Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Surgery 1/2018

Open Access 01.12.2018 | Research article

Impact of postoperative complications on long-term survival following surgery for T4 colorectal cancer

verfasst von: Michael Osseis, Francesco Esposito, Chetana Lim, Alexandre Doussot, Eylon Lahat, Liliana Fuentes, Toufic Moussallem, Chady Salloum, Daniel Azoulay

Erschienen in: BMC Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2018

Abstract

Background

Postoperative complications (POCs) after the resection of locally advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) may influence adjuvant treatment timing, outcomes, and survival. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of POCs on long-term outcomes in patients surgically treated for T4 CRC.

Methods

All consecutive patients who underwent the resection of T4 CRC at a single centre from 2004 to 2013 were retrospectively analysed from a prospectively maintained database. POCs were assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Patients who developed POCs were compared with those who did not in terms of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

The study population comprised 106 patients, including 79 (74.5%) with synchronous distant metastases. Overall, 46 patients (43%) developed at least one POC during the hospital stay, and of those patients, 9 (20%) had severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ grade III). POCs were not associated with OS (65% with POCs vs. 69% without POCs; p = 0.72) or RFS (58% with POCs vs. 70% without POCs; p = 0.37). Similarly, POCs did not affect OS or RFS in patients who had synchronous metastases at diagnosis compared with those who did not.

Conclusions

POCs do not affect the oncological course of patients subjected to the resection of T4 CRC, even in cases of synchronous metastases.
Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12893-018-0419-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Abkürzungen
CRC
Colorectal cancer
CT
Computed tomography
MRI
Magnetic resonance imaging
OS
Overall survival
POC
Post-operative complications
RFS
Recurrence-free survival

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer type and the fourth cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide [1]. Nearly 10% to 20% of patients with CRC present with locally advanced disease, including peritoneal involvement (T4a) or invasion in adjacent organs (T4b) at diagnosis [2].
Long-term survival has improved in selected patients with clinically T4 colorectal cancer managed with the multimodal treatment strategy including surgery and perioperative chemotherapy. Patient selection remains of utmost importance as CRC resection for T4 lesions is associated with significant morbidity rate ranging from 30 to 40% [3, 4].
Postoperative complications are associated with increased hospital stay and in-hospital costs [5, 6]. There is increasing evidence reporting that the postoperative complications were also risk factors for the survival or tumor recurrence in various types of abdominal malignancies including esophageal, gastric, and liver cancers [710]. In CRC patients, reports that have studied the effect of postoperative morbidity following resection on long-term survival have yielded conflicting results. To our knowledge, the effect of postoperative morbidity following surgery of T4 CRC has never been reported. Despite several studies performed in CRC patients, most studies have many limitations including heterogeneous disease stages populations, with a relatively small sample size of T4 CRC patients (Table 1).
Table 1
Literature regarding the influence of morbidity on long-term survival after resection of colorectal cancer from 2004 to 2017
1st Author (reference), year, country
Study period
Duration of FU (months)
Compared morbidity
Number of patients
% of T4 (n)
Post-op complications (%)
AL rate (%)
Impact of morbidity on OS (at 5 years)
Location of cancer
Independent predictor of OS hazard ratio
Law et al. [31] 2004, Hong Kong
1993–2002
40 (3–109)a
AL versus No AL
563
NA
6
6
8/30 vs 156/533, p = 0.7600
R
p = 0.004
Eriksen et al. [32] 2004, Norway
1993–1995
45 (0–98)a
AL versus No AL
1958
6 (117/1958)
NA
22 (T4)
93/228 vs 564/1730, p = 0.014
R
NA
Walker et al. [33] 2004, Australia
1971–1999
≥60a
AL versus No AL
1722
NA
NA
5
44.3% vs 64%, p = 0.0001
R/C
1.6 (CI 1.3–2.1)
Nespoli et al. [34] 2004, Italy
 
