Smoking induces oncogenic TP53-mutations in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs). Disruptive mutations of TP53-gene and expression of p16 protein [p16 (+)] in tumor tissue associate with worse and better prognosis, respectively. UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2 family, polypeptide B17 (UGT2B17) detoxifies smoking-related metabolites. Differences among ethnic groups in UGT2B17 are extremely high. Homozygous deletions of UGT2B17 gene (UGT2B17-deletion) are a common copy number variant (CNV) among Japanese, but not a common CNV among Africans and Europeans. Thus, we examined Japanese patients with HNSCC to explore if UGT2B17-deletion and/or p16 (+) modify effects of smoking on TP53-mutations and affect relapse.
Methods
We conducted a posthoc analysis of a prospective cohort. Polymerase chain reaction, immunohistochemistry, and direct sequencing were used to determine UGT2B17-deletion, p16 (+), and detailed TP53-mutations, respectively.
Results
UGT2B17-deletion was observed in 80% of this study population. For this 80%, TP53-mutations were significantly more common among smokers than non-smokers (P = 0.0016), but this difference between smokers and nonsmokers was not significant for the 20% with UGT2B17. In patients with UGT2B17-deletion and p16 (+), simultaneously, TP53-mutations were much more common among smokers than among non-smokers (81% versus 17%; P = 0.0050). Patients with both UGT2B17-deletion and disruptive TP53-mutations had higher relapse rates than other patients (hazard ratio, 2.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.30 to 3.80, P = 0.004) in a stepwise method.
Conclusions
These results suggest that UGT2B17-deletion interacting with p16 (+) may modify effects of smoking on TP53-mutations and may further interact with the disruptive TP53-mutations to raise relapse rates among Japanese patients with HNSCC.
Hinweise
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
YS, TH,TK, HK and MU designed the study. TH KWand TS contributed to collecting the tissue samples and clinical data. MI contributed to pathological examination. AM, CS, SI and AN have carried out molecular studies. AM and MU performed analysis and interpretation of data. AM, TH and MU participate in drafting the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Tobacco smoking is associated with 5 million deaths per year worldwide and is regarded as one of the leading causes of premature death [1]. Nicotine, a natural ingredient in tobacco leaves, is so addictive that people smoke habitually, which in turn results in exposure to a diverse array of carcinogens. Metabolites of nicotine, including cotinine and other compounds, are further catabolized and detoxified via CYP2A6 [2] and the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) family of enzymes. One UGT gene, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2 family, polypeptide B17 (UGT2B17) enzyme decreases the abundance nicotine-related metabolites via glucuronidation [3]. Consequently, UGT2B17 gene deletions may reduce detoxification rates of carcinogens in tobacco and tobacco smoke [4]. Therefore, this UGT2B17-deletion may increase an individual’s susceptibility to tobacco-related cancers, e.g., lung cancer [5].
Copy number variants (CNVs) of UGT2B17 gene, known to vary greatly among ethnic populations; for example, homozygous deletion of UGT2B17 (0 copy) is not a common CNV among Africans or Europeans e.g., 14% of Nigerians, but it is common among East Asian populations, e.g., 92% of Japanese [6]. Smoking is a major risk factor for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) [7], by inducing oncogenic mutations of the TP53 oncosuppressor gene [8] and of other genes [9,10]. In particular, disruptive mutations in TP53 were associated with reduced survival in patients with HNSCC [11].
Anzeige
Therefore, we hypothesized that smoking may increase the risk of TP53-mutations among patients with homozygous for UGT2B17 deletions (defined as “UGT2B17-deletion” in this study) to a greater extent than among patients with one or two copies of UGT2B17 (defined as “UGT2B17-presence” in this study). Because UGT2B17 deletion is common among Japanese, the power to detect interacting effects between smoking and UGT2B17-deletion on TP53-mutations can be enhanced by focusing on Japanese patients with HNSCC. In addition to TP53-mutations, overexpression of p16-protein [defined as “p16 (+)” in this study] in tumors, which is encoded by CDKN2A, increases survival time in cases of oropharyngeal cancer [12,13]. We reported that heavy alcohol consumption triggered previously known and unknown somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs) including CDKN2A, but that smoking induced TP53-mutations [14]. Using this cohort of Japanese patients with HNSCC as post hoc analysis, we newly explored if UGT2B17-deletion modify effects of smoking on TP53-mutations, in combination with p16 (+). Furthermore, we studied if combinations among UGT2B17-deletion, p16 (+), and disruptive TP53-mutations affect cancer relapse.
