Introduction
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women worldwide and although implementation of novel therapies and early detection has improved quality of life and decreased mortality rates for some BC subtypes, the overall incidence of BC continues to increase (Jemal et al.
2011). Of high concern, the overall survival has not improved significantly albeit new therapies for patients with metastatic BC have been introduced during the past decades (
https://www.kreftregisteret.no/globalassets/publikasjoner-og-rapporter/cancer-in-norway/cancer_in_norway_2009.pdf), suggesting that alternative treatment options are urgently needed. Somatic mutations in breast cancer-associated genes are today considered to be one of the main causes and drivers of BC. In addition, epigenetic and genetic alterations in key breast cancer genes such as BRCA-1/2 and their downstream regulation of DNA repair mechanisms, or in genes with impact on epithelial cell proliferation, differentiation and migration are suggested to promote breast cancer carcinogenesis (Petrucelli et al.
1993). Emerging evidence also highlights a role of the tumor microenvironment to induce pre-malignancies and promote tumor progression. Stroma cells like specialized mesenchymal cells and myo-fibroblasts, endothelial cells and infiltrating leukocytes with capacity to produce inflammatory factors may promote breast cancer carcinogenesis and affect tumor progression and metastasis formation (Balkwill et al.
2005; Coussens and Werb
2002; de Visser et al.
2006). Inflammatory cells present in the tumor microenvironment support tumor growth and enhanced malignancy, by releasing cytokines, chemokines and growth factors. Their increased production of reactive oxygen species also further enhance inflammation, oxidative DNA damage and impair DNA repair mechanisms (Coussens and Werb
2002). Therefore, chronic inflammation is considered a risk factor for breast cancer development, and added inflammation to their revised version of the Hallmarks of Cancer (Hanahan and Winberg
2011).
Eicosanoids are potent inflammatory mediators that are produced from arachidonic acid by cyclooxygenases (COXs) and lipoxygenase (LO). Enhanced inflammation via COX-2 and 5-LO promotes tumorigenesis (Chen and Smyth
2011) and is associated with poor prognosis of several cancer forms (Dreyling et al.
1986; Hennig et al.
2002; Steele et al.
1999). Over-expression of COX-2 was observed in 40% of patients with invasive breast carcinoma and correlated with poor prognosis (Denkert et al.
2003; Howe
2007). Selective COX-2 inhibitors reduce the risk of breast cancer, suppress breast cancer cell migration and invasion, and exhibit strong anti-neoplastic effects in animal models (Wang and DuBois
2010; Harris et al.
2006,
2014). COX-2 inhibitors are, therefore, currently evaluated as potential new cancer therapies, especially in epithelial-derived malignancies. A randomised phase II study of 111 postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer indicated a trend towards a longer duration of clinical benefit in the combination arm (median, 96.6 weeks vs 49 weeks) compared to the exemestane monotherapy arm (Dirix et al.
2008). Inhibition of 5-LO activity in several breast cancer cell lines also resulted in growth inhibition and enhanced apoptosis, but 5-LO inhibitors have not yet been evaluated in clinical trials in breast cancer patients (Avis et al.
2001).
Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a ubiquitous herpesvirus that is proposed to be highly prevalent in different cancer forms including breast (Harkins et al.
2010; Taher et al.
2013,
2014), colon (Dimberg et al.
2013; Harkins et al.
2002; Tafvizi and Fard
2014) and prostate cancer (Samanta et al.
2003), glioblastoma multiforme (Cobbs et al.
2002; Lucas et al.
2011; Rahbar et al.
2015), medulloblastoma (Baryawno et al.
2011) and neuroblastoma (Wolmer-Solberg et al.
2013). HCMV is also present in sentinel lymph node metastases of breast cancer and in brain metastases originating from breast and colon cancer, while healthy tissues surrounding HCMV positive primary tumors are generally HCMV negative. In breast cancer, HCMV was detected in 92% of primary tumors, in 94% of sentinel lymph nodes, and in 99% of brain metastases originating from breast cancer (Taher et al.
2013,
2014). These observations suggest a concerning association between HCMV and malignant cell growth. However, it remains to be clarified whether these findings represent an epiphenomenon or indicate that HCMV infections induce tumor-promoting mechanisms of relevance for local tumor progression.