≥60a
Yes, versus No
192
NA
NA
NA
p = 0.0006
C
NA
Branagan and Finnis et al. [35] 2005, UK
1991–1995
≥60a
AL versus No AL
1759
NA
NA
4
R: 17/36 vs 210/581, p = 0.1840
C: 9/22 vs 430/112, p = 0.8100
R/C
NA
McArdle et al. [36] 2005, UK
1991–1994
≥60a
AL versus No AL
2235
NA
NA
4
43/86 vs 688/2149, p = 0.0010
R/C
1·61 (CI 1·19, 2·16)
Ptok et al. [37] 2007, Germany
2000–2001
≥40a
AL versus No AL
1625
 
50 for (AL group)
26 (for Non-AL group)
15
74/255 vs 337/1370, p = 0.1360
R
NA
Law et al. [22] 2007, Hong Kong
1996–2004
46c
Yes, versus No
1657
NA
27
4
26/60 vs 366/1520, p = 0.0010
R/C
1.26, p = 0.023
Lee et al. [38] 2008, Korea
1996–2006
44.6 (2–157)a
AL versus No AL
1278
73 (933/1278) (T3/T4)
NA
4
80.2% vs 64.9%, p = 0.17
R
NA
Eberhardt et al. [34] 2009, USA
1979–2007
≥60a
AL versus No AL
468
NA
NA
33
13/59 vs 16/118, p = 0.1550
R/C
NA
Den Dulk et al. [39] 2009, Multinational
1987–2002
70.8 (2–179)a
AL versus No AL
2726
NA
NA
10
46/220 vs 427/2199, p = 0.5950
R
1.48
Bertelsen et al. [40] 2009, Denmark
2001–2004
45.2 (1–74)a
AL versus No AL
1494
NA
NA
11
50/357 vs 95/1077, p = 0.005
R
1.63 (CI 1.21–2.19)
Jogren et al. [41] 2009, Sweden
1995–1997
60c
AL versus No AL
250
10 (25/250)
NA
NA
63% vs 66%, p = 0.38
R
1
Mirnezami et al. [42] 2011, UK
1965–2009
AL versus No AL
21,902
 
R/C
1.75 (CI 1.47–2.1), p = 0.0001
Gooiker et al. [43] 2012, Netherland
2006–2008
48c
Yes, versus No
2131
NA
20
NA
12% vs 26%, p = 0.02 (1 year)
R/C
5.9 (CI 1.3–26.8)
Smith et al. [28] 2013, USA
1992–2010
35c
AL versus No AL
184
7
 
11
32 vs 72%, p = 0.01
R
NA
Henneman et al. [44] 2014, Netherland
2011–2012
NA
Yes, versus No
10,184
NA
NA
C: 27
R: 36.5
NA
R/C
NA
Odermatt et al. [45] 2015, UK
2003–2012
≥60a
AL versus No AL
844
10 (84/844)
5
3
p = 0.80
R/C
1.04 (CI 0.76–1.42)
Ebinger et al. [46] 2015, Germany
1991–2010
62 (2–254)a
AL versus No AL
584
NA
NA
11
p = 0.701
R
0.91 (CI 0.56–1.47)
Kulu et al. [30] 2015, Switzerland
2002–2011
56 ± 35b
AL versus No AL
570
NA
NA
9
65% vs 83%
R
2.27 (CI 1.33–3.88), p = 0.005
Hain et al. [29] 2016, France
2005–2014
40 ± 27b
AL versus No AL
428
50 (214/428) (pT3/T4)
50
28
78·6% vs 88·4%, p = 0.001
R
NA
Breugom et al. [47] 2016, Netherland
2006–2008
64.8 (56.4–74.4)a
Yes, versus No
761
75 (570/761) (T3/T4)
42
5
65% vs 35%, p = 0.001
C
1.59 (CI 1.25–2.04), p = 0.001
Jamnagerwalla et al. [48] 2016, Australia
2003–2014
46c
Chemotherapy versus No Chemotherapy
517
100 (517/517) (T3/T4)
28
3.5
NA
R
0.53, p = 0.04
Nordholm-Carstensen et al. [49] 2017, Denmark
2009–2013
37 (25–50)a
Yes, versus No
774
NA
NA
9
C: 18.7% vs 44.6% p < 0.001
R: 53.7% vs 73.3% p = 0.0600
R/C
C: 1.67 (CI 1.03–2.68), p = 0.04
R: 0.93 (CI 0.24–3.57), p = 0.91
Present study 2017, France
2004–2013
42
Yes, versus No
106
100 (106/106)
43
4
65% vs. 69%; p = 0.72
R/C
p > 0.05
Footnotes: FU indicates follow-up; AL anastomotic leakage, OS overall survival, NA not available, R rectum, C Colon, CI confidence interval
aNo mean or median given
aMedian given with range. bMean given with range. cMedian given with no range
The above knowledge was the impetus for the present study which aimed to evaluate the impact of postoperative morbidity on long-term outcomes following potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer.

