nach oben

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Erschienen in:

24.05.2023 | General Gynecology

Exploring the use of ChatGPT in OBGYN: a bibliometric analysis of the first ChatGPT-related publications

verfasst von: Gabriel Levin, Yoav Brezinov, Raanan Meyer

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 6/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Little is known about the scientific literature regarding the new revolutionary tool, ChatGPT. We aim to perform a bibliometric analysis to identify ChatGPT-related publications in obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN).

Study design

A bibliometric study through PubMed database. We mined all ChatGPT-related publications using the search term “ChatGPT”. Bibliometric data were obtained from the iCite database. We performed a descriptive analysis. We further compared IF among publications describing a study vs. other publications.

Results

Overall, 42 ChatGPT-related publications were published across 26 different journals during 69 days. Most publications were editorials (52%) and news/briefing (22%), with only one (2%) research article identified. Five (12%) publications described a study performed. No ChatGPT-related publications in OBGYN were found. The leading journal by the number of publications was Nature (24%), followed by Lancet Digital Health and Radiology (7%, for both). The main subjects of publications were ChatGPT’s scientific writing quality (26%) and a description of ChatGPT (26%) followed by tested performance of ChatGPT (14%), authorship and ethical issues (10% for both topics).In a comparison of publications describing a study performed (n = 5) vs. other publications (n = 37), mean IF was lower in the study-publications (mean 6.25 ± 0 vs. 25.4 ± 21.6, p < .001).

Conclusions

The study highlights main trends in ChatGPT-related publications. OBGYN is yet to be represented in this literature.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

ChatGPT, ChatGPT. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/ Accessed 15 Jan 2023

Biswas S (2023) ChatGPT and the future of medical writing. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.223312CrossRefPubMed

van Dis EAM et al (2023) ChatGPT: five priorities for research. Nature 614(7947):224–226CrossRefPubMed

Else H (2023) Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists. Nature 613(7944):423CrossRefPubMed

Agarwal A et al (2016) Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics. Asian J Androl 18(2):296–309CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kokol P, Blažun Vošner H, Završnik J (2021) Application of bibliometrics in medicine: a historical bibliometrics analysis. Health Info Libr J 38(2):125–138CrossRefPubMed

Fisher SA, Miller ES (2022) Critical evaluation of clinical research in obstetrics and gynecology. Clin Obstet Gynecol 65(2):290–301CrossRefPubMed

Stokel-Walker C (2023) ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove. Nature 613(7945):620–621CrossRefPubMed

Hackelöer M, Schmidt L, Verlohren S (2022) New advances in prediction and surveillance of preeclampsia: role of machine learning approaches and remote monitoring. Arch Gynecol Obstet. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06864-yCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Arezzo F et al (2022) A machine learning approach applied to gynecological ultrasound to predict progression-free survival in ovarian cancer patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 306(6):2143–2154CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Lee KS et al (2022) Association of preterm birth with medications: machine learning analysis using national health insurance data. Arch Gynecol Obstet 305(5):1369–1376CrossRefPubMed

12.

D’Amico RS et al (2023) I Asked a ChatGPT to Write an editorial about how we can incorporate chatbots into neurosurgical research and patient care. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000002414CrossRefPubMed

13.

Ahn C (2023) Exploring ChatGPT for information of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 185:109729CrossRefPubMed

14.

Fijačko N et al (2023) Can ChatGPT pass the life support exams without entering the American heart association course? Resuscitation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109732CrossRefPubMed

15.

Stokel-Walker C (2022) AI bot ChatGPT writes smart essays - should professors worry? Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-04397-7CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Exploring the use of ChatGPT in OBGYN: a bibliometric analysis of the first ChatGPT-related publications
verfasst von: Gabriel Levin
Yoav Brezinov
Raanan Meyer
Publikationsdatum: 24.05.2023
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 6/2023
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07081-x

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Klimawandel und Gesundheit: Was Sie in der Hausarztpraxis wissen müssen und tun können

Springer Medizin

Exploring the use of ChatGPT in OBGYN: a bibliometric analysis of the first ChatGPT-related publications

Abstract

Purpose

Study design

Results

Conclusions

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

Alter verschlechtert Prognose bei Endometriumkarzinom

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Erhöhte Mortalität bei postpartalem Brustkrebs

Menopausale Hormontherapie für Frauen über 65?

Update Gynäkologie

Klimawandel und Gesundheit: Was Sie in der Hausarztpraxis wissen müssen und tun können

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Study design

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2023

Antenatal prediction models for outcomes of extremely and very preterm infants based on machine learning

Hysteroscopic versus histopathological agreement in the diagnosis of chronic endometritis: results from a retrospective observational study

Segmented in vitro fertilization and frozen embryo transfer in levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device treated patients with endometrial cancer

Evaluation of nausea and vomiting in the first trimester on the risk of adverse birth outcomes and the contribution of genetic polymorphisms: a pilot prospective study

Evaluating ChatGPT as an adjunct for the multidisciplinary tumor board decision-making in primary breast cancer cases

Correspondence on “Expectant management of viable cesarean scar pregnancies: a systematic review”

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

Alter verschlechtert Prognose bei Endometriumkarzinom

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Erhöhte Mortalität bei postpartalem Brustkrebs

Menopausale Hormontherapie für Frauen über 65?

Update Gynäkologie