Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Pathology & Oncology Research 3/2011

Open Access 01.09.2011 | Research

Expression of CDX2 and Hepatocyte Antigen in Benign and Malignant Lesions of Gallbladder and Its Correlation with Histopathologic Type and Clinical Outcome

verfasst von: Qing-Long Li, Zhu-Lin Yang, Jie-Qiong Liu, Xiong-Ying Miao

Erschienen in: Pathology & Oncology Research | Ausgabe 3/2011

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that both CDX2 and Hepatocyte antigen (Hep) are detected in different types of cancer and associated with clinical prognosis. However, fever studies have examined gallbladder cancer specimens, and little is known about the clinicopathological significance of both CDX2 and Hep expression in gallbladder adenocarcinomas. In present study, we examined the expression frequencies of CDX2 and Hepatocyte antigen (Hep), and explored their clinicopathologic significances in gallbladder adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect and compare the frequencies of CDX2 and Hep expression in 108 samples of gallbladder adenocarcinoma, 46 peri-tumor tissues and 35 chronic cholecystitis. The expression frequencies for CDX2 and Hep were 49/108 (45.4%) and 45/108 (41.7%) in gallbladder carcinoma; 13/46 (28.3%) and 11/46 (23.9) in peri-tumor tissues; 5/35 (14.3%) and 2/35 (5.7%) in chronic cholecystitis. The positive staining of CDX2 or Hep in gallbladder adenocarcinoma was significantly higher than that in peritumoral tissues (both, P < 0.05), and chronic cholecystits (both, P < 0.01). The expression of CDX2 or Hep was negatively correlated to grade of differentiation, tumor size and lymph node metastasis (P < 0.01 or P < 0.05). Elevated expression frequency of CDX2 or Hep was associated with increased overall survival (P = 0.003 or P = 0.002). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that CDX2 (P = 0.014) or Hep (P = 0.026) expression was an independent prognostic predictor in gallbladder adenocarcinoma. CDX2 and Hep might function as important biological markers in the development and prognosis of gallbladder adenocarcinoma.
Abkürzungen
CDX2
Caudal-related homeobox transcription factor
Hep
Hepatocyte antigen
Hep Par 1
Hepatocyte paraffin 1 monoclonal antibody

Introduction

Gallbladder cancer is often a terminal malignancy occurring predominantly in the elderly women. It accounts for nearly two-thirds of the biliary tract cancers, making it the most common primary biliary cancer and the fifth most common cancer of the gastrointestineal tract [1, 2]. More than 85% of gallbladder cancers belong to adenocarcinomas often well or moderately differentiated, and the rest approximately 15% are squamous, adenosquamous or undifferentiated carcinoma. To date surgery is the only potentially curative modality for patients with gallbladder cancer, however, more than 70% of cases is unresectable owing to local invasion and metastasis. A better understanding of pathogenesis and clinicopathological charateristics of gallbladder cancer may provide insights for early diagnosis and treatment improvement for this deadly disease.
Caudal type homeobox transcription factor CDX2 is mostly expressed in small and large intestinal epithelial cells and plays an essential role in regulating proliferation and differentiation of the intestinal epithelium [3, 4]. CDX2 expression has been considered as a sensitive marker of intestinal metaplasia in the esophagus [5, 6] and stomach [7, 8]. Recent studies have shown that CDX2 expression is also detected in intestinal-type gastric carcinoma, esophageal carcinoma, and other malignancies such as cholangiocarcinoma and intraductal papillary neoplasia of the liver [914]. In gallbladder, CDX2 expression is not seen in the normal tissue, however it has been detected in the intestinal metaplasia mucosa in cholelithiasis [15], and also in adenocarcinoma [16, 17]. Few studies reported the relationship between CDX2 expression and prognosis of gallbladder adenocarcinoma [16]. The clinical and pathological significance of CDX expression in gallbladder adenocarcinoma remains to be further elucidated.
Hepatocyte antigen (Hep) is detected by Hep Par 1, a monoclonal antibody developed from Hepatic tissue from a failed live allograft and considered to be specific for normal and neoplastic Hepatocytes. Therefore, Hep has emerged as a diagnostic marker in surgical histopathology to distinguish Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from liver metastases of other carcinomas [18, 19]. However subsequent studies has revealed that Hep expression has been detected in cholangiocarcinomas [20, 21], gallbladder carcinomas [22, 23], gastric carcinomas and others [2125]. To our knowledge, the clinicopathological significance of Hepatocyte antigen expression in gallbladder adenocarcinoma has not been reported.
In the present study, we examined the expression frequency of CDX2 and Hepatocyte antigen in 108 specimens of gallbladder adenocarcinoma, 46 of peri-tumor tissues and 35 of chronic cholecystitis by means of immunohistochemistry with attempt to better understand the reasons for CDX2 and Hep expression in lesions of gallbladder and its clinicopathological implications.

