Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 4/2018

20.02.2018 | Original Article

FDG PET/CT after first molecular targeted therapy predicts survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma

verfasst von: Noboru Nakaigawa, Keiichi Kondo, Tomohiro Kaneta, Ukihide Tateishi, Ryogo Minamimoto, Kazuhiro Namura, Daiki Ueno, Kazuki Kobayashi, Takeshi Kishida, Ichiro Ikeda, Hisashi Hasumi, Kazuhide Makiyama, Narihiko Hayashi, Kimito Osaka, Kentaro Muraoka, Koji Izumi, Takashi Kawahara, Jun-ichi Teranishi, Yasuhide Miyoshi, Yasushi Yumura, Hiroji Uemura, Tomio Inoue, Masahiro Yao

Erschienen in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

We investigated prospectively whether 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) can predict the overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) previously treated by molecular targeted therapies.

Methods

Between 2009 and 2016, 81 patients who had received single molecular targeted therapies (43 sorafenib, 27 sunitinib, 8 temsirolimus and others) and were scheduled for second line molecular targeted therapies for advanced RCC were enrolled in this prospective study. FDG PET/CT was performed after first line molecular targeted therapies, the max SUVmax (highest standardized uptake value for each patient) recorded, and its association with OS compared with those of known risk factors. The median follow-up was 15.4 months (range 0.9–97.4 months).

Results

The max SUVmax of the 81 subjects ranged from undetectable to 23.0 (median 7.1). Patients with high max SUVmax had a poor prognosis and multivariate analysis with established risk factors showed that it was an independent predictor of survival (p < 0.001; hazard ratio 1.156; 95% confidence interval 1.080–1.239). Subclassification of patients by max SUVmax showed that the median OS of patients with max SUVmax < 7.0 (39), 7.0–12.0 (30), and ≥ 12.0 (12) were 32.8, 15.2, and 6.0 months, respectively. These differences are statistically significant (< 7.0 versus 7.0–12.0: p = 0.0333, 7.0–12.0 versus ≥ 12.0: p = 0.0235).