A close link between HCMV infections and inflammation has been established in the literature. Thus, latent HCMV can be reactivated by inflammation and the virus further promotes inflammation by inducing expression of both COX-2 and 5-LO (Benard et al.
2014; Qiu et al.
2008; Hooks et al.
2006). Results from a mouse model based on virus-induced adenocarcinoma (Bongers et al.
2010), confirmed production of inflammatory factors such as IL-10, TGF-β, IL-1β, IL-8, IL-6, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, and RANTES (Bodaghi et al.
1998; Kotenko et al.
2000; Reeves et al.
2005; Söderberg-Nauclér et al.
1997) to be involved. We earlier showed that COX-2 is almost exclusively expressed by HCMV-infected cells in medulloblastoma and that COX-2 inhibition acts to inhibit HCMV, which led to decreased tumor growth in an animal model (Baryawno et al.
2011; Schroer and Shenk
2008). In addition to inducing inflammation, HCMV may directly modulate tumor cells by affecting intracellular pathways involved in cell cycle regulation, epigenetic regulation of gene expression, cellular invasion, angiogenesis, immune evasion, and apoptosis (Cinatl et al.
2004a,
b; Slinger
2010; Vossen et al.
2002), all highly relevant in tumor biology.
The main objective of this study was to investigate a potential association between HCMV infection and simultaneous expression of COX-2 and 5-LO in BC. We examined the expression of HCMV proteins, COX-2 and 5-LO, in tissue samples obtained from BC and in adjacent normal breast tissues and investigated whether the activity level of HCMV was associated with inflammatory markers and impaired clinical outcome. In additional in vitro experiments, we assessed whether HCMV could affect the expression of 5-LO and COX-2 in well-established BC cell lines.
Materials and methods
Study design
Paraffin-embedded tissue specimens of infiltrating BC (
n = 75) and adjacent normal breast tissue (
n = 26) were retrospectively obtained from 49 patients who underwent surgery at Akershus University Hospital, Oslo, Norway during 2011. Clinical data (Table
1) were provided by the Departments of Oncology and Pathology at Akershus University Hospital (AHUS). All diagnoses were re-confirmed by an experienced BC pathologist (T.S.) at AHUS. The median age at surgery was 58.7 years. Most patients underwent mastectomy (61%), while 35% had breast-conserving surgery, and 4% bilateral surgery. All patients received standard adjuvant treatment according to the Norwegian guidelines approved at the time of surgery (Table
1); (
http://www.nbcg.no).
Table 1Patients characteristic
Patient characteristics |
Patients | 49 |
Median age (years) | 49 |
Median age at surgery (years) | 58.7 |
Type of surgery |
Breast conserving | 17 (35) |
Ablation | 30 (61) |
Bilateral | 2 (4) |
Histology |
Infiltrating ductal cancer | 41 (84) |
Infiltrating lobular cancer | 4 (8) |
Medullar cancer | 0 (0) |
Multiple cancer types | 1 (2) |
Mucinous subtype | 3 (6) |
Grades (n = 48) |
I | 6 (13) |
II | 17 (35) |
III | 25 (52) |
T stadium (n = 49) |
T1 | 25 (51) |
T2 | 24 (49) |
N stadium (n = 49) |
N0 | 29 (59.2) |
N1 | 11 (22.4) |
N2 | 7 (14.3) |
N3 | 2 (4.1) |
ER expression |
Positive (≥ 1%) | 35 (71) |
Negative | 14 (29) |
PGR expression |
Positive (≥ 10%) | 23 (47) |
Negative | 26 (53) |
HER2 expression |
Positive (IHC3 + or FISH +) | 8 (16) |
Negative | 41 (84) |
Ki-67 labeling index (n = 42) |
< 1% | 1 (2.4) |
> 1–30% | 22 (52.4) |
> 31–100% | 19 (45.2) |
Menopause (n = 18) |
Premenopause | 5 (28) |
Postmenopause | 13 (72) |
Neoadjuvant treatment |
Yes | 1 (2) |
No | 48 (98) |
Adjuvant chemotherapy |
No chemotherapy | 19 (39) |
FEC60 × 6 | 2 (4) |
FEC60 × 4 followed by taxanes (every 3 weeks) | 19 (39) |
FEC100 × 4 followed by taxanes (every 3 weeks) | 9 (18) |
Adjuvant endocrine treatment |
None | 19 (38.8) |
Tamoxifen (5 years) | 15 (30.6) |
Aromatase inhibitor (5 years) | 15 (30.6) |
Adjuvant radiation |
No | 17 (35) |
Yes | 32 (65) |
Adjuvant anti-HER2 treatment |
No | 41 (84) |
Yes | 8 (16) |
Relapse |
No | 45 (92) |
Yes | 4 (8) |
Loco regional relapse |
No | 49 (100) |
Distant metastasis |
No | 44 (90) |
Yes | 5 (10) |
Type of distant metastasis (n = 5) |
Lymph nodes | 2 (40) |
Brain | 2 (40) |
Multiple metastasis | 1 (20) |
Alive |
Death | 4 (8) |
Alive | 45 (92) |
Immunohistochemistry
Tissue microarrays were created, and all tissues were sectioned (4 µm) and analyzed by immunohistochemical techniques optimized in our laboratory. Detection of HCMV proteins was done as described previously with only minor modifications (Taher et al.