Materials and Methods

Specimens and Clinicopathologic Materials

Gallbladder carcinoma resection specimens were collected from 108 cases hospitalized in the Second and First Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, and People’s Hospital of Hunan Province (Changsha, China) from June 1996 through June 2006. Of the 108 cases with gallbladder carcinoma, 31 was male (28.7%) and 77 was female (71.3%). Ages of patients were from 35 to 70 years old with an average 52.6 ± 11.2. The pathological types of these cases were all adenocarcinoma, including 9 cases (8.2%) of adenomatous canceration, 29 cases (26.9%) of well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, 29 cases (26.9%) of moderately-differentiated adenocarcinoma, 30 cases (27.8%) of poorly-differentiated adenocarcinoma, and 11 cases (10.2%) of mucinous adenocarcinomas. There were 59 cases (54.6%) with peri-gallbladder infiltrations, 59 (54.6%) with regional lymph node metastasis, and 58 (57.3%) with gallbladder cancer complicated with gallstones. There were 34 cases (31.5%) with radical resection, 48 (44.4%) with palliative operation, and 26 (24.1%) with no operation because of distant metastasis. In 46 selected peritumoral tissues (away from tumor ≥3 mm) from some of above patients, 10 were normal, 10 were mild atypical hyperplasia, 12 were middle atypical hyperplasia, and 14 were severe atypical hyperplasia. And another 35 cases of chronic cholecystitis specimens (15 cases of simple chronic cholecystitis and 20 cases of chronic cholecystitis complicated with gallstones) were also selected as control, in which there were 11 cases of normal tissues, 12 cases of mild atypical hyperplasia, 7 cases of middle atypical hyperplasia and 5 cases of severe atypical hyperplasia. All these specimens were fixed by 4% formaldehyde, followed by conventional paraffin-embedded sectioning.

Immunohistochemical Staining

Mouse anti-human CDX2 and Hep Par 1 monoclonal antibodies and EnVision™ Detection Kit were from Dako Laboratories, California, USA. The staining of CDX2 and Hep were carried out according to the manufacture’s protocol (ChemMate™ EnVison +/HRP/DAB, Rabbit/Mouse Two Step Staining Method). Briefly, the sections were deparaffined and incubated with peroxidase inhibitor (3% H2O2) in dark for 15 min, followed by EDTA-trypsinase digestion liquid (0.125%, pH 9.0) for 15 min, then soaked with PBS liquid (pH7.4) three times with each for 5 min. The pretreated sections were then incubated with mouse anti-CDX2 or -Hep Par 1 for 60 min under room temperature. After three rinses with PBS, solution A was added to the sections, and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. Substrate DAB was added and followed by hematoxylin counter-staining. The Slides were dehydrated with different concentrations (70%–100%) of alcohol, and soaked in xylene for three times with each 5 min. and finally mounted with neutral balsam. The readouts of CDX2 or Hep staining were considered as positive when more than 20% of the tumor cells were stained, otherwise as negative. The positive controls were the positive sections that provided by Dako, and the negative controls were the 0.01 mol/L PBS liquid (pH7.4) (substitute the first antibody).

Statistically Analysis

The SPSS13.0 program was used for calculation of inter-relationships between the analyzed CDX2 or Hep and histological or clinical factors by χ2 independence test. Fisher’s exact probability test was also used for analyzing statistical association between the two independent sample groups. The results were considered to be significant when the P value were less than 0.05. Disease specific overall survival analyses were determined and compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. For multivariate analysis the Cox regression method was performed. 95% confidence intervals were used overall.

