Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation (HBCR) In Post-TAVR Patients: A Prospective, Single-Center, Cohort, Pilot Study

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is recommended in both intermediate- and high-risk patients with severe symptomatic or asymptomatic aortic stenosis [1]. Since its approval in 2011, more than 260,000 TAVRs have been performed on patients who are at high risk for surgical AVRs. As such, the role of cardiac rehabilitation in restoring functional capacity after TAVR has been widely studied. Several studies have shown an improvement in exercise tolerance, functional independence, and quality of life in post-TAVR patients who participated in cardiac rehabilitation [2‐6]. However, lack of transportation and limited access to rehabilitation programs prohibit participation in cardiac rehab [7]. To increase participation by reducing such barriers, the Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) started a 12-week-long, physician-supervised, nurse-managed, home-based cardiac rehab (HBCR) program in 2010 for patients with a broad range of cardiovascular disease conditions. In our prospective, single-center, one-arm study, we sought to assess the functional status of 14 patients who completed HBCR after TAVR between 2015 and 2018 through the Gainesville VAMC, a major referral center for TAVRs in the VA system.

Fifty-nine patients who underwent TAVR at NFSG VAMC from 2015 to 2018 were offered the HBCR program the time of discharge. Forty-one enrolled, 28 completed the program, and 14 of those completed the surveys (Table 1). Of the patients who participated in the program, two were females. The geographical locations of participants are shown in Fig. 1. No other baseline characteristics or lab values were collected as a part of this pilot study.

Inclusion criteria for enrollment in HBCR included age greater than 18 years, TAVR within 12 months, and ability to read, write, and fill-out questionnaires. Exclusion criteria were inability to attend daily exercise, complex ventricular arrhythmias, resting systolic blood pressure greater than 200 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure greater than 100 mmHg, decompensated congestive heart failure, history of arrhythmia with syncope, severe symptomatic untreated valvular disease, unstable angina, dementia, or other higher cognitive impairment limiting participation, and life expectancy of less than 1 year.

All eligible patients were referred for HBCR at time of discharge and the program lasted for 12 weeks. Participants filled out a baseline assessment questionnaire prior to participation indicating their functional capacity. Individualized plans including strength, aerobic, and balance exercises were then created for each participant based on their capacity and goals. A basic beginner’s exercise plan is shown below:

Equipment such as resistance bands, peddler, pedometer, BP cuff, and scale were provided for use at home. A pedometer was used to track steps while walking; a stationary peddler was used for upper or lower extremity exercise; and resistance bands were used for strengthening exercises. Through weekly telephone supervision from a nurse, participants performed up to 2 h of physical exercise at home per day. Education about a healthy diet, food preparation, and logging intake of food was also provided. Furthermore, counseling on smoking cessation, stress management, and psychosocial consultation was also provided via weekly telephone calls.

Various performance measures including Life’s Simple 7 survey, 6-min Walk (6-MW), Duke Activity Survey Index (DASI), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) health survey were used to assess the pre- and post-HBCR changes in emotional, functional, and physical well-being of the patients.

After 12 weeks of HBCR, 14 out of the 28 who participated in the program completed all the questionnaires. Paired comparisons using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test are listed in Table 2.

Notable findings include:

According to the 2017 focused update of AHA guidelines, TAVR is recommended for both intermediate and high-risk surgical candidates with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis [1]. The American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation (AACVPR) recommends cardiac rehabilitation for patients with myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), chronic stable angina, peripheral arterial disease (PAD), and stable systolic heart failure patients [12]. However, no guidelines exist for cardiac rehabilitation, including home-based options, for post-TAVR patients despite various studies showing that it prolongs survival, reduces re-admission rates, and improves overall functional status in this patient population [1‐4]. A more recent 2019 meta-analysis which included both sAVR and TAVR patients also reported a probable improvement in the exercise capacity of these patients after cardiac rehabilitation [6].

While the benefits of cardiac rehabilitation are well known, most programs are based either in a hospital or an outpatient center. As such, factors such as lack of transportation, time away from work, and access to rehabilitation programs present major barriers to participation in cardiac rehab [13]. To mitigate these barriers, physician-led, nurse-supervised home-based cardiac rehabilitation programs were started at several VAMCs throughout the country. Individualized exercise plans were created for the patients based on their capacity and goals and needed equipment was provided for use at home. Additionally, education about diet, smoking cessation, and stress management was also provided via weekly telephone calls. We studied the functional outcomes of 14 patients who completed HBCR at North Florida South Georgia VAMC in Gainesville, FL. Various performance measures mentioned in the Methods section were used for this assessment.

Per the latest statistics released by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, women make up 10% of the veterans [14]. This is in close alignment with the percentage of women in our study population, 14% (two out of 14 patients). Given the subjectivity and personal onus involved in the completion of surveys, it is not entirely surprising that only half (14 out of 28) the veterans who finished the HBCR program filled out the surveys. Additionally, due to the remote nature of the program and the scattered locations of our patients across two states (as shown in Fig. 1), we did not require all participants to drive back to the clinic to complete the 6-MW test. As a result, only six of the 14 patients completed the post-HBCR 6-MW test while the remaining eight completed the rehab program via telephone. The mean 6-MW distance for these six patients before HBCR was 584 feet and the mean distance after HBCR was 620 feet. Due to limitation of sample size, Wilcoxon signed-rank comparison was not performed for the 6-MW test. As a result, only five of the 14 patients completed the post-HBCR 6-MW test while the remaining eight completed the rehab program via telephone. While the data was not analyzed for statistical difference due to a small sample size, the average distance walked by patients in the 6-MW test was greater after HBCR (620 ± 388.5 feet post-HBCR vs. 584 ± 353.7 feet pre-HBCR).

Paired comparisons using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for pre- and post-HBCR analysis revealed a trend towards significance for the DASI score (p value 0.05) while statistically significant improvement was seen in the DASI-Mets scores and SF-36 physical functioning scores (p values 0.034 and 0.016, respectively). While the study population is limited, the consistency of subjective improvement in physical functioning across various instruments suggests that HBCR may play an important role in improving the physical well-being of patients after TAVR despite being an entirely home-based endeavor.

No significant difference was noted in the results of Life’s Simple 7 survey and other domains of SF-36 instrument. There was a slight increase in bodily pain reported by patients from 51 to 57 but the difference can be attributed to the subjective variation in participants’ answers over several weeks. Finally, the results of physical limitation due to physical health (RP) domain of SF-36 were invalid as only three patients completed this survey category prior to HBCR while six filled it out after HBCR. Therefore, the median was 0, resulting in no statistically significant result.

Due to the scarcity of home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) programs in the country, the data on their efficacy are scant. While this pilot study is limited in its capacity to draw major conclusions due to a small population size, it does offer valuable insights into the role of HBCR in improving physical functioning in post-TAVR patients. Furthermore, it allowed patients across the two states of Florida and Georgia to participate in personalized cardiac rehabilitation regimens in their homes. Equipment was provided by the VA thereby eliminating travel to rehabilitation facilities.

The 2018 SPORT:TAVI randomized pilot study demonstrated that in the absence of continued exercise, the beneficial effects of cardiac rehabilitation are not sustained beyond the initial period [15]. While unexplored, the flexibility of time and location offered by HBCR may result in increased adherence and lasting long-term benefits among participants. This could be a future direction for investigation.

This pilot study gives significant insight into the role of HBCR in improving physical functioning of post-TAVR patients. However, due to a small sample size, the data from this study is more suggestive rather than conclusive. Further studies, specifically randomized multicenter control trials with direct comparisons of HBCR to existing rehabilitation options, are necessary to validate these data.