.
Variant assessment
In further analysis, synonymous SNVs (sSNVs) and non-coding region variants were excluded. Variants with a minor allele frequency (MAF) greater than 1% in 1000 Genome Project (1000G,
ftp://1000genomes.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/ftp), Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC,
http://exac.broadinstitute.org/), Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD,
https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/), and dbSNP (
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp) were filtered out. The position with a reading depth less than 10 was filtered out with the aim of controlling the quality and reliability of the sequencing data. Estimation of potential deleteriousness among all candidate variants was determined using the following predictive tools: SIFT (
http://sift.jcvi.org/), Polyphen-2 (
http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/), MutationTaster (
http://mutationtaster.org/), ClinVar (
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar), and CADD (
https://cadd.gs.washington.edu/). The variants were categorized by pathogenicity – e.g., pathogenic, likely-pathogenic, uncertain significance, benign, and likely benign – according to the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) [
11], and the recommendations of CliGen Sequence Variant Interpretation (SVI) [
12‐
14], combined with the database of Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO,
https://hpo.jax.org/app/), Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM,
https://www.omim.org/), and Genetics Home Reference (GHR,
http://www.ghr.nlm.nih.gov). The variant defined as "pathogenic" or "likely-pathogenic" will be regarded as a candidate disease causal variant and be included in further validation.
Variant validation
To validate the variant identified by WES, Sanger sequencing was conducted. First, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to amplify the candidate disease causal variant region from genomic DNA with a pair of designed primers that covered > 50 bp upstream and downstream of the variant. The amplified products were sequenced by ABI 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, California). After validation of the disease causal variant, co-segregation analysis was performed to confirm the variant being inherited from the proband’s affected mother but not the healthy father with a matching of the autosomal dominant inheritance mode. An online tool, SWISS-MODEL (
https://swissmodel.expasy.org/interactive), was also applied to visualize the difference between the wild-type and variant protein structures.
Discussion
This study confirmed a non-frameshift variant c.672_701dup (p.A225_A234dup) in FOXL2 as a disease-causing variant associated with a rare BPES pedigree that presents with anisometropia and unilateral PM. These results expand the phenotypic profile of FOXL2 in BPES.
In addition to the four typical features of BPES – blepharophimosis, ptosis, epicanthus inversus, and telecanthus – this syndrome is most commonly characterized by microphthalmia and hyperopia. In a previous report, anisometropia and amblyopia were present in approximately 41% of patients, while only approximately 1% of patients presented with unilateral PM. However, none of the patients concurrently presented with unilateral PM, anisometropia, and amblyopia [
10]. An additional study previously reported the disease causal variant c.672_701dup in a fourth-generation Chinese family, which included 13 patients. However, no manifestations of PM or congenital cataracts were recognized [
15]. Moreover, previous research has also reported 20 patients with this specific variant in seven pedigrees, though none had PM or congenital cataracts [
16]. Other studies have found that patients who carried this variant also had congenital hydronephrosis, ventricular septal heart defect (VSD), Duane syndrome, and/or growth hormone deficiency. Yet again, none had PM or congenital cataracts [
17,
18]. We have reviewed the current studies that have reported different syndromes of BPES or ocular manifestations caused by variant c.672_701dup, which are presented in Table
1. Although more than half of the studies did not report the refractive status of the patients, about 41.7% (5/12) of the patients were diagnosed with isometropia, and 29.4% (5/17) of the patients had PM (Table
1). Furthermore, only one study reported congenital cataracts but did not genetically investigate the underlying cause (Table
1). Thus, this study expands the genotype–phenotype profile of the disease causal variant c.672_701dup in a BPES family with the rare manifestations of anisometropia, unilateral PM, and/or congenital cataracts. Additionally, the diverse clinical manifestations caused by this gene may be due to the variant's different types and positions and the distinct epigenetics of the same variant, which are valuable to investigate further.
Table 1
Reported Multiple Ocular Manifestations in BPES Caused by c.672_701dup or other disease causal variants in FOXL2
1 | c.672_701dup | + | - | - | NA | 31,048,069 |
2 | c.672_701dup | - | - | NA | NA | 17,968,144 |
c.273C > G | - | - | NA | NA |
c.663_692dup | - | - | - | NA |
c.307C > T | + | - | - | NA |
c.855_871dup | + | - | - | NA |
c.576_577insC | + | - | - | NA |
3 | c.672_701dup | NA | - | NA | NA | 33,875,939 |
4 | c.672_701dup | NA | NA | NA | NA | 27,283,035 |
c.663_692dup30 | NA | + | NA | NA |
5 | c.672_701dup | NA | NA | NA | NA | 23,441,113 |
6 | c.672_701dup | NA | NA | NA | NA | 17,277,738 |
7 | c.672_701dup | NA | NA | NA | NA | 22,926,839 |
8 | c.672_701dup | NA | NA | NA | NA | 21,325,395 |
9 | c.672_701dup | NA | NA | NA | NA | 18,484,667 |
10 | c.650C > G | NA | + (2/3) | - | NA | 22,312,189 |
11 | c.844_860dup17 | + (1/4) | + (2/4) | NA | NA | 28,849,110 |
12 | c.876dupC | - | - | - | NA | 19,929,410 |
13 | c.672_701dup | NA | NA | NA | Congenital hydronephrosis; hypertensive | 25,192,944 |
14 | c.672_701dup | NA | NA | NA | Duane syndrome | 16,283,882 |
15 | c.672_701dup | NA | NA | NA | 2/3 skin syndactyly | 18,642,388 |
c.672_701dup | NA | NA | NA | Pediatric Burkitt lymphoma |
c.672_701dup | NA | NA | NA | Small apical muscular ventricular septal heart defect |
16 | NA | NA | NA | + | NA | 35,219,116 |
The Forkhead box L2 (FOXL2) gene (OMIM #605,597), which is a member of the highly conserved FOX superfamily, encodes a transcription factor that plays a role in the development of both the eyelids and ovaries [
19]. The FOXL2 protein contains approximately 100 amino acids and is highly divergent in expression and function [
19].
FOXL2 was previously reported to be a candidate gene in the loci 3q22–q23 with translated truncated proteins identified in both types of BPES families [
2]. It was then hypothesized that severe loss of function (LOF) variants in
FOXL2 lead to type I BPES, while type II BPES is caused by frameshift variants that result in elongation of the protein [
20]. In the future, RNA isolation and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) can be performed to further analyze the variant effect at the gene expression level and help to study the mechanism deeper. In this study, the inframeshift variant c.672_701dup causing 10aa elongation of products was discovered in a BPES family with rare ocular characteristics. The ovaries of the affected female were not dysfunctional, which cross-validated the above hypothesis. BPES requires eyelid surgery, particularly to correct ptosis, to allow for normal or improved visual development and cosmesis. In this study, the proband underwent ptosis and epicanthus surgery in both eyes and cataract surgery in the left eye during childhood. Proper interventional approaches at an early age are important for the adequate development of visual acuity and confidence in patients with BPES. Since BPES is an inherited disease commonly caused by disease causal variants in
FOXL2, genetic screening early in life is a good tool to predict the type of BPES and to provide genetic information for clinicians to make an informed decision regarding therapeutic approaches.
However, there are some limitations of this study. This study involved only one family with two affected subjects, so more patients are warranted to replicate our findings. Although the reported gene was known, the newly discovered associated phenotypes need further functional study to investigate.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.