Results

Expressions of CDX2 and Hep in Benign and Malignant Lesions of Gallbladder

We examined expression of CDX2 and Hep by immunostaining in 108 cases of gallbladder adenocarcinoma, 46 cases of pericancerous tissues, and 35 cases of chronic cholecystitis. Positive CDX2 staining was seen in the nuclei of carcinoma cells, as shown in Fig. 1. Hep staining was observed in the cytoplasm and/or cell membrane with brown-yellow granules as shown in Fig. 2 (a and b). For comparison, a typical Hep positive staining of hepatocytes from a liver section was shown in Fig. 2c. Overall, of the 108 cases of gallbladder adenocarcinomas, expression of CDX2 and Hep was detected in 49 (45.4%) and 45 (41.7%) cases, respectively. In the 46 cases of pericancerous tissues, CDX2 and Hep were positive in 13 (28.3%) and 11 (23.9%) cases, respectively. However, in the 35 cases of chronic cholecystitis, CDX2 and Hep stains were positive in 5 (14.3%) and 2 (5.7%) cases. Statistically, the positive rates of CDX2 and Hep in gallbladder adenocarcinoma were significantly higher than those in peritumoral tissues (χ 2 = 3.93, P < 0.05 and χ 2 = 4.39, P < 0.05 respectively) and chronic cholecystitis (χ 2 = 10.87, P < 0.01 and χ 2 = 15.49, P < 0.01 respectively). In addition, moderate to severe atypical hyperplasia were observed in all CDX2 and Hep-positive cases of peritumoral tissues and chronic cholecystitis epitheliums. Some of the benign lesions and gallbladder adenocarcinoma showed morphological evidences of intestinal metaplasia, such as existence of goblet cells, secretion of mucus, and high columnar cancer cells.

Expressions of CDX2 and Hep and Their Correlation With Clinicopathologic Parameters of Gallbladder Adenocarcinoma

We further analyzed whether expression of CDX2 and Hep was correlated with the clinical and pathological features of gallbladder adenocarcinoma. As shown in Table 1, the frequencies of CDX2 and Hep expression in the cases with adenomatous canceration, maximal diameter of mass <2 cm, and no-metastasis of lymph node were significantly higher than those in the ones characterized by poorly-differentiated adenocarcinoma, maximal diameter of mass ≥2 cm, and metastasis of lymph node (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). The positive rate of CDX2 in cases with no-invasive regional tissues was significantly higher than that in cases with invasive regional tissues (P < 0.01). 37 cases were Hep-positive in the 49 CDX2-positive cases, and highly consistency in CDX2 and Hep expression was found in gallbladder adenocarcinoma (χ 2 = 42.27, P < 0.01).
Table 1
Expressions of CDX2 and Hep and their correlation with clinicopathologic parameters of gallbladder adenocarcinoma
Group
n
CDX2+ (%)
P-value (χ2-test)
Hep Par 1 + (%)
P-value (χ2-test)
Sex
Male
31
14(45.2)
>0.05
14(45.2)
>0.05
Female
77
35(45.5)
31(40.3)
Age
≤45
24
11(45.8)
>0.05
10(41.7)
>0.05
>45
84
38(45.2)
35(41.7)
Pathologic type
Adenomatous canceration
9
8(88.9)
<0.01
7(77.8)
<0.05
Well-differentiated
29
16(55.2)
16(55.2)
Moderately-differentiated
29
13(44.8)a
12(41.4)a
Poorly-differentiated
30
7(23.3)b,c
6(20.0)b,c
Mucinous adenocarcinoma
11
5(45.5)
4(36.4)
Tumor diameter
<2.0 cm
31
21(67.7)
<0.01
18(58.1)
<0.05
≥2.0 cm
77
28(36.4)
27(35.1)
Lymph node metastasis
No
49
31(63.2)
<0.01
26(53.1)
<0.05
Yes
59
18(30.1)
19(32.2)
Surrounding tissue invasion
No
49
30(61.2)
<0.01
24(49.0)
>0.05
Yes
59
19(32.2)
21(35.6)
Gallstones
No
50
20(40.0)
>0.05
21(42.0)
>0.05
Yes
58
29(50.0)
24(41.3)
aP < 0.05 and bP < 0.01 when compared to adenomatous canceration; cP < 0.05 when compared to well-differentiation adenocarcinoma.

