Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology 5/2017

26.09.2016 | Original Article

First clinical evaluation of a new single-use flexible ureteroscope (LithoVue™): a European prospective multicentric feasibility study

verfasst von: Steeve Doizi, Guido Kamphuis, Guido Giusti, Kim Hovgaard Andreassen, Thomas Knoll, Palle Jörn Osther, Cesare Scoffone, Daniel Pérez-Fentes, Silvia Proietti, Oliver Wiseman, Jean de la Rosette, Olivier Traxer

Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology | Ausgabe 5/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

We evaluated a new digital single-use flexible ureteroscope, LithoVue™ with respect to deflection, image quality and maneuverability.

Methods

A prospective cohort study was conducted in eight tertiary reference centers in Europe in December 2015 and January 2016. All consecutive patients included underwent flexible ureteroscopy and were 18 years or older. Deflection and image quality pre- and post-use and maneuverability were rated with a Likert scale.

Results

A total of 40 procedures were performed (five per institution). The indication for FURS was treatment of renal stones in 92.5 % of the cases. Before LithoVue™ usage, the median measured upward and downward deflections were both 270°. Image quality was rated as “very good” in 65 % of cases and “good” in 30 %. Maneuverability was “very good” in 77.5 % and “good” in 17.5 %. At the final evaluation, median upward and downward deflections were both 270°. Image quality was still “very good” in 65 % of cases and “good” in 30 % with no significant difference compared with preoperative data (p = 1). Maneuverability was “very good” in 72.5 % and “good” in 17.5 %, with no significant difference compared with preoperative data (p = 0.92). Two LithoVue™ broke during surgery (5 %): one occurring in extreme deflection with acute infundibulopelvic angle and spontaneous loss of vision for the second one.