2013). Tissue specimens were deparaffinized in xylene (Sigma Aldrich), rehydrated in an ethanol (Apoteket Farmaci), and washed in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing Triton X-100 (Substrate Department, Karolinska University Hospital). Antigen retrieval and unmasking was done by heating the tissues in DIVA decloaker buffer (Histolab), pH 6.2, in a pressure cooker (BioCARE) for 15 min. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with peroxidase 1 (Histolab) for 5 min, and nonspecific binding was blocked with Sniper (Histolab) for 16 min at room temperature. The tissue sections were then incubated with antibodies against HCMV-IE and HCMV-LA (IgG2a, Merck), COX-2 (CellSignaling), 5-LO (Abcam), and cytokeratins 5, 6, 8, 17, and 19 (IgG1, Dako). An antibody against cytokeratin 20 (IgG2a, Chemicon International) and rabbit IgG (Biocare Medical) served as negative controls. Paraffin-embedded tissue section from HCMV-infected placenta was used as positive control and from HCMV negative breast cancer patient as negative control for IHC.
During the staining procedure a few of the tissue sections were lost.
HCMV, COX-2, and 5-LO staining was evaluated as described previously (Taher et al.
2013), and according to the estimated percentage of cells expressing HCMV or COX-2 or 5-LO proteins: negative (0%), grade 1 (< 25%), grade 2 (≥ 25–50%), grade 3 (≥ 50–75%), and grade 4 (≥ 75%). To ensure a sufficient number of cases in each category for statistical analysis, tumors were considered as HCMV-negative or as having focal HCMV infection (< 50% positive cells) or extensive infection (≥ 50% positive cells). Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for HCMV was evaluated and graded by a senior scientist (A.R.) without access to the clinical records at Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, while IHC staining for Ki-67 was performed and evaluated at the Department of Pathology, Akershus University Hospital.
Cell lines and virus
Breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 (ER/PR/ positive but HER2 negative) and MDA-MB-231 (ER/PR/HER-2 negative), both from ATCC, were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/ml of penicillin and 100 µg/ml of streptomycin and maintained in a 37-C incubator with 5% CO
2. Viral stocks of HCMV VR1814 strain were prepared through virus propagation in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) at low passage and ultracentrifugation of supernatants as described earlier (Frascaroli and Sinzger
2014).
RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR)
MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells were infected with HCMV VR1814 at multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 5 and were collected at different times post-infection. RNA was extracted from lysed cells using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) according to manufacturer’s instructions and cDNA was synthesized using random primers and the high-capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems). Gene expression levels were quantified by real-time PCR using TaqMan Fast Universal PCR Master Mix (Life Technologies) and the following specific TaqMan probes: COX-2 (PTGS2, assay ID Hs00153133_m1), 5-LO (ALOX5, assay ID Hs00167536_m1), HCMV IE, and human β2-microglobulin (B2M, assay ID, Hs00984230_m1) (Life Technologies). The PCR was performed using a 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). The endogenous control B2M was used for normalization and relative expression was determined by the 2−ΔΔCt method. (Three separate experiments were performed).