Correlation of CDX2 and Hep Expression with Disease Specific Overall Survival

After surgical resection, only 67 out of 108 patients were able to be followed up via phone or mail surveys. Of the 67 cases with follow-up, 20 cases had over 1 year survival, and 47 died within 1 year after surgery, with a mean survival time of 9.6 ± 5.2 months. 36 of the 67 (53.7%) patients had positive staining of CDX2 and 35 (52.2%) had Hep positive staining. The relevance of positive CDX2 and Hep expression to patients’ survival was examined by univariate Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Overall survival was positive association with increased expression frequencies of CDX2 (P = 0.003) (Fig. 3a) and Hep (P = 0.020) (Fig. 3b). The relevance of overall survival and other clinicopathological characteristics were also assessed by univariate analysis which showed that the overall survival was associated with tumor pathological type(P = 0.031), tumor diameter(P = 0.003), lymph node metastasis (P = 0.005) and surrounding tissue invasion (P = 0.002). All factors that showed significant association in the univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis were subsequently subject to multivariate Cox regression survival analysis, which indicated that lymph node metstasis and surrounding tissue invasion were the most significant predictors of short overall survival followed by CDX2 and Hep expression (Table 2).
Table 2
Multivariate cox regression analysis of overall survival in 67 patients with surgical resection of gallbladder carcinoma
Group
Category
B
SE(B)
Exp(B)
P
95% CI for Exp(B)
Inferior
Superior
Pathology type
Adenoma canceration/well-/moderately-/poorly-differentiatied/mucous carcinoma
0.508
0.378
1.66
0.253
0.79
3.49
Tumor Diameter
<2.0 cm/≥2.0 cm
0.723
0.301
2.06
0.04
1.14
3.72
Lymphonode metastasis
No/Yes
0.958
0.302
2.61
0.013
1.44
4.71
Surrounding tissue invasion
No/Yes
0.911
0.308
2.49
0.027
1.36
4.55
CDX2
−/+
−0.852
0.350
0.43
0.014
0.21
0.84
Hep Par 1
−/+
−0.185
0.056
0.82
0.026
0.72
0.94