Methods
Study design
We conducted a cohort study at Jikei University Hospital from March 2006 to November 2012. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee for Biomedical Research of the Jikei Institutional Review Board. The entire process of study design, data monitoring, and data analyses were performed in the Division of Molecular Epidemiology. Eligible participants were Japanese patients with HNSCC (oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, laryngeal, oral and nasal cancer) aged 20 years or older who had newly diagnosed or recurrent disease. A total of 262 patients provided written informed consent to participate in this study. Of these 262 patients, 28 patients were excluded because pathological diagnosis was not squamous cell carcinoma or because the primary tumor site was unknown. 27patient received in combination with chemotherapy or radiotherapy after surgery for close surgical margin and/or extracapsular spread of metastatic node. All of them were stage IV. Clinical data from the remaining 234 patients were used. Clinical information was obtained from clinical and surgical charts. Tumor node metastasis (TNM) classification and cancer stages were determined according to the 6th Union for International Cancer Control TNM classification and stage groupings. Tumor grade with regard to cell differentiation was classified into three categories—well differentiated, moderately differentiated, or poorly differentiated—by a pathologist (M.I.). Of these 234 patients, nine patients were unknown of cell differentiation.
Smoking and alcohol drinking
A history of current or past cigarette smoking was obtained based on a questionnaire completed by each patient at surgery. The age at which they started smoking and the number of cigarettes smoked per day was recorded. For past smokers, the age at which the patient ceased smoking was also recorded. The extent of previous smoking was quantified in pack-years (PYs); 10 PYs is any equivalent to smoking 1 pack including 20 cigarettes/day for 10 years (e.g., 2 packs/day for 5 years). Patients were classified as smokers if they had smoked at for least 10 PYs within the 20 years preceding diagnosis of HNSCC. Non-smokers were defined as patients who had never smoked, had not smoked in the 20 years preceding diagnosis, or smoked less than 10 PY prior to surgical resection of HNSCC. Of these 234 patients, two patients were unknown of smoking status.
The following three categories were used to classify patients based upon average daily alcohol consumption during the 20 years preceding diagnosis of HNSCC: 1) non-drinkers were defined as patients who did not consume alcohol or consumed less than one drink per day; 2) moderate drinkers were defined as patients who consumed at least one, but less than two, drinks per day, and 3) heavy drinkers were defined as patients who consumed two or more drinks per day. One drink was defined as containing approximately 10 g of alcohol, which is equal to 30 ml of hard liquor, 100 ml of wine containing 12% alcohol, or 360 ml of beer.
Anzeige
Samples
With each patient’s consent, peripheral blood samples and tumor tissue were collected during the operation. QIAamp DNA Micro Kits 50 (Qiagen, Tokyo, Japan) were used to purify extracted DNA, and NanoVue plus (General Electric healthcare Japan, Tokyo, Japan) was used to measure DNA concentration in each sample; samples were then frozen at -80°C until use.
An Agilent Enzymatic Labeling Kit was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions to label 0.5 μg of genomic DNA for each CGH array. Labeled DNA was hybridized to an Agilent-022060 SurePrint G3 Human CGH Microarray 4x180K (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA); the Agilent Microarray Scanner and Feature Extraction v.10.7.3.1 (Agilent Technologies), were used according to manufacturer’s instruction to scan probed arrays. Control DNA was obtained from one Japanese individual who is an author (MU) of this study. We focused only on previously reported SCNAs of CDKN2A [14] and on CNVs of UGT2B17 that are associated with metabolism of nicotine [15]. The data described in this article have been deposited in NCBIs Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) [16] and are accessible through GEO series accession number GSE47443.
TaqMan Real-time PCR
We also performed real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to confirm the microarray data. The TaqMan-based real-time PCR method for comparative quantification was performed with extracted DNA according to Life Technologies’ protocol. Genomic sequences of UGT2B17 were used to generate the specific target sequence. Primers for UGT2B17 (Taqman Copy Number Assays No. 186891217) and a probe for RNase P (Taqman copy number Reference Assay RNase P No. 4401631) were used (Life Technologies Corp.). Reactions (20 μL) were performed in 96-well plates using Brilliant III Ultra-Fast QPCR Master Mix, Reference Dye (30 nM), nuclease-free water (8 μL), DNA sample (1 μL), and UGT2B17 primer (1 μL) (Applied Biosystems) or TaqMan Copy Number Reference Assay RNase P (1 μL); reaction mixtures were subjected to 40 cycles of 95°C for 3 min, 95°C for 10 s, and 60°C for 30 s. For the precise and accurate amplification of DNA, each assay with each primer pairs was run in duplicate. Comparative quantification was calculated using a sample from the same person (MU) who provided the control samples for the CGH array. A MX 3005P Real-Time QPCR System with Mx Pro Software version 4.10 (Agilent Technologies) was used to measure the product of each real-time PCR assay.