Conclusions

The max SUVmax by FDG PET/CT of patients with RCC evaluated after their first molecular targeted therapy predicts OS. FDG PET/CT is a useful “imaging biomarker” for patients with advanced RCC planning sequential molecular targeted therapies.
Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Linehan WM, Walther MM, Alexander RB et al (1993) Adoptive immunotherapy of renal cell carcinoma: studies from the Surgery Branch, National Cancer Institute. Semin Urol 11:41–43 Linehan WM, Walther MM, Alexander RB et al (1993) Adoptive immunotherapy of renal cell carcinoma: studies from the Surgery Branch, National Cancer Institute. Semin Urol 11:41–43
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Janzen NK, Kim HL, Figlin RA et al (2003) Surveillance after radical or partial nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma and management of recurrent disease. Urol Clin N Am 30:843–852CrossRef Janzen NK, Kim HL, Figlin RA et al (2003) Surveillance after radical or partial nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma and management of recurrent disease. Urol Clin N Am 30:843–852CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Tomczak P et al (2007) Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 356:115–124CrossRefPubMed Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Tomczak P et al (2007) Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 356:115–124CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Escudier B, Eisen T, Stadler WM et al (2007) Sorafenib in advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 356:125–134CrossRefPubMed Escudier B, Eisen T, Stadler WM et al (2007) Sorafenib in advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 356:125–134CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hudes G, Carducci M, Tomczak P et al (2007) Temsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 356:2271–2281CrossRefPubMed Hudes G, Carducci M, Tomczak P et al (2007) Temsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 356:2271–2281CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Motzer RJ, Escudier B, Oudard S et al (2008) Efficacy of everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase III trial. Lancet 372:449–456CrossRef Motzer RJ, Escudier B, Oudard S et al (2008) Efficacy of everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase III trial. Lancet 372:449–456CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Rini BI, Escudier B, Tomczak P et al (2011) Comparative effectiveness of axitinib versus sorafenib in advanced renal cell carcinoma (AXIS): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet 378:1931–1939CrossRefPubMed Rini BI, Escudier B, Tomczak P et al (2011) Comparative effectiveness of axitinib versus sorafenib in advanced renal cell carcinoma (AXIS): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet 378:1931–1939CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Cella D et al (2013) Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 369:722–731CrossRef Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Cella D et al (2013) Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 369:722–731CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Escudier B, Porta C, Schmidinger M et al (2014) ESMO guidelines working group renal cell carcinoma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 25(Suppl 3):iii49–iii56CrossRefPubMed Escudier B, Porta C, Schmidinger M et al (2014) ESMO guidelines working group renal cell carcinoma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 25(Suppl 3):iii49–iii56CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Motzer RJ, Jonasch E, Agarwal N et al (2015) Kidney cancer, version 3.2015. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 13:151–159CrossRef Motzer RJ, Jonasch E, Agarwal N et al (2015) Kidney cancer, version 3.2015. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 13:151–159CrossRef
12.
13.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakaigawa N, Kondo K, Tateishi U et al (2016) FDG PET/CT as a prognostic biomarker in the era of molecular-targeting therapies: max SUVmax predicts survival of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer 16:67CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nakaigawa N, Kondo K, Tateishi U et al (2016) FDG PET/CT as a prognostic biomarker in the era of molecular-targeting therapies: max SUVmax predicts survival of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer 16:67CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Motzer RJ, Bacik J, Murphy BA et al (2002) Interferon-alfa as a comparative treatment for clinical trials of new therapies against advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 20:289–296CrossRef Motzer RJ, Bacik J, Murphy BA et al (2002) Interferon-alfa as a comparative treatment for clinical trials of new therapies against advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 20:289–296CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ko JJ, Xie W, Kroeger N et al (2015) The International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium model as a prognostic tool in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma previously treated with first-line targeted therapy: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 16:293–300CrossRefPubMed Ko JJ, Xie W, Kroeger N et al (2015) The International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium model as a prognostic tool in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma previously treated with first-line targeted therapy: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 16:293–300CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Aide N, Cappele O, Bottet P et al (2003) Efficiency of [(18)F]FDG PET in characterising renal cancer and detecting distant metastases: a comparison with CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30:1236–1245CrossRefPubMed Aide N, Cappele O, Bottet P et al (2003) Efficiency of [(18)F]FDG PET in characterising renal cancer and detecting distant metastases: a comparison with CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30:1236–1245CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang DE, White RL Jr, Zuger JH et al (2004) Clinical use of fluorodeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography for detection of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 171:1806–1809CrossRefPubMed Kang DE, White RL Jr, Zuger JH et al (2004) Clinical use of fluorodeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography for detection of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 171:1806–1809CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Namura K, Minamimoto R, Yao M et al (2010) Impact of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) evaluated by 