Discussion

Under normal conditions, CDX2 expression is intestine-specific and plays an important role in the regulation of cell proliferation and differentiation in the embryo and gut. Recent studies demonstrated that ectopic CDX2 expression has been observed in intestinal metaplasia and carcinoma of the stomach, it might be related to gastric mucosa transformation from gastric to intestinal phenotype, and gastric carcinogenesis [9, 10, 13]. CDX2 expression was not detected in normal gallbladder mucosa [17]. We reported here that ectopic CDX2 expression was detected in 49/108 (45.4%) of gallbladder adenocarcinoma. In the 108 cases of gallbladder carcinoma, there was no differential frequency of CDX2 expression in different sex groups, age, and with or without gallstones. However, we observed there was a trend of increasing expression frequency of CDX2 in benign lesions and CDX2 was strongly relevant to grades of tumor differentiation.
CDX2 expression has been considered as one of the good prognostic markers in patients with gastric carcinoma [13, 26, 27], pancreatic tumor [28], and carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater [29]. Few studies have examined CDX2 expression in gallbladder cancer specimens. Wu et al. reported that CDX2 expression was detected in 25 (36.8%) of 68 gallbladder carcinomas, and was closely related to histological differenation grades, i.e., in the tubular type gallbladder carcinomas, significantly higher expression in well-differentiated type than the moderately and poorly differentiated types, indicating that ectopic expression of CDX2 is an early event in gallbladder carcinomas. However, whether CDX2 can be a prognostic factor remained unclear in their study due to limited case number obtained [17]. Jinawath et al. have found that CDX2 expression was observed in 22 (37.3%) of 59 cholangiocarcinoma cases, and correlated with MUC2 expression. The expression of CDX2 was much higher in papillary-type than tubular-type cholangiocarcinoma [14]. Additionally, Hong et al. have shown that CDX2 was detected in 72 (37.3%) out of 193 extraHepatic bile duct carcinomas and correlated with histologic subtypes, and more frequently in tumors with papillary growth and no vascular invasion. They further concluded that Patients with CDX2+/MUC2+ tumors had significantly better overall survival in univariate but not multivariate analysis than patients with other tumors [30]. Chang et al. demonstrated that 27/164 (16.46%) patients with biliary tract carcinoma expressed CDX2, and the frequency of CDX2 expression was much higher in gallbladder carcinoma (12/41, 29.3%) and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (22.45%) than in the intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma [16]. By univariate and multivariate analyses, the expression of CDX2 was associated with a significant survival advantage; CDX2 and tumor stage were independent prognostic factor in patients with biliary tract carcinomas [16]. In our study, CDX2 expression was associated with tumor differentiation stages, it was found much higher in benign lesions, i.e. adenomous canceration and well-differentiated types, than the poor-differentiated type. Additionally, CDX2 expression was associated with better over survival patients with gallbladder carcinomas, and multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that CDX2 was an independent predictor of survival in addition to lymph node metstasis and surrounding tissue invasion after resection of gallbladder tumor.
Hep is a component of the membrane of hepaticcellular mitochondrial. The positive rates of Hep in normal hepatic cells and cells of chronic hepatic diseases were 100%, and the positive rate of Hep in hepatocellular carcinoma was above 90%, especially that in well-differentiated Hepatocellular carcinoma was nearly 100%, so Hep was regarded as an important marker for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and differential diagnosis between hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic carcinoma of liver, and positive cases had better prognosis than negative cases [8]. Recent studies have found that Hep had high expression in many other malignant tumors, such as intestinal gastric cancer and esophagus adenocarcinoma with intestinal metaplasia, and Hep was regarded as a specific marker reflecting intestinal metaplasia of gastric mucosa; malignant tumors with higher Hep expression had better prognosis, and Hep was regarded as a objective biological marker reflecting the prognosis of malignant tumors [13, 18, 24, 3133]. To our knowledge, quite few literatures have reported the expression of Hep in gallbladder carcinoma, in nomoral condition there is no Hep expression detected in gallbladder tissue. In gallbladder adenocarcinomas, the Hep expression rate from 0 to 100% have been reported [2023]. When Leong et al. used Hep par 1 to distinct hepatocellular carcinoma from cholangiocarcinoma, combined tumors and metastatic carcinoma, they did not detect Hep expression in 2 cases of metastic gallbladder adenocarcinomas [20]. Neither did Mosnier et al. in their study with 6 cases of gallbladder adenocarcinomas [21]. However, Maitra et al. and Lugli et al. reported positive rate 100% and 26% of Hep expression in gallbladder adenocarcinomas, respectively [22, 23]. Our results showed that Hep expression was detected in 45 (41.7%) out of 108 gallbladder adenocarnoma cases, which is close to Lugli et al. reported 26% [23]. We found out the expression rate of Hep in gallbladder adenocarcinoma was significantly higher than those in peritumoral tissues (23.9%) and chronic cholecystitis (5.7%). Hep expression was positively associated with well-differentiated, small size and no metastasis tumors. Most of positive cases showed intestinal metaplasia., suggesting Hep expression is associated with intestineal metaplasia. The gallbladder lesions with Hep expression was significantly correlated to early stage, small size, well differentiation, and no-metastasis.