Conclusion

The LithoVue™ displayed good image quality, active deflection and maneuverability. Further evaluation of surgical outcomes and cost analysis will help to present the best utility of this single-use FURS in current practice.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Takayasu H, Aso Y, Takagi T, Go T (1971) Clinical application of fiber-optic pyeloureteroscope. Urol Int 26(2):97–104CrossRefPubMed Takayasu H, Aso Y, Takagi T, Go T (1971) Clinical application of fiber-optic pyeloureteroscope. Urol Int 26(2):97–104CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bagley DH, Huffman JL, Lyon ES (1987) Flexible ureteropyeloscopy: diagnosis and treatment in the upper urinary tract. J Urol 138(2):280–285PubMed Bagley DH, Huffman JL, Lyon ES (1987) Flexible ureteropyeloscopy: diagnosis and treatment in the upper urinary tract. J Urol 138(2):280–285PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Knoll T (2016) EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69(3):475–482CrossRefPubMed Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Knoll T (2016) EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69(3):475–482CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat de la Rosette J, Denstedt J, Geavlete P, Keeley F, Matsuda T, Pearle M, Preminger G, Traxer O, CROES URS Study Group (2014) The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 11,885 patients. J Endourol 28(2):131–139CrossRefPubMed de la Rosette J, Denstedt J, Geavlete P, Keeley F, Matsuda T, Pearle M, Preminger G, Traxer O, CROES URS Study Group (2014) The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 11,885 patients. J Endourol 28(2):131–139CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Afane JS, Olweny EO, Bercowsky E, Sundaram CP, Dunn MD, Shalhav AL, McDougall EM, Clayman RV (2000) Flexible ureteroscopes: a single center evaluation of the durability and function of the new endoscopes smaller than 9Fr. J Urol 164(4):1164–1168CrossRefPubMed Afane JS, Olweny EO, Bercowsky E, Sundaram CP, Dunn MD, Shalhav AL, McDougall EM, Clayman RV (2000) Flexible ureteroscopes: a single center evaluation of the durability and function of the new endoscopes smaller than 9Fr. J Urol 164(4):1164–1168CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Pietrow PK, Auge BK, Delvecchio FC, Silverstein AD, Weizer AZ, Albala DM, Preminger GM (2002) Techniques to maximize flexible ureteroscope longevity. Urology 60(5):784–788CrossRefPubMed Pietrow PK, Auge BK, Delvecchio FC, Silverstein AD, Weizer AZ, Albala DM, Preminger GM (2002) Techniques to maximize flexible ureteroscope longevity. Urology 60(5):784–788CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Monga M, Best S, Venkatesh R, Ames C, Lee C, Kuskowski M, Schwartz S, Vanlangendock R, Skenazy J, Landman J (2006) Durability of flexible ureteroscopes: a randomized, prospective study. J Urol 176(1):137–141CrossRefPubMed Monga M, Best S, Venkatesh R, Ames C, Lee C, Kuskowski M, Schwartz S, Vanlangendock R, Skenazy J, Landman J (2006) Durability of flexible ureteroscopes: a randomized, prospective study. J Urol 176(1):137–141CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Traxer O, Dubosq F, Jamali K, Gattegno B, Thibault P (2006) New-generation flexible ureterorenoscopes are more durable than previous ones. Urology 68(2):276–279CrossRefPubMed Traxer O, Dubosq F, Jamali K, Gattegno B, Thibault P (2006) New-generation flexible ureterorenoscopes are more durable than previous ones. Urology 68(2):276–279CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Carey RI, Gomez CS, Maurici G, Lynne CM, Leveillee RJ, Bird VG (2006) Frequency of ureteroscope damage seen at a tertiary care center. J Urol 176(2):607–610CrossRefPubMed Carey RI, Gomez CS, Maurici G, Lynne CM, Leveillee RJ, Bird VG (2006) Frequency of ureteroscope damage seen at a tertiary care center. J Urol 176(2):607–610CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Knudsen B, Miyaoka R, Shah K, Holden T, Turk TM, Pedro RN, Kriedberg C, Hinck B, Ortiz-Alvarado O, Monga M (2010) Durability of the next-generation flexible fiberoptic ureteroscopes: a randomized prospective multi-institutional clinical trial. Urology 75(3):534–538CrossRefPubMed Knudsen B, Miyaoka R, Shah K, Holden T, Turk TM, Pedro RN, Kriedberg C, Hinck B, Ortiz-Alvarado O, Monga M (2010) Durability of the next-generation flexible fiberoptic ureteroscopes: a randomized prospective multi-institutional clinical trial. Urology 75(3):534–538CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Defidio L, De Dominicis M, Di Gianfrancesco L, Fuchs G, Patel A (2012) Improving flexible ureterorenoscope durability up to 100 procedures. J Endourol 26(10):1329–1334CrossRefPubMed Defidio L, De Dominicis M, Di Gianfrancesco L, Fuchs G, Patel A (2012) Improving