Methods

Patients

All consecutive patients who underwent either elective or urgent surgery with histologically proven T4 CRC on final resected specimens were retrospectively identified from a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing laparoscopic or open colorectal resection at Henri Mondor Hospital between January 2004 and December 2013. Patients were categorized into two groups: with synchronous distant metastases (stage IV according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer) or without (stage II–III). Patients who died within 90 days of surgery were not considered for inclusion in this study because they were not exposed to recurrence.

Perioperative management and surgical techniques

All patients underwent a preoperative evaluation, including colonoscopy with tumour biopsy and thoraco-abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) scan. In cases of rectal cancer, pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endorectal ultrasonography were performed for local rectal cancer staging. Liver MRI was systematically performed in case of synchronous liver metastases diagnosed by CT.
In patients with mid or low rectal cancer who underwent elective surgery, the indications were for neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiation therapy (45–50.4 Gy delivered in daily fractions of 1.8–2 Gy over a 5- to 6-week period combined with 5-fluorouracil [5-FU] or capecitabine [Xeloda]). Short-course radiotherapy (5 × 5 Gy for 1 week) or chemotherapy alone were determined by multidisciplinary cancer boards according to local standards. Surgery was performed 6 to 8 weeks after the completion of chemo-radiotherapy and immediately after short-course radiotherapy.
All patients were operated with a curative intent. During the study period, the following oncological principles were applied: vascular control at the root of the corresponding mesenteric axis for appropriate lymphadenectomy and multivisceral en bloc resection in cases of adhesion to adjacent organs. Total mesorectal excision was performed in cases of mid or low rectal cancer [11]. Curative resection was defined as the complete removal of all macroscopically evident disease at the time of surgery and tumour-free resection margins on histological examination. A diverting ileostomy was performed in all cases of infraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis.

Definitions and study design

Any postoperative event occurring within 90 days and deemed as leading to any deviation from the normal postoperative course was considered a complication [12]. Surgical complications included anastomotic leakage, bleeding, ileus, intraabdominal or pelvic abscess, and wound infection. Anastomotic leakage was defined and given one of three grades (A, B and C) according to the international study group of rectal cancer [13]. Non-surgical complications included renal, pulmonary, cardiac, and infectious complications. Postoperative complications (POCs) were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo staging system [14]. Grade III and IV complications were considered as severe complications.
All patients participated in an oncological follow-up program every 3 months for the first 2 years and every 6 months thereafter. Abdominal and chest CT scans with a blood test including carcinoembryonic antigen levels were routinely performed during every follow-up visit. A full colonoscopy was performed 1 to 2 years after surgery and then once every 4 years. If recurrence was suspected, MRI and/or positron emission tomography-CT were used to confirm the diagnosis. Biopsies were selectively performed.
Patients were divided in two groups: patients who did and did not develop POCs. The two groups were then compared in terms of OS and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Additionally, the time from surgery to adjuvant chemotherapy was retrieved to measure the impact of POCs on adjuvant chemotherapy delivery.
This study was approved by the local institutional review board and ethics committee of Henri Mondor Hospital, conformed to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables are presented as the mean (SD); all other variables are presented as the median (range) and were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. RFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival differences between groups were compared using the log-rank test. Variables that reached statistical significance (p < 0.05) in univariate analyses were included in a Cox proportional hazard model to identify independent prognostic predictors of OS and RFS. All analyses were performed using SPSS® version 22.0 (IBM, Armonk, New York, USA).