Highly consistency in CDX2 and Hep expression was found in gallbladder adenocarcinoma. Unitivariate Kaplan-Meier analysis and Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that increased expression of Hep also was an independent better-prognostic factor. The result suggested that some gallbladder adenocarcinoma expressed high level of Hep, which might be related to intestinal metaplasia of gallbladder epithelium, and Hep might be one of the important biological markers reflecting the prognosis of gallbladder adenocarcinoma. In addition, highly consistency in CDX2 and Hep expression might because that they were both biological markers of intestinal metaplasia.
In summary, our findings indicate that expression of CDX2 or Hep expression influenced the overall survival in patients with gallbladder carcinoma. Both CDX2 and Hep expression were independent markers of clinical outcome in addition to lymph node metstasis and surrounding tissue invasion in gallbladder adenocarcinoma patients, and might be useful to predict the prognosis for gallbladder carcinoma.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Open AccessThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by-nc/​2.​0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones RS (1990) Carcinoma of the gallbladder. Surg Clin North Am 70:1419–1428PubMed Jones RS (1990) Carcinoma of the gallbladder. Surg Clin North Am 70:1419–1428PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Carriaga MT, Henson DE (1995) Liver, gallbladder, extraHepatic bile ducts, and pancreas. Cancer 75:171–190PubMedCrossRef Carriaga MT, Henson DE (1995) Liver, gallbladder, extraHepatic bile ducts, and pancreas. Cancer 75:171–190PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Suh E, Chen L, Taylor J, Traber PG (1994) A homeodomain protein related to caudal regulates intestine-specific gene transcription. Mol Cell Biol 14:7340–7351PubMed Suh E, Chen L, Taylor J, Traber PG (1994) A homeodomain protein related to caudal regulates intestine-specific gene transcription. Mol Cell Biol 14:7340–7351PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Silberg DG, Swain GP, Suh ER, Traber PG (2000) Cdx1 and cdx2 expression during intestinal development. Gastroenterology 119:961–971PubMedCrossRef Silberg DG, Swain GP, Suh ER, Traber PG (2000) Cdx1 and cdx2 expression during intestinal development. Gastroenterology 119:961–971PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Phillips RW, Frierson HF Jr, Moskaluk CA (2003) Cdx2 as a marker of epithelial intestinal differentiation in the esophagus. Am J Surg Pathol 27:1442–1447PubMedCrossRef Phillips RW, Frierson HF Jr, Moskaluk CA (2003) Cdx2 as a marker of epithelial intestinal differentiation in the esophagus. Am J Surg Pathol 27:1442–1447PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Eda A, Osawa H, Satoh K et al (2003) Aberrant expression of CDX2 in Barrett’s epithelium and inflammatory esophageal mucosa. J Gastroenterol 38:14–22PubMedCrossRef Eda A, Osawa H, Satoh K et al (2003) Aberrant expression of CDX2 in Barrett’s epithelium and inflammatory esophageal mucosa. J Gastroenterol 38:14–22PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bai YQ, Yamamoto H, Akiyama Y et al (2002) Ectopic expression of homeodomain protein CDX2 in intestinal metaplasia and carcinomas of the stomach. Cancer Lett 176:47–55PubMedCrossRef Bai YQ, Yamamoto H, Akiyama Y et al (2002) Ectopic expression of homeodomain protein CDX2 in intestinal metaplasia and carcinomas of the stomach. Cancer Lett 176:47–55PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mutoh H, Hakamata Y, Sato K et al (2002) Conversion of gastric mucosa to intestinal metaplasia in Cdx2-expressing transgenic mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 294:470–479PubMedCrossRef Mutoh H, Hakamata Y, Sato K et al (2002) Conversion of gastric mucosa to intestinal metaplasia in Cdx2-expressing transgenic mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 294:470–479PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim HS, Lee JS, Freund JN et al (2006) CDX-2 homeobox gene expression in human gastric carcinoma and precursor lesions. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 21:438–442PubMedCrossRef Kim HS, Lee JS, Freund JN et al (2006) CDX-2 homeobox gene expression in human gastric carcinoma and precursor lesions. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 21:438–442PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Vallbohmer D, DeMeester SR, Peters JH et al (2006) Cdx-2 expression in squamous and metaplastic columnar epithelia of the esophagus. Dis Esophagus 19:260–266PubMedCrossRef Vallbohmer D, DeMeester SR, Peters JH et al (2006) Cdx-2 expression in squamous and metaplastic columnar epithelia of the esophagus. Dis Esophagus 19:260–266PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Nonaka D, Kusamura S, Baratti D, Casali P, Younan R, Deraco M (2006) CDX-2 expression in pseudomyxoma peritonei: a clinicopathological study of 42 cases. Histopathology 49:381–387PubMedCrossRef Nonaka D, Kusamura S, Baratti D, Casali P, Younan R, Deraco M (2006) CDX-2 expression in pseudomyxoma peritonei: a clinicopathological study of 42 cases. Histopathology 49:381–387PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishikawa A, Sasaki M, Ohira S et al (2004) Aberrant expression of CDX2 is closely related to the intestinal metaplasia and MUC2 expression in intraductal papillary neoplasm of the liver in Hepatolithiasis. Lab Investigation Journal Technical Methods Pathology 84:629–638CrossRef Ishikawa A, Sasaki M, Ohira S et al (2004) Aberrant expression of CDX2 is closely related to the intestinal