Skip to main content
Erschienen in: coloproctology 5/2018

27.07.2018 | Übersichten

Frequency of metachronous polyps and adenocarcinoma in the interposed colon after esophagectomy in adults

Protocol of a systematic review

verfasst von: Dr. M. Sohn, A. Agha, E. Trum, C. Moser, I. Iesalnieks, F. Gundling, F. Aigner, P. Ritschl

Erschienen in: coloproctology | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Colon interposition counts among the most common techniques for reconstruction of the intestinal passage after esophagectomy. Data on metachronous mucosal pathologies such as adenoma and adenocarcinoma in the literature are weak, and no systematic reviews or meta-analyses exist. The planned analysis aims to assess the frequency of polyp growth and/or development of adenocarcinoma in adult colon interposition patients. Therefore, a systematic review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines in the following databases: Medline/PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane database for randomized trials (CENTRAL), Bayerische Staatsbibliothek München, Library of the University Hospital Regensburg, Germany, Library of the Charité, University Hospital Berlin. All studies (randomized and non-randomized, case series, case reports) reporting on adult patients with colon interposition for reconstruction of the intestinal passage after esophagectomy for benign (e. g., Boerhaave syndrome, trauma, corrosive injury) or malignant reasons (esophageal cancer) are eligible for data analysis. Randomized and non-randomized studies will be included into the qualitative analysis. The review protocol and the systematic review itself are constructed in accordance with the PRISMA statement and the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews. This systematic review protocol is registered with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (http://​www.​crd.​york.​ac.​uk/​prospero) as CRD42017082144.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bollschweiler E, Schloesser T, Leers J, Vallböhmer D, Schäfer H, Hölscher AH (2009) High prevalence of colonic polyps in white males with esophageal adenocarcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 52(2):299–304CrossRef Bollschweiler E, Schloesser T, Leers J, Vallböhmer D, Schäfer H, Hölscher AH (2009) High prevalence of colonic polyps in white males with esophageal adenocarcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 52(2):299–304CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins J, Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated march 2011]. The Cochrane collaboration. http://handbook.cochrane.org. Accessed 25.10.2017 Higgins J, Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated march 2011]. The Cochrane collaboration. http://​handbook.​cochrane.​org. Accessed 25.10.2017
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M et al (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 349:g7647CrossRef Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M et al (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 349:g7647CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M et al (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 4:1CrossRef Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M et al (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 4:1CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lo CK-L, Mertz D, Loeb M (2014) Newcastle-Ottawa Scale: comparing reviewers’ to authors’ assessments. BMC Med Res Methodol 14:45CrossRef Lo CK-L, Mertz D, Loeb M (2014) Newcastle-Ottawa Scale: comparing reviewers’ to authors’ assessments. BMC Med Res Methodol 14:45CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ, for the GRADE Working Group (2008) Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336:924–926CrossRef Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ, for the GRADE Working Group (2008) Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336:924–926CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Frequency of metachronous polyps and adenocarcinoma in the interposed colon after esophagectomy in adults
Protocol of a systematic review
verfasst von
Dr. M. Sohn
A. Agha
E. Trum
C. Moser
I. Iesalnieks
F. Gundling
F. Aigner
P. Ritschl
Publikationsdatum
27.07.2018
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
coloproctology / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0174-2442
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-6730
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00053-018-0280-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

coloproctology 5/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.