Results

Study population

According to the objective of the study, 17 patients were excluded from the analysis—8 (6.5%) died within 90 days of surgery, and 9 were lost to follow-up. The remaining 106 patients represented the study population (Table 2). The tumour was rectal in 15 patients (14%) and colonic in 92 patients (86%). One patient had combined colon and rectal cancer. Six patients (5.6%) underwent preoperative and postoperative chemo-radiotherapy, and 10 patients (9%) underwent preoperative chemotherapy alone. At presentation, 27 (26%) patients had synchronous metastases: 18 (67%) had stage IVA (liver only), 4 (15%) had stage IVA (lung only), and 5 (19%) had stage IVB CRC. Eighty-six patients (81%) underwent elective CRC resection, and 20 (19%) patients underwent emergent resection due to perforation or bleeding.
Table 2
Demographics, perioperative variables, and histopathological findings
Variable
Total
n = 106
No complication
n = 60
(56%)
Any complication
n = 46
(44%)
P
Age (years)
69 ± 14
70 ± 14
67 ± 14
0.27
Male sex
46 (43%)
25 (42%)
21 (46%)
0.68
ASA score > 2
13 (12%)
8 (61.5%)
5 (38.5%)
0.70
BMI
24 ± 6
24 ± 6
25 ± 6
0.32
Comorbidity
 Cardiovascular
45 (42%)
25 (55.5%)
20 (44.5%)
0.85
 Pulmonary
20 (19%)
6 (30%)
14 (70%)
0.01
 Diabetes
17 (16%)
11 (65%)
6 (35%)
0.46
Localization
 Rectum
14 (13%)
9 (64%)
5 (36%)
0.53
 Colon
92 (86%)
51 (55%)
41 (45%)
 
Synchronous metastasis
27 (25%)
15 (55.5%)
12 (44.5%)
0.90
 Stage IVA (liver only)
18 (67%)
9 (50%)
9 (50%)
 
 Stage IVA (lung only)
4 (15%)
3 (75%)
1 (25%)
 
 Stage IVB
5 (19%)
3 (60%)
2 (40%)
 
Serum CEA (μ/L)
54 ± 116
71 ± 140
37 ± 82
0.25
Neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy
16 (15%)
9 (56%)
7 (44%)
0.98
Operative setting
   
0.51
 Elective
84 (79%)
48 (57%)
36 (43%)
 
 Emergent
22 (21%)
12 (54.5%)
10 (45.5%)
 
Surgical procedure
   
0.85
 Abdominoperineal resection
2 (1.8%)
1 (50%)
1 (50%)
 
 Hartmann’s procedure
7 (6.6%)
3 (43%)
4 (57%)
 
 Anterior resection
17 (16%)
11 (65%)
6 (35%)
 
 Segmental resection
80 (75.5%)
45 (56%)
35 (44%)
 
Surgical approach
   
0.75
 Open
78 (74%)
43 (55%)
35 (45%)
 
 Laparoscopic
28 (26%)
11 (39%)
17 (61%)
 
Associated resection
40 (37.8%)
23 (57.5%)
17 (42.5%)
 
 1 organ
23 (49%)
15 (65%)
8 (35%)
0.51
  > 1 organ
17 (51%)
8 (47%)
9 (53%)
 
Synchronous liver resection
11 (10.3%)
5 (45%)
6 (55%)
0.88
Stoma
42 (39.6%)
21 (50%)
21 (50%)
0.27
Specimen analysis
N+
60 (56.6%)
35 (58%)
25 (42%)
0.68
 Surgical margins status
   
0.35
 R0
85 (80%)
35 (41%)
50 (59%)
 
 R1
21 (20%)
11 (52%)
10 (48%)
 
Adjuvant chemotherapy
65 (61%)
32 (53%)
33 (72%)
0.06
Delay from surgery to chemotherapy (days)
52 ± 50
55 ± 62
49 ± 33
0.69
Footnotes: ASA American Society of Anaesthesiologists, BMI body mass index, CEA carcinoembryonic antigen