The method of measurement was based on the comparative cycle threshold (Ct) method for the target sequence (UGT2B17) and a reference sequence (RNase P). The RNase P gene was co-amplified with UGT2B17 and served as an internal standard. The PCR amplification efficiencies of RNase P and UGT2B17 were 100% and 99%; these were calculated by using the comparative ΔΔCt methods as described by Pfaffl et al. [17]. The fold changes in copy numbers of the gene were log2 transformed and determined to be gene positive or gene negative (over two copies or not). Finally, 97% of array results were consistent with real-time PCR.
PCR to differentiate between one and two copies of UGT2B17
In 3% of samples, array and real-time PCR results were conflicted and could not differentiate between one and two copies of the UGT2B17 gene, To determine the absence or presence of the UGT2B17 gene, we further performed PCR as follows. Because a high level of sequence identity exists between the UGT2B17 and UGT2B15 genes, we used gene-specific PCR primers to distinguish UGT2B17 from UGT2B15 and to distinguish between one and two copies of the UGT2B17 gene: Marker D (Forward primer 5’-TCACAAGTCAATCTCCCATCC-3’, Reverse primer 5’-CTGCAGAATATGTCAATAATTGGC-3’) is positive for one copy and two copies (100 bp), Marker J (Forward primer 5’-TGCACAGAGTTAAGAAATGGAGAGATGTG-3’, Reverse primer 5’-GATCATCCTATATCCTGACAGAATT-3’) is positive for only one copy (900 bp) [18,19]. PCR reactions were carried out in 25-μl mixtures containing 1 μg of genomic DNA, 2.5 μL of 10xLA PCR buffer II, 2 μL of dNTP (400 μM), 0.25 μL of LA Taq (Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan), 18.25 μL of nuclease-free water, and 0.5 μL of each of the two primers (100 pmol/μL). Each reaction mixture was incubated at 94°C for 3 min and then subjected to 30 cycles of 94°C for 20 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 90 s; each reaction was then incubated at 16°C until analysis.
TP53-mutations
The quality or quantity of DNA samples from 14 patients was not adequate to assess TP53 mutational status; therefore, only 234 samples were analyzed with regard to TP53-mutations.
Exons 2 thru 11 of the TP53 gene were each independently amplified by PCR using purchased primers following the manufacturer’s protocol (NIPPON GENE Co. Ltd., Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan). Each resulting PCR product was cloned and then sequenced with the ABI PRISM 3700 Genetic Analyzer (Life Technologies Corp.). The following 10 single-nucleotide polymorphisms —V31I, P36P, P47S, P72R, R158R, R213R, V217M, P222P, T312S, and G360A—are reportedly each caused by a single nucleotide polymorphism [20], and thus excluded from total TP53-mutations. Disruptive TP53-mutations were defined as non-conservative mutations located inside the key DNA-binding domain (L2-L3 region) or as stop codons in any region [9]. Sites containing cytidine phosphate guanosine (CpG) dinucleotides were determined according to the database of WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer and based on the work by Petitjean et al. [21].
p16 immunohistochemistry
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor specimens were evaluated for p16 overexpression with a rabbit monoclonal antibody that recognizes p16 (Anti-CDKN2A/p16INK4a antibody [EPR1473]: Abcam Plc, Science Park, Cambridge, England). In this study, positive p16-protein expression (designated p16 (+)) determined via immunohistochemistry (IHC) was defined as strong and diffuse nuclear, cytoplasmic staining or both in at least 70% of tumor cells. Any other pattern of p16 expression was classified as p16 (-).
Anzeige
Statistical analysis
To evaluate significant differences between groups, the unpaired t test and the Mann-Whitney test were used to analyze ages and PYs, respectively. The chi-square test was used to assess categorical variables. Interaction effects between smoking and each of ten sub-groupings—age (< vs. ≥ 65 years), gender, drinking status, primary sites of tumor, tumor grades, stages, UGT2B17-CNV, CDKN2A-SCNA, p16-ICH, and UGT2B17-CNV and p16-ICH combined—were assessed with respect to any type of TP53-mutations; potential interactions were assessed by a Pinteraction term. Then, for each sub-grouping, risks for any kind of TP53-mutations were compared between smokers and non-smokers using a risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI).
