Background
Metatarsal fractures are one of the most common injuries of the midfoot with an incidence of up to 75 persons per 100,000 per year among adults [
1‐
3]. More than half of all metatarsal fractures involve the fifth metatarsal bone and the majority is located at the proximal end [
1,
3]. The peak incidence of fifth metatarsal fractures in men is below the age of 40, whereas mostly women older than 50 years are affected [
3,
4]. Over time different classification systems were developed according to the location and number of fragments [
5‐
7]. The Lawrence and Botte classification is most frequently used nowadays [
8]. The authors distinguish between three types of fractures to the proximal fifth metatarsal bone: type I includes tuberosity avulsion fractures, proximal to the intermetatarsal joint (L&B type I), whereas type II fractures are located at the intermetatarsal joint (L&B type II), and type III fractures are defined as diaphyseal stress fractures, distal to the intermetatarsal joint (L&B type III) [
8]. In a rather current review of the literature Polzer et al. concluded that acute fractures to the proximal fifth metatarsal should be classified into ‘epi-metaphyseal’ (beyond the distal end of the intermetatarsal articulation) and metaphyseal fractures (at the distal end of the intermetatarsal articulation) [
9]. Their meta-analysis showed, that L&B type I and II fractures have an equivalent outcome and thus can be summarized as ‘epi-metaphyseal’ fractures [
9].
In the literature different definitions of ‘Jones fractures’ were developed [
10]. Following the classification of Dameron diaphyseal stress fractures, distal to the intermetatarsal joint, are so-called ‘Jones fractures’ (L&B type III) [
5]. According to Lawrence and Botte ‘Jones fractures’ are located at the intermetatarsal joint (L&B type II) [
8]. Due to the different terminology, there is no standardized treatment recommendation for all fracture types of the proximal fifth metatarsal bone [
10]. According to the existing studies L&B type I and II fractures can be satisfactory managed conservatively [
11‐
13]. But there are also studies recommending surgical treatment of ‘Jones fractures’ [
14,
15]. L&B type III fractures should be treated surgically due to their higher likelihood of pseudarthrosis following conservative management [
10,
16]. Overall the outcome of adequately treated fractures to the proximal fifth metatarsal bone is good to excellent [
3].
The aim of the presented study was to provide further evidence for treatment recommendations by analyzing the functional outcome following operative as well as conservative treatment of fractures to the proximal fifth metatarsal bone.
Methods
After ethical board approval (No: 409/15 S, Technical University of Munich) the retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2003 and 2015 in a level I trauma center. All patients presenting with a fracture to the proximal fifth metatarsal bone at the department of trauma and orthopedic surgery were reviewed for enrollment. Only patients > 18 years, who were capable of giving informed consent, suffering from a closed fracture to the proximal fifth metatarsal bone were enrolled. The outcome of conservatively and operatively managed patients was analyzed. All patients with a fracture at the same leg, multiple metatarsal fractures, pathological fractures, substance abuse, presenting for revision surgery after external operation and with legal guardian were excluded from the study.
For the evaluation of the functional outcome following fracture of the proximal fifth metatarsal bone the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) was used. The FAOS is a self-administered patient-relevant outcome questionnaire consisting of 42 items (range: 0–100). The German version of the FAOS is a valid and reliable instrument for foot and ankle patients [
17]. After hospital treatment and standard postoperative visits, patients were invited by mail to complete the FAOS. Only patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months were included for further analysis. The main focus of the study was the long-term functional outcome following fractures to the fifth metatarsal bone. Unless otherwise stated, i.e., revision surgery or change of treatment, the bone healed uneventfully following operative and conservative treatment.
Fractures to the base of the fifth metatarsal were classified based on radiographs using the Lawrence and Botte classification system [
8]. According to Polzer et al. L&B type I and II fractures can be classified as one entity based on the prognosis and therapeutic consequences [
9]. Considering this aspect, we performed an additional analysis with these groups.
General data such as age, gender, affected side, date of latest follow-up, time between fracture and surgery and reoperation rate were collected. Operative treatment involved open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with screw, plate or K-wire osteosynthesis. The treating senior trauma surgeon specialized in foot and ankle surgery evaluated the type of fracture and determined the treatment. Indications for surgery were comminution, displacement > 2 mm, age and functional demand. The forms of fixation were determined by the treating senior trauma surgeon depending on the type of fracture (localization, comminution, bone quality). Patients with conservative treatment performed partial weight bearing with 15 kg for 6 weeks with crutches and a walking boot undergoing regular radiographic evaluations. After 6 weeks and proper radiographic follow-up patients were allowed to remove the walking boot and start with full weight bearing. The standard outpatient aftercare involves visits to the ambulatory facility with radiographic follow-ups 6 weeks, 3 months and 1 year after trauma.
Statistics
Data were presented as median ± standard deviation (SD) or minimum and maximum (min; max). RStudio [RStudio Team (2020). RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA URL
http://www.rstudio.com/] was used for data processing.