flexible ureterorenoscope durability up to 100 procedures. J Endourol 26(10):1329–1334CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Karaolides T, Bach C, Kachrilas S, Goyal A, Masood J, Buchholz N (2013) Improving the durability of digital flexible ureteroscopes. Urology 81(4):717–722CrossRefPubMed Karaolides T, Bach C, Kachrilas S, Goyal A, Masood J, Buchholz N (2013) Improving the durability of digital flexible ureteroscopes. Urology 81(4):717–722CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Carey RI, Martin CJ, Knego JR (2014) Prospective evaluation of refurbished flexible ureteroscope durability seen in a large public tertiary care center with multiple surgeons. Urology 84(1):42–45CrossRefPubMed Carey RI, Martin CJ, Knego JR (2014) Prospective evaluation of refurbished flexible ureteroscope durability seen in a large public tertiary care center with multiple surgeons. Urology 84(1):42–45CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Multescu R, Geavlete B, Georgescu D, Geavlete P (2014) Improved durability of flex-Xc digital flexible ureteroscope: how long can you expect it to last? Urology 84(1):32–35CrossRefPubMed Multescu R, Geavlete B, Georgescu D, Geavlete P (2014) Improved durability of flex-Xc digital flexible ureteroscope: how long can you expect it to last? Urology 84(1):32–35CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah K, Monga M, Knudsen B (2015) Prospective randomized trial comparing 2 flexible digital ureteroscopes: aCMI/Olympus invisio DUR-D and Olympus URF-V. Urology 85(6):1267–1271CrossRefPubMed Shah K, Monga M, Knudsen B (2015) Prospective randomized trial comparing 2 flexible digital ureteroscopes: aCMI/Olympus invisio DUR-D and Olympus URF-V. Urology 85(6):1267–1271CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Landman J, Lee DI, Lee C, Monga M (2003) Evaluation of overall costs of currently available small flexible ureteroscopes. Urology 62(2):218–222CrossRefPubMed Landman J, Lee DI, Lee C, Monga M (2003) Evaluation of overall costs of currently available small flexible ureteroscopes. Urology 62(2):218–222CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kramolowsky E, McDowell Z, Moore B, Booth B, Wood N (2016) Cost analysis of flexible ureteroscope repairs: evaluation of 655 procedures in a community-based practice. J Endourol 30(3):254–256CrossRefPubMed Kramolowsky E, McDowell Z, Moore B, Booth B, Wood N (2016) Cost analysis of flexible ureteroscope repairs: evaluation of 655 procedures in a community-based practice. J Endourol 30(3):254–256CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Semins MJ, George S, Allaf ME, Matlaga BR (2009) Ureteroscope cleaning and sterilization by the urology operating room team: the effect on repair costs. J Endourol 23(6):903–905CrossRefPubMed Semins MJ, George S, Allaf ME, Matlaga BR (2009) Ureteroscope cleaning and sterilization by the urology operating room team: the effect on repair costs. J Endourol 23(6):903–905CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sung JC, Springhart WP, Marguet CG, L’Esperance JO, Tan YH, Albala DM, Preminger GM (2005) Location and etiology of flexible and semirigid ureteroscope damage. Urology 66(5):958–963CrossRefPubMed Sung JC, Springhart WP, Marguet CG, L’Esperance JO, Tan YH, Albala DM, Preminger GM (2005) Location and etiology of flexible and semirigid ureteroscope damage. Urology 66(5):958–963CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Abraham JB, Abdelshehid CS, Lee HJ, Box GN, Deane LA, Le T, Jellison F, Borin JF, Manipon A, McDougall EM, Clayman RV (2007) Rapid communication: effects of steris 1 sterilization and Cidex ortho-phthalaldehyde high-level disinfection on durability of new-generation flexible ureteroscopes. J Endourol 21(9):985–992CrossRefPubMed Abraham JB, Abdelshehid CS, Lee HJ, Box GN, Deane LA, Le T, Jellison F, Borin JF, Manipon A, McDougall EM, Clayman RV (2007) Rapid communication: effects of steris 1 sterilization and Cidex ortho-phthalaldehyde high-level disinfection on durability of new-generation flexible ureteroscopes. J Endourol 21(9):985–992CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Qahtani SM, Geavlete B, de Medina SG, Traxer OP (2011) The new Olympus digital flexible ureteroscope (URF-V): initial experience. Urol Ann 3(3):133–137CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Al-Qahtani SM, Geavlete B, de Medina SG, Traxer OP (2011) The new Olympus digital flexible ureteroscope (URF-V): initial experience. Urol Ann 3(3):133–137CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Tosoian JJ, Ludwig W, Sopko N, Mullins JK, Matlaga BR (2015) The effect of repair costs on the profitability of a ureteroscopy program. J Endourol 29(4):406–409CrossRefPubMed Tosoian JJ, Ludwig W, Sopko N, Mullins JK, Matlaga