metaplasia and MUC2 expression in intraductal papillary neoplasm of the liver in Hepatolithiasis. Lab Investigation Journal Technical Methods Pathology 84:629–638CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fan Z, Li J, Dong B, Huang X (2005) Expression of Cdx2 and Hepatocyte antigen in gastric carcinoma: correlation with histologic type and implications for prognosis. Clin Cancer Res 11:6162–6170PubMedCrossRef Fan Z, Li J, Dong B, Huang X (2005) Expression of Cdx2 and Hepatocyte antigen in gastric carcinoma: correlation with histologic type and implications for prognosis. Clin Cancer Res 11:6162–6170PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Jinawath A, Akiyama Y, Yuasa Y, Pairojkul C (2006) Expression of phosphorylated ERK1/2 and homeodomain protein CDX2 in cholangiocarcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 132:805–810PubMedCrossRef Jinawath A, Akiyama Y, Yuasa Y, Pairojkul C (2006) Expression of phosphorylated ERK1/2 and homeodomain protein CDX2 in cholangiocarcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 132:805–810PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakamoto H, Mutoh H, Ido K, Satoh K, Hayakawa H, Sugano K (2007) A close relationship between intestinal metaplasia and Cdx2 expression in human gallbladders with cholelithiasis. Hum Pathol 38:66–71PubMedCrossRef Sakamoto H, Mutoh H, Ido K, Satoh K, Hayakawa H, Sugano K (2007) A close relationship between intestinal metaplasia and Cdx2 expression in human gallbladders with cholelithiasis. Hum Pathol 38:66–71PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang YT, Hsu C, Jeng YM, Chang MC, Wei SC, Wong JM (2007) Expression of the caudal-type homeodomain transcription factor CDX2 is related to clinical outcome in biliary tract carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22:389–394PubMedCrossRef Chang YT, Hsu C, Jeng YM, Chang MC, Wei SC, Wong JM (2007) Expression of the caudal-type homeodomain transcription factor CDX2 is related to clinical outcome in biliary tract carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22:389–394PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu XS, Akiyama Y, Igari T et al (2005) Expression of homeodomain protein CDX2 in gallbladder carcinomas. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 131:271–278PubMedCrossRef Wu XS, Akiyama Y, Igari T et al (2005) Expression of homeodomain protein CDX2 in gallbladder carcinomas. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 131:271–278PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Chu PG, Ishizawa S, Wu E, Weiss LM (2002) Hepatocyte antigen as a marker of Hepatocellular carcinoma: an immunohistochemical comparison to carcinoembryonic antigen, CD10, and alpha-fetoprotein. Am J Surg Pathol 26:978–988PubMedCrossRef Chu PG, Ishizawa S, Wu E, Weiss LM (2002) Hepatocyte antigen as a marker of Hepatocellular carcinoma: an immunohistochemical comparison to carcinoembryonic antigen, CD10, and alpha-fetoprotein. Am J Surg Pathol 26:978–988PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kakar S, Gown AM, Goodman ZD, Ferrell LD (2007) Best practices in diagnostic immunohistochemistry: Hepatocellular carcinoma versus metastatic neoplasms. Arch Pathol Lab Med 131:1648–1654PubMed Kakar S, Gown AM, Goodman ZD, Ferrell LD (2007) Best practices in diagnostic immunohistochemistry: Hepatocellular carcinoma versus metastatic neoplasms. Arch Pathol Lab Med 131:1648–1654PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Leong AS, Sormunen RT, Tsui WM, Liew CT (1998) Hep Par 1 and selected antibodies in the immunohistological distinction of Hepatocellular carcinoma from cholangiocarcinoma, combined tumours and metastatic carcinoma. Histopathology 33:318–324PubMedCrossRef Leong AS, Sormunen RT, Tsui WM, Liew CT (1998) Hep Par 1 and selected antibodies in the immunohistological distinction of Hepatocellular carcinoma from cholangiocarcinoma, combined tumours and metastatic carcinoma. Histopathology 33:318–324PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Mosnier JF, Kandel C, Cazals-Hatem D et al (2009) N-cadherin serves as diagnostic biomarker in intraHepatic and perihilar cholangiocarcinomas. Mod Pathol 22:182–190PubMedCrossRef Mosnier JF, Kandel C, Cazals-Hatem D et al (2009) N-cadherin serves as diagnostic biomarker in intraHepatic and perihilar cholangiocarcinomas. Mod Pathol 22:182–190PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Maitra A, Murakata LA, Albores-Saavedra J (2001) Immunoreactivity for Hepatocyte paraffin 1 antibody in Hepatoid adenocarcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract. Am J Clin Pathol 115:689–694PubMedCrossRef Maitra A, Murakata LA, Albores-Saavedra J (2001) Immunoreactivity for Hepatocyte paraffin 1 antibody in Hepatoid adenocarcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract. Am J Clin Pathol 115:689–694PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Lugli A, Tornillo L, Mirlacher M, Bundi M, Sauter G, Terracciano LM (2004) Hepatocyte paraffin 1 expression in human normal and neoplastic tissues: tissue microarray analysis on 3, 940 tissue samples. Am J Clin Pathol 122:721–727PubMedCrossRef Lugli A, Tornillo L, Mirlacher M, Bundi M, Sauter G, Terracciano LM (2004) Hepatocyte paraffin 1 expression in human normal and neoplastic tissues: tissue microarray analysis on 3, 940 tissue samples. Am J Clin Pathol 122:721–727PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Fan Z, van de Rijn M, Montgomery K, Rouse RV (2003) Hep par 1 antibody stain for the differential diagnosis of Hepatocellular carcinoma: 676 tumors tested using tissue microarrays and conventional tissue sections. Mod Pathol 16:137–144PubMedCrossRef Fan Z, van de Rijn M, Montgomery K, Rouse RV (2003) Hep par 1 antibody stain for the differential diagnosis of Hepatocellular carcinoma: 676 tumors tested using tissue