Shapiro–Wilk test was performed to test for normality. The nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test was used to assess significant differences between two groups. To assess the correlation between two variables, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was calculated. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Discussion
In general, metatarsal fractures are one of the ten most common skeletal fractures in adults [
2]. The majority of these foot injuries affect the proximal fifth metatarsal bone [
1,
3]. Treatment recommendations were derived depending on different fracture entities. In the current literature there is still critical discourse whether operative or conservative treatment of fractures to the proximal fifth metatarsal bone is superior [
10]. Therefore, the aim of the presented study was to provide further evidence for treatment recommendations by analyzing the functional outcome following operative as well as conservative treatment of fractures to the fifth metatarsal bone.
Overall, the functional outcome of 103 patients suffering from fifth metatarsal bone fractures was assessed. The majority of the patients were female (61%) and on average older than the enrolled male patients. Epidemiological studies of metatarsal fractures also demonstrated a similar age and gender distribution with peak incidences in women around the age or older than 50 years [
3,
4].
The functional outcome of L&B type I fractures was satisfactory with a median FAOS score of 91 following a nonoperative treatment (
n = 10). This is in accordance with other studies advocating a conservative treatment for this fracture type to the proximal fifth metatarsal bone [
12,
18,
19]. Outcome was assessed with the Visual Analogue Scale Foot and Ankle Questionnaire (VAS FA) and reported as good to excellent following conservative treatment [
19,
20]. The VAS FA is a subjective patient reported score based on 20 questions [
21]. In contrast to the FAOS some subscales are underrepresented or missing [
17]. The type of conservative treatment included a short walking boot/cast and crutches for 5 weeks or a double-layered elasticated bandage/below the knee-walking cast for 4 weeks [
19,
20]. Patients were not advised to partially weight bear and in some cases only received a symptomatic treatment without immobilization. Comparing the 1 year results of Shahid et al. with the presented findings, the long-term outcome after conservative treatment seems to be independent of the treatment protocol [
20]. The advantage of a functional treatment with full weight bearing is an early-return-to-work and can be satisfactory employed, independent of displacement, articular involvement and comminution [
11,
12].
Patients with an L&B type II fracture presented with a FAOS score of 91 a very good functional outcome. In the analyzed patient cohort conservative management (FAOS = 91) was equivalent in comparison to operative treatment (FAOS = 89) regarding the functional score. Despite some studies supporting surgery in these kind of fractures [
14,
15,
22], there is growing evidence in the literature that conservative treatment results in excellent functional outcome [
12,
13,
23]. The discrepancies might be due to inconsistent definition of fracture types among the studies since exact fracture location is decisive for prognosis. Following the classification of Dameron diaphyseal stress fractures, distal to the intermetatarsal joint, are so-called ‘Jones fractures’ (L&B type III) [
5]. According to Lawrence and Botte ‘Jones fractures’ are located at the intermetatarsal joint (L&B type II) [
8]. These inconsistencies regarding the classification systems can lead to inconclusive results in meta-analysis.
The presented results of L&B type I and II fractures strongly support the findings of Polzer et al. and their derived terminology combining type I and type II fractures in ‘epi-metaphyseal’ (L&B type I and II) and metaphyseal (L&B type III) fractures, since they show similar prognosis following operative and nonoperative treatment [
9].
Patients with L&B type III fractures presented an overall FAOS score of 93 and the treatment in most cases was operatively. Surgically treated patients tended to have a better functional outcome in comparison to conservative treatment without reaching level of significance. This is in line with other studies recommending operative treatment for these fracture types to the fifth metatarsal bone [
14,
16]. In a systematic review Roche et al. concluded, that nonoperative treatment is likely to lead to a higher failure rate than early surgical intervention in L&B type III fractures [
14]. In a randomized control trial Mologne et al. demonstrated that screw osteosynthesis lead to a significant lower failure rate in comparison to immobilization in a short leg cast [
16]. Due to the different healing progress following operative and nonoperative treatment, Polzer et al. concluded that fractures to the proximal fifth metatarsal bone should be classified as ‘epi-metaphyseal’ and metaphyseal [
9]. Looking at the anatomy, this division into two zones follows the watershed line of blood supply of the proximal fifth metatarsal bone. Proximal to this watershed line (L&B type I and II) there is a rich intraosseous blood supply by numerous vessels of the lateral tarsal artery penetrating the non-articular surfaces of the tuberosity. The metaphyseal zone (L&B type III) is supplied by retrograde branches of a discrete nutrient artery [
24,
25]. This results in a zone of relative lack of blood supply around this watershed line contributing to a delayed union or nonunion following trauma [
9,
24,
25].
In the analyzed study age did not affect the functional outcome, which is in line with previous published studies showing no significant influence of patient age on the functional outcome [
12,
13,
26].
Limitations of the study are the retrospective design and small number of patients in certain subgroups. Furthermore, long-term clinical and radiological results were not part of the study and thus the revision rate needs to be interpreted with caution. But to the best of our knowledge, the presented work reports about the largest patient population suffering from fractures to the fifth metatarsal bone using a self-reported patient outcome measurement questionnaire to assess and analyze functional outcome.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.