Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 5/2019

11.03.2019 | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Guidance for elective single-embryo transfer should be applied to frozen embryo transfer cycles

verfasst von: Melanie R. Freeman, M. Shaun Hinds, Kay G. Howard, Julie M. Howard, George A. Hill

Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Ausgabe 5/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To provide clinicians with data showing the benefits of transferring a single blastocyst in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles so that they may counsel their patients accordingly.

Methods

This is a closed cohort study of 678 FET cycles occurring between January 2011 and December 2017 in a private IVF laboratory and associated physicians’ practice. Patients included in the analysis were less than 38 years of age at oocyte collection, had at least two vitrified blastocysts, and were undergoing their first autologous FET cycle. The patients were categorized into four groups after they had chosen either elective single-embryo transfer (eSET) or double-embryo transfer (eDET). Outcomes for eSET and eDET were compared within groups of patients having freeze-all IVF cycles (PGT-A patient vs. non-PGT-A patient) and fresh IVF transfer groups (negative outcome vs. pregnant/delivered in fresh cycle). Main outcome measures of the study were live birth, multiple pregnancy, and implantation rates.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences observed in live birth rates for eSET (54–62%) vs. eDET (54–66%) (P = 0.696–1.000) in the four patient groups evaluated. Multiple pregnancy rates were significantly decreased in all eSET groups (0–3%), compared with eDET groups (24–65%) (P = 0.0001–0.037).