Perioperative data and specimen analysis

Intraoperative data are reported in Table 2. Surgery was performed by an open approach in 78 (74%) patients and by a laparoscopic approach in 28 (26%) patients. The surgical procedures included segmental colectomy in 80 patients (75%), low anterior resection of the rectum in 17 patients (16%), Hartmann’s procedure in 7 patients (6.6%), and abdominoperineal resection in 2 patients (1.9%). Temporary faecal diversion was performed in 42 patients (40%). In the latter subset of patients, the cancer was rectal in 13 cases, left colonic in 16 cases, right colonic in 9 cases, and transverse in 4 cases. Resection of adjacent organs was needed in 40 patients (38%): one organ in 23 patients (22%) and more than one organ in 17 patients (16%). Concomitant hepatectomy for synchronous liver metastases was performed in 11 patients (10%), and the en bloc resection of organs adjacent to the tumour was required in 29 (27%) patients. The number and types of additional organs resection are reported in Additional file 1: Table S1.
Pathological findings included 21 R1 (20%) and 85 R0 (80%) CRC resections. The malignant infiltration of adherent organs was observed in 22 patients (21%). Lymph nodes that tested positive for disease were found in 60 patients (57%).

Post-operative complications

Pre- and perioperative variables associated with the development of POCs are presented in Table 2. Globally, the two groups did not differ in terms of demographics, clinical, and perioperative outcomes.
Forty-six patients developed POCs (morbidity rate = 43%), and the rate of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3) was 8.5% (9 patients). Four patients (3.7%) had anastomotic leakage—two were classified as grade A anastomotic leakage, and the other two were considered grade B. Details of complications are detailed in Table 3.
Table 3
Details of postoperative complications among 106 patients
 
No. of patients (%)
Anastomotic leakage
4 (3.7%)
Infectious complications
 Pelvic abscess
6 (5.6%)
 Intra-abdominal abscess
6 (5.6%)
 Urinary infection
4 (3.7%)
 Wound infection
10 (9.4%)
Non-infectious complications
 Ileus
6 (5.6%)
 Kidney failure
2 (1.8%)
 Pulmonary failure/pleuresia
4 (3.7%)
 Intra-abdominal bleeding
1 (0.9%)
 Cardiac problems
2 (1.8%)
According to Clavien-Dindo classification
Patients may have had more than one complication

Adjuvant therapy

Sixty-five patients (61%) received adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. There was no significant difference in the delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy between the patient groups with and without POCs (53% vs. 72%, respectively; p = 0.06). The delay from surgery to chemotherapy was not different between the two groups (55 vs. 49 days, respectively; p = 0.69).

Impact of POCs on long-term outcomes

All stages combined

The median follow-up was 42 [4–125] months. Overall, the 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates were 91%, 79%, and 67%, respectively (Fig. 1). The 1-, 3- and 5-year RFS rates were 91%, 72%, and 64%, respectively (Fig. 2). In the multivariable analysis, no variables were identified as predictors of OS (data not shown), while the presence of positive lymph nodes was the sole independent predictor of decreased RFS rate (Table 4). POCs did not impact either OS or RFS in the entire cohort.
Table 4
Uni- and multivariate analyses of risk factors for overall and recurrence-free survival in the entire cohort (n = 106)
Variable
Univariate P value
Multivariate P value
Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)
Age ≥ 60 (years)
0.76
  
Male sex
0.37
  
BMI ≥ 30 (kg/m2)
0.79
  
ASA score ≥ 2
0.12
  
Elevated CEA
0.03
0.46
 
Colon vs rectum
0.59
  
Synchronous metastases
0.03
0.21
 
Neoadjuvant treatment
0.45
  
Emergent surgery
0.46
  
Laparoscopic approach
0.51
  
Multiple organ resection
0.88
  
Synchronous liver resection
0.43
  
N+ status
0.009
0.01
3 (1–7)
R1 margins
0.03
0.08
 
Postoperative complications
0.37
  
Grade III-IV complications
0.57
  
Adjuvant chemotherapy
0.80
  
Footnotes: BMI indicates body mass index, ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists, CEA carcinoembryonic antigen

Stage I–III disease

In patients without synchronous metastases, the 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates did not differ between the two groups (94%, 80%, and 75%, respectively, in the POCs group vs. 91.4%, 82%, and 74.6%, respectively, in the no POCs group; p = 0.77). In the multivariable analyses, no variables were identified as predictors of OS; however, three variables were identified as independent predictors of low RFS rates: ASA score > 2, positive lymph nodes, and R1 margins (Table 5). POCs did not impact either OS or RFS in patients who did not have synchronous metastases.
Table 5
Uni- and multivariate analyses of risk factors for overall and recurrence-free survival in patients without synchronous metastases (n = 79)
Variable
Univariate P Value
Multivariate P Value
Hazard Ratio
(95% Confidence Interval)
Age ≥ 60 years
0.39
  