In survival analyses, the time from surgery to relapse was used to calculate relapse-free rates. Patients were considered as “censored”, when follow-ups were stopped at the time of a patient’s death by causes other than HNSCC relapse or the last outpatient clinic visit. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to calculate each hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% CI. To distinguish significant prognostic factors from non-significant factors, a stepwise backward elimination method was applied to all 13 factors identified—age, gender, smoker (10PYs≤), heavy drinker, primary sites of tumor, CDKN2A-SCNA, p16-ICH, disruptive TP53-mutations, UGT2B17-deletion, interaction between disruptive TP53-mutations and UGT2B17-deletion, interaction between disruptive TP53-mutations and p16 (+), stages, tumor grades— with a cutoff point of P = 0.05. The Kaplan–Meier survival curves were drawn based on relapse-free rates; log-rank tests were used to compare these rates differentiated by p16 (+), UGT2B17-deletion and disruptive TP53-mutations. Each P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. However, the Bonferroni correction was used to correct for multiple testing, and each pairwise interaction among the 10 subgroups was considered significant when Pinteraction was less than 0.005. All statistical analyses were performed using STATA 13.1 (STATA Crop., College Station, TX).
Results
Patient characteristics
Patient characteristics were compared between non-smokers and smokers and between patients with wild-type TP53 and those with any type of TP53-mutations in the primary tumors (Table 1). Tumors with TP53-mutations were significantly more common among smokers (67%) than among non-smokers (52%) (RR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.65, P = 0.030), which we have already reported [14]. Men (P < 0.001) and alcohol-drinkers (P < 0.001) were also significantly more common among smokers than among non-smokers. Oral cancer was more frequent among non-smokers than smokers compared with other primary tumor sites (P = 0.030). Well differentiated histology was less common among smokers than non-smokers. Heterozygous and homozygous deletions of the CDNK2A-gene were significantly more prevalent among patients with TP53-mutations than those with wild-type TP53 (P = 0.035). Additionally, we found that 80% of this study population harbored UGT2B17-deletions. However, non-smokers did not differ significantly from smokers with regard to p16 (+) or UGT2B17-CNVs; similarly, patients with wild-type TP53 did not differ significantly from those with TP53-mutations with regard to p16 (+) or UGT2B17-CNVs.
Table 1
Patient*1characteristics assessed based on smoking status andTP53-mutations
Total
Smokers*2
Non-smokers*2
p-value
MutantTP53
Wild-typeTP53
p-value
(N = 161: 69%)
(N = 71: 31%)
(N = 147: 63%)
(N = 87: 37%)
Smoking status – PYs
25%/50%/75%
0/25/40
25/40/46
0/0/0
<0.0001*3
8/30/40
0/20/40
0.085*3
Smokers – no. (%)
161 (69)
-
-
-
108 (74)
53 (61)
0.030*4
TP53-mutations – no. (%)
147 (63)
108 (67)*7
37 (52) *7
0.030*4
Age, years – yr. mean ± s.d.
63.2 ± 10.9
63.5 ± 10.2
62.6 ± 12.6
0.56*5
64.1 ± 10.4
61.6 ± 11.5
0.082*5
Men – no. (%)*6
187 (80)
152 (94)
33 (46)
<0.001*4
122 (83)
65 (75)
0.13*4
Drinking status – no. (%)*6
<0.001*4
0.043*4
Non-drinker
89 (38)
35 (22)
53 (75)
50 (34)
39 (45)
Moderate drinker
74 (32)
64 (40)
9 (13)
55 (37)
19 (22)
Heavy drinker
71 (30)
62 (39)
9 (13)
42 (29)
29 (33)
Primary site of tumor – no. (%)*6
0.030*4
0.13*4
Oropharyngea
63 (27)
47 (29)
16 (23)
37 (25)
26 (30)
Hypopharyngeal
64 (27)
47 (29)
16 (23)
49 (33)
15 (17)
Laryngeal
29 (12)
24 (15)
5 (7)
17 (12)
12 (14)
Oral
57 (24)
32 (20)
25 (35)
32 (22)
25 (29)
Nasal
21 (9)
11 (7)
9 (13)
12 (8)
9 (10)
Cell differentiation – no. (%)*6
0.023*4
0.94*4
Well differentiated