microarrays and conventional tissue sections. Mod Pathol 16:137–144PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Mac MT, Chung F, Lin F, Hui P, Balzer BL, Wang HL (2009) Expression of Hepatocyte antigen in small intestinal epithelium and adenocarcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 132:80–85PubMedCrossRef Mac MT, Chung F, Lin F, Hui P, Balzer BL, Wang HL (2009) Expression of Hepatocyte antigen in small intestinal epithelium and adenocarcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 132:80–85PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Mizoshita T, Tsukamoto T, Nakanishi H et al (2003) Expression of Cdx2 and the phenotype of advanced gastric cancers: relationship with prognosis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 129:727–734PubMedCrossRef Mizoshita T, Tsukamoto T, Nakanishi H et al (2003) Expression of Cdx2 and the phenotype of advanced gastric cancers: relationship with prognosis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 129:727–734PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Seno H, Oshima M, Taniguchi MA et al (2002) CDX2 expression in the stomach with intestinal metaplasia and intestinal-type cancer: prognostic implications. Int J Oncol 21:769–774PubMed Seno H, Oshima M, Taniguchi MA et al (2002) CDX2 expression in the stomach with intestinal metaplasia and intestinal-type cancer: prognostic implications. Int J Oncol 21:769–774PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsumoto K, Mizoshita T, Tsukamoto T et al (2004) Cdx2 expression in pancreatic tumors: relationship with prognosis of invasive ductal carcinomas. Oncol Rep 12:1239–1243PubMed Matsumoto K, Mizoshita T, Tsukamoto T et al (2004) Cdx2 expression in pancreatic tumors: relationship with prognosis of invasive ductal carcinomas. Oncol Rep 12:1239–1243PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansel DE, Maitra A, Lin JW et al (2005) Expression of the caudal-type homeodomain transcription factors CDX 1/2 and outcome in carcinomas of the ampulla of Vater. J Clin Oncol 23:1811–1818PubMedCrossRef Hansel DE, Maitra A, Lin JW et al (2005) Expression of the caudal-type homeodomain transcription factors CDX 1/2 and outcome in carcinomas of the ampulla of Vater. J Clin Oncol 23:1811–1818PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Hong SM, Cho H, Moskaluk CA, Frierson HF Jr, Yu E, Ro JY (2005) CDX2 and MUC2 protein expression in extraHepatic bile duct carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 124:361–370PubMedCrossRef Hong SM, Cho H, Moskaluk CA, Frierson HF Jr, Yu E, Ro JY (2005) CDX2 and MUC2 protein expression in extraHepatic bile duct carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 124:361–370PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Kakar S, Muir T, Murphy LM, Lloyd RV, Burgart LJ (2003) Immunoreactivity of Hep Par 1 in Hepatic and extraHepatic tumors and its correlation with albumin in situ hybridization in Hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 119:361–366PubMedCrossRef Kakar S, Muir T, Murphy LM, Lloyd RV, Burgart LJ (2003) Immunoreactivity of Hep Par 1 in Hepatic and extraHepatic tumors and its correlation with albumin in situ hybridization in Hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 119:361–366PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramos-Vara JA, Miller MA (2002) Immunohistochemical characterization of canine intestinal epithelial and mesenchymal tumours with a monoclonal antibody to Hepatocyte paraffin 1 (Hep Par 1). Histochem J 34:397–401PubMedCrossRef Ramos-Vara JA, Miller MA (2002) Immunohistochemical characterization of canine intestinal epithelial and mesenchymal tumours with a monoclonal antibody to Hepatocyte paraffin 1 (Hep Par 1). Histochem J 34:397–401PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Hishinuma M, Ohashi KI, Yamauchi N et al (2006) Hepatocellular oncofetal protein, glypican 3 is a sensitive marker for alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric carcinoma. Histopathology 49:479–486PubMedCrossRef Hishinuma M, Ohashi KI, Yamauchi N et al (2006) Hepatocellular oncofetal protein, glypican 3 is a sensitive marker for alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric carcinoma. Histopathology 49:479–486PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Expression of CDX2 and Hepatocyte Antigen in Benign and Malignant Lesions of Gallbladder and Its Correlation with Histopathologic Type and Clinical Outcome
verfasst von
Qing-Long Li
Zhu-Lin Yang
Jie-Qiong Liu
Xiong-Ying Miao
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2011
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Pathology & Oncology Research / Ausgabe 3/2011
Print ISSN: 1219-4956
Elektronische ISSN: 1532-2807
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-010-9346-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2011

Pathology & Oncology Research 3/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

25.04.2024 NSCLC Nachrichten

Das Risiko für Rezidiv oder Tod von Patienten und Patientinnen mit reseziertem ALK-positivem NSCLC ist unter einer adjuvanten Therapie mit dem Tyrosinkinase-Inhibitor Alectinib signifikant geringer als unter platinbasierter Chemotherapie.

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

24.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Nachrichten

Patienten, die zur Behandlung ihres Prostatakarzinoms eine Androgendeprivationstherapie erhalten, entwickeln nicht selten eine Anämie. Wer ältere Patienten internistisch mitbetreut, sollte auf diese Nebenwirkung achten.

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Müssen sich Schwangere einer Krebstherapie unterziehen, rufen Immuncheckpointinhibitoren offenbar nicht mehr unerwünschte Wirkungen hervor als andere Mittel gegen Krebs.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.