Male sex
0.28
  
BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2
0.79
  
ASA ≥ 2
0.03
0.03
4 (1–13)
Elevated CEA
0.17
  
Colon vs rectum
0.77
  
Synchronous metastases
  
Neoadjuvant treatment
0.17
  
Emergent surgery
0.55
  
Laparoscopic approach
0.96
  
Multiple organ resection
0.81
  
Synchronous liver resection
  
N+ status
0.03
0.01
4 (1–13)
R1 margins
0.05
0.02
3 (1–8)
Postoperative complications
0.90
  
Grade III-IV complications
0.82
  
Adjuvant chemotherapy
0.70
  
Footnotes: BMI indicates body mass index, ASA American Score of Anesthesiologists, CEA carcinoembryonic antigen

Stage IV disease

In patients with synchronous metastases, the 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates did not differ between the two groups (90%, 65.6%, and 21.9%, respectively, in the POCs group vs. 85.7%, 77.9%, and 59.4%, respectively, in the no POCs group; p = 0.35).

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the effect of POCs on long-term outcomes following resection of T4 CRC. In this present single centre analysis of a homogeneous group of consecutive T4 CRC patients, OS and RFS rates were not significantly different between patients who developed POCs and those who did not. These results were maintained after patients’ stratification for the presence of synchronous metastases.
In the present study, the overall morbidity rate was 43%. This is consistent with the values reported in recent reports (POCs in the range of 33–45%) [4, 15].
The laparoscopic approach was used in a relatively low proportion of patients in our study (26%). Although the impact of this approach on postoperative morbidity and survival was beyond the scope of this study, the laparoscopic approach might contribute to contain the postoperative morbidity (POCs in the range of 7–26%) [1618] and to improve the oncologic results [16]. These results were further confirmed by two recent studies using propensity score methodology [19, 20]. However, the rate of conversion rate remains relatively high, varying between 8 and 28% [1618, 21]. Further studies are needed to ascertain the real impact, if any, of laparoscopic approach on the incidence of postoperative morbidity in the specific setting of T4 CRC.
In this study, POCs did not impact on OS. The impact of POCs on the long-term prognosis of patients following different surgeries has recently been investigated. Khuri et al. used data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program to study the effects of POCs on the survival rate of more than 100,000 patients who underwent eight major operations [7]. In contrast with our results, the study showed that the occurrence of POCs within the first 30 days, independent of the patient’s preoperative risk, reduced the median survival by 69%. This latter study also showed that in patients who underwent a colectomy, there was a significant difference of 14.5% in mortality at 5 years between those who did and did not have complications. However, it is important to note that the group of patients who underwent colectomies in this study (13,310/100,000 patients) is a heterogeneous group with different indications for colectomy, not only for colon cancer. The present study included only patients who underwent surgical treatment for locally advanced CRC, which might explain this discrepancy between the results of the 2 studies. In a recent study by Law et al. [22], the occurrence of POCs was an independent factor associated with a worse overall survival and a higher overall recurrence rate. However, the impact of POCs on the survival and oncologic outcome in patients with T4 CRC was not clarified.
Whereas positive lymph node status was identified as the sole independent predictor of a decreased RFS, POCs did not impact on DFS even after patients’ stratification for the presence of synchronous distant metastases. These findings are in agreement with previous reports [23, 24]. Based on this, it could be argued that tumor biology rather than postoperative morbidity remained the main determinant of survival in these patients.
The debate regarding whether POCS may delay the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery remains active [25, 26]. The present study showed that patients who developed POCs had similar delay in time to adjuvant chemotherapy than those who did not (p = 0.69). However, the relatively high rate of adjuvant chemotherapy (72%) in the POCs group might explain the similar long-term outcome between these 2 groups. As reported in a recent study in the field of pancreatic cancer surgery, a minimally invasive surgery approach may offer earlier time to adjuvant chemotherapy [27]. Further studies are required to assess the potential impact of minimally invasive surgery on the delay to adjuvant chemotherapy in the field of colorectal cancer surgery.
The impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival has previously been reported for malignant tumours [2830]. Postoperative anastomotic leakage occurred in 3.7% of our patients. This result is lower compared with the results published by previous studies ([28, 29] 4–20%). One explanation may include the fact that 40% of our patients had a temporary faecal diversion. The relatively low rate of anastomotic leakage in our study does not allow providing any robust conclusions on the relationship between the occurrence of POCs and survival.
Our study has several limitations. One the main limitation includes the single centre design and its retrospective nature which might decrease the ability to generalize the results. A second limitation of our analysis is the relatively short median follow-up time of 42 months. The main strength of this study is that we provide unique and comprehensive insight into the association between the most frequent complications after surgery for T4 CRC and short- and long-term outcomes.
This study provides oncologists additional data that can be used to give patient information to some extent regarding the impact of potentially postoperative complications on long-term survival after T4 CRC surgery. The development of minimally invasive approach might open the door to reduce postoperative complications and time to adjuvant chemotherapy in future studies.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study provides persuasive evidence that POCs do not affect the oncological outcomes in patients after the resection of T4 CRC, whether the patient did or did not have synchronous liver metastases, possibly because the prognostic value of the tumour stage in T4 CCR tumours is so important that the corresponding value of POCs becomes negligible [22, 2849].