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) on survival for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a preliminary report. BMC Cancer 10:667CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Namura K, Minamimoto R, Yao M et al (2010) Impact of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) evaluated by 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) on survival for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a preliminary report. BMC Cancer 10:667CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JW, Jo MK, Lee HM (2009) Significance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography for the postoperative surveillance of advanced renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 103:615–619CrossRefPubMed Park JW, Jo MK, Lee HM (2009) Significance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography for the postoperative surveillance of advanced renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 103:615–619CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Majhail NS, Urbain JL, Albani JM et al (2003) F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of distant metastases from renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 21:3995–4000CrossRefPubMed Majhail NS, Urbain JL, Albani JM et al (2003) F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of distant metastases from renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 21:3995–4000CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ueno D, Yao M, Tateishi U et al (2012) Early assessment by FDG-PET/CT of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors is predictive of disease course. BMC Cancer 12:162CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ueno D, Yao M, Tateishi U et al (2012) Early assessment by FDG-PET/CT of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors is predictive of disease course. BMC Cancer 12:162CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakaigawa N, Kondo K, Ueno D et al (2017) The acceleration of glucose accumulation in renal cell carcinoma assessed by FDG PET/CT demonstrated acquisition of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. BMC Cancer 17:39CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nakaigawa N, Kondo K, Ueno D et al (2017) The acceleration of glucose accumulation in renal cell carcinoma assessed by FDG PET/CT demonstrated acquisition of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. BMC Cancer 17:39CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Lyrdal D, Boijsen M, Suurküla M et al (2009) Evaluation of sorafenib treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma with 2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography. Nucl Med Commun 30:519–524CrossRef Lyrdal D, Boijsen M, Suurküla M et al (2009) Evaluation of sorafenib treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma with 2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography. Nucl Med Commun 30:519–524CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Vercellino L, Bousquet G, Baillet G et al (2009) 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging for an early assessment of response to sunitinib in metastatic renal carcinoma: preliminary study. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 24:137–144CrossRef Vercellino L, Bousquet G, Baillet G et al (2009) 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging for an early assessment of response to sunitinib in metastatic renal carcinoma: preliminary study. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 24:137–144CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Kayani I, Avril N, Bomanji J et al (2011) Sequential FDG-PET/CT as a biomarker of response to sunitinib in metastatic clear cell renal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 17:6021–6028CrossRefPubMed Kayani I, Avril N, Bomanji J et al (2011) Sequential FDG-PET/CT as a biomarker of response to sunitinib in metastatic clear cell renal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 17:6021–6028CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen JL, Appelbaum DE, Kocherginsky M et al (2013) FDG-PET as a predictive biomarker for therapy with everolimus in metastatic renal cell cancer. Cancer Med 2:545–552CrossRef Chen JL, Appelbaum DE, Kocherginsky M et al (2013) FDG-PET as a predictive biomarker for therapy with everolimus in metastatic renal cell cancer. Cancer Med 2:545–552CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Ito H, Kondo K, Kawahara T et al (2017) One-month assessment of renal cell carcinoma treated by everolimus using FDG PET/CT predicts progression-free and overall survival. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 79:855–861CrossRefPubMed Ito H, Kondo K, Kawahara T et al (2017) One-month assessment of renal cell carcinoma treated by everolimus using FDG PET/CT predicts progression-free and overall survival. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 79:855–861CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferda J, Ferdova E, Hora M et al (2013) 18F-FDG-PET/CT in potentially advanced renal cell carcinoma: a role in treatment decisions and prognosis estimation. Anticancer Res 33:2665–2672PubMed Ferda J, Ferdova E, Hora M et al (2013) 18F-FDG-PET/CT in potentially advanced renal cell carcinoma: a role in treatment decisions and prognosis estimation. Anticancer Res 33:2665–2672PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Mizuno T, Kamai T, Abe H et al (2015) Clinically significant association between the maximum standardized uptake value on 18F-FDG PET and expression of phosphorylated Akt and S6 kinase for prediction of the biological characteristics of renal cell cancer. BMC Cancer 15:1097CrossRefPubMed Mizuno T, Kamai T, Abe H et al (2015) Clinically significant association between the maximum standardized uptake value on 18F-FDG PET and expression of phosphorylated Akt and S6 kinase for prediction of the biological characteristics of renal cell cancer. BMC Cancer 15:1097CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
FDG PET/CT after first molecular targeted therapy predicts survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma
verfasst von
Noboru Nakaigawa
Keiichi Kondo
Tomohiro Kaneta
Ukihide Tateishi
Ryogo Minamimoto
Kazuhiro Namura
Daiki Ueno
Kazuki Kobayashi
Takeshi Kishida
Ichiro Ikeda
Hisashi Hasumi
Kazuhide Makiyama
Narihiko Hayashi
Kimito Osaka
Kentaro Muraoka
Koji Izumi
Takashi Kawahara
Jun-ichi Teranishi
Yasuhide Miyoshi
Yasushi Yumura
Hiroji Uemura
Tomio Inoue
Masahiro Yao
Publikationsdatum
20.02.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0344-5704
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-018-3542-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 4/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.