69 (31)
39 (25)
29 (43)
45 (31)
24 (29)
Moderately differentiated
111 (49)
84 (54)
26 (39)
70 (49)
41 (50)
Poorly differentiated
45 (20)
33 (21)
12 (18)
28 (20)
17 (21)
Stages – no. (%)*6
0.12*4
0.97*4
I
12 (5)
11 (7)
1 (1)
8 (5)
4 (5)
II
48 (21)
34 (21)
14 (20)
29 (20)
19 (22)
III
48 (21)
28 (18)
20 (29)
30 (21)
18 (21)
IV
124 (53)
87 (54)
35 (50)
79 (54)
45 (52)
Anticancer therapy – no. (%)
Radiotherapy ± Chemotherapy
27 (12)
22 (13)
4 (6)
0.13*4
15 (10)
12 (14)
0.41*4
CDKN2A-SCNAs – no. (%)*6
0.73*4
0.035*4
Norma
174 (77)
117 (76)
55 (80)
99 (72)
75 (86)
Heterozygous deletion
39 (17)
29 (19)
10 (14)
29 (21)
10 (11)
Homozygous deletion
12 (5)
8 (5)
4 (6)
10 (7)
2 (2)
p16 (+) – no. (%)
47 (20)
28 (17)
19 (27)
0.10*4
24 (16)
23 (26)
0.062*4
UGT2B17 CNVs – no. (%)*6
0.60*4
0.95*4
Homozygous deletions: 0 copy
181 (80)
124 (81)
55 (80)
111 (80)
70 (80)
Heterozygous deletion: 1 copy
42 (19)
28 (18)
14 (20)
26 (19)
16 (18)
Normal: 2 copies
2 (1)
2 (1)
0 (0)
0.60*4
1 (1)
1 (1)
0.95*4
*1Smoking history was unavailable for two of the 234.
*2Non-smokers were defined as having a <10-PYs history; smokers were defined as having a ≥10-PYs history.
*3Mann-Whitney test was used to calculate the p-value.
*4χ2 test was used to calculate the p-value. *5Student’s t test was used to calculate the --value.
*6Because of rounding, total values are not always 100%. *7RR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.65.
Then, we focused more closely on TP53 status of tumors. Of the 234 tumor samples analyzed, 86 samples had no TP53 mutation, 84 had one mutation, 27 had two mutations, 20 had three, 7 had four, 9 had five, and 1 had six. The frequencies of specific base-pair changes among these 234 patients were as follows: A:T > C:G, 1 (0.4%); A:T > G:C, 13 (5.6%), A:T > T:A, 5 (2%); G:C > A:T, 60 (26%); G:C > C:G, 19 (8%); G:C > T:A, 82 (35%). The frequencies of other types of mutations were as follows: deletion, 10 (4%); insertion, 4 (2%); nonsense, 63 (27%); missense, 69 (30%); frameshift, 14 (6%). In non-smokers, 9 in 37 (24%; 95% CI, 12 to 41%) TP53-mutations occurred at CpG sites, but in smokers, 13 in 108 (12%; 95% CI, 7 to 20%) did.
Anzeige
Effects modifiers of smoking on TP53-mutations
Interactions between smoking and each of 11 variables—age, gender, alcohol drinking status, the primary sites of tumors, tumor grades, stages, the number of lymph node metastasis, UGT2B17-deletion, CDKN2A-SCNAs, p16 (+), and a combination of UGT2B17-deletion and p16 (+)—were assessed (Table 2). In variables of the primary sites of tumors, CDKN2A-SCNAs, p16 (+), and a combination of UGT2B17-deletion and p16 (+), interactions were analyzed except for HPV-positive patients. Smoking interacted significantly with four factors—stages, UGT2B17-deletion, p16 (+), and the combination of UGT2B17-deletions and p16 (+)—to induce TP53-mutations, but not with age (P = 0.55), gender (P = 0.22), drinking status (P = 0.90), primary tumor sites (P = 0.09), tumor grades (P = 0.30), the number of lymph node metastasis (P = 0.51) or CDKN2A-SCNAs (P = 0.08). Restricting to patients with UGT2B17-deletion, TP53-mutations were more prevalent among smokers than among non-smokers (P = 0.0016), but restricting to patients with UGT2B17-presence, differences between smokers and non-smokers were not significant. Similarly, restricting to patients with p16 (+) tumors, smoking increased the risk of TP53-mutations up to 3.48-fold in comparison with non-smoking, but not in restricting to patients with p16 (-) tumors. In restricting to patients with UGT2B17-deletion and had p16 (+), smokers had significantly higher risk of TP53-mutations than did non-smokers (RR, 4.88; 95% CI, 0.80 to 29.6; P = 0.0050), but not in other combinations: UGT2B17-presence and p16 (-), UGT2B17-deletion and p16 (-), and UGT2B17 presence and p16 (+) (Table 2).
