nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.12.2015 | Original Article

Exploring the Relation Between Impairment Rating by AMA Guide and Activity and Participation Based on ICF in the Patients with Hand Injuries

verfasst von: Maryam Farzad, Ali Asgari, Fereydoun Layeghi, Farzaneh Yazdani, Seyyed Ali Hosseini, Mehdi Rassafiani, Sandra Kus

Erschienen in: Journal of Hand and Microsurgery | Ausgabe 2/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyze the relation between components of disability with distinguished score of impairment, activity and participation questionnaire based on clinical data of persons with hand injuries. Impairment was evaluated by use of AMA guide 6th edition and disability by DASH questionnaire on Convenience sample of patients (N = 117), with chronic hand injuries. Linking and allocating items of the DASH were done based on the ICF Core Set for Hand Conditions and the opinions of a group of experts from different related fields. Data was analyses by using Kappa index, Chi square test and a set of Pearson, Part and Partial correlations coefficient. Most of the DASH items were allocated to the activity; one to four of the items could not be classified and 0 to 22 were classified as having overlap. Participation and activity scores correlated positively with each other (r > 0.80). Impairment had high correlation with activity and participation scores (>73). With controlling the effect of each or both construct, this relation between them with impairment diminished but still significant between activity and impairment. There is a huge overlap in definition of activity and participation. The most effecting item in relation of disability and impairment is activity restriction. Participation had no relation with impairment.

Gustafsson M, Ahlstram G (2004) Problems experienced during the first year of an acute traumatic hand injury‚ Äìa prospective study. J Clin Nurs 13(8):986–995CrossRefPubMed

Rondinelli RD, Genovese E, Brigham CR (2008) Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment: American Medical Association

Lindenhovius AL, Buijze GA, Kloen P, Ring DC (2008) Correspondence between perceived disability and objective physical impairment after elbow trauma. J Bone Joint Surg 90(10):2090–2097CrossRefPubMed

Adams J, Burridge J, Mullee M, Hammond A, Cooper C (2004) Correlation between upper limb functional ability and structural hand impairment in an early rheumatoid population. Clin Rehabil 18(4):405–413CrossRefPubMed

Farzad M, Asgari A, Dashab F, Layeghi F, Karimlou M, Hosseini SA, Rassafiani M (2015) Does disability correlate with impairment after hand injury?. Clin Orthop Relat Res®:1–7

Jette AM (2006) Toward a common language for function, disability, and health. Phys Ther 86(5):726–734PubMed

Seelman K. Trends in rehabilitation and disability: transition from a medical model to an integrative model. In: National Rehabilitation Conference Keynote Tokorozawa, Japan: National Center for Persons with Disabilities Retrieved November: 2003; 2003: 2004

World Health Organization WHO (2001) International classification of functioning disability and health (ICF)

Mij G (2001) International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF)

10.

Salter K, Jutai J, Teasell R, Foley N, Bitensky J, Bayley M (2005) Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF activity. Disabil Rehabil 27(6):315–340CrossRefPubMed

11.

Kus S, Oberhauser C, Cieza A (2012) Validation of the brief international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF) core set for hand conditions. J Hand Ther

12.

Dixon D, Johnston M, McQueen M (2008) The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) can measure the impairment, activity limitations and participation restriction constructs from the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9(1):114PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

13.

Eberhardt K, Fex E (1995) Functional impairment and disability in early rheumatoid arthritis--development over 5 years. J Rheumatol 22(6):1037PubMed

14.

Chapman TT, Richard RL, Hedman TL, Renz EM, Wolf SE, Holcomb JB (2008) Combat casualty hand burns: evaluating impairment and disability during recovery. J Hand Ther 21(2):150–159CrossRefPubMed

15.

ICF W (2001) International classification of functioning, disability and health. In: World Health Organization, Geneva. 3–25

16.

Fowler D, French P, Hodgekins J, Lower R, Turner R, Burton S, Wilson J (2013) CBT to address and prevent social disability in early and emerging psychosis. CBT for Schizophrenia: Evidence-Based Interventions and Future Directions :143–167

17.

Bot S, Terwee C, Van der Windt D, Bouter L, Dekker J, De Vet H (2004) Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis 63(4):335–341PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

18.

Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C, Beaton D, Cole D, Davis A, Hawker G, Katz JN, Makela M, Marx RG (1996) Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Head). Am J Ind Med 29(6):602–608CrossRefPubMed

19.

Chen C, Granger C, Peimer C, Moy O, Wald S (2005) Manual Ability Measure (MAM-16): a preliminary report on a new patient-centred and task-oriented outcome measure of hand function. J Hand Surg: Br Eur 30(2):207–216CrossRef

20.

Gandek B, Sinclair SJ, Jette AM, Ware JE Jr (2007) Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the participation measure for post-acute care (PM-PAC). Am J Phys Med Rehabil 86(1):57–71CrossRefPubMed

21.

Janda DH, Geiringer SR, Hankin FM, Barry DT (1987) Objective evaluation of grip strength. J Occup Environ Med 29(7):569–571

22.

Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann R, Trotter M, Howard L (1969) An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 50(6):311PubMed

23.