Flow cytometric analysis (FACS)
MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells non-infected or infected with HCMV MOI of 5 were fixed at 6 days post infection (dpi). Cells were treated in Fix &Perm Medium A and B according to the supplier`s instruction (Molecular Probes) and co-stained with primary antibodies HCMV IE (Merck) and COX-2 (CellSignaling) or 5-LO (Abcam) diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 1% BSA (Sigma) for 45 min at 4 °C. After washing with PBS, cells were incubated with secondary Alexa Fluor 633 goat anti-mouse antibodies (Life Technologies) and Alexa Fluor 488 anti-rabbit antibodies (Invitrogen). Rabbit IgG (Biocare Medical) and mouse IgG2a (Dako) served as negative controls. Acquisition was performed using Flow cytometry (FACS) and data were analyzed by Summit 4.3 software. (Three separate experiments were performed).
Statistical analysis
All analyses were done with GraphPad Prism version 6; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Nonparametric Pearson correlation assay was used to assess statistical significance of correlation between different grades of HCMV-IE, COX-2, and 5-LO in BC tissues. Two-tailed Student t test was used for analysis of in vitro data, presented as mean standard deviation.
Discussion
The presence of HCMV, as well as other herpesviruses in different types of cancers has been studied by several groups with variable results (Cianchi et al.
2006; Rahbar et al.
2017). Several studies have reported a very high prevalence of HCMV in breast cancer and linked the virus activity levels to overall survival (Taher et al.
2013; Tsai et al.
2007). Consistent with these observations, we found HCMV protein expression in all breast cancer tissue specimens examined. Moreover, HCMV IE protein expression was extensive (defined as > 50% positive cells) in 72% of breast cancer samples, but only in 8% of adjacent non tumor tissues. These observations give support for a potential role of HCMV in breast cancer progression (Kumar et al.
2018; Rahbar et al.
2017). As it seems, HCMV infections can provide direct effects on tumor cells by expression of viral proteins that affect tumor biology-relevant mechanisms and by virus-induced inflammation. In fact, HCMV seems to contribute to all established Hallmarks of Cancer (Soroceanu and Cobbs
2011).
In support of this statement, we detected extensive expression of the inflammatory factors COX-2 and 5-LO in infiltrating breast cancer (58%, 53%, respectively), but less pronounced activity of these inflammatory mediators in adjacent non-tumor breast tissues (8% and 31%, respectively). These inflammatory factors were expressed in the tumor and in inflammatory cells. We also found a concordant extensive expression of COX-2, 5-LO, and HCMV-IE in breast cancer, suggesting that HCMV activity on tumor cells may be linked to COX-2 and 5-LO expression. This hypothesis was further supported by in vitro experiments demonstrating virus-induced transcript of both COX-2 and 5-LO and COX-2 protein expression in HCMV-infected MDA-231 and MCF-7 cells. However, we did not observe higher expression of COX-2 or 5-LO transcripts in HCMV-infected MDA-231 cells, which may be explained by the already high expression levels of COX-2 proteins in the more aggressive cell line MDA-231 that was originally established from a triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Previous studies have reported high expression levels of COX-2 in TNBCs (Chikman et al.
2014; Mosalpuria et al.
2014), and we recently reported that HCMV protein expression was high in TNBC (Rahbar et al.
2017). Our results confirm previous studies demonstrating increased levels of COX-2, 5-LO, and their metabolites prostaglandins and leukotrienes in HCMV-infected cells both in vitro and in vivo (Maussang et al.
2009; Qiu et al.
2008; Hooks et al.
2006; Bongers et al.
2010).
HCMV-induced COX-2 expression is mediated by the constitutively active viral chemokine receptor homologue US28, which promotes inflammation, angiogenesis, and tumor formation (Maussang et al.
2009). US28 promotes angiogenesis and tumor formation via COX-2 induced production of IL-6, phosphorylation of STAT-3, and activation of nuclear factor-kappaB (Maussang et al.
2009). High COX-2 and 5-LO expression and production of inflammatory mediators will also attract inflammatory cells capable of releasing inflammatory factors and reactive oxygen species causing inflammation, oxidative DNA damage, and impaired DNA repair mechanisms (Coussens and Werb
2002). In a mouse model with targeted expression of US28 in colon, mice developed inflammation associated adenocarcinoma (Bongers et al.
2010). Consistent with an important role for the virus to induce COX-2 expression, COX-2 inhibition obstructs HCMV replication (Zhu et al.