Table 2
Effects modifiers of smoking onTP53-mutations in tumors*1
Outcome: any type ofTP53-mutations
Pinteraction*2
Smokers N = 167
Non-smokers N = 65
RR
95% CI
p-value
Primary sites of tumor – no. (%)*6
0.09
Oropharyngeal
26 (76)
4 (80)
0.96
0.59 to 1.54
0.86
Hypopharyngeal
37 (79)
11 (69)
1.15
0.80 to 1.64
0.42
Laryngeal
14 (58)
3 (60)
0.97
0.44 to 2.15
0.95
Oral
15 (48)
16 (67)
0.73
0.46 to 1.15
0.18
Nasal
10 (91)
1 (11)
8.18
1.28 to 52.4
0.0004
Stages – no. (%)
0.0019
I
7 (64)
1 (100)
0.64
0.41 to 0.99
0.46
II
19 (56)
10 (71)
0.78
0.50 to 1.22
0.32
III
21 (75)
9 (45)
1.67
0.98 to 2.83
0.034
IV
60 (69)
17 (49)
1.42
0.98 to 2.05
0.035
UGT2B17 CNVs*5 – no. (%)
0.0016
UGT2B17-deletion: 0 copy
85 (69)
24 (44)
1.57
1.14 to 2.17
0.0016
UGT2B17-presence: 1 copy or 2 copies
16 (53)
11 (79)
0.68
0.44 to 1.05
0.11
CDKN2A SCNA*3*6 – no. (%)
0.08
Normal: 2 copies
68 (65)
22 (51)
1.27
0.91 to 1.75
0.12
Heterozygous deletion: 1 copy
21 (78)
7 (70)
1.11
0.71 to 1.75
0.62
Homozygous deletions: 0 copy
6 (75)
4 (100)
0.75
0.50 to 1.12
0.27
p16-ICH in tumor*4*6 – no. (%)
0.043
p16 (-)
85 (68)
33 (66)
1.03
0.82 to 1.30
0.80
p16 (+)
17 (77)
2 (22)
3.48
1.00 to 12.1
0.0043
UGT2B17-CNVs & p16-ICH – no. (%)*6
0.0080
UGT2B17-presence & p16 (-)
13 (57)
10 (91)
0.62
0.42 to 0.93
0.045
UGT2B17-deletions & p16 (-)
67 (69)
21 (57)
1.22
0.89 to 1.66
0.18
UGT2B17-presence & p16 (+)
2 (50)
1 (33)
1.50
0.23 to 9.80
0.66
UGT2B17-deletions & p16 (+)
13 (81)
1 (17)
4.88
0.80 to 29.6
0.0050
*1Any type of TP53-mutations observed in the tumor genome was used as the outcome.
*2Pinteraction was calculated as interaction effect between a factor and smoking on the risk of TP53-mutations in a tumor. With the Bonferroni correction, p < 0.005 was considered as statistically significant.
*3CDKN2A SCNA: Copy number alterations of CDKN2A, which encodes p16, were determined by CGH array.
*4p16 overexpression in tumor samples was determined via ICH and classified as positive (+) or negative (-).
*5UGT2B17 CNV: Copy number variants of UGT2B17 were screened via CGH array and confirmed by real-time PCR and PCR to differentiate between one and two copies of UGT2B17-gene.
*6Interaction was analyzed except for HPV-positive patients.
Prognostic factors
Using backward elimination for 13 candidate prognostic factors (Table 3), we found that disruptive TP53-mutations and UGT2B17-deletion interacted to significantly increase the risk of relapse (HR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.30 to 3.80, P = 0.004); however, either TP53-mutations or UGT2B17-deletion alone did not significantly affect the risk. Notably, p16 (+) was a better prognostic factor than p16 (-) (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.99, P = 0.047). Thus, we analyzed three grouping of the 234 patients based on combinations of three factors—p16 (+) tumors, presence of disruptive TP53-mutations, and UGT2B17-deletions. During a median follow-up period of 1.5 years (interquartile range, 1.0 to 2.5 years), relapse occurred in 89 of 232 patients (38%) in this study. Based on Kaplan-Meier curves, patients harboring both UGT2B17-deletion and a disruptive TP53-mutation in the primary tumors had the highest relapse rates among the three groups, and the group comprising patients with p16 (+) tumors and lacking any disruptive TP53-mutation in the primary tumors had the lowest relapse rates (Figure 1). Relapse was occurred in 21 of 35 patients in the group of both UGT2B17-deletion and a disruptive TP53-mutation in the primary tumors (indicated as green-colored line in Figure 1), 16 of 59 patients in the group of both p16 (+) and no disruptive TP53-mutation in the primary tumors (indicated as blue-colored line in Figure 1) and 48 of 131 patients in the other groups (indicated as red-colored line in Figure 1). We also analyzed overall survival by Kaplan-Meier curves. Although patients with p16 (+) tumors and lacking any disruptive TP53-mutation in the primary tumors had the highest survival rates than the other groups (P = 0.0190, figure was not shown), there was no significant effect among these three factors; status of disruptive TP53-mutation, p16 and UGT2B17.
Table 3
Cox proportional hazard model as determined with backward eliminated via a stepwise method*1
Outcome: any type ofTP53-mutationsin a tumor
HR
95% CI
p-value
Having both disruptiveTP53-mutationsandUGT2B17-deletions
2.22
1.30 to 3.80
0.004
p16-positive tumor
0.53
0.29 to 0.99
0.047
Stage IV
2.32
1.44 to 3.74
0.001
Poorly differentiated tumor grade
1.66
1.01 to 2.74
0.047
*1By backward elimination from age, gender, smoker (10 PYs ≤), heavy drinker, primary site of tumor, CDKN2A-SCNAs, p16 (+), disruptive TP53-mutations, UGT2B17-deletion, interaction effect between disruptive TP53-mutations and UGT2B17-deletion, interaction between disruptive TP53-mutations and p16 (+), stages, tumor grade of cell differentiation.
Figure 1
Kaplan-Meier curves of relapse-free rates in 234 patients with HNSCC. Differences in time until relapse were compared among combinations of p16 (+) tumors, disruptive TP53-mutations, and homozygous UGT2B17 deletions. The group of both UGT2B17-deletion and a disruptive TP53-mutation in the primary tumors is indicated as green-colored line, the group of both p16 (+) and no disruptive TP53-mutation in the primary tumors is indicated as blue-colored line and the other groups are indicated as red-colored line. p16 (+): p16-positive tumor; p16 (-): p16- negative tumor; dTP53 (+): presence of disruptive TP53-mutations; dTP53 (-): no disruptive TP53-mutations or wild-type TP53; UGT2B17 (+): UGT2B17-deletion: homozygous deletion of UGT2B17; UGT2B17 (-): UGT2B17-presence: one or two copies of UGT2B17.
×
Discussion
The prevalence of copy number variants (CNVs) of UGT2B17 gene is quite different among ethnic populations. The frequency of UGT2B17-deletion was only about 10 to 15% among general Caucasian population or Caucasian with lung cancer [5,22]. In contrast, the frequency of UGT2B17-deletion among Japanese athletes was 74.5% in male and 60.2% in female [23] and 92% among those contributing to the Japanese HapMap [6]. We first confirmed that homozygous deletion of UGT2B17 is highly prevalent among this cohort of Japanese patients. Of the 234 patients examined, 80% were homozygous for UGT2B17-deletions; 19% carried one copy of UGT2B17, and only 1% had two copies; these findings were within the range of previous reports for the Japanese or East Asian [6,23]. Therefore, Japanese patients with HNSCC constitute a valid study population for examination of the influence of UGT2B17-deletion on TP53 mutation ratio and relapse rates.
We next found that 63% of all tumors had some type of mutation within exon-2 to exon-11 of TP53. There were significantly more TP53-mutant tumors among smokers than non-smokers, which we have already reported [14]. Moreover, the frequency of TP53-mutations at CpG sites was 2-fold higher among non-smokers than among smokers. These findings were consistent with previous findings from whole-exome sequencing studies [9].
Anzeige
Thirdly, we found a significant interaction effect between UGT2B17-deletion and smoking on TP53 mutation rate (Pinteraction = 0.0016). Specifically, restricting to patients with UGT2B17-deletion, TP53-mutations were significantly more common in tumors from smokers than those from non-smokers, but not for patients with UGT2B17-presence; to our knowledge, these and following findings have not been reported previously. UGT2B17-deletion may 1) reduce a person’s ability to detoxify smoking-associated metabolites, 2) allow cellular DNA to become exposed to high levels of carcinogens in cigarettes and cigarette smoke, and 3) raise the probability of DNA injury, and thus increase the risk of TP53-mutations, resulting in tumor development. Moreover, p16 expression also interacted with smoking to increase the risk of TP53-mutations. Specifically, restricting to patients with p16 (+) tumors, the frequency of TP53-mutations was 3.48-fold higher among smokers than non-smokers. Overexpression of p16 can result from disruption of the negative feedback loop that normally operates among p16, cyclin-dependent kinases, cyclins, and phosphorylation of retinoblastoma protein; several causes—including human papillomavirus infection—can disrupt this loop [24], and such disruption may facilitate cell cycle progression and make cells more susceptible to the carcinogens in cigarettes and cigarette smoke.