Robinson JP, Turk DC, Loeser JD (2004) Pain, impairment, and disability in the AMA guides. J Law Med Ethics 32(2):315–326CrossRefPubMed

24.

Spieler EA, Barth PS, Burton JF Jr, Himmelstein J, Rudolph L (2000) Recommendations to guide revision of the guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment. JAMA: J Am Med Assoc 283(4):519–523CrossRef

25.

Rondinelli RD (2009) Changes for the new AMA Guides to impairment ratings: implications and applications for physician disability evaluations. PM&R 1(7):643–656

26.

Blais BR, Association AM (2011) AMA guides to the evaluation of ophthalmic impairment and disability: measuring the impact of visual impairment on activities of daily life. American Medical Association

27.

Hudak PL, McKeever PD, Wright JG (2004) Understanding the meaning of satisfaction with treatment outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 15

28.

Mousavi SJ, Parnianpour M, Abedi M, Askary-Ashtiani A, Karimi A, Khorsandi A, Mehdian H (2008) Cultural adaptation and validation of the Persian version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome measure. Clin Rehabil 22(8):749–757CrossRefPubMed

29.

Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2013) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge

30.

Whiteneck G, Dijkers MP (2009) Difficult to measure constructs: conceptual and methodological issues concerning participation and environmental factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90(11):S22–S35CrossRefPubMed

31.

Mink van der Molen ABEA, Hovius SER (2003) Outcome of hand trauma: the hand injury severity scoring system (HISS) and subsequent impairment and disability. Hand Surg 28B:285–299

32.

André M, Hagelberg S, Stenström CH (2004) The juvenile arthritis foot disability index: development and evaluation of measurement properties. J Rheumatol 31(12):2488–2493PubMed

33.

Slim FJ, van Schie CH, Keukenkamp R, Faber WR, Nollet F (2010) Effects of impairments on activities and participation in people affected by leprosy in The Netherlands. J Rehabil Med 42(6):536–543CrossRefPubMed

34.

Fougeyrollas P (1995) Documenting environmental factors for preventing the handicap creation process: Quebec contributions relating to ICIDH and social participation of people with functional differences. Disabil Rehabil 17(3–4):145–153CrossRefPubMed

35.

Cardol M, Jong BAD, Ward CD (2002) On autonomy and participation in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 24(18):970–974CrossRefPubMed

36.

Heinemann AW, Tulsky D, Dijkers M, Brown M, Magasi S, Gordon W, DeMark H (2010) Issues in participation measurement in research and clinical applications. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91(9):S72–S76CrossRefPubMed

37.

Brown M, Dijkers MP, Gordon WA, Ashman T, Charatz H, Cheng Z (2004) Participation objective, participation subjective: a measure of participation combining outsider and insider perspectives. J Head Trauma Rehabil 19(6):459–481CrossRefPubMed

38.

Pollard B, Johnston M, Dieppe P (2011) Exploring the relationships between International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) constructs of Impairment, Activity Limitation and Participation Restriction in people with osteoarthritis prior to joint replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12(1):97PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

39.

Nagi SZ (1991) Disability concepts revisited: implications for prevention. Disability in America: toward a national agenda for prevention :309–327

40.

Jette AM, Haley SM, Kooyoomjian JT (2003) Are the ICF activity and participation dimensions distinct? J Rehabil Med 35(3):145–149CrossRefPubMed

41.

Whiteneck G (2008) A conceptual and practical solution for differentiating activity and participation in the ICF. In: 14th Annual North American Collaborating Center Conference on ICF “Evaluating Social Participation: Applications of ICF & ICF-CY”, Quebec, Canada, August: 2008

42.

Franchignoni F, Giordano A, Sartorio F, Vercelli S, Pascariello B, Ferriero G (2010) Suggestions for refinement of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure (DASH): a factor analysis and Rasch validation study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91(9):1370–1377CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Exploring the Relation Between Impairment Rating by AMA Guide and Activity and Participation Based on ICF in the Patients with Hand Injuries
verfasst von: Maryam Farzad
Ali Asgari
Fereydoun Layeghi
Farzaneh Yazdani
Seyyed Ali Hosseini
Mehdi Rassafiani
Sandra Kus
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2015
Verlag: Springer India
Erschienen in: Journal of Hand and Microsurgery / Ausgabe 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0974-3227
Elektronische ISSN: 0974-6897
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12593-015-0197-z

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

23.04.2024 | Ablationstherapie | Nachrichten

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 | Appendizitis | Nachrichten

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 | Operationsvorbereitung | Nachrichten

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

19.04.2024 | EAU 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

weitere anzeigen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2015

Effect of Heparin on Post-Operative Adhesion in Flexor Tendon Surgery of the Hand

Factors Associated with Patient Delay in Scaphoid Nonunions

Histologic and Biomechanical Evaluation of the Effects of Social Stress and the Antidepressant Fluoxetine on Tendon Healing in Rats

Time from Booking Until Appointment and Healthcare Utilization in Hand Surgery Patients with Discretionary Conditions

Acute Median Neuropathy and Carpal Tunnel Release in Perilunate Injuries Can We Predict Who Gets a Median Neuropathy?

An Ulnar Neurofibroma: Management with Sural Graft Reconstruction

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

Update Chirurgie

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“