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the Division of General Surgery, Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil France, on reasonable request.
This study was approved by the local institutional review board and ethics committee of Henri Mondor Hospital, conformed to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Written informed consent was obtained from all participants to publish their data.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Gebhardt C, Meyer W, Ruckriegel S, Meier U. Multivisceral resection of advanced colorectal carcinoma. Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 1999;384:194–9.CrossRef Gebhardt C, Meyer W, Ruckriegel S, Meier U. Multivisceral resection of advanced colorectal carcinoma. Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 1999;384:194–9.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Doussot A, Lim C, Lahat E, Salloum C, Osseis M, Gavara CG, et al. Complications after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma independently shorten survival: a Western, single-center audit. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:1569–78.CrossRef Doussot A, Lim C, Lahat E, Salloum C, Osseis M, Gavara CG, et al. Complications after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma independently shorten survival: a Western, single-center audit. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:1569–78.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RDH. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery???The clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg. 1982;69:613–6.CrossRef Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RDH. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery???The clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg. 1982;69:613–6.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A, et al. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the international study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery. 2010;147:339–51.CrossRef Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A, et al. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the international study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery. 2010;147:339–51.CrossRef
16.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan DKH, Tan KK. Laparoscopic surgery should be considered in T4 colon cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017;32:517–20.CrossRef Chan DKH, Tan KK. Laparoscopic surgery should be considered in T4 colon cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017;32:517–20.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J, Grieve R, Khanna S, Couture J, et al. Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2009;373:821–8.CrossRef Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J, Grieve R, Khanna S, Couture J, et al. Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2009;373:821–8.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Bertelsen CA, Neuenschwander AU, Jansen JE, Wilhelmsen M, Kirkegaard-Klitbo A, Tenma JR, et al. Disease-free survival after complete mesocolic excision compared with conventional colon cancer surgery: a retrospective, population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:161–8.CrossRef Bertelsen CA, Neuenschwander AU, Jansen JE, Wilhelmsen M, Kirkegaard-Klitbo A, Tenma JR, et al. Disease-free survival after complete mesocolic excision compared with conventional colon cancer surgery: a retrospective, population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:161–8.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Tevis SE, Kohlnhofer BM, Stringfield S, Foley EF, Harms BA, Heise CP, et al. Postoperative complications in patients with rectal cancer are associated with delays in chemotherapy that lead to worse disease-free and overall survival. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:1339–48 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24201387.CrossRef Tevis SE, Kohlnhofer BM, Stringfield S, Foley EF, Harms BA, Heise CP, et al. Postoperative complications in patients with rectal cancer are associated with delays in chemotherapy that lead to worse disease-free and overall survival. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:1339–48 Available from: http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​24201387.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Mirkin KA, Greenleaf EK, Hollenbeak CS, Wong J. Minimally invasive surgical approaches offer earlier time to adjuvant chemotherapy but not improved survival in resected pancreatic cancer. Surg. Endosc. Other Interv. Tech. Springer US; 2017;0:1–10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5937-7 CrossRef Mirkin KA, Greenleaf EK, Hollenbeak CS, Wong J. Minimally invasive surgical approaches offer earlier time to adjuvant chemotherapy but not improved survival in resected pancreatic cancer. Surg. Endosc. Other Interv. Tech. Springer US; 2017;0:1–10. Available from: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00464-017-5937-7 CrossRef