BR (2015) The effect of repair costs on the profitability of a ureteroscopy program. J Endourol 29(4):406–409CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Cone EB, Eisner BH, Ursiny M, Pareek G (2014) Cost-effectiveness comparison of renal calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol 28(6):639–643CrossRefPubMed Cone EB, Eisner BH, Ursiny M, Pareek G (2014) Cost-effectiveness comparison of renal calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol 28(6):639–643CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Bagley DH (1987) Flexible ureteropyeloscopy with modular, “disposable” endoscope. Urology 29(3):296–300CrossRefPubMed Bagley DH (1987) Flexible ureteropyeloscopy with modular, “disposable” endoscope. Urology 29(3):296–300CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Boylu U, Oommen M, Thomas R, Lee BR (2009) In vitro comparison of a disposable flexible ureteroscope and conventional flexible ureteroscopes. J Urol 182(5):2347–2351CrossRefPubMed Boylu U, Oommen M, Thomas R, Lee BR (2009) In vitro comparison of a disposable flexible ureteroscope and conventional flexible ureteroscopes. J Urol 182(5):2347–2351CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Walther S, Schlenker B, Tilki D, Hocaoglu Y, Sroka R, Stief CG, Reich O (2010) The Polyscope: a modular design, semidisposable flexible ureterorenoscope system. J Endourol 24(7):1061–1066CrossRefPubMed Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Walther S, Schlenker B, Tilki D, Hocaoglu Y, Sroka R, Stief CG, Reich O (2010) The Polyscope: a modular design, semidisposable flexible ureterorenoscope system. J Endourol 24(7):1061–1066CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Bansal H, Swain S, Sharma GK, Mathanya M, Trivedi S, Dwivedi US, Singh PB (2011) Polyscope: a new era in flexible ureterorenoscopy. J Endourol 25(2):317–321CrossRefPubMed Bansal H, Swain S, Sharma GK, Mathanya M, Trivedi S, Dwivedi US, Singh PB (2011) Polyscope: a new era in flexible ureterorenoscopy. J Endourol 25(2):317–321CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Ding J, Xu D, Cao Q, Huang T, Zhu Y, Huang K, Chen Y, Liang C, Qi J, Huang Y (2015) Comparing the efficacy of a multimodular flexible ureteroscope with its conventional counterpart in the management of renal stones. Urology 86(2):224–229CrossRefPubMed Ding J, Xu D, Cao Q, Huang T, Zhu Y, Huang K, Chen Y, Liang C, Qi J, Huang Y (2015) Comparing the efficacy of a multimodular flexible ureteroscope with its conventional counterpart in the management of renal stones. Urology 86(2):224–229CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Noronha AM, Brozak S (2014) A 21st century nosocomial issue with endoscopes. BMJ 19(348):g2047CrossRef Noronha AM, Brozak S (2014) A 21st century nosocomial issue with endoscopes. BMJ 19(348):g2047CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang CL, Su LH, Lu CM, Tai FT, Huang YC, Chang KK (2013) Outbreak of ertapenem-resistant Enterobacter cloacae urinary tract infections due to a contaminated ureteroscope. J Hosp Infect 85(2):118–124CrossRefPubMed Chang CL, Su LH, Lu CM, Tai FT, Huang YC, Chang KK (2013) Outbreak of ertapenem-resistant Enterobacter cloacae urinary tract infections due to a contaminated ureteroscope. J Hosp Infect 85(2):118–124CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
First clinical evaluation of a new single-use flexible ureteroscope (LithoVue™): a European prospective multicentric feasibility study
verfasst von
Steeve Doizi
Guido Kamphuis
Guido Giusti
Kim Hovgaard Andreassen
Thomas Knoll
Palle Jörn Osther
Cesare Scoffone
Daniel Pérez-Fentes
Silvia Proietti
Oliver Wiseman
Jean de la Rosette
Olivier Traxer
Publikationsdatum
26.09.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
World Journal of Urology / Ausgabe 5/2017
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1936-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2017

World Journal of Urology 5/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Viel pflanzliche Nahrung, seltener Prostata-Ca.-Progression

12.05.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Ein hoher Anteil pflanzlicher Nahrung trägt möglicherweise dazu bei, das Progressionsrisiko von Männern mit Prostatakarzinomen zu senken. In einer US-Studie war das Risiko bei ausgeprägter pflanzlicher Ernährung in etwa halbiert.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Hypertherme Chemotherapie bietet Chance auf Blasenerhalt

07.05.2024 Harnblasenkarzinom Nachrichten

Eine hypertherme intravesikale Chemotherapie mit Mitomycin kann für Patienten mit hochriskantem nicht muskelinvasivem Blasenkrebs eine Alternative zur radikalen Zystektomie darstellen. Kölner Urologen berichten über ihre Erfahrungen.

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.