Conclusions

This data shows that transfer of a single vitrified-warmed blastocyst maintains live birth rates, while decreasing multiple pregnancies, and may become more acceptable to physicians and patients.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hazekamp J, Bergh C, Wennerholm UB, Hovatta O, Karlström PO, Selbing A. Avoiding multiple pregnancies in ART: consideration of new strategies. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1217–9.CrossRefPubMed Hazekamp J, Bergh C, Wennerholm UB, Hovatta O, Karlström PO, Selbing A. Avoiding multiple pregnancies in ART: consideration of new strategies. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1217–9.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Qin JB, Wang H, Sheng X, Xie Q, Gao S. Assisted reproductive technology and risk of adverse obstetric outcomes in dichorionic twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:1180–92.CrossRefPubMed Qin JB, Wang H, Sheng X, Xie Q, Gao S. Assisted reproductive technology and risk of adverse obstetric outcomes in dichorionic twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:1180–92.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang YA, Chughtai AA, Farquhar CM, Pollock W, Lui K, Sullivan EA. Increased incidence of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia after assisted reproductive technology treatment. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:920–6.CrossRefPubMed Wang YA, Chughtai AA, Farquhar CM, Pollock W, Lui K, Sullivan EA. Increased incidence of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia after assisted reproductive technology treatment. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:920–6.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Qin J, Wang H, Sheng X, Liang D, Tan H, Xia J. Pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in multiple pregnancies resulting from assisted reproductive technology: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:1492–508.CrossRefPubMed Qin J, Wang H, Sheng X, Liang D, Tan H, Xia J. Pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in multiple pregnancies resulting from assisted reproductive technology: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:1492–508.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Daniel Y, Ochshorn Y, Fait G, Geva E, Bar-Am A, Lessing J. Analysis of 104 twin pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive technologies and 193 spontaneously conceived twin pregnancies. Fertil Steril. 2000;74:683–9.CrossRefPubMed Daniel Y, Ochshorn Y, Fait G, Geva E, Bar-Am A, Lessing J. Analysis of 104 twin pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive technologies and 193 spontaneously conceived twin pregnancies. Fertil Steril. 2000;74:683–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lemos EV, Zhang D, Van Voorhis BJ, Hu H. Healthcare expenses associated with multiple vs singleton pregnancies in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209:586e1–11.CrossRef Lemos EV, Zhang D, Van Voorhis BJ, Hu H. Healthcare expenses associated with multiple vs singleton pregnancies in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209:586e1–11.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee MS, Evans BT, Stern AD, Hornstein MD. Economic implications of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology embryo transfer guidelines: healthcare dollars saved by reducing iatrogenic triplets. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:189–95.CrossRefPubMed Lee MS, Evans BT, Stern AD, Hornstein MD. Economic implications of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology embryo transfer guidelines: healthcare dollars saved by reducing iatrogenic triplets. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:189–95.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Crawford S, Boulet SL, Mneimneh AS, Perkins KM, Jamieson DJ, Zhang Y, et al. Costs of achieving live birth from assisted reproductive technology: a comparison of sequential single and double embryo transfer approaches. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:444–50.CrossRefPubMed Crawford S, Boulet SL, Mneimneh AS, Perkins KM, Jamieson DJ, Zhang Y, et al. Costs of achieving live birth from assisted reproductive technology: a comparison of sequential single and double embryo transfer approaches. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:444–50.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Practice Committee, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Guidelines on the number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:773–4.CrossRef Practice Committee, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Guidelines on the number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:773–4.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Guidelines on number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(Suppl 4):S51–2. Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Guidelines on number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(Suppl 4):S51–2.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Criteria for number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:44–6.CrossRef Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Criteria for number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:44–6.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, and the Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Guidance on the limits to the number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:901–3.CrossRef Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, and the Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Guidance on the limits to the number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:901–3.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Int J Surgery. 2014;12:1500–24.CrossRef Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Int J Surgery. 2014;12:1500–24.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Mukaida T, Nakamura S, Tomiyama T, Wada S, Kasai M, Takahashi K. Successful birth after transfer of vitrified human blastocysts with use of a cryoloop containerless technique. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:618–20.CrossRefPubMed Mukaida T, Nakamura S, Tomiyama T, Wada S, Kasai M, Takahashi K. Successful birth after transfer of vitrified human blastocysts with use of a cryoloop containerless technique. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:618–20.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Schoolcraft WB, Gardner DK, Lane M, Schlenker T, Hamilton F, Meldrum DR. Blastocyst culture and transfer analysis of results and parameters affecting outcome in two in vitro fertilization programs. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:604–9.CrossRefPubMed Schoolcraft WB, Gardner DK, Lane M, Schlenker T, Hamilton F, Meldrum DR. Blastocyst culture and transfer analysis of results and parameters affecting outcome in two in vitro fertilization programs. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:604–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin AS, Chang J, Zhang Y, Kawwass JF, Boulet SL, McKane P, et al. Perinatal outcomes among singletons after assisted reproductive technology with single-embryo or double-embryo transfer versus no assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:954–66.CrossRefPubMed Martin AS, Chang J, Zhang Y, Kawwass JF, Boulet SL, McKane P, et al. Perinatal outcomes among singletons after assisted reproductive technology with single-embryo or double-embryo transfer versus no assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:954–66.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Li Z, Wang YA, Ledger W, Edgar DH, Sullivan EA. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:2794–801.CrossRefPubMed Li Z, Wang YA, Ledger W, Edgar DH, Sullivan EA. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:2794–801.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Tobias T, Sharara FI, Franasiak JM, Heiser PW, Pinckney-Clark E. Promoting the use of elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice. Fertil Res Pract. 2016;2:1–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tobias T, Sharara FI, Franasiak JM, Heiser PW, Pinckney-Clark E. Promoting the use of elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice. Fertil Res Pract. 2016;2:1–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mersereau J, Stanhiser J, Coddington C, Jones T, Luke B, Brown MB. Patient and cycle characteristics predicting high pregnancy rates with single – embryo transfer: an analysis of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology outcomes between 2004 and 2013. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:750–6.CrossRefPubMed Mersereau J, Stanhiser J, Coddington C, Jones T, Luke B, Brown MB. Patient and cycle characteristics predicting high pregnancy rates with single – embryo transfer: an analysis of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology outcomes between 2004 and 2013. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:750–6.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Stillman RJ, Richter KS, Banks NK, Graham JR. Elective single embryo transfer: a 6 – year progressive implementation of 784 single blastocyst transfers and the influence of payment method on patient choice. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1895–906.CrossRefPubMed Stillman RJ, Richter KS, Banks NK, Graham JR. Elective single embryo transfer: a 6 – year progressive implementation of 784 single blastocyst transfers and the influence of payment method on patient choice. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1895–906.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Mullin CM, Fino ME, Talebian S, Krey LC, Licciardi F, Griffo JA. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes in elective single blastocyst transfer versus double blastocyst transfer stratified by age. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:1837–43.CrossRefPubMed Mullin CM, Fino ME, Talebian S, Krey LC, Licciardi F, Griffo JA. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes in elective single blastocyst transfer versus double blastocyst transfer stratified by age. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:1837–43.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Berin I, McLellan ST, Macklin EA, Toth TL, Wright DL. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: clinical outcomes of single and double blastocyst transfers. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:575–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Berin I, McLellan ST, Macklin EA, Toth TL, Wright DL. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: clinical outcomes of single and double blastocyst transfers. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:575–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Fiddelers AAA, Nieman FHM, Dumoulin JCM, van Montfoort APA, Land JA, Evers JLH, et al. During IVF treatment patient preference shifts from singletons towards twins but only a few patients show an actual reversal of preference. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:2092–100.CrossRefPubMed Fiddelers AAA, Nieman FHM, Dumoulin JCM, van Montfoort APA, Land JA, Evers JLH, et al. During IVF treatment patient preference shifts from singletons towards twins but only a few patients show an actual reversal of preference. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:2092–100.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C, Thomas S. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfers in high responders. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:516–8.CrossRefPubMed Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C, Thomas S. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfers in high responders. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:516–8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Guidance for elective single-embryo transfer should be applied to frozen embryo transfer cycles
verfasst von
Melanie R. Freeman
M. Shaun Hinds
Kay G. Howard
Julie M. Howard
George A. Hill
Publikationsdatum
11.03.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Ausgabe 5/2019
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01433-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2019

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 5/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.