30.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Eberhardt JM, Kiran RP, Lavery IC. The impact of anastomotic leak and intra-abdominal abscess on cancer-related outcomes after resection for colorectal cancer: a case control study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:380–6.CrossRef Eberhardt JM, Kiran RP, Lavery IC. The impact of anastomotic leak and intra-abdominal abscess on cancer-related outcomes after resection for colorectal cancer: a case control study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:380–6.CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ. Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1150–4.CrossRef McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ. Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1150–4.CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Ptok H, Marusch F, Meyer F, Schubert D, Gastinger I, Lippert H. Impact of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome after rectal cancer resection. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1548–54.CrossRef Ptok H, Marusch F, Meyer F, Schubert D, Gastinger I, Lippert H. Impact of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome after rectal cancer resection. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1548–54.CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Den Dulk M, Marijnen CAM, Collette L, Putter H, Påahlman L, Folkesson J, et al. Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2009;96:1066–75.CrossRef Den Dulk M, Marijnen CAM, Collette L, Putter H, Påahlman L, Folkesson J, et al. Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2009;96:1066–75.CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Bertelsen CA, Andreasen AH, Jørgensen T, Harling H. Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection for rectal cancer: short and long-term outcome. Color Dis. 2010;12:e76–81.CrossRef Bertelsen CA, Andreasen AH, Jørgensen T, Harling H. Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection for rectal cancer: short and long-term outcome. Color Dis. 2010;12:e76–81.CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Jörgren F, Johansson R, Damber L, Lindmark G. Anastomotic leakage after surgery for rectal cancer: a risk factor for local recurrence, distant metastasis and reduced cancer-specific survival? Color Dis. 2011;13:272–83.CrossRef Jörgren F, Johansson R, Damber L, Lindmark G. Anastomotic leakage after surgery for rectal cancer: a risk factor for local recurrence, distant metastasis and reduced cancer-specific survival? Color Dis. 2011;13:272–83.CrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Mirnezami A, Mirnezami R, Chandrakumaran K, Sasapu K, Sagar P, Finan P. Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2011;253:890–9.CrossRef Mirnezami A, Mirnezami R, Chandrakumaran K, Sasapu K, Sagar P, Finan P. Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2011;253:890–9.CrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Ebinger SM, Warschkow R, Tarantino I, Schmied BM, Marti L. Anastomotic leakage after curative rectal cancer resection has no impact on long-term survival: a propensity score analysis. Int J Color Dis. 2015;30:1667–75.CrossRef Ebinger SM, Warschkow R, Tarantino I, Schmied BM, Marti L. Anastomotic leakage after curative rectal cancer resection has no impact on long-term survival: a propensity score analysis. Int J Color Dis. 2015;30:1667–75.CrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Breugom AJ, van Dongen DT, Bastiaannet E, Dekker FW, van der Geest LG, Liefers GJ, et al. Association between the Most frequent complications after surgery for stage I-III Colon Cancer and short-term survival, long-term survival, and recurrences. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:2858–65.CrossRef Breugom AJ, van Dongen DT, Bastiaannet E, Dekker FW, van der Geest LG, Liefers GJ, et al. Association between the Most frequent complications after surgery for stage I-III Colon Cancer and short-term survival, long-term survival, and recurrences. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:2858–65.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Impact of postoperative complications on long-term survival following surgery for T4 colorectal cancer
verfasst von
Michael Osseis
Francesco Esposito
Chetana Lim
Alexandre Doussot
Eylon Lahat
Liliana Fuentes
Toufic Moussallem
Chady Salloum
Daniel Azoulay
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2018
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2018
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-018-0419-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

BMC Surgery 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.