Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Diabetes Reports
Erschienen in: Current Diabetes Reports 4/2011

01.08.2011

Imaging of Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema

verfasst von: Ronald P. Danis, Larry D. Hubbard

Erschienen in: Current Diabetes Reports | Ausgabe 4/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Imaging of the retinal complications of diabetes mellitus is rapidly changing from the emergence of new technology such as optical coherence tomography. In particular, the characterization of diabetic macular edema is much easier for the clinician and there are new, more sensitive clinical research end points. However, our understanding of structure-functional relationships remains suboptimal and the classification of macular edema by optical coherence tomography continues to evolve. The classification of diabetic retinopathy severity continues to rely upon fundus photography, although the transition from film to digital photography presents both challenges and advantages.
Literatur
1.
Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Report 7. A modification of the Airlie House classification of Diabetic Retinopathy. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981;21:210–26.
2.
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs–an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:786–806.
3.
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Fundus photographic risk factors for progression of diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 12. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:823–33.
4.
Wilkinson CP, Ferris 3rd FL, Klein RE, et al. Proposed international clinical diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema disease severity scales. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1677–82.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Scott IU, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, et al. Agreement between clinician and reading center gradings of diabetic retinopathy severity level at baseline in a phase 2 study of intravitreal bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema. Retina. 2008;28:36–40.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Boes DA, Clifton BC, Mills RP. Resolution of nidek 3-dx, zeiss, canon, and topcon fundus cameras. J Glaucoma. 1994;3:190–200.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Flower RW, Hochheimer BF. A clinical technique and apparatus for simultaneous angiography of the separate retinal and choroidal circulations. Invest Ophthalmol. 1973;12:248–61.PubMed
8.
Li HK, Hubbard LD, Danis RP, Florez-Arango JF, Esquivel A, Krupinski EA. Comparison of multiple stereoscopic and monoscopic digital image formats to film for diabetic macular edema evaluation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:6753–61.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Haller JA, Qin H, Apte RS, et al. Vitrectomy outcomes in eyes with diabetic macular edema and vitreomacular traction. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1087–93.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Massin P, Duguid G, Erginay A, Haouchine B, Gaudric A. Optical coherence tomography for evaluating diabetic macular edema before and after vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:169–77.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Sivaprasad S, Ockrim Z, Massaoutis P, Ikeji F, Hykin PG, Gregor ZJ. Posterior hyaloid changes following intravitreal triamcinolone and macular laser for diffuse diabetic macular edema. Retina. 2008;28:1435–42.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Domalpally A, Danis RP, Zhang B, Myers D, Kruse CN. Quality issues in interpretation of optical coherence tomograms in macular diseases. Retina. 2009;29:775–81.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Sadda SR, Wu Z, Walsh AC, et al. Errors in retinal thickness measurements obtained by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:285–93.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Sadda SR, Joeres S, Wu Z, et al. Error correction and quantitative subanalysis of optical coherence tomography data using computer-assisted grading. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:839–48.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Domalpally A, Danis RP. Optimizing Stratus OCT3 image and data quality. Review of Ophthalmology. 2008;15:87–92.
16.
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Fluorescein angiographic risk factors for progression of diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 13. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:834–40.
17.
• Danis RP, Scott IU, Qin H, et al. Association of fluorescein angiographic features with visual acuity and with optical coherence tomographic and stereoscopic color fundus photographic features of diabetic macular edeam in a randomized clinical trial. Retina. 2010;30:1627–1637. This report from the DRCR.net evaluates OCT, photograph, and angiograph variables measured from eyes with DME as predictors of concurrent VA and for VA outcomes. FA and photograph variables are associated with vision, but none stronger than OCT center thickness. None of the variables were good predictors of vision outcomes in a clinical trial of laser treatment.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Browning DJ, Glassman AR, Aiello LP, et al. Relationship between optical coherence tomography-measured central retinal thickness and visual acuity in diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:525–36.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Diabetes Control and Complications Research Group. Color photography vs fluorescein angiography in the detection of diabetic retinopathy in the diabetes control and complications trial. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105:1344–51.
20.