We then assessed a combination of these two variables—UGT2B17-deletion and p16 (+)—to assess potential interactions between them. Restricting to patients with UGT2B17-deletion and p16 (+) tumors, TP53-mutations were significantly more common among tumors from smokers (81%) than those from non-smokers (17%) (RR, 4.88; 95% CI, 0.80 to 29.6; P = 0.0050). On the other hand, patients with UGT2B17-presence and p16 (-) tumors, TP53-mutations were significantly less common among tumors from smokers (57%) than those from non-smokers (91%) (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.93; P = 0.045). From these findings, together UGT2B17-deletion and p16 (+) synergistically enhanced the risk of TP53-mutations occurring in tumors, because UGT2B17-deletion reduced the metabolism and detoxification of metabolites from cigarette smoke and p16-overexpression reflected abnormal cell cycle progression and increased cellular susceptibility to carcinogens.
In survival analyses, we confirmed that patients survival were significantly associated with stages, cell differentiation levels and the number of lymph node metastasis before adjustment; these results were consistent with previous studies. Then we analyzed using stepwise elimination and survival analysis by adjusting for stages, cell differentiation levels and others.
Fourth, we found a significant interaction between disruptive TP53-mutations and UGT2B17-deletion. Patients with TP53-mutant tumors and UGT2B17-deletion were more than twice as likely to relapse as all other patients; this finding was novel and striking. In contrast, patients with p16 (+) tumors and wild-type TP53 were half as likely to relapse as those with other patterns of tumor mutation; this finding was consistent with a previous finding about oropharyngeal cancer [12].
There were four main limitations in this study. Only two patients had two copies of UGT2B17; therefore, we mainly compared the effects of homozygosity with those of heterozygosity with regard to UGT2B17-deletions. Among 262 participants, TP53-mutations could not be measured in 28 samples, because of too small size of resected tumors to use for this study. Third is we analyzed relapse-free survival within the patients who had newly diagnosed or recurrent disease. It appears that one of the causes for no significant differences in the over survival may be the effect by the curative treatment to recurrence. Fourth is the most patients were advanced stage III to IV (74%) in this study. In spite of limited to the patients with early stage I to II, the patients harboring both UGT2B17-deletion and a disruptive TP53-mutation in the primary tumors had the highest relapse rates among the three groups using Kaplain-Meier curves (Log-rank test, P = 0.0071, figure was not shown).
Conclusions
In conclusions, homozygous UGT2B17-deletion may interact with smoking and p16-protein expression to increase the risk of TP53-mutations, and may further interact with disruptive TP53-mutations to raise relapse rates among Japanese patients with HNSCC.
Acknowledgements
We would also like to thank Mr. Hiroaki Suga and Mr. Takeshi Mimura for arranging samples. This research was supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in the Japan-Supported Program for the Strategic Research Foundation at Private Universities the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) and The Jikei University Research Fund. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
YS, TH,TK, HK and MU designed the study. TH KWand TS contributed to collecting the tissue samples and clinical data. MI contributed to pathological examination. AM, CS, SI and AN have carried out molecular studies. AM and MU performed analysis and interpretation of data. AM, TH and MU participate in drafting the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.
Das Risiko für Rezidiv oder Tod von Patienten und Patientinnen mit reseziertem ALK-positivem NSCLC ist unter einer adjuvanten Therapie mit dem Tyrosinkinase-Inhibitor Alectinib signifikant geringer als unter platinbasierter Chemotherapie.
Patienten, die zur Behandlung ihres Prostatakarzinoms eine Androgendeprivationstherapie erhalten, entwickeln nicht selten eine Anämie. Wer ältere Patienten internistisch mitbetreut, sollte auf diese Nebenwirkung achten.
Müssen sich Schwangere einer Krebstherapie unterziehen, rufen Immuncheckpointinhibitoren offenbar nicht mehr unerwünschte Wirkungen hervor als andere Mittel gegen Krebs.
Update Onkologie
Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletterund bleiben Sie gut informiert.