2002) and reduces growth of HCMV positive tumors in animal models (Baryawno et al.
2011; Maussang et al.
2009). In addition, combined antiviral therapy targeting HCMV (Valganciclovir) and COX-2 (Celecoxib) prevents HCMV replication and PGE2 production, further reduced meduloblastoma and neuroblastoma cell proliferation in vitro (Baryawno et al.
2011; Wolmer-Solberg et al.
2013) and tumor size in meduloblastoma xenografts (Baryawno et al.
2011).
Taken together, these observations raise the question of a possible impact of HCMV on tumor progression through induced production of potent inflammatory factors such as COX-2 and 5-LO that through their effects on both tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment may enhance tumor malignancy grade and promote tumor progression.
Epidemiological studies in large patient cohorts have reported that the cancer risk and metastasis development is reduced in patients who are treated with non-selective COX inhibitors (Anderson et al.
2002; Burn et al.
2011; Xu
2002). The critical role of inflammatory COX-2 and 5-LO and their biological products, prostaglandin and leukotrienes in inflammation and their ability to stimulate signalling pathways contributing to angiogenesis, tumor growth, and invasiveness, further highlights them as potential targets for cancer therapy. Notably, inhibitors of 5-LO were efficiently used to block proliferation of breast cancer cells and a lipoxygenase inhibitor administrated to one breast cancer patient successfully reverted multiple brain metastasis (Flavin
2007; Hammamieh et al.
2007; Poeckel et al.
2006). In vitro experiments and animal models using specific COX-2 inhibitors show a reduction in proliferation and invasion of breast cancer cells and an effect on tumor development and growth (Bocca et al.
2011; Na et al.
2013; Silva et al.
2012). Consistent with these findings, specific or non-specific inhibition of COX-2 has successfully been used for prevention and therapy of breast cancer (Arun and Goss
2004). Selective COX-2 inhibitors appear to be more protective but in both cases, with a significant reduction in the breast cancer risk (Ashok et al.
2011). However, the inhibition of both COX-2 and 5-LO would have additive benefits by simultaneously targeting both pathways of arachidonic acid metabolism. Indeed, combined treatment with COX-2 and 5-LO inhibitors showed a stronger effect on tumor cell proliferation and induction of apoptosis in colon cancer cells (Che et al.
2016; Cianchi et al.
2006). However, these compounds may also involve a so far not considered anti-viral effect against HCMV to affect tumor growth (Schroer and Shenk
2008; Zhu et al.
2002). As selective COX-2 inhibitors may confer increased risk of cardiovascular diseases and stroke (Trelle et al.
2011; Back et al.
2012; Martinez-Gonzalez and Badimon
2007; Sibbald
2004), there is a need to develop a non-toxic drug with potential to inhibit COX-2 and 5-LO, with therapeutic action in human cancers (Gautam et al.
2017).
In conclusion, we detected higher grades of HCMV-IE, COX-2 and 5-LO in the majority of BC samples than in adjacent non-malignant tissue specimens and a significant correlation between extensive HCMV-IE, COX-2 and 5-LO protein levels in infiltrating BCs. These results suggest that inflammation driven by COX-2 and 5-LO in human BC might be induced by HCMV in some patients and promote tumor progression. Thus, we suggest that anti-viral therapy targeting HCMV and inhibitors targeting COX-2 and 5-LO should be evaluated as new therapeutic options in selected breast cancer patients.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by BILTEMA Foundation, Nexttobe, Stichting af Jochnicks Foundation, Sten A. Olssons Foundation for Research and Culture, Familjen Erling-Perssons Foundation, RATOS, independent Grants from Hoffmann La Roche, Torsten and Ragnar Söderbergs Foundations, Dan och Jane Olssons Foundation, Swedish Cancer Foundation, Swedish Medical Research Council, Swedish Society for Medical Research (SLS), Goljes Memory Foundation, Magnus Bergvalls Foundation, Swedish Society for Medical Research (SSMF), Percy Falks Foundation, Karolinska Institutet Foundation, IngaBritt och Arne Lundbergs Foundation and Tore Nilsons Foundation. In Norway, the study was supported by a Grant from the regional health administration (Helse Sør-Øst), funding from internal research funds of Akerhus University Hospital and by generous support provided by Bodil and Magne’s Cancer Research Fund, Oslo, Norway.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.