• Kaines A, Oliver S, Reddy S, Schwartz SD. Ultrawide angle angiography for the detection and management of diabetic retinopathy. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2009;49:53–9. This discusses use of a novel instrument to evaluate peripheral retinal ischemia and neovascularization in DR.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Tsui I, Kaines A, Havunjian MA, et al. Ischemic index and neovascularization in central retinal vein occlusion. Retina. 2011;31:105–10.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Webb RH, Hughes GW. Scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Biomed Eng IEEE Trans. 1981;28:488–92.CrossRef
23.
Staurenghi G, Viola F, Mainster MA, Graham RD, Harrington PG. Scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and angiography with a wide-field contact lens system. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:244–52.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Gangnon RE, Davis MD, Hubbard LD, et al. A severity scale for diabetic macular edema developed from ETDRS data. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:5041–7.PubMedCrossRef
25.
• Browning DJ, Apte RS, Bressler SB, et al. Association of the extent of diabetic macular edema as assessed by optical coherence tomography with visual acuity and retinal outcome variables. Retina. 2009;29:300–305. This detailed analysis of various OCT variables from eyes with DME yeilded little additional predictive value beyond center subfield thickness.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Kiss CG, Barisani-Asenbauer T, Simader C, Maca S, Schmidt-Erfurth U. Central visual field impairment during and following cystoid macular oedema. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:84–8.PubMedCrossRef
27.
• Deak GG, Bolz M, Ritter M, Prager S, Benesch T, Schmidt-Erfurth U. A systematic correlation between morphology and functional alterations in diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:6710–4. Subretinal fluid and outer retinal cysts had the greatest negative effect on VA in eyes with DME.PubMedCrossRef
28.
• Maheshwary AS, Oster SF, Yuson RM, Cheng L, Mojana F, Freeman WR. The Association between Percent Disruption of the Photoreceptor Inner Segment-Outer Segment Junction and Visual Acuity in Diabetic Macular Edema. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;150:63–67. Semiquantitative assessment of the IS/OS junctional integrity was significantly associated with VA.PubMedCrossRef
29.
• Forooghian F, Stetson PF, Meyer SA, et al. Relationship between photoreceptor outer segment length and visual acuity in diabetic macular edema. Retina. 2010;30:63–70. Quantitative measurement of outer segment length was moderately correlated with VA in eyes with DME and the association was stronger than that between retinal thickness and VA.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Bolz M, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Deak G, Mylonas G, Kriechbaum K, Scholda C. Optical coherence tomographic hyperreflective foci: a morphologic sign of lipid extravasation in diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:914–20.PubMedCrossRef
31.
• van Dijk HW, Kok PH, Garvin M, et al. Selective loss of inner retinal layer thickness in type 1 diabetic patients with minimal diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:3404–9. Identification of a potential biomarker for early neuroretinopathic changes from diabetes.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Bressler NM, Edwards AR, Antoszyk AN, et al. Retinal thickness on Stratus optical coherence tomography in people with diabetes and minimal or no diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:894–901.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Hubbard LD, Sun W, Cleary PA, et al. Comparison of digital and film grading of diabetic retinopathy severity in DCCT/EDIC. Arch Ophthalmol 2011; In Press.
34.
Gangaputra S, R.P. D, Almukhtar T. Comparison of film and digital fundus photographs in diabetic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;Submitted for publication.
35.
Li HK, Florez-Arango JF, Hubbard LD, Esquivel A, Danis RP, Krupinski EA. Grading diabetic retinopathy severity from compressed digital retinal images compared with uncompressed images and film. Retina. 2010;30:1651–61.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Li HK, Hubbard LD, Danis RP, Esquivel A, Florez-Arango JF, Krupinski EA. Monoscopic versus stereoscopic retinal photography for grading diabetic retinopathy severity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:3184–92.PubMedCrossRef
37.
• Lammer J, Scholda C, Prunte C, Benesch T, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Bolz M. Retinal thickness and volume measurements in diabetic macular edema: a comparison of four optical coherence tomography systems. Retina. 2011;31:48–55. Specifically in eyes with DME, different OCT machines produced significantly different measurements in the same eyes.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Giani A, Cigada M, Choudhry N, et al. Reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements on normal and pathologic eyes by different optical coherence tomography instruments. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;150:815–24.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Imaging of Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema
verfasst von
Ronald P. Danis
Larry D. Hubbard
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2011
Verlag
Current Science Inc.
Erschienen in
Current Diabetes Reports / Ausgabe 4/2011
Print ISSN: 1534-4827
Elektronische ISSN: 1539-0829
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-011-0203-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2011

Current Diabetes Reports 4/2011 Zur Ausgabe

ReviewPaper

AGEs, RAGE, and Diabetic Retinopathy

Clinical Trial Report

Is Duloxetine More Effective than Amitriptyline for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy?

ReviewPaper

Microvascular Modifications in Diabetic Retinopathy

ReviewPaper

A Review of the Eurodiale Studies: What Lessons for Diabetic Foot Care?

ReviewPaper

Painful Diabetic Neuropathy is More than Pain Alone: Examining the Role of Anxiety and Depression as Mediators and Complicators

ReviewPaper

Oxidative Stress and Diabetic Kidney Disease

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

25.04.2024 Allergien und Intoleranzreaktionen Nachrichten

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise