Background
Methods
Study design
Case study | |||
---|---|---|---|
Chiang Rai (Thailand) | Yangon (Myanmar) | Hanoi (Vietnam) | |
Study population | Febrile patients | Febrile patients | Patients with acute respiratory infections |
Trial sample | 1182 Participants (600 adults, 582 children) | 1228 Participants (609 adults, 619 children) | 2036 Participants (1008 adults, 1028 children) |
CRP POCT usersa | Nurses and public health technical officersb | Medical doctors | Medical doctors |
Location | Peri-urban Chiang Rai district | Hlaing Tha Yar and Shwe Pyi Thar sub-urbs | Rural and urban Hanoi |
Study sites | 6 Public primary healthcare centres | 3 NGO clinics and 1 public hospital | 9 Public primary healthcare centres (urban) and 1 public district hospital (rural) |
Qualitative data collection
Case study | |||
---|---|---|---|
Chiang Rai (Thailand) | Yangon (Myanmar) | Hanoi (Vietnam) | |
Timing of data collection | August 2016, May 2017 | December 2016 –January 2017 | June – December 2015 |
Healthcare worker sample | |||
Sample size | 21 HCWs (16 female/5 male) | 12 HCWs (6 female/6 male) | 12 HCWs (10 female/2 male) |
Sampling strategy | Census (all participating HCWs) | Purposive sample (at least 1 from each site)a | Purposive sample (at least 1 from each site)b |
Semi-structured interviews | 21 SSIs | 12 SSIs | 2 SSIs |
Focus group discussions | None | None | 1 FGD (10 participants) |
Patient sample | |||
Sample size | 37 Patientsc (control and treatment; 24 female/13 male, average age 42 years) | 21 Patientsc (control and treatment; 13 female/8 male, average age 37 years) | 27 Patientsc (treatment group only; 23 female/4 male, average age 49 years) |
Sampling strategy | Purposive sample (maximum variation)d | Purposive sample (maximum variation)d | Random sample with information saturatione |
Semi-structured interviews | 25 SSIs (incl. 2 interviews with 2 participants) | 11 SSIs (incl. 1 interview with 2 participants) | 9 SSIs |
Focus group discussions | 3 FGDs (3 male, 4 female; 3 female guardians) | 2 FGDs (4 male, 5 female; mixed adult/guardian) | 3 FGDs (5/6/7 participants; male/female/guardian) |
Patients in Chiang Rai and Yangon | Patients in Hanoi | ||
Data collection topics | Example questions | Data collection topics | Example questions |
Medicine use and treatment-seeking behaviour | “You recently visited the health centre because of a fever. What was the process of getting treatment? Please be as specific as possible, step by step.” | Acute respiratory infections (ARIs) and treatment-seeking behaviour | “What is your understanding about the causes of ARI and its natural history?”, “Why did you choose to visit the clinic on this occasion?” |
Decision-making about medicines | “When would you use medicines for an illness? When not?” | Perception of CRP testing | “Does the test need to be improved? If yes, how?” |
Demand-side preferences, local notions and myths about medicine | “What is the best treatment for fever?” | Impact on antimicrobial use | “What do you expect from seeing the doctor with ARI?”, “Did you seek for subsequent antimicrobials if your doctor did not give you antimicrobial?” |
Health provider landscape and preferences from patient perspective | “Can you tell me which health providers are available to you, and which of them you would visit for treatment?” | Impact on consultation | “What other information would you need to help you fully trust the test and trust the doctor’s opinion that you do not need antimicrobials?” |
Experiences in public healthcare | “For your visit at the health centre, can you please tell me: How did you feel if you did not receive the medication you expected?” | Recommendations | “In your opinion, should a CRP test be done as a part of routine diagnosis for ARI patients in primary care settings?” |
CRP POCT experiences | “Do you feel that you were treated differently than usual because of the test?” | ||
Healthcare workers in Chiang Rai and Yangon | Healthcare workers in Hanoi | ||
Data collection topics | Example questions | Data collection topics | Example questions |
Workload, freedom and constraint in work | “What are your roles and responsibilities in your work” | Perception of CRP testing | “What do you like / dislike about the test?” |
Scope of outpatient work | “How many outpatients do you deal with on a normal day” | Impact on antimicrobial prescription | “How did the test support your treatment decision?”, “What do you think your patients are expecting from seeing a doctor? (Drugs / Antimicrobials / Advice / Reassurance / Diagnosis / Others)” |
The system context of CRP POCT | “Are any tests being carried out (e.g. by yourself) to diagnose [common outpatient complaints]?” | Impact on consultation | “Did you use the CRP result to discuss with patients about your treatment decision?” |
Antibiotics marketing | “Do drug company representatives promote the use of certain medicines in your health centre?” | Recommendations | “In your opinion, should a CRP test be introduced in routine practice of your setting? Why / Why not?” |
Extent of patient demand, dynamics in patient–HCW interaction | “Do patients demand certain drugs or treatments?” | ||
Antibiotics prescription practice | “For what conditions do you prescribe antibiotics?” | ||
Risk reduction through antibiotics | “Can antibiotics be a way to protect you from patient demands, ineffective treatment, or problems in diagnosing an illness?” | ||
(Measures to limit) over-prescription | “If you had to reduce antibiotics prescriptions, what would you consider the most effective way?” |
Qualitative data analysis
Results
Perceived infectious disease risks
“If we prescribe antibiotics, we would not be blamed for any problem the patients might have. If we don’t prescribe antibiotics, the patients might get worse. In this case, we would not be able to explain to their relatives. And they would not accept our explanation.” (Doctor, Hanoi, FGD)
Health system context
Policy environment
“100% of patients have been provided with antibiotics as here are a lot of antimicrobials in stock that need to be dispensed. Depending on CRP results, I tell my patients to use the antimicrobial immediately or keep for another illness episode.” (Doctor, Hanoi, FGD)
“I don’t think [antibiotic over-prescription] is a problem in health centres. Because you need to prescribe it anyway, it’s a principle. If you don’t, the patients cannot get better.” (Nurse, Chiang Rai, SSI)
“It is not the problem of my clinic. We do not have the pressure of prescribing antibiotics.” (Doctor, Hanoi, FGD)
“Doctors mainly have limitations [i.e. guidelines when using antibiotics], but I think that the drug stores are out of control. Doctors have their ethics so …” (Doctor, Yangon, SSI)
Health system structure
Demand-side factors
“Sometimes I give [my daughter] ampi [ampicillin], small capsule. After replacing it by cefexim, I found [the treatment] better. Since then, I often treat her with cefixim at home, normally for 3-5 days. If she doesn’t have fever, I will treat her at home or buy medicines from [the] drug store.” (Patient, Hanoi, SSI)
“Anti... anti-inflammatory [i.e. antibiotic]; if they have a fever only—fever or cold—I wouldn’t prescribe [an antibiotic]” (Nurse, Chiang Rai, SSI).
Question (Q): “Right. And when you have a fever, do you normally take anti-inflammatory [i.e. antibiotic]?”Response (R): “For just fever, no, only Para.”Q: “There has to be a sore throat.”R: “Yes, if there’s an irritation, I’d take it right away.” (patient, Chiang Rai, SSI).
“Here they don’t ask for germ killers [i.e. antibiotics]. Because people that come here don’t have much knowledge, they might not even know that what they are taking are germ killers.” (Doctor, Yangon, SSI).
“I don’t take medicine [for a fever]. I usually have a sponge bath, if I have doubts [that I have fever], I take a sponge bath. I don’t usually take medicine.” (patient, Yangon, SSI).